`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
`
`JS6
`
`
`
`GOTV STREAMING, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`NETFLIX, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-07556-RGK-SHK
`
`HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER
`COURTROOM 850 – ROYBAL
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`FAC Filed: November 10, 2022
`Trial Date: October 17, 2023
`
`WHEREAS, this action was tried to a jury beginning on October 17, 2023,
`and, on October 20, 2023, the jury returned a verdict. Dkt. 398.
`WHEREAS, the Court took the Parties’ respective Motions for Judgment as a
`Matter of Law under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) under submission (Dkt. 389 and 403), and,
`after considering the Motions, issued an Order on November 28, 2023, Granting-in-
`Part and Denying-in-Part Netflix, Inc.’s (“Netflix” or “Defendant”) Motion for
`Judgment as a Matter of Law, Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part GoTV
`Streaming, LLC’s (“GoTV” or “Plaintiff”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.
`Dkt. 415.
`NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
`THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN THIS MATTER AS
`FOLLOWS:
`1.
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,103,865 (the “’865 Patent”), 8,478,245 (the “’245
`Patent”), and 8,989,715 (the “’715 Patent”) are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
`2.
`The ’865 Patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112.
`3.
`Defendant has literally infringed Claim 4 the ’715 Patent.
`1
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-07556-RGK-SHK Document 425 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:17593
`
`
`
`4.
`Defendant has not literally infringed Claim 16 of the ’245 Patent.
`5.
`Defendant has not infringed Claim 4 of the ’715 Patent or Claim 16 of
`the ’245 Patent under the doctrine of equivalents.
`6.
`Judgment as a matter of law is entered for Plaintiff on its ownership of
`the ’715 and ’245 Patents.
`7.
`Judgment as a matter of law is entered against Defendant on its
`counterclaims of invalidity of Claim 4 of the ’715 Patent and Claim 16 of the ’245
`Patent.
`8.
`Defendant shall pay Plaintiff compensatory damages in the amount of a
`paid-up lump sum of $2,500,000.
`9.
`the
`to
`interest applicable
`Plaintiff
`is awarded pre-judgment
`compensatory damages award, from the date the Complaint was filed, October 17,
`2022, until the date of entry of judgment, at a rate of 7%, compounded annually.
`10. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the Court awards post-judgment interest
`applicable to the compensatory damages award and to the pre-judgment interest,
`calculated in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), from the date of entry of
`judgment until paid.
`11. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), Local Rule 54-1, and
`28 U.S.C. § 1920, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this case and shall recover its
`costs from Defendant, and Plaintiff is directed to file its proposed bill of costs.
`12. This Order is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to seek attorneys’ fees
`pursuant to, among other things, 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest. There being no just reason
`for delay, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment immediately.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`DATED: January 16, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
