throbber
Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 1 of 95 Page ID #:1
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page1of95 Page ID#:1
`Case
`
`John T. Jasnoch (CA 281605)
`Wlasnoch@scott-scott.com
`COTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYSAT LAW LLP
`600 W. Broadway, Suite 3300
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel.: 619-233-4565
`Fax: 619-236-0508
`
`Counselfor Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`ADONIS REAL and ADAM TITCHER,
`Individually and on Behalf of All Others
`Similarly Situated,
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-08909
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Vv.DEMANDFORJURYTRIAL
`YUGALABS,INC., WYLIE ARONOW,
`GREG SOLANO, KEREM ATALAY,
`ZESHANALI, NICOLE MUNIZ,
`JASMIN SHOEMAKER, PATRICK
`EHRLUND, CHRISTOPHER LYONS,
`ALEXIS OHANIAN, AMY WU, MAARIA
`BAJWA, DEAN STEINBECK, GUY
`OSEARY, MIKE WINKELMANN,
`MADONNA LOUISE CICCONE,PARIS
`HILTON, JAMES FALLON, ELECTRIC
`HOT DOG,INC., UNIVERSAL
`TELEVISION, LLC, JUSTIN BIEBER,
`GWYNETH PALTROW, SERENA
`WILLIAMS, THOMAS PENTZ, AUSTIN
`RICHARD POST, CALVIN BROADUS
`JR., KEVIN HART, ALEXANDER
`PALL, ANDREW TAGGART,
`WARDELL STEPHEN CURRYII,
`NAYVADIUS WILBURN CASH, ABEL
`TESFAYE, KHALED MOHAMMED
`KHALED,ADIDAS AMERICAINC.,
`ADIDAS VENTURE B.V., IVAN SOTO-
`WRIGHT, and MOONPAYUSALLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`2:22-cv-08909
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 2 of 95 Page ID #:2
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 2of95 Page ID#:2
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`Plaintiffs Adonis Real and Adam Titcher, individually and on behalf ofall
`
`others similarly situated, bring this action against Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga” or the
`
`“Company’”’), Wylie Aronow, Greg Solano, Kerem Atalay, Zeshan Ali, Nicole
`
`Muniz, Jasmin Shoemaker, Patrick Ehrlund, Christopher Lyons (the “Executive
`
`Defendants’’), Alexis Ohanian, Amy Wu, Maaria Bajwa, Dean Steinbeck (the “Ape
`
`DAO Board Defendants”), Guy Oseary, Mike Winkelmann, Madonna Louise
`
`Ciccone, Paris Hilton, James Fallon, Electric Hot Dog, Inc., Universal Television,
`
`LLC, Justin Bieber, Gwyneth Paltrow, Serena Williams, Thomas Pentz, Austin
`
`Richard Post, Calvin Broadus, Jr., Kevin Hart, Alexander Pall, Andrew Taggart,
`
`Wardell Stephen Curry II, Nayvadius Wilburn Cash, Abel Tesfaye, Khaled
`
`Mohammed Khaled, adidas America Inc., adidas Ventures B.V. (the “Promoter
`
`Defendants’), Ivan Soto-Wright, and MoonPay USA LLC (““MoonPay,”and together
`
`with Ivan Soto-Wright,
`
`the “MoonPay Defendants”)
`
`(collectively, with the
`
`Company, the Executive Defendants, Ape DAO Board Defendants, and the Promoter
`
`Defendants, the “Defendants’’). The following allegations are based upon personal
`
`knowledgeasto Plaintiffs’ own facts, upon investigation by Plaintiffs’ counsel, and
`
`upon information and belief where facts are solely in possession of Defendants.
`
`I.
`
`NATUREOF THE CASE
`
`“Celebrities and NFTs Are a Match Madein Hell...
`Somehow, star endorsements havefound a new low.’
`-Amanda Mull, The Atlantic
`
`
`3
`
`1.
`Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all investors who purchased
`Yuga’s non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) or ApeCoin tokens (“ApeCoin”)' between
`
`April 23, 2021 and the present (the “Relevant Period”), and were damagedthereby.
`
`Yuga’s various collections of NFTs (including, but not limited to, the Bored
`!
`Ape Yacht Club NFT collection), ApeCoins, and virtual land in the Otherside are
`collectively referred to as the “Yuga Financial Products”or the “Yuga securities.”
`1
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 3 of 95 Page ID #:3
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 3of95 Page ID#:3
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`2.
`
`Celebrity promotions of cryptocurrencies are fraught with problems. As
`
`the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) previously stated:
`
`“Celebrities and others are using social media networks to encourage the public to
`
`purchase stocks and other investments. These endorsements may be unlawfulif they
`
`do not disclose the nature, source, and amount of any compensation paid, directly or
`2 According to The
`
`indirectly, by the company in exchange for the endorsement.
`
`Atlantic: “Celebrity endorsements—ofa product, a brand, an idea, a haircut—have
`
`been around for ages, but they’ve become especially thick on the ground in recent
`
`years, as stars have developed their own direct-advertising channels on social media.
`
`For people with somethingtosell, a celebrity’s fan base provides an easy, responsive
`
`audience.”?
`
`3.
`
`This case epitomizes these concerns as it involves a vast scheme
`
`between a blockchain start-up company, Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Yuga”), a highly-
`
`connected Hollywood talent agent (Defendant Guy Oseary), and a front operation
`
`(MoonPay), whoall united for the purpose of promoting andselling a suite ofdigital
`
`assets. The executives at Yuga and Oseary together devised a plan to leverage their
`
`vast network of A-list musicians, athletes, and celebrity clients and associates to
`
`misleadingly promote andsell the Yuga Financial Products.
`
`4.
`
`_Yuga’s flagship NFT collection, the so-called Bored Ape Yacht Club
`
`(“BAYC”), and related brand rely heavily on the perception that “joining the club”
`
`(i.e., buying a BAYC NFT)brings investors status and provides them access to
`
`events, benefits, and other lucrative investment opportunities exclusive to BAYC
`
`holders. The exclusiveness of BAYC membership was entirely based on the
`
`Statement, SEC Statement Urging Caution Around Celebrity Backed ICOS,
`U.S. SEc. & EXCH. COMM’N (Nov. 1, 2017), https:/Awww.sec.gov/news/public-stat
`ement/statement-potentially-unlawful-promotion-icos.
`3
`Amanda Mull, Celebrities andNFTs Are a Match Made in Hell, THE ATLANTIC
`(Feb.
`4,
`2022),
`available
`at
` https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archi
`ve/2022/02/nft-jimmy-fallon-paris-hilton-millionaire/621486/.
`2
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 4 of 95 Page ID #:4
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 4of95 Page ID#:4
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`inclusion and endorsements of highly influential celebrities. But this purported
`
`interest in, and endorsementof, the BAYC NFTsby high-profile taste makers was
`
`entirely manufactured by Oseary at the behest of the Executive Defendants.
`
`5.
`
`In order to make the promotion of, and subsequentinterest in, the BAYC
`
`NFTsappearto be organic (as opposedto being solely the result of a paid promotion),
`
`the Company needed a wayto discreetly pay their celebrity cohorts. To do this,
`
`Oseary tapped into a different part of his network:
`
`the MoonPay Defendants.
`
`Oseary’s venture capital firm, Sound Ventures, was one of the early investors in
`
`MoonPay, along with, inter alia, Defendants Justin Bieber, Paris Hilton, Jimmy
`
`Fallon, Gwyneth Paltrow, Serena Williams, Austin Post, Thomas Pentz, Calvin
`
`Broadus, Jr., Kevin Hart, Alexander Pall, Andrew Taggart, Wardell Stephen Curry
`
`II, Nayvadius Cash, and Abel Tesfaye. MoonPay purports to be a white-glove service
`
`designed to help the super-rich and celebrities buy NFTs “‘withoutall the hassle of
`
`setting up a wallet, buying crypto, using that crypto to purchase an NFT and then
`taking custody ofit.” In truth, the Executive Defendants and Oseary used their
`
`connections to MoonPayandits service as a covert way to compensate the Promoter
`
`Defendants for their promotions of the BAYC NFTs without disclosing it
`
`to
`
`unsuspecting investors.
`
`6.
`
`Defendants’ promotional campaign was wildly successful, generating
`
`billions of dollars in sales and re-sales. The manufactured celebrity endorsements
`
`and misleading promotions regarding the launch of an entire BAYC ecosystem (the
`
`so-called Otherside metaverse) were able to artificially increase the interest in and
`
`price of the BAYC NFTsduring the Relevant Period, causing investors to purchase
`
`these losing investmentsat drastically inflated prices.
`
`Ryan Weeks, MoonPay has quietly set up a concierge service to help
`4
`celebrities buy NFTS, THE BLOCK (Nov. 5, 2021), https://www.theblock.co/post/12
`5483/moonpay-concierge-celebrities-nft?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss.
`3
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 5 of 95 Page ID #:5
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page5of95 Page ID#:5
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`7.
`
`The staggering profits of the BAYC NFTs were not enough for the
`
`Executive Defendants. Next, they cut out the artifice of the NFT altogether and went
`
`a more direct route to making money: they created their own out of thin air. The
`
`Executive Defendants minted digital assets called ApeCoins and promoted that
`
`BAYC NFT owners would receive an airdrop of ApeCoins for membership in the
`
`club.
`
`In doing so, the Executive Defendants, Oseary, and the Ape DAO Board
`
`Defendants sought to obscure their sales of their own massive ApeCoin allocations
`
`directly to retail purchasers. At no point did any of the Defendants register these
`
`securities with the SEC.
`
`8.
`
`In addition, Executive Defendants Aronow, Solano, Atalay, and Ali
`
`disguised their control of Yuga to avoid scrutiny and facilitate this scheme. This
`
`conspiracy among the Executive Defendants and Oseary, then carried out with
`
`assistance of the Promoter Defendants and the MoonPay Defendants, raked in
`
`millions for them all. Meanwhile, investors were left with staggering losses.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of themselves and an
`
`objectively identifiable Class consisting of all investors that purchased the Yuga
`
`Financial Products between April 23, 2021 and the present.
`
`Il.
`
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`10.
`
`PlaintiffAdam Titcher (“Titcher’”) is a resident and citizen of California.
`
`During the Relevant Period, Titcher purchased a Mutant Ape Yacht Club (“MAYC’”’)
`
`NFT via the U.S.-based NFT exchange OpenSea. Titcher also purchased an
`
`Otherdeed NFT associated with the Yuga metaverse, Otherside, via the U.S.-based
`
`NFT exchange on OpenSea. Titcher purchased the Yuga securities in reliance on the
`
`misleading promotions from the Company and the Promoter Defendants (described
`
`in detail below), and he suffered investmentlosses as a result of Defendants’ conduct.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff Adonis Real (‘Real’) is a resident and citizen of Florida.
`
`During the Relevant Period, Real purchased ApeCoin tokens via the U.S.-based
`
`4
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 6 of 95 Page ID #:6
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 6of95 Page ID #:6
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. Real purchased ApeCoin tokensin reliance on
`
`the misleading promotions from the Company and the Promoter Defendants
`
`(described in detail below) and suffered investmentlosses as a result of Defendants’
`
`conduct.
`
`B.
`
`Defendants
`
`12. Defendant Yuga Labs,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Yuga”)
`
`is a Delaware corporation,
`
`registered on February, 8, 2021, with its headquarters located at 1850 Towers
`
`Crescent Plaza, Suite 200, Tysons, VA 22182. On September 16, 2022, Yuga
`
`registered with the California Secretary of State to transact business within
`
`California.
`
`13. Wylie Aronow (“Aronow’’) is a resident and citizen of South Carolina,
`
`living in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. Aronow is the co-founder/creator of the
`
`Company, served as a consultant and spokesman for the Company,exercised control
`
`over the Company and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the sale
`
`and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`14. Defendant Greg Solano (“Solano”) is a resident and citizen of Florida,
`
`living in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Solanois the co-founder/creator of the Company,
`
`served as a consultant and spokesman for the Company, exercised control over the
`
`Company and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly,
`
`the sale and/or
`
`solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`15. Kerem Atalay (“Atalay’’) is a resident and citizen of Missouri, living in
`
`St. Louis, Missouri. Atalay is the co-founder/creator of the Company, served as a
`
`developer, consultant and spokesman for the Company, exercised control over the
`
`Company and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly,
`
`the sale and/or
`
`solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`16.
`
`Zeshan Ali (“Alt”) is a resident and citizen of California, living in Los
`
`Angeles, California. Ali is the co-founder/creator of the Company, served as a
`
`developer, consultant and spokesman for the Company, exercised control over the
`
`3
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 7 of 95 Page ID #:7
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 7of95 Page ID#:7
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`Company and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly,
`
`the sale and/or
`
`solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`17. Defendant Nicole Muniz (“Muniz”) is a resident and citizen of New
`
`York, living in Brooklyn, New York. Muniz is the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
`
`of the Company,served as a consultant and spokesman for the Company,exercised
`
`control over the Companyand directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the
`
`sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`18.
`
`Defendant Jasmin Shoemaker (“Shoemaker’) is a resident and citizen
`
`of New York, living in Brooklyn, New York. Shoemakeris the Chief Operating
`
`Officer (“COO”) of the Company, served as a consultant and spokesman for the
`
`Company, exercised control over the Company and directed and/or authorized,
`
`directly or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the
`
`public.
`
`19. Defendant Patrick Ehrlund (“Ehrlund”) is a resident and citizen of New
`
`York, living in Brooklyn, New York. Ehrlundis the Chief Creative Officer (“CCO”’)
`
`and minority partner of the Company, served as a consultant and spokesman for the
`
`Company, exercised control over the Company and directed and/or authorized,
`
`directly or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the
`
`public.
`
`20. Defendant Christopher Lyons (“Lyons”) is a resident and citizen of
`
`Florida, living in Plantation, Florida. Lyons served as a board member, consultant
`
`and spokesman for the Company,exercised control over the Company and directed
`
`and/or authorized, directly or indirectly,
`
`the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga
`
`Financial Products to the public.
`
`21. Defendant Alexis Ohanian (“Ohanian’’) is a resident and citizen of
`
`Florida, living in Jupiter, Florida. Ohanian served as a board memberof the Ape
`
`DAO,servedas a consultant and spokesmanfor the Company,exercised control over
`
`the Ape DAO, Ape Foundation, and the Company anddirected and/or authorized,
`
`6
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 8 of 95 Page ID #:8
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 8of95 Page ID#:8
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`directly or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the
`
`public. Ohanian’s SevenSevenSix was oneof several investors in Yuga during the
`
`$450 million funding round.
`
`22. Defendant Amy Wu (“Wu”)is a resident and citizen of California, living
`
`in San Francisco, California. Wu served as a board memberof the Ape DAO,served
`
`as a consultant and spokesman for the Company, exercised control over the Ape
`
`DAO,Ape Foundation, and the Companyand directed and/or authorized, directly or
`
`indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial Products to the public.
`
`23. Defendant Maaria Bajwa (“Bajwa”)
`
`is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Glendale, California. Bajwa served as a board memberof the
`
`Ape DAO,servedas a consultant and spokesman for the Company, exercised control
`
`over the Ape DAO, Ape Foundation, and the Company and directed and/or
`
`authorized, directly or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial
`
`Products to the public.
`
`24. Defendant Dean Steinbeck (“Steinbeck”) is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Beverly Hills, California. Steinbeck served as a board member
`
`of the Ape DAO,served as a consultant and spokesman for the Company,exercised
`
`control over the Ape DAO, Ape Foundation, and the Companyand directed and/or
`
`authorized, directly or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga Financial
`
`Products to the public.
`
`25. Defendant Guy Oseary (“Oseary’’)is a resident and citizen of California,
`
`living in Santa Monica, California. Oseary acted as a minority partner, consultant
`
`and spokesman for the Company,exercised control over the Company and directed
`
`and/or authorized, directly or indirectly,
`
`the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga
`
`Financial Products to the public. Oseary’s Sound Ventures was one of several
`
`investors in Yuga during the Seed funding rounds.
`
`26. Defendant Mike “Beeple” Winkelmann (“Winkelmann”) is a resident
`
`and citizen of South Carolina,
`
`living in North Charleston, South Carolina.
`
`7
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 9 of 95 Page ID #:9
`:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page9of95 Page ID#:9
`Case
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`Winkelmann acted as a promotor for the Company and solicited sales of Yuga
`
`securities to the public.
`
`27. Defendant Madonna Louise Ciccone (“Ciccone”) is a resident and
`
`citizen of California, living in Hidden Hills, California. Ciccone acted as a promotor
`
`for the Company andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`28. Defendant Justin Bieber
`
`(“Bieber”)
`
`is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Hidden Hills, California. Bieber acted as a promotor for the
`
`Companyandsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`29. Defendant James “Jimmy”Fallon (“Fallon”) is a resident andcitizen of
`
`New York, living in New York, New York. Fallon acted as a promotor for the
`
`Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`30. Defendant Electric Hot Dog, Inc. “SEHD”f/k/a Holiday Road) is a New
`
`York corporation, with its headquarters located at 200 Park Avenue South, 8th Floor,
`
`New York, NY 10003. EHD is Defendant Fallon’s personal production company,as
`
`well as being the production company for The Tonight Show (“Tonight Show’), of
`
`which DefendantFallon is the host. EHD acted as a spokesman for the Company,
`
`exercised control over Defendant Fallon and the content and disclosures of the
`
`Tonight Show, and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the sale and/or
`
`solicitations of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`31. Defendant Universal Television, LLC (“Universal”) is a New York
`
`corporation, with its headquarters located at 100 Universal City Plaza, UniversalCity,
`
`CA 91608. Universal is the production company for the Tonight Show, of which
`
`Defendant Fallon is the host. Universal acted as an indirect spokesman for the
`
`Company byvirtue of its exercise of control over both Defendant Fallon and the
`
`content and disclosures of the Tonight Show, and directed and/or authorized, directly
`
`or indirectly, the sale and/or solicitations of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`8
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 10 of 95 Page ID #:10
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 10o0f95 Page ID #:10
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`32. Defendant Paris Hilton (“Hilton”) is a resident and citizen of California,
`
`living in Malibu, California. Hulton acted as a promotor for the Company and
`
`solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`33. Defendant Gwyneth Paltrow (‘Paltrow’) is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Montecito, California. Paltrow acted as a promotor for the
`
`Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`34. Defendant Serena Williams (“Williams”) is a resident and citizen of
`
`Florida, living in Jupiter, Florida. Williams acted as a promotor for the Company,
`
`and solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`35. Defendant Austin Richard “Post Malone”Post (“Post”) is a resident and
`
`citizen of Utah, living in Cottonwood Heights, Utah. Post acted as a promotor for
`
`the Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`36. Defendant Thomas “Diplo” Pentz (“Pentz’”) is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Montecito, California. Pentz acted as a promotor for the
`
`Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`37. Defendant Calvin “Snoop Dogg” Broadus,Jr. (“Broadus”) is a resident
`
`and citizen of California, living in Diamond Bar, California. Broadus acted as a
`
`promotor for the Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`38. Defendant Kevin Hart (“Hart”) is a resident and citizen of California,
`
`living in Calabasas, California. Hart acted as a promotor for the Company, and
`
`solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`39. Defendant AlexanderPall (‘Pall’) is a resident and citizen of California,
`
`living in Hollywood, California. Pall acted as a promotor for the Company, and
`
`solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`40. Defendant Andrew Taggart (“Taggart’’) is a resident and citizen of
`
`California, living in Los Angeles, California. Taggart acted as a promotor for the
`
`Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`9
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 11 of 95 Page ID #:11
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 11of95 Page ID#:11
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`41. Defendant Wardell Stephen Curry II (“Curry”) is a resident and citizen
`
`of California, living in Atherton, California. Curry acted as a promotor for the
`
`Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`42. Defendant Nayvadius “Future” Wilburn Cash (“Wilburn Cash’) is a
`
`resident and citizen of Georgia, living in Decatur, Georgia. Wilburn Cash as a
`
`promotor for the Company,andsolicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`43. Defendant Abel “The Weeknd” Tesfaye (“‘Tesfaye’’) is a resident and
`
`citizen of California, living in Los Angeles, California. Tesfaye acted as a promotor
`
`for the Company, and solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`44. Defendant Khaled Mohammed Khaled (“Khaled”) is a resident and
`
`citizen of California, living in Los Angeles, California. Khaled acted as a promotor
`
`for the Company, and solicited sales of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`45. Defendant adidas America Inc.
`
`is an Oregon corporation, with its
`
`headquarters located at 5055 N Greeley Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97217. Adidas
`
`AmericaInc. is the parent of adidas Ventures B.V., and acted as an agent and direct
`
`or indirect spokesman for the Company by virtue of its capital investment in the
`
`Company, and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the solicitations of
`
`Yuga securities to the public. On March 29, 2010, adidas America Inc. registered
`
`with the California Secretary of State to transact business within California.
`
`46. Defendant adidas Ventures B.V.is a corporate venture capital firm with
`
`its headquarters located at Hoogoorddreef 9 A, 1101BA, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
`
`adidas Ventures B.V. operates as the investmentarm of adidas AmericaInc. and acted
`
`as an agent and direct or indirect spokesman for the Companybyvirtueofits capital
`
`investment in the Company,and directed and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the
`
`solicitations of Yuga securities to the public.
`
`47. Defendants adidas America Inc and adidas Ventures B.V. are
`
`collectively referred to as “Adidas.”
`
`10
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 12 of 95 Page ID #:12
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 12o0f95 Page ID #:12
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`48. Defendant Ivan Soto-Wright (“Soto-Wright’”) is a resident and citizen of
`
`Florida, living in Miami, Florida. Soto-Wright served as the CEO ofMoonPay during
`
`the Relevant Period, and acted as a promotor for the Company,andsolicited sales of
`
`Yuga securities to the public.
`
`49. Defendant MoonPay USA LLC (“MoonPay”)
`
`is
`
`a Delaware
`
`corporation, with its headquarters located at 1111 Brickell Avenue, 10th Floor,
`
`Miami, Florida 33131. MoonPay acted as an agent and indirect spokesman for the
`
`Company byvirtue of it being controlled, in part, by Defendant Oseary, directed
`
`and/or authorized, directly or indirectly, the solicitations of Yuga securities to the
`
`public. On April 30, 2021, MoonPayregistered with the California Secretary of State
`
`to transact business within California.
`
`Hl.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`50.
`
`This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action pursuantto 28
`
`U.S.C. §1332. Plaintiffs bring this civil action seeking to represent a class of more
`
`than 100 plaintiffs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Plaintiffs are
`
`citizens of the State of California and the State of Florida.
`
`17 of the 37 named
`
`Defendants are citizens of California; all of the other Defendants reside outside of
`
`California. Plaintiffs seek an award exceeding $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and
`
`costs, on behalf of themselves and the putative Class.
`
`51.
`
`The Court has general jurisdiction over Defendants Ali, Wu, Bajwa,
`
`Steinbeck, Oseary, Ciccone, Bieber, Hilton, Paltrow, Pentz, Broadus, Hart, Pall,
`
`Taggart, Curry, Tesfaye, and Khaledas theyareall residents of the State of California
`
`and are thus “at home” in the forum.
`
`52.
`
`This Court may exercise jurisdiction over Defendants because they have
`
`continuous and systematic contacts with this District, do substantial business in this
`
`State and within this District, and engage in unlawful practices in this District as
`
`described in this Complaint, so as to subject themselves to personal jurisdiction in
`
`11
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 13 of 95 Page ID #:13
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 130f95 Page ID #:13
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`this District, thus rendering the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court proper and
`
`necessary.
`
`53.
`
`Venueis properin this judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)
`
`because Defendants live and/or conduct business in this District, and a substantial
`
`part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims alleged herein occurred in
`
`this District.
`
`IV.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`54.
`
`Cryptocurrency,or crypto, is a form of digital asset that exists virtually
`
`and uses cryptography to secure transactions. Cryptocurrencies use a decentralized
`
`system to record transactions and issue new units. The first cryptocurrency was
`
`Bitcoin, which was founded in 2009. As of March 2022,
`
`there are 18,465
`
`cryptocurrencies in existence.°
`
`55. Anyone can create a new cryptocurrency. An internet search will
`
`provide you step-by-step instructions with video for creating a new cryptocurrency
`
`in less than an hour. Once created,
`
`the new cryptocurrency can be traded on
`
`cryptocurrency exchanges.
`
`Exchanges can be centralized such as Coinbase,
`
`Crypto.com, Gemini, BitMart and others, or decentralized (Dex) such as Uniswap,
`
`Pancake Swap, and others.
`
`56.
`
`Cryptocurrencyis stored in crypto “wallets”, which are physical devices
`
`or online software used to store the private keys to the owner’s cryptocurrencies
`
`securely. Wallets have unique identifiers called “Wallet IDs.” There is no limit on
`
`the numberof wallets a person can control.
`
`57.
`
`Transactions of cryptocurrencies are recorded in a “blockchain,” which
`
`serves as a distributed public ledger. The amountof cryptocurrency transacted, the
`
`sender’s wallet address, the recipient’s wallet address and the date and time of the
`
`Josh Howarth, How Many Cryptocurrencies are There In 2022?, EXPLODING

`Topics (July 19, 2022), https://explodingtopics.com/blog/number-of-cryptocurrenc
`ies.
`
`12
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 14 of 95 Page ID #:14
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 140f95 Page ID #:14
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`
`NONONONBONHNNOWNNKNHHHFHFHFKFPFOReSeoNBNOOWBPWNKFCODOOWBNDBnaBWNYKFCO
`
`transfer for every transfer of cryptocurrency between digital wallets can be publicly
`
`viewed
`
`on
`
`the
`
`blockchain
`
`by
`
`using
`
`any
`
`number
`
`of websites
`
`like
`
`www.blockchain.com/explorer or www.etherscan.io.
`
`58.
`
`The identity of an ownerofa particular wallet is not publicly available
`
`from the blockchain. However, an owner can chooseto reveal themselves. Or, since
`
`users usually have to reveal their identity in order to receive services or goods, many
`
`times the owner of a wallet can be deduced from a wallet’s transactions or by
`
`matching wallet data with other identifiable data points such as a user’s IP address.
`
`59.
`
`Like physical money, cryptocurrencies are fungible, meaning that they
`
`can be traded or exchanged, one for another. For example, one bitcoin is always
`
`equal in value to another bitcoin. Conversely, non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) are
`
`cryptographic assets with unique identification codes and metadata that distinguish
`
`them from each other and cannot be replicated. Unlike regular cryptocurrencies,
`
`NFTscannotbe traded or exchangedat equivalency. Instead, each NFT is assigned
`
`its own value. Notably, a given NFT collection may set a floor price for each ofits
`
`NFTs. This is the lowest “Buy Now”price for an NFT within that collection. For
`
`example,if the floor price for an NFT collection is five ether, it means that the lowest
`
`price someone can pay for an NFT that is not currently in an auctionis five of the
`
`cryptocurrency token ether. Floor price is one of the key metrics investors consider
`
`whenevaluating the intrinsic value for an NFT.
`
`60.
`
`Besides being traded and exchanged, a cryptocurrency may sometimes
`
`also be used for governanceoverthe particular project or for someartificially created
`
`purpose or use. For example, cryptocurrencies can be used as a form of in-game
`
`virtual currency in an online video game. Cryptocurrencies can also be used as an
`
`incentive for players who earn special tokensas part of the game that can be swapped
`
`for other tokens or sold for cash.
`
`61.
`
`Similarly, a cryptocurrency can be usedasvirtual currency for purchases
`
`madewithin the metaverse. The “metaverse”refers to a virtual-reality space in which
`
`13
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document 1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 15 of 95 Page ID #:15
`2-cv-08909-FMO-PLA Document1 Filed 12/08/22 Page 15o0f95 Page ID #:15
`Case 2:
`
`CSWHNDBnHBPWNY
`NONONONYNNONRHRHFFeRRReReeeAnBPWwNYKF&DOOWNDnBPWNKFCO
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`users can interact with a computer-generated virtual environment and other users.
`
`Analysts predict that the metaverse has the potential to generate up to $5 trillion in
`value by 2030.°
`
`A.
`
`Yuga Labs Background
`
`1.
`
`The Founders
`
`62. Yuga Labsis acryptocurrency-related NFT project founded in February
`
`2021 by a group offour friends: Defendants Aronow,Solano, Atalay, and Ali, along
`
`with Defendant Muniz.
`
`63. Ali first met Atalay when they were at the University of Virginia, and
`
`then both met Solano while studying computerscienceat the University of Maryland.
`
`Solano was also friends with Aronow, sharing a mutual interest in literature and
`
`online gaming.
`
`64.
`
`In February 2021, Solano contacted Aronow aboutstarting an NFT
`
`project. During the early conception of the Bored Ape Yacht Club brand, Aronow
`
`brought in Muniz to discuss both the creative and business side of the project.
`
`According to an interview of both Solano and Aronow, they described the early
`
`formation of Yuga as follows:
`
`Despite his interest in digital collectibles, Solano did not buy his
`first NFT until early 2021. Shortly thereafter, in February, Solano
`texted Aronow to start an NFT project of their own. Aronow said: “We
`immediately started to conceive. One of the ideas was a public digital
`canvas, which

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket