`
`
`J. DAVID HADDEN (CSB NO. 176148)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`DARREN E. DONNELLY (CSB NO. 194335)
`ddonnelly@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone: (650) 988-8500
`Facsimile:
`(650) 938-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`NETFLIX, INC.
`
`ANDREW G. DiNOVO
`adinovo@dpelaw.com
`DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER & HARDY LLP
`7000 North Mopac Expressway, Ste. 350
`Austin, TX 78731
`Telephone (512) 539-2632
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION – SANTA ANA
`
`PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`NETFLIX, INC.; AMAZON.COM,
`INC.; FACEBOOK, INC.; SONY
`CORPORATION OF AMERICA;
`DISH NETWORK CORPORATION,
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. SACV11-01862 DOC (JPRx)
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND
`TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
`COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE
`THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)
`Complaint served: December 19, 2011
`Current response date: January 9, 2012
`New response date: February 8, 2012
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, Plaintiff, Preservation Technologies LLC
`(“Preservation”) and Defendant Netflix, Inc., (“Netflix”) by and through their
`respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time to respond to the initial
`complaint served on Netflix in this matter by thirty (30) days. Netflix’s response to
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
`TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN
`30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`MOUNTAIN VIEW
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`
`
`Case 8:11-cv-01862-DOC-JPR Document 9 Filed 01/09/12 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:436
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint, which is presently due January 9, 2012, shall be filed on or
`before February 8, 2012. No prior extension of time to respond has been requested
`or granted.
`
`Dated: January 9, 2012
`
`
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`By: /s/ Darren E. Donnelly
`Darren E. Donnelly
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Netflix, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 9, 2012
`
`
`
`DiNOVO PRICE ELLWANGER &
`HARDY LLP
`
`By: /s/ Andrew G. DiNovo
`Andrew G. DiNovo
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Preservation Technologies LLC
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
`TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN
`30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3)
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28