throbber
Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 44 Filed 12/02/19 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:578
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`Date: December 2, 2019
`
`
`Case Nos. SA CV 19-1061-DOC-KES
` SA CV 19-1062-DOC-KES
` SA CV 19-1150-DOC-KES
` SA CV 19-1151-DOC-KES
`
`
`Title: SQAURE ENIX, INC. ET AL. v. UNILOC 2017 LLC, and related cases
`
`
`PRESENT:
`
`
`THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
`
`Deborah Lewman
`Courtroom Clerk
`
`
`
`
` Not Present
`Court Reporter
`
`ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
`PLAINTIFF:
`None Present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
`DEFENDANT:
`None Present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER FOR BRIEFING
`
`In light of the upcoming status conference in these cases, scheduled for December
`
`4, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to submit supplemental
`briefing, of no more than five pages in length, on the following questions by December 3,
`2019 at 12:00 p.m.:
`
`
`(1) What is the current status of the Square Enix case pending in Texas, and how
`would it affect any of the four related cases before this Court? 

`(2) Netsuite, in its papers, contends that adopting Judge Schroeder’s claim
`construction would be dispositive of the case against it. Is this also true of the
`infringement claims in the other cases (viz., the claims in Infor and the
`counterclaims in Square Enix and Ubisoft)?  

`
`

`

`Case No. SA CV 19-1061-DOC-KES and related
`cases
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 2, 2019
` Page 2
`
`Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 44 Filed 12/02/19 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:579
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`(3) In its Supplemental Rule 26(f) Report, Uniloc 2017 refers to “an interlocutory
`claim construction order” that is currently the subject of a motion to reconsider. Is
`this claim construction the same one that Netsuite contends would be dispositive
`of its case? 

`(4) The Court is presently considering three options for consolidating these cases:
`(i) consolidating all four cases together;
`(ii) consolidating Square Enix with Ubisoft (the declaratory judgment cases), and
`Infor with Netsuite; and
`(iii) consolidating Ubisoft, Infor, and Netsuite, but leaving Square Enix separate.
`
`Which of these options—in light of the pending Square Enix action in Texas and
`this Court’s interest in efficient case management—would provide for the most
`equitable and efficient resolution of these cases? 
`
`The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties.
`
`MINUTES FORM 11
`CIVIL-GEN
`
`
`
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk: djl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket