throbber
Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 56 Filed 10/05/20 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:741
`
`
`WILLIAM C. ROOKLIDGE, SBN 134483
` wrooklidge@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON DUNN AND CRUTCHER LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612−4412
`Telephone: 949.451.4009
`Facsimile: 949.475.4752
`
`JOSHUA A. KREVITT, SBN 208552
`jkrevitt@gibsondunn.com
`PAUL E. TORCHIA (pro hac vice)
`ptorchia@gibsondunn.com
`FLORINA YEZRIL (pro hac vice)
`fyezril@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166-0193
`Telephone: 212.351.4000
`Facsimile: 212.351.4035
`
`JENNIFER J. RHO, SBN 254312
`jrho@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Telephone: 213.229.7000
`Facsimile: 213.229.7520
`
`ANDREW ROBB, SBN 291438
`arobb@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1881 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211
`Telephone: 650.849.5300
`Facsimile: 650.849.5333
`Attorneys for Defendant Infor, Inc.
`
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES
`
`DEFENDANT INFOR, INC.’S
`NOTICE OF MOTION AND
`RENEWED MOTION TO
`DISMISS PURSUANT TO
`FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6)
`
`Hearing
`November 2, 2020
`Time:
`8:30 AM
` Courtroom 9D
`Judge:
`Hon. David O. Carter
`
`v.
`INFOR, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gibson, Dunn &
`Crutcher LLP
`
`
`INFOR’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 56 Filed 10/05/20 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:742
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on November 2, 2020, at 8:30 AM, in
`
`Courtroom 9D of the United States District Court for the Central District of California
`at Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 411 W. Fourth
`Street, Santa Ana, California, 92701, Defendant Infor, Inc. (“Infor”) will and hereby
`does move the Court to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiff Uniloc
`2017 LLC (“Uniloc”) against Infor in the above-captioned matter under Federal Rule
`of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the following grounds:
`Uniloc has failed, after amendment, to plead both a plausible case of
`infringement and a plausible allegation that Uniloc gave Infor pre-suit notice of
`infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) in accordance with Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S.
`662 (2009) and Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007).
`This Motion is based on this Notice of Motion and Renewed Motion, the
`Memorandum of Points and Authorities included herein, the accompanying
`documents, all further pleadings that will be filed by Defendant Infor herein, the paper
`and records on file herein, and on such further evidence and argument as the Court
`may permit or require at or prior to the time of the hearing on this Motion.1
`RELIEF SOUGHT
`Infor seeks an order dismissing Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.
`LOCAL RULE 7-3 STATEMENT
`This Motion is made following the telephonic conference of counsel pursuant to
`Local Rule 7-3, which took place on October 15, 2019. The parties were not able to
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
` 1 This renewed motion to dismiss is substantively identical to the renewed motion to
`dismiss that Infor filed before Judge Staton on October 31, 2020, in Case 8:19-cv-
`01150-JLS-ADS (Dkt. 35). This Court vacated the hearing date for this motion,
`along with all other pending motions, when the Court consolidated and stayed the
`various Uniloc cases before this Court on December 4, 2020. Dkt. 48.
`
`In accordance with a recommendation of the docket clerk in this case, Infor has
`re-filed this motion in this case.
`
`Gibson, Dunn &
`Crutcher LLP
`
`
`INFOR’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`1
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 56 Filed 10/05/20 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:743
`
`reach an agreement, as discussed in the Declaration of Paul E. Torchia filed
`concurrently herewith.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`JOSHUA A. KREVITT
`PAUL E. TORCHIA
`WILLIAM C. ROOKLIDGE
`FLORINA YEZRIL
`JENNIFER J. RHO
`ANDREW ROBB
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ William C. Rooklidge
`William C. Rooklidge
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Infor, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 5, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gibson, Dunn &
`Crutcher LLP
`
`
`INFOR’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`2
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES
`
`

`

`Case 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES Document 56 Filed 10/05/20 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:744
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`I, the undersigned, declare:
`I am employed in the City of Irvine, State of California. I am over the age of
`18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 3161 Michelson
`Drive Irvine, CA 92612.
`On October 5, 2020, I caused the foregoing document to be electronically filed
`with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of
`such filings to all known counsel of record. I declare under penalty of perjury under
`the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the above is
`true and correct.
`Executed on October 5, 2020, at Irvine, California.
`
`By: /s/ William C. Rooklidge
`William C. Rooklidge
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gibson, Dunn &
`Crutcher LLP
`
`INFOR’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`3
`
`CASE NO. 8:19-cv-01150-DOC-KES
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket