`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CORE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
` No. 8:19-cv-02190 JAK (RAOx)
`
`No. 8:20-cv-01468 JAK (RAOx)
`Plaintiff,
`No. 8:20-cv-01463 JAK (RAOx)
`
`
`ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’
`v.
`APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
`
`FILE UNDER SEAL DEFENDANTS’
`NOKIA CORPORATION and NOKIA OF
`EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
`AMERICA CORPORATION,
`(DKT. 92)
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`ADVA OPTICAL NETWORKING SE and
`ADVA OPTICAL NETWORKING
`NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 8:20-cv-01468-JAK-RAO Document 96 Filed 11/04/21 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:20889
`
`
`Based on a review of Defendants’ Application to File Under Seal Defendants’
`Evidentiary Objections (the “Application” (Dkt. 92)), which is unopposed, sufficient
`good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the relief requested in
`the Application is GRANTED. The following materials may be filed under seal:
`
`Document or portion of document to be
`filed under seal
`Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections to
`Materials Submitted with Plaintiff’s
`Oppositions to Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment
` Page 18, lines 3-13
`
`Nature of document or portion of
`document to be filed under seal
`Excerpts of a declaration sworn to by
`Mark Core, which Core Optical and/or
`Northrop Grunmman maintains
`is
`confidential.
`
` Page 19, lines 16-28
`
` Page 20, lines 1-23, 25
`
` Page 21, lines 1-8, 11-15, 20-27
`
` Page 23, lines 18-24, 27-28
`
` Page 24, lines 1-16
`
` Page 26, lines 13-14, 15-22
`
` Page 28, lines 26-28
`
` Page 29, lines 4, 7-8, 9-12
`
` Page 43, lines 7-9, 10-12
`
` Page 46, lines 10-12
`
` Page 51 line 28
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 8:20-cv-01468-JAK-RAO Document 96 Filed 11/04/21 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:20890
`
`
`Excerpts of a declaration sworn to by
`Joseph Kahn, which Core Optical and/or
`Northrop Grumman maintains
`is
`confidential.
`
`Excerpts of a declaration sworn to by a
`witness Derek Kubo, which Core Optical
`and/or Northrop Grumman maintains is
`confidential.
`
` Page 52, lines 1, 3-4
`
`Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections to
`Materials Submitted with Plaintiff’s
`Oppositions to Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment at:
` Page 58, lines 25-26, 28
` Page 59, lines 1-2, 3, 5-27
` Page 60, lines 1-28
` Page 61, lines 1-3, 4-9, 11-27, 28
` Page 62, lines 1-28
` Page 63, lines 1-4, 9-28
` Page 64, lines 1-8, 9-28
` Page 65, lines 1-28
` Page 66, lines 1-28
` Page 67, lines 1-26
` Page 68 lines 1-24
` Page 74, lines 9-17
` Page 78, lines 9-17
` Page 83, lines 5-7
` Page 92, lines 19-28
` Page 99, lines 9-10, 11-14, 15-21
` Page 108, lines 5-9, 13-14
`Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections to
`Materials Submitted with Plaintiff’s
`Oppositions to Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment at:
` Page 111, lines 11-28
` Page 112, lines 1-2, 26-28
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 8:20-cv-01468-JAK-RAO Document 96 Filed 11/04/21 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:20891
`
` Page 113, lines 1-3, 18-28
` Page 114, lines 1-7
` Page 118, lines 9-12
` Page 120, lines 1, 3-4, 5-7, 7-8, 10-
`28
` Page 121, lines 1-20
` Page 122, lines 11-18, 21, 22
` Page 123, lines 2-3, 4-10
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`November 4, 2021
`
`John A. Kronstadt
`United States District Judge
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
