`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`DANIEL MONTES; MARIA DIAZ;
`OCTAVIANO MONTALVO, on behalf of
`themselves and others similarly situated,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-01162-JLT-EPG
`
`ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT’S
`COUNTERCLAIMS AND ORDER
`DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’
`MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC.; and DOES 1
`through 10, inclusive,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`(Doc. 45)
`
`
`
`On August 17, 2022, the Court dismissed named Plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice and
`
`requested that Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc. notify the Court regarding whether it intended to maintain
`
`its counterclaims. (Doc. 44.) On August 18, 2022, Bee Sweet filed a notice of voluntary dismissal
`
`of its counterclaims against Plaintiffs (Doc. 9) and counterclaims against Cross-Defendants
`
`Eduardo Soto (also known as Eduardo Soto, FLC and/or Soto Farm Labor Contractor) and
`
`Harvest Kings, LLC (also known as RT/King Harvesting) (Doc. 10). (Doc. 45.) Accordingly, the
`
`Court hereby ORDERS:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Bee Sweet’s counterclaims (Doc. 9; Doc. 10) are DISMISSED.
`
`Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss Bee Sweet’s counterclaims (Doc. 15) is DENIED as
`
`moot.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`///
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01162-JLT-EPG Document 46 Filed 08/31/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`3.
`
`The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
` Dated: August 31, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
