throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 2:24-cv-02891-AC Document 19 Filed 11/06/24 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`FRANK LEE JOHNSON,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SANJAY AGARWAL, et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`No. 2:24-cv-2891 AC P
`
`ORDER
`
`
`Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to
`
`42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the
`required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $55.00 administrative fee.1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a),
`1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in
`support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the required fees totaling $405.00.
`
`Plaintiff also requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to
`require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States
`Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an
`attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer,
`
`
`1 If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee
`but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not
`required to pay the $55.00 administrative fee.
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:24-cv-02891-AC Document 19 Filed 11/06/24 Page 2 of 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir.
`1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider
`plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his
`claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d
`965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel).
`The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances
`common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not
`establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.
`
`Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to
`meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of
`counsel at this time. Therefore, his requests for the appointment of counsel are denied without
`prejudice.
`
`Plaintiff has also requested an extension of time to return his form indicating whether he
`consents or declines magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. For good cause shown, the court
`will grant plaintiff an extension of time to return the form.
`In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in
`
`support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or
`the required fees in the amount of $405.00; plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result
`in a recommendation that this action be dismissed;
`
`2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In
`Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and
`
`3. Plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 12, 18) are denied
`without prejudice.
`////
`////
`////
`////
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:24-cv-02891-AC Document 19 Filed 11/06/24 Page 3 of 3
`
`4. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 18) is granted. Within 30 days
`
`from the date of this order, plaintiff shall return the form indicating whether he consents or
`declines magistrate judge jurisdiction in this case.
`DATED: November 6, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket