`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Civil Minutes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 4, 2020
`
`Time: 50 Minutes
`
`Judge: Hon. James Donato
`
`
`
`Case No.
`Case Name
`
`C-15-03747-JD
`In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation
`
`Rafey S. Balabanian
`Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s):
`Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Michael Rhodes
`
`Deputy Clerk: Lisa R. Clark
`
`Court Reporter: Debra Pas
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`Motion for Preliminary Approval -- Held (Zoom)
`
`
`NOTES AND ORDERS
`
`
`The motion for preliminary approval is denied without prejudice for the reasons stated at the
`hearing. Dkt. No. 445. The Court’s main concerns include in summary:
`
`
`• The unduly steep discount on statutory damages under the BIPA, and the failure to
`account for the BIPA’s enhanced damages of $5,000 for intentional or reckless
`violations, particularly in light of the FTC consent decree.
`• A conduct remedy that does not appear to require Facebook to do anything other than
`follow existing law and Section VI of the FTC consent decree.
`• A post-certification change of the class definition to exclude users under the age of 18
`and impose a September 2019 cutoff date.
`• The scope of release for claims beyond the BIPA and for Facebook’s sister and affiliated
`companies.
`• An opt-out period of less than 60 days.
`• Proposed notices to the class that are unclear and overly legalistic.
`• An unduly complicated claim form requirement.
`•
`Insufficient channels of notice outside of Facebook.
`
`
`The Court requires an additional hearing at which Facebook engineers and/or business-side
`employees will explain (1) how Facebook’s new practices for biometric information and
`templates will be different from past practices, and (2) how and where the notices of Facebook’s
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 3:15-cv-03747-JD Document 456 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`biometric data policies will be made available to users. Facebook will also provide additional
`information on the predicted home location protocols.
`
`The parties should jointly propose a date for the hearing within the next few weeks. The pretrial
`conference and trial dates are vacated pending further order.
`
`
`
`2
`
`