`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff(s)/Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`Case Number: 3:16-cv-2787-WHO
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION & ORDER
`RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants / Counterclaim-
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`and
`
`
`SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant,
`
` v.
`
`
`HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiffs HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
`CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., and
`HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. (collectively, “Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-
`Defendant”), and Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. (“SEC”), SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (“SEA”), and SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA (“SRA”)
`(collectively, “Defendants”), through their respective counsel, that the initial claim construction
`disclosure dates be rescheduled as follows:
`
`
`
`1
`
`STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 112 Filed 01/26/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction
`4-2 Exchange of Preliminary Constructions and
`Extrinsic Evidence
`4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing
`Statement
`
`Proposed Date
`Current Date
`Feb. 24, 2017
`Feb. 10, 2017
`Mar. 3, 2017 Mar. 17, 2017
`
`Mar. 24, 2017 Apr. 7, 2017
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been six previous
`modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation to reschedule the initial Case Management
`Conference, and for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint
`(Dkt. 37); (3) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Defendants’
`partial motion to dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiffs and
`Counterclaim Defendants to respond to Defendants’ answer and counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a
`stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion to dismiss and extend briefing
`deadlines (Dkt. 81); and (6) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion
`to dismiss and extend briefing deadlines (Dkt. 83).
`The requested change to the initial claim construction deadlines will have no effect on
`other deadlines in this case.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
`
`Dated: January 19, 2016
`
`
`/s/ Michael J. Bettinger
`Counsel for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants
`
`Dated: January 19, 2016
`
`
`/s/ Marissa R. Ducca
`Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs
`
`
`PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`The Honorable William H. Orrick
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`2
`
`STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
