throbber
Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 139 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE]
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER
`TO RESCHEDULE TECHNOLOGY
`TUTORIAL AND CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
`
`
`Plaintiffs / Counterclaim-
`Defendants,
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`Defendants / Counterclaim-
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`and
`
`
`SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`
`v.
`
`HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants
`
`Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., and
`
`HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Huawei”) and Defendants and Counterclaim-
`
`Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
`
`Research America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”), through their respective counsel, respectfully
`
`request that the Court reschedule the Technology Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing to the
`
`proposed dates in the following table to accommodate the schedules of Samsung’s counsel.
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 139 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Event
`
`Current Date
`
`Proposed Date
`
`Technology Tutorial
`
`July 17, 2017
`
`August 7, 2017
`
`Patent L.R. 4-6 Claim Construction Hearing
`
`July 19, 2017
`
`August 10, 2017
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been six previous time
`
`modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei’s
`
`Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation and order rescheduling the initial Case Management
`
`Conference and extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei’s Complaint (Dkt. 38); (3) a
`
`stipulation and order rescheduling the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung’s Partial
`
`Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation extending the time for Huawei to respond to
`
`10
`
`Samsung’s Answer and Counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a stipulation and order rescheduling the
`
`11
`
`hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 83); and (6) a
`
`12
`
`stipulation and order rescheduling the initial claim construction disclosure dates (Dkt. 112).
`
`13
`
`
`
`The requested change to the Technology Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing dates will
`
`14
`
`not have an effect on other deadlines in this case.
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 139 Filed 05/10/17 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: May 9, 2017
`
`By: /s/ Michael Bettinger (with
`permission)
`
`
`Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196)
`mbettinger@sidley.com
`Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
`irene.yang@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California Street, Ste. 2000
`San Francisco, California 94104
`Telephone: +1 415 772-1200
`Facsimile: +1 415 772-7400
`
`David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice)
`dpritikin@sidley.com
`David C. Giardina (pro hac vice)
`dgiardina@sidley.com
`Douglas I. Lewis (pro hac vice)
`dlewis@sidley.com
`John W. McBride (pro hac vice)
`jwmcbride@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`One South Dearborn
`Chicago, Illinois 60603
`Telephone: +1 312 853 7000
`Facsimile: +1 312 853 7036
`
`Attorneys for Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
`Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei
`Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon
`Technologies Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Victoria Maroulis
`
`Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
`charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
`David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502)
`davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: 415-875-6600
`Fax: 415-875-6700
`
`Kevin Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Victoria Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
`victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Tel: 650-801-5000
`Fax: 650-801-5100
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
`Samsung Research America, Inc.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The tutorial is set for August 7, 2017 at
`
`9:30 a.m. and the Claim Construction hearing is set for August 10, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 10, 2017
`
`
`
`The Honorable William H. Orrick
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket