`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES
`
`Time: 2 hours, 59 minutes
`9:00 a.m. to 11:59 a.m.
`Case Name: Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung
`Electronics Co, Ltd.
`
`Date: August 7, 2017
`
`Judge: WILLIAM H. ORRICK
`
`Case No.: 16-cv-02787-WHO
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff: Mike Bettinger, Irene I. Yang, Douglas I. Lewis, and John McBride
`Attorneys for Defendant: Charles K. Verhoeven, Deepa Acharya, Alan Whitehurst, Ray B.
`Zado, and Marissa R. Ducca
`
`Deputy Clerk: Jean Davis
`
`
`
`Court Reporter: Rhonda Aquilina
`
`
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`Counsel appear for claim construction tutorial. Process for the tutorial and for the up-coming
`claim construction hearing reviewed.
`
`Huawei company and technology overview presented (Bettinger)
`9:03 a.m.
`9:14 a.m. Huawei presentation regarding '613 and '166 patents (McBride)
`9:38 a.m.
`Huawei presentation regarding '197, '246 and '003 patents (Yang)
`9:47 a.m.
`Huawei presentation regarding '278 and '239 patents (Lewis)
`10:02 a.m.
`Samsung rebuttal to Huawei '278 and '239 patents (Verhoeven)
`10:19 a.m.
`Samsung rebuttal to Huawei '613 patent (Acharya)
`10:30 a.m.
`Samsung rebuttal to Huawei '166 and the '197 patent group (Verhoeven)
`10:47 a.m.
`Court in recess
`10:58 a.m.
`Court in session
`
`
`Samsung presentation as to '130 and '726 patents (Whitehurst)
`11:20 a.m.
`Samsung presentation as to '825 patent (Zado)
`11:31 a.m.
`Samsung presentation as to '195 patent (Whitehurst)
`11:35 a.m.
`Samsung presentation as to '588 patent (Zado)
`11:41 a.m.
`Huawei rebuttal as to '825, '588, and '726 patents (Yang)
`11:55 a.m.
`Huawei rebuttal as to '195 and '130 patents (Lewis)
`11:59 a.m.
`Court in recess
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
