`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
` Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
` charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
` David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)
` davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
` Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
` kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
` Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
` victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone:
`(650) 801-5000
`Facsimile:
`(650) 801-5100
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
`Research America, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., et al.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`DECLARATION OF CARL ANDERSON
`IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBIT 28 TO
`SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION TO
`HUAWEI’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE
`JURY DEMAND FOR SAMSUNG’S
`BREACH OF CONTRACT
`COUNTERCLAIM
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., &
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI
`TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., & HISILICON
`TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`Counterclaim-Defendants.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`DECLARATION OF CARL ANDERSON IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBIT 28 TO SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 442 Filed 01/28/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`I, Carl Anderson, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am a partner at the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, counsel
`for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc., and Defendant Samsung Research America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). I submit
`this declaration in support of Samsung’s Opposition to Huawei’s Motion to Strike the Jury Demand
`For Samsung’s Breach of Contract Counterclaim. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth
`in this declaration, and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such facts under
`oath.
`
`Exhibit 28, filed as Dkt. No. 440 in the above-captioned matter on January 22, 2019,
`2.
`is a true and correct copy an excerpt of the book Principles of French Law (2nd ed.), Oxford, 2008,
`by J. Bell, S. Boyron & S. Whittaker.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed January 28, 2019, in San
`
`Francisco, California.
`
`/s/ Carl Anderson
`Carl Anderson
`
`-2-
`Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`DECLARATION OF CARL ANDERSON IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBIT 28 TO SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 442 Filed 01/28/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
`above Declaration. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Carl Anderson has
`concurred in the aforementioned filing.
`
`/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
`Victoria F. Maroulis
`
`-3-
`Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`DECLARATION OF CARL ANDERSON IN SUPPORT OF EXHIBIT 28 TO SAMSUNG’S OPPOSITION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
