throbber
Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 460 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES, CO, LTD, et
`al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD., et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:16-cv-02787-WHO
`
`
`ORDER ON AMENDED MOTIONS TO
`SEAL
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 457, 458
`
`On January 30, 2019, I issued an Order on numerous motions to seal that remained
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pending in this case. Order on Pending Motions to Seal (“1/30/19 Order”) [Dkt. No. 446]. I
`
`denied some of the parties’ requests because they were overbroad and others because they were
`
`insufficiently justified under the Ninth Circuit’s compelling reasons standard. See generally id. I
`
`gave the parties leave to amend, and they submitted their amended requests on February 19, 2019.
`
`Samsung’s Amended Motion [Dkt. No. 457]; Huawei’s Amended Motion [Dkt. No. 458]. I now
`
`address those amendments.
`
`
`
`The parties rely on some of the same justifications I addressed in my prior Order, including
`
`source code, confidential product information, licensing information, and sales and financial data.
`
`I incorporate those justifications by reference. See 1/30/19 Order 2–3, 13, 19. In their
`
`amendments, the parties reduced the scope of requests I denied as overbroad. They also submitted
`
`declarations from third parties in support of requests I denied as insufficiently justified. The latter
`
`requests fall into two categories. First, Huawei and Samsung seek to seal information from
`
`research reports they purchased from Signals Research and ABI Research. The chief operating
`
`officer of ABI Research asserts that public disclosure of the report will significantly harm its
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 460 Filed 02/25/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`competitive standing because customers will no longer have to pay to access it. Declaration of
`
`Edward Rerisi [Dkt. No. 457-19] ¶¶ 5–6; see also Declaration of Xiaowu Zhang [Dkt. No. 458-2]
`
`¶ 8. Second, InterDigital, Inc. seeks to seal confidential information including internal practices,
`licensing strategies, and arbitration information.1 Declaration of Ranae McElvaine [Dkt. No. 458-
`
`1] ¶¶ 7–8. Public disclosure would cause competitive harm to its licensing business. Id. ¶ 7.
`
`These declarations are sufficient to cure the deficiencies I noted in my prior Order. But as
`
`I wrote there, just because I agree to seal information at this juncture does not necessarily mean it
`
`will remain sealable at trial, particularly if it is key to the public’s ability to understand the case
`
`and the parties’ respective arguments. 1/30/19 Order 2 n.1. The parties’ requests and my orders
`
`are as follows:
`
`
`
`Document
`
`Dkt. 327-26
`(Peterson Decl.,
`Exh. 3)
`
`Dkt. 331-6
`Exhibit 1
`(resubmitted at
`Dkt. 422-1)
`(expert report)
`
`Dkt. 331-8
`Exhibit 2
`(resubmitted at
`Dkt. 422-2)
`(expert report)
`
`Dkt. 331-12
`Exhibit 4
`(resubmitted at
`Dkt. 422-4)
`(expert report)
`
`Requesting Party and Portion
`to be Sealed
`
`Description of Contents Court Ruling
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions (page 13, paragraph 14)
`
`
`License counterparty
`name
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on pages 5, 9-11, 13-16,
`18, 44, 45, 47-49, 53, 54, 57, 60-
`62, 66, 77, 78, 81, 89, 90, 97, 98,
`Schedules 21.2-21.5, and in
`Appendix D
`Huawei, Samsung: green-
`highlighted portions on pages 38-
`39 and footnote 87
`
`Samsung: blue-highlighted
`portions on pages 38-39
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on pages 11-12, and 27
`
`Licensing information,
`sales and financial
`information, proprietary
`data
`
`Licensing information
`
`
`
`Licensing information
`
`Licensing information,
`sales and financial
`information
`
`GRANTED
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`1 Huawei asserts that InterDigital’s requests are associated with a motion to strike an expert report
`and thus are subject to the good cause standard. See Huawei’s Amended Motion 5; United States
`v. Celgene Corp., No. CV 10-3165 GHK, 2016 WL 6609375, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2016)
`(applying the good cause standard to a motion to seal associated with a motion to strike portions of
`a supplemental expert report).
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 460 Filed 02/25/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Document
`
`Requesting Party and Portion
`to be Sealed
`
`Description of Contents Court Ruling
`
`Dkt. 331-18
`Exhibit 7
`(resubmitted at
`Dkt. 422-6)
`(expert report)
`Dkt. 331-20
`Exhibit 8
`(resubmitted at
`Dkt. 422-7)
`(expert report)
`
`Dkt. 331-23
`Exhibit 10
`
`Dkt. 347-14 at 54
`Exhibit 5
`(deposition)
`
`At 89 Exhibit 10
`(expert report)
`
`
`At 101 Exhibit 11
`(expert report)
`
`
`
`
`Dkt. 347-16
`Szczepanik
`Declaration
`
`At page 19:
`Exhibits 4-9
`(deposition)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`At page 281
`Exhibit 16
`(deposition)
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on pages 34-37, 113-119,
`and 121-122
`
`Signals Research
`
`GRANTED
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on pages 62-71, and 75
`
`Huawei, Samsung: green-
`highlighted portions of
`paragraphs 163, 164, 179
`Samsung: entire document
`
`Licensing information
`
`
`Licensing information
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`ABI Research Report
`
`GRANTED
`
`Samsung: red boxes on pages
`204- 209
`
`
`Interdigital: second and third
`sentences of paragraph 17
`
`
`Samsung: red boxes on page 35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Samsung: blue highlighted
`portions of Exhibit 4 (pages 25,
`28-33), Exhibit 5 (pages 22-24,
`29, 100-113, 115- 130, 188-190),
`Exhibit 6 (pages 24, 25, 27, 28,
`33, 34, 37, 38, 87-89, 102, 107,
`108, 111-113, 115- 121, 128-135,
`139-142, 168-175, 181-183, 191,
`192, 197-199, 204-208, 211-213,
`217-220, 226, 227, 231-236, 239-
`245), Exhibit 7 (entire exhibit),
`Exhibit 8 (entire exhibit), Exhibit
`9 (pages 33-38, 49, 51-55, 57-65,
`67-73, 75-82, 89-95, 99-103)
`
`Samsung: blue highlighted
`portions on pages 73-76, 78, 80,
`81, 83-85, 87-90, 92-94, 105
`
`Royalty rates
`
`
`
`Arbitration information
`
`
`
`Information about the
`parties’ investments in
`research and design
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`
`
`Some discussion of
`confidential features
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Some references to
`source code and
`confidential products
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 460 Filed 02/25/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`Document
`
`Requesting Party and Portion
`to be Sealed
`
`Description of Contents Court Ruling
`
`Dkt. 357-4
`Samsung’s
`Opposition to
`Huawei’s MSJ
`(corrected at Dkt.
`362)
`Dkt. 357-8
`Exhibit 2
`(deposition)
`
`Dkt. 357-12
`Exhibit 4
`(deposition)
`
`Dkt. 378-10
`Exhibit 3 (expert
`report)
`
`Samsung: blue highlighted
`portion on page 9, line 24
`
`Sales and financial
`information
`
`GRANTED
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on pages 137- 138
`
`Licensing information
`
`GRANTED
`
`Huawei: yellow-highlighted
`portions on page 171
`
`Licensing information
`
`GRANTED
`
`Huawei, Samsung: Yellow-
`highlighted portions on pages 53,
`92, 101, and in Appendix D
`
`
`Samsung: Blue-highlighted
`portions on page 53, footnote 195
`
`Licensing information,
`sales and financial
`information, proprietary
`data
`
`Sales and financial
`information, proprietary
`data
`
`GRANTED
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: February 25, 2019
`
`
`
`
`William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket