`
`Reset Form
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT(cid:3)
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA(cid:3)
`
`Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., et al.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff(s)
`v.
`
`,
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
`
`
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`,
`
`3:16-cv-02787-WHO
`Case No. C
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
`
`Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
`stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
`following ADR process: (cid:3)
`(cid:136) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) (cid:3)
`(cid:136) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)(cid:3)
`(cid:136) Private ADR (specify process and provider)
`Private mediation through JAMS or similar
`provider
`
`Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
`mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
`early settlement conference with a Magistrate
`Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
`ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
`form. See Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.(cid:3)
`
`■
`
`The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: (cid:3)
`(cid:136) the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
`unless otherwise ordered.) (cid:3)
`60 days after Markman order
`(cid:136) other requested deadline: (cid:3)
`8/23/16
`
`■
`
` Date:
`
`Signed:
`
`/s/ Michael J. Bettinger
`Attorney for Plaintiff (cid:3)
`/s/ Victoria Maroulis
`Attorney for Defendant(cid:3)
`
`Print Form
`
`Date:
`
`8/23/16
`
`(cid:3)
`
`Signed:
`
`(cid:136) IT IS SO ORDERED
`(cid:136) IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
`
`U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices:
`“Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or
`“Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
`Form ADR-Stip rev. 6-2016