throbber
Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 83 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE]
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
`
`
`Plaintiffs / Counterclaim-
`Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND
`ORDER TO RESCHEDULE
`HEARING ON SAMSUNG’S
`PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS
`AND EXTEND BRIEFING
`DEADLINES
`
`Defendants / Counterclaim-
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`and
`
`
`SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA,
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2 and 7-2, the above-captioned parties respectfully request that
`
`the Court reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6)
`
`(Dkt. 39) from October 19, 2016 to October 26, 2016, at 2:00 pm. Huawei’s counsel has requested,
`
`and Samsung has agreed to this time modification to accommodate the schedules of Huawei’s
`
`counsel. The parties also respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiffs Huawei Technologies,
`
`Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., and Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. (“Huawei”) to respond
`
`to the motion to dismiss be extended from September 20 to September 27, 2016. The parties
`
`further request that the deadline for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MOTION HEARING AND EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 83 Filed 09/20/16 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Research America (“Samsung”) to file their reply be
`
`extended from October 4 to October 11, 2016.
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been four previous time
`
`modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation to reschedule the initial Case Management
`
`Conference, and for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt.
`
`37); (3) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Defendants’ partial
`
`motion to dismiss (Dkt. 62); and (4) a stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiffs and
`
`counterclaim Defendants to respond to Defendants’ answer and counterclaims (Dkt. 68). The
`
`requested motion hearing date and briefing schedule will have no effect on other deadlines in this
`
`case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MOTION HEARING AND EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 3:16-cv-02787-WHO Document 83 Filed 09/20/16 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Victoria Maroulis (by permission)
`
`Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
`charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
`David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)
`davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: 415-875-6600
`Fax: 415-875-6700
`
`Kevin Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Victoria Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
`victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: 650-801-5000
`Fax: 650-801-5100
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and
`Samsung Research America
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 16, 2016
`
`By: /s/ Michael J. Bettinger
`
`Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196)
`mbettinger@sidley.com
`Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
`irene.yang@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California Street, Ste. 2000
`San Francisco, California 94104
`Telephone: +1 415 772-1200
`Facsimile: +1 415 772-7400
`
`David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice)
`dpritikin@sidley.com
`David C. Giardina (pro hac vice)
`dgiardina@sidley.com
`Douglas I. Lewis (pro hac vice)
`dlewis@sidley.com
`John W. McBride (pro hac vice)
`jwmcbride@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`One South Dearborn
`Chicago, Illinois 60603
`Telephone: +1 312 853 7000
`Facsimile: +1 312 853 7036
`
`Attorneys for Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
`Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei
`Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon
`Technologies Co. Ltd.
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: September 20, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. William H. Orrick, District Judge
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE MOTION HEARING AND EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket