`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`DEBBIE KROMMENHOCK and STEPHEN
`HADLEY, on behalf of themselves, all others
`similarly situated, and the general public,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 3:16-cv-04958-WHO
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
`SETTLEMENT
`
`13
`
`POST FOODS, LLC,
`
`Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
`
`Defendant.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`WHEREAS, the above-entitled action is pending before this Court (the “Action”);
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Debbie Krommenhock and Stephen Hadley have moved, pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order approving the Settlement of this Action in accordance with the
`
`Class Action Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of
`
`Jack Fitzgerald in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement (the
`
`“Motion”), which Settlement Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed classwide
`
`settlement of the Action;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court, has read and considered the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs’ Motion, and
`
`the arguments of counsel;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Settlement Terms. All capitalized terms herein have the same meanings ascribed to them in
`
`12
`
`the Settlement Agreement.
`
`13
`
`2.
`
`Jurisdiction. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and over all
`
`14
`
`parties to the action, including all members of the Settlement Class.
`
`15
`
`3.
`
`Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement Agreement. The Court finds that, subject to
`
`16
`
`the Final Approval hearing, the proposed Settlement Agreement appears to be fair, reasonable, adequate,
`
`17
`
`and within the range of possible approval considering the possible damages at issue and defenses to
`
`18
`
`overcome. The Court also finds that the Settlement Agreement: (a) is the result of serious, informed, non-
`
`19
`
`collusive, arms-length negotiations, involving experienced counsel familiar with the legal and factual issues
`
`20
`
`of this case and made with the assistance and mediation services of Hon. Edward A. Infante (Ret.), Hon.
`
`21
`
`James F. Holderman (Ret.), and Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero; and (b) appears to meet all
`
`22
`
`applicable requirements of law, including Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and the Class Action Fairness
`
`23
`
`Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1715. Therefore, the Court grants preliminary approval of the Settlement.
`
`24
`
`4.
`
`Class Certification for Settlement Purposes Only. The Court conditionally certifies, for
`
`25
`
`settlement purposes only, a Class defined as all persons in the United States who, between August 29, 2012
`
`26
`
`and November 2, 2020 (the “Class Period”), purchased in the United States, for household use and not for
`
`27
`
`resale or distribution, any of the Class Products identified in Appendix 1 to the Settlement Agreement.
`
`28
`
`
`
`1
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`5.
`
`The Court finds, for settlement purposes only, that class certification under Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) is appropriate in the settlement context because (a) the Settlement Class Members
`
`are so numerous that joinder of all Settlement Class Members is impracticable; (b) there are questions of
`
`law and fact common to the Settlement Class which predominate over any individual questions; (c) the
`
`claims of the Plaintiffs and proposed Class Representatives are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class;
`
`(d) the Plaintiffs and proposed Class Representatives and their counsel will fairly and adequately represent
`
`and protect the interests of the Settlement Class Members; (e) questions of law or fact common to the
`
`Settlement Class Members predominate over any questions affecting only individual Settlement Class
`
`Members; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication
`
`10
`
`of the controversy.
`
`11
`
`6.
`
`Class Representatives. The Court appoints Plaintiffs Debbie Krommenhock and Stephen
`
`12
`
`Hadley as Class Representatives.
`
`13
`
`7.
`
`Class Counsel. The Court appoints The Law Office of Jack Fitzgerald, PC and Jackson and
`
`14
`
`Foster, LLC as Class Counsel.
`
`15
`
`8.
`
`Settlement Class Administrator. The Court hereby approves Postlethwaite & Netterville
`
`16
`
`(“P&N”) to act as Class Administrator. P&N shall be required to perform all the duties of the Class
`
`17
`
`Administrator as set forth in the Agreement and this Order.
`
`18
`
`9.
`
`Qualified Settlement Fund. P&N is authorized to establish the Settlement Fund under 26
`
`19
`
`C.F.R. §§ 1.468B-1(c) and (e)(1), to act as the “administrator” of the Settlement Fund pursuant to 26 C.F.R.
`
`20
`
`§ 1.468B-2(k)(3), and to undertake all duties as administrator in accordance with the Treasury Regulations
`
`21
`
`promulgated under § 1.468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. All costs incurred by the Class
`
`22
`
`Administrator operating as administrator of the Settlement Fund shall be construed as costs of Claims
`
`23
`
`Administration and shall be borne solely by the Settlement Fund. Interest on the Settlement Fund shall inure
`
`24
`
`to the benefit of the Class.
`
`25
`
`10.
`
`Class Notice. The Court approves the form and content of the Class Notice in the long form
`
`26
`
`attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit 1, the short form attached to the Settlement Agreement as
`
`27
`
`Exhibit 2, and the other forms of notice submitted with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval. The
`
`28
`
`Court finds that dissemination of the Class Notice as proposed in the Settlement Agreement and in P&N’s
`
`
`
`2
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Notice Plan as set forth in the January 18, 2021 Declaration of Brandon Schwartz meets the requirements
`
`of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2), and due process, and further constitutes the best notice
`
`practicable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the Court hereby approves the Notice Plan.
`
`11.
`
`The Court recognizes that Defendant Post Foods, LLC (“Post”) has collected approximately
`
`68,400 individual customer email addresses that that likely include some Settlement Class Members. The
`
`Court further recognizes that Post’s privacy policy generally prohibits it from sharing personal information,
`
`such as these names and emails, to unrelated third parties, but allows for disclosure “required by law” or “in
`
`response to a lawful request by public authorities.” In order to achieve “the best notice that is practicable
`
`under the circumstances, including individual notice to all members who can be identified with reasonable
`
`10
`
`effort,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2), the Court orders that: (i) Post produce the approximately 68,400 individual
`
`11
`
`customer names and email addresses that it has collected to P&N; (ii) P&N use the individual customer
`
`12
`
`names and email addresses solely for the purpose of disseminating Class Notice in this case and no other
`
`13
`
`purpose; and (iii) P&N maintain the confidentiality of the individual customer names and email addresses
`
`14
`
`and not disclose them to any person outside of P&N except as necessary to disseminate Class Notice in this
`
`15
`
`case.
`
`16
`
`12.
`
`Objection and Exclusion Deadline. Settlement Class Members who wish either to object to
`
`17
`
`the Settlement or to exclude themselves from the Settlement must do so by the Objection Deadline and
`
`18
`
`Exclusion Deadline which are sixty-three (63) calendar days after the Settlement Notice Date. Settlement
`
`19
`
`Class Members may not both object to and exclude themselves from the Settlement. If a Settlement Class
`
`20
`
`Member submits both a Request for Exclusion and an Objection, the Request for Exclusion will be
`
`21
`
`controlling.
`
`22
`
`13.
`
`Exclusion from the Settlement Class. To submit a Request for Exclusion, Settlement Class
`
`23
`
`Members must follow the directions in the Notice and send a compliant request to the Class Administrator
`
`24
`
`at the address designated in the Class Notice, postmarked by the Exclusion Deadline. The Request for
`
`25
`
`Exclusion must (i) be in writing and mailed; (ii) contain the name of this Action, Krommenhock v. Post
`
`26
`
`Foods, LLC, No. 5:16-cv-04958-WHO, (iii) contain the full name and address of the Settlement Class
`
`27
`
`Member; (iv) state that the Settlement Class Member wishes to be excluded by the Settlement; and (v) be
`
`28
`
`
`
`3
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`signed individually by the Settlement Class Member or his or her attorney. No Request for Exclusion may
`
`be made on behalf of a group of Settlement Class Members.
`
`14.
`
`All Settlement Class Members who submit a timely, valid Request from Exclusion will be
`
`excluded from the Class and will not be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and any
`
`determinations and judgments concerning it. All Settlement Class Members who do not submit a valid
`
`Request for Exclusion the required date in accordance with the terms set forth in the Agreement, will be
`
`bound by all determinations and judgments concerning the Agreement.
`
`15.
`
`Objections to the Settlement. To object to the Settlement, Settlement Class Members are
`
`encouraged to follow the directions in the Notice and file or mail to the Court a written Objection by the
`
`10
`
`Objection Deadline. In the written Objection, the Settlement Class Member should include (i) a caption or
`
`11
`
`title that clearly identifies the Action and that the document is an objection, (ii) the Settlement Class
`
`12
`
`Member’s name, current address, and telephone number, or—if objecting through counsel—his or her
`
`13
`
`lawyer’s name, address, and telephone number, (iii) the Class Product(s) the Settlement Class Member
`
`14
`
`bought during the Class Period, (iv) a clear and concise statement of the Class Member’s objection, as well
`
`15
`
`as any facts and law supporting the objection, (v) if the Class Member (or his or her lawyer) wishes to appear
`
`16
`
`and speak at the Final Approval Hearing, a statement to that effect, (v) the objector’s signature, and (vi) the
`
`17
`
`signature of the objector’s counsel, if any. The Parties may seek leave from the Court to obtain document
`
`18
`
`discovery from and take depositions of any objecting Settlement Class Member on topics relevant to the
`
`19
`
`Objection.
`
`20
`
`16.
`
`If a Settlement Class Member does not submit a written Objection to the Settlement or to
`
`21
`
`Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and costs or the Service Awards in accordance with the
`
`22
`
`deadline and procedure set forth in the Notice and this Order, but the Settlement Class Member wishes to
`
`23
`
`be appear and be heard at the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Class Member may do so given leave
`
`24
`
`of Court.
`
`25
`
`17.
`
`Objecting Settlement Class Members may appear at the Final Approval Hearing and be
`
`26
`
`heard. If an objecting Class Member wants to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, a notice of intention to
`
`27
`
`appear should be filed with the Court.
`
`28
`
`
`
`4
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`18.
`
`All members of the Settlement Class, except those who submit timely Requests for
`
`Exclusion, will be bound by all determinations and judgments in this Action, whether favorable or
`
`unfavorable to the Settlement Class.
`
`19.
`
`Submission of Claims. To receive a cash award, Settlement Class Members must follow the
`
`directions in the Notice and file a claim with the Class Administrator by the Claims Deadline, which is
`
`sixty-three (63) calendar days after the Settlement Notice Date. Settlement Class Members who do not
`
`submit a claim will not receive a cash award but will be bound by the Settlement.
`
`20.
`
`Schedule of Future Events. The Court adopts the schedule proposed by Plaintiff, as follows
`
`(with Day “1” the date of this Order):
`
`Event
`
`Day
`
`Approximate Weeks After
`Preliminary Approval
`
`Date of Preliminary Approval Order
`
`Deadline to commence 63-day notice period
`
`Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Motion for Attorneys’ Fees,
`Costs, and Incentive Awards
`
`Notice completion date, and deadline to make a claim, opt
`out, and object
`
`Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Motion for Final Approval
`
`Final Approval Hearing
`
`1
`
`21
`
`49
`
`84
`
`102
`
`116
`
`-
`
`3 weeks
`
`7 weeks
`
`12 weeks
`
`15 weeks
`
`17 weeks
`
`21.
`
`Final Approval Hearing. A Final Approval Hearing is scheduled for Wednesday June 23,
`
`2021, at 2:00 p.m., for the Court to determine whether the proposed settlement of the Action on the terms
`
`and conditions provided for in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement
`
`Class and should be finally approved by the Court; whether a Judgment should be entered; and to determine
`
`any amount of fees, costs, and expenses that should be awarded to Class Counsel and the amount of any
`
`service awards to Plaintiffs. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Final Approval Hearing
`
`without further notice to the members of the Settlement Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further
`
`applications arising out of or connected with the proposed Settlement. The Court may approve the
`
`5
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the settling Parties, if appropriate, without
`
`further notice to the Settlement Class.
`
`22.
`
`Stay of Proceedings. All proceedings in this action are stayed until further order of this Court,
`
`except as may be necessary to implement the Settlement or comply with the terms of the Settlement
`
`Agreement.
`
`23.
`
`If the Settlement is not approved or consummated for any reason whatsoever, the Settlement
`
`and all proceedings in connection with the Settlement will be without prejudice to the right of Defendant or
`
`the Class Representatives to assert any right or position that could have been asserted if the Agreement had
`
`never been reached or proposed to the Court, except insofar as the Agreement expressly provides to the
`
`10
`
`contrary. In such an event, the certification of the Settlement Classes will be deemed vacated. The
`
`11
`
`certification of the Settlement Classes for settlement purposes will not be considered as a factor in
`
`12
`
`connection with any subsequent class certification issues.
`
`13
`
`24.
`
`No Admission of Liability. By entering this Order, the Court does not make any
`
`14
`
`determination as to the merits of this case. Preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement is not a finding
`
`15
`
`or admission of liability by Defendant. Furthermore, the Agreement and any and all negotiations,
`
`16
`
`documents, and discussions associated with it will not be deemed or construed to be an admission or
`
`17
`
`evidence of any violation of any statute, law, rule, regulation, or principle of common law or equity, or of
`
`18
`
`any liability or wrongdoing by Defendant, or the truth of any of the claims. Evidence relating to the
`
`19
`
`Agreement will not be discoverable or used, directly or indirectly, in any way, whether in this Action or in
`
`20
`
`any other action or proceeding, except for purposes of demonstrating, describing, implementing, or
`
`21
`
`enforcing the terms and conditions of the Agreement, this Order, the Final Approval Order, and the
`
`22
`
`Judgment.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`
`
`Case 3:16-cv-04958-WHO Document 294 Filed 02/24/21 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`25.
`
`Retention of Jurisdiction. The Court retains jurisdiction over the Action to consider all further
`
`matters arising out of or connected with the Settlement Agreement and the settlement described therein.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 24, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________
`Hon. William H. Orrick
`United States District Judge
`
`7
`Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLC, No. 16-cv-4958-WHO
`ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AS AMENDED
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`