throbber
Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 12781 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`WILKINSON STEKLOFF LLP
`Brian L. Stekloff (pro hac vice)
`(bstekloff@wilkinsonstekloff.com)
`Rakesh Kilaru (pro hac vice)
`(rkilaru@wilkinsonstekloff.com)
`2001 M St. NW
`10th Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel:
`202-847-4030
`Fax: 202-847-4005
`
`HOLLINGSWORTH LLP
`Eric G. Lasker (pro hac vice)
`(elasker@hollingsworthllp.com)
`1350 I St. NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Tel: 202-898-5843
`Fax: 202-682-1639
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MONSANTO COMPANY
`
`
`
` COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`Michael X. Imbroscio (pro hac vice)
`(mimbroscio@cov.com)
`One City Center
`850 10th St. NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Tel: 202-662-6000
`
`
`
`
`BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP
`K. Lee Marshall (CA Bar No. 277092)
`(klmarshall@bclplaw.com)
`Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: 415-675-3400
`Fax: 415-675-3434
`
`
`
`IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS
`LIABILITY LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cervantes v. Monsanto Co., 3:19-cv-03015-VC
`Karman v. Monsanto Co., 3:19-cv-01183-VC
`Pecorelli v. Monsanto Co., 3:16-cv-06936-VC
`Peterson v. Monsanto Co., 3:18-cv-07271-VC
`Rehak v. Monsanto Co., 3:19-cv-01719-VC
`Schafer v. Monsanto Co., 3:19-cv-02169
`Seidl v. Monsanto Co., 3:17-cv-00519-VC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` MDL No. 2741
`
`Case No.: 3:16-md-02741-VC
`
`
`DEFENDANT MONSANTO
`COMPANY’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`TESTIMONY OF DR. CHARLES
`BENBROOK, DR. CHARLES
`JAMESON, AND MR. STEPHEN
`PETTY
`
`Hearing date: May 28, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BENBROOK, JAMESON AND PETTY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 12781 Filed 03/18/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT beginning on May 28, 2021, in Courtroom 4 of the United
`States District Court, Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
`Francisco, CA 94102, or as ordered by the Court, Defendant Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”)
`will present its Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Charles Benbrook, Dr. Charles Jameson,
`and Mr. Stephen Petty. Monsanto seeks an order excluding opinion of these witnesses under
`Federal Rule of Evidence 702.
`
`DATED: March 18, 2021
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ K. Lee Marshall___________
`K. Lee Marshall
`BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: 415-675-3400
` Fax: 415-675-3434
`klmarshall@bclplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BENBROOK, JAMESON AND PETTY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 12781 Filed 03/18/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Monsanto hereby moves to exclude Plaintiffs’ experts Dr. Charles Benbrook, Dr. Charles
`
`Jameson, and Mr. Stephen Petty under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell
`Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589 (1993) in the above-captioned cases.1 Monsanto
`recognizes the Court’s Pretrial Order No. 202 (Dkt. No. 9143), which denied without prejudice
`Monsanto’s motions as to these three experts in Wave 1, on the basis that Monsanto’s challenges
`to these experts are more appropriately filed and ruled upon after the cases are transferred to
`Plaintiffs’ home districts for trial. See PTO 202 (Dkt. No. 9143) at 1-2 (the issues raised in
`Monsanto’s motion “should be left to the judges who will be trying the cases,” and thus “are
`denied without prejudice to filing new motions with the district judges who will be trying the
`cases” after transfer from the MDL).
`
`Therefore, consistent with the Court’s instruction not to re-litigate issues previously ruled
`upon, but in order to fully preserve the record, Monsanto hereby incorporates the following
`pleadings that were filed on the MDL docket:
` Monsanto’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Charles Benbrook (Dkt. No. 8006)
`and Reply in Support (Dkt. No. 8531)
` Monsanto’s Motion to Exclude Factual Testimony About IARC from Dr. Charles
`Jameson (Dkt. No. 8007) and Reply in Support (Dkt. No. 8528)
` Monsanto’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Stephen Petty (Dkt. No. 8009) and
`Reply in Support (Dkt. No. 8536)
`By incorporating by reference its prior filings, Monsanto is in no way waiving any of the
`arguments raised therein.
`In accordance with Pretrial Order No. 202, Monsanto also hereby expressly preserves its
`right to file new motions to exclude Dr. Jameson, Dr. Benbrook, and Mr. Petty after the above-
`captioned cases are transferred to their home districts for trial, including raising case-specific
`arguments and/or additional arguments not previously raised in Wave 1.
`
`
`1 Mr. Petty was disclosed as an expert witness only by Plaintiff Seidl, and thus this motion as to
`Mr. Petty applies only to Seidl v. Monsanto Co., 3:17-cv-00519-VC.
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BENBROOK, JAMESON AND PETTY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 12781 Filed 03/18/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`Dated: March 18, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Lee Marshall
`K. Lee Marshall
`BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel:
`415-675-3400
`Fax: 415-675-3434
`klmarshall@bclplaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Monsanto Company
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BENBROOK, JAMESON AND PETTY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 12781 Filed 03/18/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Lee Marshall
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 18th day of March, 2021, a copy of the foregoing was
`filed with the Clerk of the Court through the CM/ECF system which sent notice of the filing to
`all appearing parties of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BENBROOK, JAMESON AND PETTY
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket