throbber
Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 125 Filed 01/25/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`Jonathan Gardner (admitted pro hac vice)
`Alfred L. Fatale III (admitted pro hac vice)
`Joseph N. Cotilletta (admitted pro hac vice)
`Marco A. Dueñas (admitted pro hac vice)
`LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
`140 Broadway
`New York, New York 10005
`Telephone: (212) 907-0700
`Facsimile: (212) 818-0477
`Email: jgardner@labaton.com
`
`afatale@labaton.com
`
`jcotilletta@labaton.com
`
`mduenas@labaton.com
`Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Boston Retirement System
`[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
`Individually and On Behalf Of All Others
`Similarly Situated,(cid:3)
`laintiff,(cid:3)
`.(cid:3)
`BER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,(cid:3)
`efendants.(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)P
`
`(cid:3)v
`
`(cid:3)U
`
`Case No. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`
`STIPULATION AND
`CONSOLIDATION ORDER
`
`(cid:3)D
`
`(cid:3)
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-08610-RS
`
`DAVID MESSINGER, GERALD
`ASHFORD,
`IRVING S. AND JUDITH BRAUN, ELLIE
`MARIE TORONTO ESA, VARGHESE
`PALLATHU, JOSEPH CIANCI, and
`JOHNNY RAMEY, Individually and on
`Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
`Plaintiffs,
`v.
`UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 125 Filed 01/25/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 16(d), Civil Local Rule
`(“Civil L.R.”) 23-1(b), and Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth §§ 11.12, 11.21 and 31
`(2004), the parties stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:
`WHEREAS, on October 4, 2019, Benjamin Stirratt filed a complaint alleging violations
`of the federal securities laws against Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), certain of its current and
`former directors and officers, and the investment banks that served as underwriters for Uber’s
`initial public offering;
`WHEREAS, pursuant to a January 3, 2020 Court order, the Court appointed Boston
`Retirement System as Lead Plaintiff and Labaton Sucharow LLP as Lead Counsel for the case,
`now captioned Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`(“Boston Retirement System Action”);
`WHEREAS, pursuant to an August 7, 2020 Court order, the Court denied Defendants’
`motion to dismiss the operative complaint in the Boston Retirement System Action;
`WHEREAS, pursuant to a November 30, 2020 Court order, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP was
`appointed Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff in the Boston Retirement System Action;
`WHEREAS, on December 5, 2020, plaintiffs David Messinger, Gerald Ashford, Irving S.
`and Judith Braun, Ellie Marie Toronto ESA, Varghese Pallathu, Joseph Cianci, and Johnny
`Ramey filed a complaint alleging violations of the federal securities laws against the same
`defendants, in the action captioned Messinger et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-
`08610-WHA (“Messinger Action”), which action has since been deemed related to the Boston
`Retirement System Action and assigned to this Court; and
`WHEREAS, the parties believe the Boston Retirement and Messinger Actions should be
`consolidated because: (1) they are both purported class actions asserting the same causes of
`action under §§11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, against the same Defendants,
`and arising from the same circumstances; and (2) it would be unduly burdensome, involve
`unwarranted duplication of effort and expense, and give rise to the prospect of inconsistent or
`conflicting results if the Actions were heard by different Judges.
`
`1
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION ORDER – CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 125 Filed 01/25/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`IT IS ORDERED, in accord with the Parties’ stipulation and agreement as reflected
`herein, that these matters are related cases within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12. Pursuant to Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 42(a), the Messinger Action (No. 3:20-cv-08610-RS) is consolidated into the Boston
`Retirement System Action (No. 3:19-cv-06361-RS) for all purposes before this Court.
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Boston Retirement System shall continue as the Lead
`Plaintiff in the consolidated action.
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Labaton Sucharow LLP shall continue to serve as the
`Lead Counsel. Lead Counsel shall have the discretion to coordinate activities and dissemination
`of work to counsel of record in the Messinger Action for the benefit of the Class and in keeping
`with its obligations and continuing role as Lead Counsel.
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are not required to respond to the complaint
`in the Messinger Action because the operative complaint for purposes of this consolidation shall
`be the amended complaint filed in the Boston Retirement System Action (Docket No. 80), while
`reserving all rights and defenses that Defendants may have with respect to the Messinger Action.
`DATED: January 21, 2021
`
`SCOTT+SCOTT
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
`/s/ John T. Jasnoch
`JOHN T. JASNOCH (CA 281605)
`600 W. Broadway, Suite 3300
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619/233-4565
`619/233-0508 (fax)
`jjasnoch@scott-scott.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff David Messinger
`
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`/s/ Daniel H.R. Laguardia
`Patrick D. Robbins
`Daniel H.R. Laguardia
`
`LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
`/s/ Alfred. L. Fatale III
`JONATHAN GARDNER
`ALFRED L. FATALE III
`JOSEPH N. COTILLETTA
`MARCO A. DUEÑAS
`140 Broadway
`New York, New York 10005
`Telephone: 212/554-1400
`212/544-1444
`jgardner@labaton.com
`afatale@labaton.com
`jcotilletta@labaton.com
`mduenas@labaton.com
`Lead Counsel
`for Lead Plaintiff
`Boston Retirement System
`WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER
`LLP
`/s/ Todd G. Cosenza
`Todd G. Cosenza
`
`2
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION ORDER – CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 125 Filed 01/25/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`Emily V. Griffen
`George B. Adams, III
`535 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`probbins@shearman.com
`daniel.laguardia@shearman.com
`egriffen@shearman.com
`george.adams@shearman.com
`Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies,
`Inc., Dara Khosrowshahi, Nelson Chai, Glen
`Ceremony, Ronald Sugar, Ursula Burns,
`Garrett Camp, Matt Cohler, Ryan Graves,
`Arianna Huffington, Travis Kalanick, Wan
`Ling Martello, H.E. Yasir Al-Rumayyan, John
`Thain, and David Trujillo
`
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019-6099
`Telephone: (212) 728-8677
`Facsimile: (212) 728-9677
`tcosenza@willkie.com
`Attorneys for Defendants Morgan
`Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs
`& Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
`Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
`Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup
`Global Markets Inc., Allen &
`Company LLC, RBC Capital
`Markets, LLC, SunTrust Robinson
`Humphrey, Inc. (f/k/a Truist
`Securities, Inc.), Deutsche Bank
`Securities Inc., HSBC Securities
`(USA) Inc., SMBC Nikko Securities
`America, Inc., Mizuho Securities
`USA LLC, Needham & Company,
`LLC, Loop Capital Markets LLC,
`Siebert Cisneros Shank & Co.,
`L.L.C., Academy Securities, Inc.,
`BTIG, LLC, Canaccord Genuity
`LLC, CastleOak Securities, L.P.,
`Cowen and Company, LLC, Evercore
`Group L.L.C., JMP Securities LLC,
`Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc.,
`Mischler Financial Group, Inc.,
`Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Raymond
`James & Associates, Inc., William
`Blair & Company, L.L.C., The
`Williams Capital Group, L.P., and
`TPG Capital BD, LLC
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________
`January 25, 2021
`United States District Judge
`
`3
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION ORDER – CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 125 Filed 01/25/21 Page 5 of 5
`Case 3:19-cv-06361-RS Document 124 Filed 01/21/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`ECF ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
`document has been obtained from each of the other signatories thereto.
`Executed this 21st day of January, 2021, in New York, New York.
`
` /s/ Alfred L. Fatale III
`Alfred L. Fatale III
`
`4
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION ORDER – CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-06361-RS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket