throbber
Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 1 of 48
`
`KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
`Matthew B. George (SBN 239322)
`Maia C. Kats (pro hac vice)
`Laurence D. King (SBN 206423)
`Mario M. Choi (SBN 243409)
`1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1560
`Oakland, CA 94612
`Telephone: 415-772-4700
`Facsimile: 415-772-4707
`mgeorge@kaplanfox.com
`mkats@kaplanfox.com
`lking@kaplanfox.com
`mchoi@kaplanfox.com
`
`COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP
`Anne Marie Murphy (SBN 202540)
`Mark C. Molumphy (SBN 168009)
`Noorjahan Rahman (SBN 330572)
`Tyson C. Redenbarger (SBN 294424)
`Julia Q. Peng (SBN 318396)
`San Francisco Airport Office Center
`840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
`Burlingame, CA 94010
`Telephone: (650) 697-6000
`Facsimile: (650) 697-0577
`amurphy@cpmlegal.com
`mmolumphy@cpmlegal.com
`nrahman@cpmlegal.com
`tredenbarger@cpmlegal.com
`jpeng@cpmlegal.com
`
`[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`In re: Robinhood Outage Litigation
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 2 of 48
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendants Robinhood Financial,
`
`LLC (“Robinhood Financial”), Robinhood Securities, LLC (“Robinhood Securities”), and
`
`Robinhood Markets, Inc. (“Robinhood Markets”) (collectively, “Robinhood”), demanding a trial
`
`by jury. Plaintiffs make the following allegations pursuant to the investigation of counsel and based
`
`upon information and belief, except as to the allegations specifically pertaining to each individual
`
`Plaintiff, which are based on personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`Robinhood is an online brokerage firm founded in 2013 that states it is “a pioneer
`
`in commission-free investing.” Robinhood’s customers can place securities trades through the
`
`firm’s website and by using a web-based application (or “app”). Robinhood permits customers,
`
`when its trading platform is operational, to purchase and sell certain securities, including option
`
`contracts, and engage in trading on margin. The company has no storefront offices and operates
`entirely online. Robinhood is a FINRA1 regulated broker-dealer
`
`3.
`
`Unfortunately for Robinhood’s customers, including Plaintiffs and the putative class
`
`(the “Class”), Robinhood’s trading systems have repeatedly crashed—preventing Plaintiffs and the
`
`Class from accessing their accounts and making any trades through the firm’s website or app. The
`
`most significant crash occurred on Monday, March 2, 2020, and extended through mid-day
`
`Tuesday, March 3, 2020. The March 2-3 outage crashed all of Robinhood’s operating systems for
`
`more than a full trading day.
`
`4.
`
`Several days later, on March 9, 2020, Robinhood again experienced another
`
`complete system outage. Plaintiffs and Class members again experienced significant outages on
`
`March 13, 16, and June 18, 2020. In total, the Robinhood website and app have gone down 47
`times since March.2 The service outages are individually referred to as an “Outage” and
`
`1 Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a private corporation that acts as a a
`non-governmental, self-regulatory organization that regulates member brokerage firms and
`exchange markets.
`2 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug.19, 2020).
`
`- 1 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 3 of 48
`
`collectively as the “Outages”.3
`
`
`
`5.
`
`During the Outages, Robinhood’s customers were completely unable to use the
`
`services, including to buy or sell securities or to exercise option contracts through Robinhood’s
`
`website and app. Robinhood’s help center, which should provide email and phone support, was
`
`also unavailable during the Outages and customers were unable to obtain any information or
`
`meaningful assistance from Robinhood. During the Outages, Class members repeatedly attempted
`
`to contact the help center, by phone and email, to no avail. Robinhood has admitted that during the
`
`Outages the help center was unavailable and that Robinhood’s phone support was non-existent.
`
`Customers were thus left with no recourse during the Outages, unable to access their funds or
`
`exercise time-sensitive trades. They were forced to sit helplessly until services were re-established.
`
`The Outages on March 2 and 3, 2020, were particularly devastating for Plaintiffs
`6.
`and the Class as the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 5.1% during that time.4 Meanwhile,
`
`Robinhood users were locked out of their accounts and unable to access their funds or make
`
`trades—while the markets gained a record $1.1 trillion. The Outage on March 9, 2020, was
`
`similarly harmful, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its largest point plunge in history up to
`that date.5 Again, Plaintiffs and the Class were unable to access their funds or make trades and
`
`suffered significant losses as a result. Trades that were placed before the Outages, for which
`
`Plaintiffs and the Class received trade confirmations, also failed, or were processed at incorrect
`
`times or incorrect prices during the Outages. Additionally, Plaintiffs and the Class members were,
`
`at times during the Outages, able to seemingly place trades, and again the Plaintiffs and class
`
`received trade confirmations; however, it was later learned that those trades also failed, or were
`
`
`3 Plaintiffs and the Class seek damages related to the Outages on March 2, 3, and 9, 2020.
`4 Fred Imbert and Eustance Huang, Dow roars back from coronavirus sell-off with biggest gain
`since 2009, surges 5.1%, CNBC (March 2, 2020) https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/01/awaiting-
`us-stock-futures-open-at-6-pm-after-wall-streets-worst-week-since-2008.htm (last visited Aug.
`19, 2020).
`5 Kimberly Amadeo, How Does the 2020 Stock Market Crash Compare With Others? The
`Balance (April 27, 2020) https://www.thebalance.com/fundamentals-of-the-2020-market-crash-
`4799950#:~:text=The%20stock%20market%20crash%20of,point%20drops%20in%20U.S.%20hi
`story (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 4 of 48
`
`
`
`processed at incorrect times or incorrect prices during or after the Outages.
`
`7.
`
`Such failures constitute negligence, breaches of contract and fiduciary duties, and
`
`are violations of FINRA regulations. Per FINRA regulations, Robinhood has a duty to process
`
`trades timely and at the best prices for its users. Robinhood is also required to have a business
`
`continuity plan identifying a procedure relating to an emergency or significant business disruption.
`
`During the Outages, Robinhood failed to process trades in a timely manner or at all, and it was
`
`discovered that Robinhood’s continuity plan was nonexistent. Robinhood simply abandoned its
`
`customers.
`
`8.
`
`The loss of access to Robinhood’s trading platform and absence of contingency
`
`plans and customer service support caused concrete, particularized, and actual damages for
`
`Robinhood customers. Plaintiffs and members of the class were unable to monitor their accounts,
`
`make trades, or exercise their option contracts to capitalize on gains or to mitigate losses. Many
`
`Plaintiffs and Class members held options contracts that expired, worthless, during the Outages.
`
`And some of those contracts, such as the contracts held by certain Plaintiffs herein, were exercised
`
`by Robinhood during the Outages, without express authorization or approval of its customers, at a
`
`loss. Other Plaintiffs and Class members were subjected to forced margin calls as a result of the
`
`Outages, which they otherwise would have been able to avoid if they had access to their accounts.
`
`9.
`
`Robinhood accepts fault for the Outages, which it attributes to stress on its systems.
`
`According to Robinhood employees, the March 2020 “outage was rooted in issues with the
`
`company’s phone app and servers. They said the start-up had underinvested in technology and
`moved too quickly rather than carefully.”6 These flaws were known and insufficiently addressed:
`
`“[s]oftware mishaps have rocked Robinhood before,” including in 2018, for example, when
`
`its “options trading service had an outage that locked consumers out of their accounts and stopped
`
`
`6 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug.19, 2020).
`- 3 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 5 of 48
`
`them from closing positions[.]”7
`
`
`
`10.
`
`In offering trading services, Robinhood assumed a duty to ensure that its systems
`
`were sufficiently equipped to reliably deliver such services under reasonably foreseeable customer
`
`demands and market conditions, such as those at issue in this case. Robinhood acted negligently
`
`by failing to adequately or properly equip itself technologically and systemically to maintain
`
`Plaintiff and Class members’ access to trading services. Due solely to its own negligence and failure
`
`to maintain adequate infrastructure, Robinhood breached obligations owed to Plaintiff and Class
`
`members and caused them substantial losses. Its failures are all the more serious due to
`
`Robinhood’s history of such failures, the magnitude of the Outages, the absence of alternative
`
`means for customers to protect their positions and investments, and lack of communication and
`
`customer support.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of Robinhood customers who were denied
`
`access to their Robinhood trading accounts during the Outages and for the many, including
`
`themselves, who suffered losses as a result of the Outages. Plaintiffs assert putative class action
`
`claims generally including negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations
`
`of California’s Unfair Competition Law, on behalf of themselves and all other Robinhood
`
`customers who are similarly situated. Plaintiffs seek damages, restitution, disgorgement and
`
`declaratory relief.
`
`PARTIES
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff Daniel Beckman (“Plaintiff Beckman”) is a citizen of Florida and is over
`
`the age of 18.
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff Joseph Gwaltney (“Plaintiff Gwaltney”) is a citizen of Florida and is over
`
`the age of 18.
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff Emma Jones (“Plaintiff Jones”) is a citizen of Texas and is over the age
`
`
`7 John Gittlelsohn, Annie Massa, and Jennifer Surane, Robinhood Maxed Out a Credit Line Last
`Month as Markets Fell, Bloomberg (March 10, 2020)
`https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-10/robinhood-maxed-out-credit-line-last-
`month-amid-market-tumult (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 6 of 48
`
`
`
`of 18.
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff Leila Kuri (“Plaintiff Kuri”) is a citizen of North Carolina and is over the
`
`age of 18.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff Jared Leith (“Plaintiff Leith”) is a citizen of Minnesota and is over the age
`
`
`of 18.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff Omeed Mahrouyan (“Plaintiff Mahrouyan”) is a citizen of California and
`
`is over the age of 18.
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff Mahdi Heidari Moghadam (“Plaintiff Moghadam”) is a citizen of Texas
`
`and is over the age of 18.
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff Howard Morey (“Plaintiff Morey”) is a citizen of Oklahoma and is over the
`
`age of 18.
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff Colin Prendergast (“Plaintiff Prendergast”) is a citizen of California and is
`
`over the age of 18.
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff Raghu Rao (“Plaintiff Rao”) is a citizen of New Jersey and is over the age
`
`of 18.
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiff Michael Riggs (“Plaintiff Riggs”) is a citizen of Pennsylvania and is over
`
`the age of 18.
`
`23.
`
`Plaintiff Kevin Russell (“Plaintiff Russell”) is a citizen of Illinois and is over the
`
`age of 18.
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff Jason Steinberg (“Plaintiff Steinberg”) is a citizen of California and is over
`
`the age of 18.
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiff Jared Ward (“Plaintiff Ward”) is a citizen of California and is over the age
`
`of 18.
`
`of 18.
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff Mengni Xia (“Plaintiff Xia”) is a citizen of New York and is over the age
`
`27.
`
`Defendant Robinhood Financial is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
`
`of business at 85 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
`
`
`
`Robinhood Markets. Robinhood Financial is registered as a broker-dealer with the U.S. Securities
`- 5 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 7 of 48
`
`
`
`& Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Defendant Robinhood Financial acts as an introducing broker
`
`and has a clearing arrangement with its affiliate Defendant Robinhood Securities.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant Robinhood Securities is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
`
`of business at 500 Colonial Center Parkway, Suite 100, Lake Mary, Florida 32746. It is a wholly-
`
`owned subsidiary of Defendant Robinhood Markets.
`
`29.
`
`Defendant Robinhood Markets is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
`
`business at 85 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. Defendant Robinhood Markets is the
`
`corporate parent of Defendants Robinhood Financial and Robinhood Securities. Robinhood
`
`Markets is also the entity that actually owns, develops and/or maintains the technology
`
`infrascturcture that was at the root cause of and that was impacted by the Outages. Robinhood
`
`Markets is the developer and provider of the mobile application that Plaintiffs downloaded and
`
`used as customers of Robinhood. Robinhood Markets is the employer of most, if not all, of the key
`
`engineering personnel who developed, designed and maintained the technology infrastructure that
`
`failed during the Outages. Most, if not all, of Robinhood Markets’ engineering employees who
`
`were responsible for developing and/or maintaining Robinhood’s electronic securities trading
`
`application perform their work at facilities and/or on equipment owned or leased by Robinhood
`
`Markets, which also acts as a technology vendor for its own subsidiaries Robinhood Financial and
`
`Robinhood Securities. Robinhood Markets also pays for and provides staffing and services
`
`pertaining to customer service for Robinhood Financial and Robinhoood Securities, including at
`
`times pertinent to the Outages. Certain personnel maintain multiple roles at the various entities,
`
`such as Robinhood Markets’ current director of engineering who also serves as Robinhood
`
`Financial’s Chief Technology Officer, creating intertwined management and supervision of the
`
`technology infrastructure that failed during the Outages and gives rise to Plaintiffs’ claims.
`
`Plaintiffs bring their claims against Robinhood Markets in its capacity as a parent corporation of
`
`the co-defendants, but also in its own capacity as an alleged tortfeasor on the claims identified
`
`below.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`30.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`- 6 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 8 of 48
`
`
`
`U.S.C §1332(d), because the amount in controversy for the Classes exceeds $5,000,000 exclusive
`
`of interest and costs, there are more than 100 putative Class members defined below and minimal
`
`diversity exists because the majority of putative Class members are citizens of a state different than
`
`Defendants.
`
`31.
`
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, this Court is the proper venue for this action because
`
`a substantial part of the events, omissions, and acts giving rise to the claims herein occurred in this
`
`District where Robinhood is headquartered and where it developed and sold the financial services
`
`which are the subject of the present complaint. Finally, venue is appropriate in this District pursuant
`
`to 28 USC § 1391(b)(2) because Robinhood is headquartered in Menlo Park and a substantial part
`
`of the acts and omissions that gave rise to this Complaint occurred or emanated from this District.
`
`32.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Robinhood because it is headquartered in
`
`and authorized to do business and does conduct business in California, and because it has sufficient
`
`minimum contacts with this state and/or sufficiently avails itself of the markets of this state through
`
`its business within this state to render the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court permissible.
`
`INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
`
`33.
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-2(c), an intradistrict assignment to the San Francisco
`
`Division is appropriate because a substantial part of the events or omissions which give rise to the
`
`claims asserted herein occurred in this Division, and because the District Court transferred this
`
`matter to the San Francisco Division after it was originally filed in the San Jose Division, and then
`
`consolidated about a dozen related matters filed in, transferred to, or removed to this District.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`Robinhood’s Business Model
`
`34.
`
`Robinhood was founded by Vlad Tenev and Baiju Bhatt, who met each other at
`
`Stanford University in 2005. After teaming up on several ventures, including a high-speed trading
`firm, they created Robinhood in 2013.8
`
`8 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug.19, 2020).
`- 7 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 9 of 48
`
`
`
`35.
`
`Robinhood offers people the ability to invest in stocks, ETFs, and options through
`
`an electronic trading platform, both online and through an app.
`
`36.
`
`Robinhood competes with other online and traditional brokerages by not charging
`
`trading fees. At the time of its founding, most brokerage firms charged about $10 or more to make
`
`a trade. Robinhood also competes with traditional financial institutions by offering more user-
`
`friendly digital services, which has made Robinhood very popular, especially with younger traders.
`
`In July of 2020, Robinhood said it had over 13 million users on its platform. In August 2020, after
`raising $200 million in Series G funding, Robinhood was valued at $11.2 billion.9
`
`37.
`
`Robinhood’s original product was commission-free trades of stocks and
`
`exchange-traded funds. As Robinhood grew, it added more risky and complex products—like
`
`options and margin trading. Those products, combined with Robinhood's game-like interface, have
`been a hit with millenials, and its typical customer is 31 years old on average.10
`
`38.
`
`Robinhood’s trading app, when functional, is designed to be easy to use. For
`
`example, on the Robinhood home screen, there is a list of popular stocks that users can “trade” with
`
`just the touch of the screen, which skips many of the steps that other firms require.
`
`
`9 Kate Rooney, Robinhood snags third mega-investment of the year, boosting valuation to $11.2
`billion, CNBC (August 17, 2020) https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/17/robinhood-announces-
`another-mega-round-valuation-soars-to-11point2b.html (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`10 Graham Rapier, Robinhood had to install protective glass after frustrated traders kept showing
`up at its office, Business Insider (July 10, 2020) https://www.businessinsider.com/robinhood-
`office-installed-bulletproof-glass-after-frustrated-traders-visited-report-2020-7 (last visited Aug.
`19, 2020).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 10 of 48
`
`
`
`39.
`
`Robinhood also includes many features that make investing appear more like a
`
`game. New members are given a free share of stock when they join Robinhood—to reveal the
`stock users scratch-off images that look like a lottery ticket.11 Once the stock is revealed, confetti
`
`appears to fall from the top of the screen.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40.
`
`One of Robinhood’s popular features is the ability for users to engage in options
`
`trading. Robinhood describes its options trading as “quick, straightforward & free.” To start
`
`trading options, users respond to multiple-choice questions. “Beginners are legally barred from
`
`trading options, but those who click that they have no investing experience are coached by the app
`
`on how to change the answer to ‘not much’ experience. Then people can immediately begin option
`trading.”12
`
`According to the New York Times, Robinhood’s “success appears to have been built
`41.
`on a Silicon Valley playbook of behavioral nudges and push notifications,13 which has drawn
`
`inexperienced investors into the riskiest trading. . . And the more that customers engaged in such
`
`11 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug.19, 2020).
`12 Id.
`13 Nudges and push notifications are reminders or prompts sent directly to users. Nudges and push
`notifications may appear on a users home screen similar to a text message or email alerts.
`- 9 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 11 of 48
`
`
`
`behavior, the better it was for the company.”14 “At the core of Robinhood’s business is an incentive
`
`to encourage more trading. It does not charge fees for trading, but it is still paid more if its
`customers trade more.”15
`
`42.
`
`A research analyst at Chicago-based Sumner Capital group pointed out that
`
`Robinhood’s app has “slick interfaces. Confetti popping everywhere…They try to gamify trading
`and couch it as an investment.”16 Unfortunately for many Americans, losing investment and
`retirement funds or accruing colossal debt is not a game, and the consequences have been tragic.17
`
`43.
`
`Robinhood’s digital platform app has been beset by its technology glitches, which
`
`have been significant and ongoing. “In 2018, Robinhood released software that accidentally
`
`reversed the direction of options trades giving customers the opposite outcome from what they
`
`expected. Last year, it mistakenly allowed people to borrow infinite money to multiply their bets,
`leading to some enormous gains and losses.”18
`
`Robinhood claims that its more recent Outages resulted from “stress on [their]
`44.
`infrastructure” due to “unprecedented load,” and “record volume.” 19 But these circumstances,
`
`even if true, were encouraged and driven by Robinhood’s own business model—encourage its users
`to trade as much as possible.20
`
`
`14 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug.19, 2020)..
`15 Id.
`16 Antoine Gara, Sergei Klebnikov, 20-Year-Old Robinhood Customer Dies by Suicide After
`Seeing a $730,000 Negative Balance, Forbes (June 17, 2020)
`https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/06/17/20-year-old-robinhood-customer-dies-
`by-suicide-after-seeing-a-730000-negative-balance/#11d468081638 (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`17 Id.
`18 Robinhood options errors, Elite Trader, https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/robinhood-
`options-errors.327998/ (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`19 Baiju Bhatt and Vladimir Tenev, An Update from Robinhood’s Founders, Robinhood (March
`3, 2020) https://blog.robinhood.com/news/2020/3/3/an-update-from-robinhoods-founders ((last
`visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`20 Nathaniel Popper, Robinhood Has Lured Young Traders, Sometimes With Devastating Results,
`The New York Times (July 8, 2020)
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/08/technology/robinhood-risky-
`trading.html?searchResultPosition=2 (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`- 10 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 12 of 48
`
`
`
`45.
`
`Robinhood’s users trade more often than average, faster, and with more risk than
`
`traders who use other platforms. According to an analysis of new filings from nine brokerage firms
`
`by the research firm Alphacution for The New York Times, in the first quarter of 2020, Robinhood
`
`users traded nine times as many shares as E-Trade customers and 40 times as many shares as
`
`Charles Schwab customers. They also bought and sold 88 times as many risky options contracts as
`Schwab customers, relative to the average account size, according to the analysis. 21
`
`46.
`
`According to Tim Welsh, founder and CEO of wealth management consulting firm
`
`Nexus Strategy, “they should put a cigarette warning label on Robinhood, because it could be
`
`hazardous to your financial health the more you trade. Every study on planet Earth has shown day
`
`traders that are not sophisticated do not make money. They game-ify it, they throw confetti after
`each trade, the make it ‘free’ but ultimately it’s a losers game.”22
`Robinhood’s Services and How it Makes Money
`
`47. When a user opens an account with Robinhood, they enter into a Customer
`
`Agreement with “Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, and their agents and
`
`assigns.” Prior to the Outages in March 2020, the Customer Agreement had most recently been
`
`revised on February 5, 2020. After the March Outages, Robinhood revised its Customer Agreement
`
`21 Id.
`22 Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 13 of 48
`
`on April 28, 2020, and again on June 22, 2020.
`
`
`
`48.
`
`Robinhood provides its users educational information with the tagline “Investing
`
`can be complicated — that’s why we’re here. From beginners’ guides to timely features, explore
`
`articles that make finance a little more understandable.” The information provided varies from
`
`investment strategy for investors in their 20’s, to basic information about the market and common
`terms used in investing.23 Robinhood’s interface also highlights particular stocks and “makes
`suggestions to users on what to trade next.”24
`
`49.
`
`Robinhood offers a paid subscription product called “Gold.” Users who purchase
`
`Gold memberships pay $5 a month to have faster deposit processing, access to professional
`
`research, the ability to see additional information about stock prices, and the ability to invest on
`margin.25
`
`50.
`
`Robinhood also makes money from “payment for order flow” fees. In fact, payment
`
`for order flow fees are reportedly Robinhood’s primary revenue stream—greatly exceeding what it
`
`earns from Robinhood Gold, or from the interest it makes on cash balances in customer accounts,
`
`which is another source of Robinhood’s revenue.
`
`51.
`
`Payment for order flow fees are paid to Robinhood from electronic market makers
`
`for passing on customer orders. For example, if a Robinhood users purchase a share of Apple on
`
`through their account, Robinhood sends that order to a large market maker like Citadel Securities
`
`and receives a few pennies in return—i.e., the “payment for order flow” fees. Citadel, meanwhile,
`completes the trade and makes a few pennies itself.26
`
`52.
`
`For Robinhood, those fees add up. According to a recent SEC filing, Citadel
`
`
`23 See https://learn.robinhood.com/ (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`24 Alicia Adamcyk, Trading Apps Like Robinhood Are Having A Moment. But Users Should Be
`Careful, CNBC (Aug. 21, 2020), https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/21/robinhood-is-having-a-
`moment-users-should-be-careful.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2020).
`25 A margin account is a brokerage account in which the broker lends the investor money to buy
`more securities than what they could otherwise buy with the balance in their account.
`26Jeff John Roberts, David Z. Morris, Robinhood makes millions selling your stock trades … is
`that so wrong?, Fortune (July 8, 2020), https://fortune.com/2020/07/08/robinhood-makes-
`millions-selling-your-stock-trades-is-that-so-wrong/ (last visited Aug. 19, 2020).
`- 12 -
`Case No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD
`SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-01626-JD Document 120 Filed 06/30/21 Page 14 of 48
`
`
`
`Securities and several other firms paid Robinhood nearly $100 million in the first quarter of 2020.27
`
`And in the second quarter of 2020 — Robinhood made $180 million off trades, roughly double
`from the prior quarter.28
`The Outages
`
`At 9:33 am29 the morning of March 2, 2020, a Monday and the first day of the month
`
`53.
`
`for trading traditional securities, Robinhood’s trading platform completely stopped functioning. As
`
`a result, at that moment, the platform stopped processing orders entered by customers prior to the
`
`Outage and customers were unable to enter new orders. The majority of users were also prevented
`
`from accessing their account and funds altogether.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket