throbber
Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 29
`
`
`
`MARC N. BERNSTEIN (SBN 145837)
`mbernstein@blgrp.com
`WILL B. FITTON (SBN 182818)
`wfitton@blgrp.com
`THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.
`150 Spear Street, Suite 800
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.765.6633
`Facsimile: 415.283.4804
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`UAB “PLANNER5D”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`UAB “PLANNER5D” dba PLANNER 5D,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`FACEBOOK INC.,
`FACEBOOK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, THE
`TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON
`UNIVERSITY, DOES 1-200, ABC
`CORPORATIONS 1-20, and XYZ
`UNIVERSITIES 1-20.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
` Case No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR
`COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 2 of 29
`
`
`
`UAB “Planner5D” (Planner 5D) sued Facebook, Inc., Facebook Technologies,
`LLC (together, Facebook), and The Trustees of Princeton University (Princeton or
`Princeton University) in a case entitled UAB “Planner5D” v. Facebook et al., Case
`No. 3:19-cv-03132 WHO (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2019) (the Companion Case). There, the
`Court dismissed Planner 5D’s copyright claims but gave it leave to re-file them in a
`new lawsuit. (See Companion Case ECF Nos. 52 & 59.) Accordingly, for its new
`Complaint against Facebook and Princeton, Planner 5D now alleges as follows.
`INTRODUCTION
`Computer vision—the ability of machines to recognize three-
`1.
`dimensional scenes—is one of today’s leading research fields. Whoever first masters
`this technology will forever change humankind’s relationship with machines.
`Scene-recognition technology will soon enable robots to care for home-
`2.
`bound patients, and to boost safety and productivity at offices, airports, hospitals,
`and factories. It will also revolutionize an array of applications outside of robotics.
`One product looks after elderly people in their homes, using computer vision to
`detect changes in their gait or behavior, and to recognize stumbles or falls. Other
`applications will usher in a new era in virtual reality. Virtual objects will be
`seamlessly integrated into the user’s actual indoor environment, enhancing realism
`for both industrial and recreational applications. Shipping giant DHL has already
`equipped its warehouse employees with “smart glasses” that use scene recognition
`to display where each item picked from the warehouse should be placed on the
`trolley for delivery. It’s been estimated that the computer vision market will reach
`$48 billion by 2023, and $60 billion by 2025.
`Yet even as scientists make great strides in this burgeoning research
`3.
`area, they have encountered a roadblock. Teaching machines to recognize three-
`dimensional settings requires feeding them large volumes of realistic, digitized
`samples of such places—digitized doors, walls, furniture, and the like, arranged into
`plausible interiors that are readable by machines. Creating lifelike digital scenes is
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`1
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 3 of 29
`
`
`
`extremely time- and labor-intensive, and requires the exercise of substantial human
`judgment, creativity, and expression. For truly realistic scenes, human modelers
`must personally craft each three-dimensional object, and human designers must
`arrange the objects in lifelike configurations. Large collections of these kinds of three-
`dimensional settings are thus exceedingly rare.
`Yet such collections are vital to scene-recognition research. In a slide
`4.
`presentation posted online, a senior Princeton computer scientist asked, “What is the
`main roadblock for 3D scene understanding and research?” His answer: “Data!!” (See
`Thomas Funkhouser, 3D Data for Data-Driven Scene Understanding, 8-9,
`https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~funk/VRWorkshop.pdf (last visited March 30, 2020).)
`Planner 5D owns a collection of over a million hand-crafted, digitized,
`5.
`and realistic three-dimensional objects and scenes, depicting a wide variety of
`household and office designs. To Planner 5D’s knowledge, no other collection in the
`world numbers even in the tens of thousands. The company created and grew its
`collection over many years, at a cost of millions of dollars. It began by creating
`several thousand hand-crafted three-dimensional objects. These were lifelike models
`of furniture, appliances, plants, people, lighting, or other objects that could occupy
`the interior or immediate exterior of a structure. Millions of users of the company’s
`design tool then dragged and dropped these virtual objects into floor plans, creating
`realistic three-dimensional interior designs, or “scenes.” Each created design, or
`scene, is stored on Planner 5D’s own servers, for later access and use by Planner 5D
`and the user who created it. Planner 5D’s collection of such scenes has mushroomed
`over the years to many millions of scenes. Users can designate their scenes for
`inclusion in Planner 5D’s public gallery. From these, Planner 5D carefully selects a
`subset, numbering in the tens of thousands, to display in the public gallery. This
`curated public gallery contains the scenes that are visible to all users. The remaining
`scenes in Planner 5D’s collection can be accessed or viewed only by Planner 5D or the
`users who created them.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`2
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 4 of 29
`
`
`
`Computer scientists at Princeton were eager to use Planner 5D’s
`6.
`uniquely large, uniquely realistic collection of data. They decided to download the
`entirety of Planner 5D’s then-existing public gallery of scenes, as well as all of
`Planner 5D’s individual objects. Planner 5D will need discovery to determine the
`precise means by which Princeton did so. But on information and belief, they or
`others acting at their behest used special software tools, including Princeton’s own
`software, specially engineered for this purpose, to access the digital files underlying
`Planner 5D’s objects and scenes. Without these special tools, users could only see and
`manipulate on-screen images rendered from these data files. For example, users
`could see an image of a sofa, and drag and position it onto a floor plan for a living
`room. But the data files from which these images were rendered were always
`invisible, and wholly inaccessible, to users.
`On information and belief, using software developer tools, Princeton or
`7.
`its agents monitored and intercepted communications activity between Planner 5D’s
`software and its European servers. Using information extracted from these
`intercepted communications, together with data-harvesting software of its own
`creation, Princeton determined the secret Internet addresses where the tens of
`thousands of Planner 5D’s object and scene files were hidden. Princeton’s computer
`code then crawled the location of each of the tens of thousands of addresses, scraping
`the files it encountered into its unauthorized collection.
`In this way, Princeton downloaded over five gigabytes of Planner 5D
`8.
`data. It then used this data for its scene-recognition activities. Princeton researchers
`published multiple articles using the data. The authors confessed the data’s
`provenance: “We use a collection of 3D scene models downloaded from the
`Planner5D website.” (E.g., Yinda Zhang, et al, Physically-Based Rendering for Indoor
`Scene Understanding Using Convolutional Neural Networks 3 (Proceedings of IEEE
`Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017)
`https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.07429v2.pdf.) (last visited March 30, 2020).)
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`3
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 5 of 29
`
`
`
`Princeton also made the stolen data available to researchers at a
`9.
`Princeton URL. Visitors to this URL would fill out a form and agree to certain terms
`in order to be approved for access to the dataset. Planner 5D will need discovery to
`determine exactly how many researchers applied to Princeton for access to the data,
`how many were accepted, who those researchers are, and whether and how their use
`of the data was restricted. Princeton labeled the stolen data the “SUNCG dataset.”
`10. Defendants Facebook, Inc. and its subsidiary, Facebook Technologies,
`LLC (together, Facebook) were also interested in Planner 5D’s objects and scenes.
`Facebook Technologies runs “Oculus,” the well-known virtual-reality brand
`Facebook acquired in 2014. Scene recognition is a vital component of virtual-reality
`products and services. As one example, “scene fusion”—the fusing of virtual objects
`with the user’s actual surroundings—relies critically on scene-recognition
`technology.
`Eager to tap the enormous commercial potential of scene recognition
`11.
`technology, Facebook assembled its own, internal, computer-vision team. This team
`then enlisted broader aid in its research.
`Facebook joined with researchers at Princeton, Stanford, UC Berkeley,
`12.
`Georgia Tech, and other institutions to jointly organize and run an international
`scene-recognition competition called the SUMO Challenge (Scene Understanding
`and MOdeling Challenge). Facebook served as the lead sponsor of the SUMO
`Challenge. (See THE 2019 SCENE UNDERSTANDING AND MODELING CHALLENGE,
`https://sumochallenge.org/ (last visited March 30, 2020).) The first SUMO Challenge
`was launched in late August, 2018; another was held in 2019.
`SUMO Challenge entrants were encouraged to submit scene-
`13.
`recognition papers and algorithms. The SUMO Challenge organizers promised
`contest winners cash prizes and a speaking slot at a “SUMO Challenge conference.”
`To facilitate contestants’ work, beginning no earlier than the inaugural SUMO
`Challenge in mid-2018, Facebook and the other SUMO Challenge organizers created
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 6 of 29
`
`
`
`their own copy of the SUNCG dataset, and made it available to contestants who
`signed up for the contest to use for their submissions. These SUMO Challenge
`organizers published a link to the copied SUNCG dataset, at a URL belonging to
`Stanford University—itself a SUMO Challenge organizer. In return for their chance
`at cash prizes and the opportunity to present their winning submissions, SUMO
`contestants granted Facebook a “perpetual, royalty-free, no-cost license and right to
`use and otherwise exploit” the submitted materials, including Facebook’s right to use
`the contest submissions “in any merchandising, advertising, marketing, promotion
`or for any other commercial or non-commercial purpose.” Planner 5D will need
`discovery to determine how many contestants applied to the SUMO Challenge for
`access to the SUNCG dataset, how many were accepted, who those contestants were,
`and how, if at all, their use of the data was restricted. But on information and belief,
`enough contestants were given access to the dataset to cause Planner 5D enormous
`economic damage.
`The gigabytes of data Princeton, Facebook, and an unknown number of
`14.
`others have downloaded and used are the intellectual property of Planner 5D.
`Planner 5D’s data was scraped, copied, and used without its knowledge or
`permission. The defendants’ copying, use, and public disclosure and dissemination
`of Planner 5D’s core asset has caused catastrophic and potentially permanent
`damage to the company.
`
`JURISDICTION
`This case arises under the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101
`15.
`et seq. Accordingly, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Facebook, Inc. and Facebook
`16.
`Technologies, LLC because each is headquartered in California.
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Princeton University because,
`17.
`on information and belief, Princeton, together with its current and former employees
`and students has engaged in the following acts:
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`5
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 7 of 29
`
`
`
`• participated in and assisted with the SUMO Challenge in California,
`including as SUMO Challenge organizers and advisors;
`• worked with Facebook and other California-based companies,
`individuals, and institutions involved with the SUMO Challenge;
`• received “generous support”—presumably cash funding—for scene
`recognition work from Silicon Valley companies such as Facebook, Inc.,
`Google LLC, and Nvidia Corporation.
`• permitted the copying and storage in this district of the SUNCG dataset
`used in the SUMO Challenge;
`• made its own copy of the SUNCG dataset generally available for
`download in California, an invitation that on information and belief at
`least some California residents accepted;
`• co-authored articles with California residents about the SUNCG
`dataset, and specifically its origin as data downloaded from
`Planner 5D;
`• consented to and enabled the current sabbatical here, at Google and
`Stanford, of Dr. Thomas Funkhouser, one of Princeton’s leading
`computer-vision professors. Dr. Funkhouser co-authored articles
`dealing with Princeton’s use of the Planner 5D data and serves as one
`of four members of the SUMO Challenge Advisory Board; and
`• accepted Facebook’s support of another of its key scene-understanding
`researchers, Dr. Shuran Song, via a “Facebook Fellowship.”
`The Court also has personal jurisdiction over all defendants because no
`18.
`defendant timely challenged personal jurisdiction in the Companion Case. The
`defendants thereby waived a jurisdictional challenge there, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(1),
`and, by extension, also here.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`6
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 8 of 29
`
`
`
`VENUE
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a), because the
`19.
`defendants and their agents either reside or can be found in this district.
`Venue is also proper in this district because no defendant timely
`20.
`challenged venue in the Companion Case. The defendants thereby waived a venue
`challenge there, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(1), and, by extension, also here.
`INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
`This is an intellectual property action subject to assignment on a
`21.
`district-wide basis. N.D. Cal. Civ. Local Rule 3-2(c). The Companion Case has been
`assigned to the San Francisco Division.
`PARTIES
`Planner 5D is a private limited liability company organized under the
`22.
`laws of the Republic of Lithuania.
`Facebook, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Menlo
`23.
`Park, California.
`Facebook Technologies, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company
`24.
`headquartered in California. It is a subsidiary of Facebook, Inc.
`The Trustees of Princeton University is a non-profit educational
`25.
`corporation and academic institution in New Jersey. In this complaint, “Princeton”
`refers to the university, its employees, agents, and others acting at its behest and
`direction.
`26. Does 1-200 are individuals whose names and identities Planner 5D does
`not presently know, but who, on information and belief, committed or facilitated the
`copyright infringement or other acts or omissions alleged here. Planner 5D will add
`the names and identities of these Doe defendants when it learns them.
`27. ABC Corporations 1-20 are business entities or unincorporated
`associations, whose names, states of organization or incorporation, and entity types
`Planner 5D does not presently know, but which, on information and belief,
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`7
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 9 of 29
`
`
`
`committed or facilitated the copyright infringement or other acts or omissions
`alleged here. Planner 5D will add the names and identities of these business entities
`or unincorporated associations when it learns them.
`XYZ Universities 1-20 are academic institutions whose identities, or
`28.
`whose exact role in the events alleged here, Planner 5D does not presently know. On
`information and belief, some of these academic institutions committed or facilitated
`the copyright infringement or other acts or omissions alleged here. Planner 5D will
`add the names, identities, and roles of these academic institutions when it learns
`them.
`
`29. On information and belief, in committing the acts or omissions alleged
`in this complaint, each defendant conspired with, aided and abetted, or acted in
`concert with each other, and each acted as the agent of each other. Under principles
`of respondeat superior and like principles, employer defendants are liable for the acts
`and omissions of their employees and agents.
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`A.
`Planner 5D and Its Object and Scene Files
`Planner 5D was founded in 2011 as a user-friendly home design tool
`30.
`that allowed anyone to quickly and easily create their own home, office, or landscape
`designs. Users select from thousands of available objects, from structural features
`(such as windows, arches, doors, and stairs), to furniture (such as sofas, beds, tables,
`chairs, and rugs), to kitchen and bathroom appurtenances (such as baths and sinks),
`to electrical appliances (such as lights, video equipment, and computers), to exterior
`features (such as paths, lawns, trees, plants, barbeques, and swimming pools). To
`create a design, users simply drag any of these objects onto or around a chosen floor
`plan. Once added to a design, these objects can be quickly and easily moved, rotated,
`tilted, re-sized, or otherwise manipulated to create the desired design. Users can
`easily toggle between two- and three-dimensional presentations of the design. In 3D,
`a design can easily be rotated and tilted to any desired perspective.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`8
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 10 of 29
`
`
`
`In the years since its founding, Planner 5D has become a leader in web-
`31.
`based interior design tools. It currently has over 40 million users worldwide.
`1.
`Planner 5D’s Object Files
`Planner 5D created its collection of realistic, digitized objects over a
`32.
`span of many years at a cost of millions of dollars. Planner 5D continues to add to
`this collection. At the time Princeton scraped Planner 5D’s object data, it scraped the
`entire then-existing collection, which numbered over 2,600 data files of objects.
`Currently, Planner 5D owns a collection of over 4,500 individual object files.
`Planner 5D’s objects are original and creative works of authorship in
`33.
`each of three independent ways. First, original and creative design choices govern
`the nature and appearance of the 3D objects, including how the objects are rendered
`on users’ screens. Second, the digital files that generate these 3D images are
`themselves the product of creative choices, with multiple digital configurations
`possible for a single design object. And finally, Planner 5D’s selection of objects for
`inclusion in its object collection is itself an original and creative process giving rise to
`copyright protection.
`
`a.
`
`Originality and Creativity of the Rendered
`Images
`Concerning the first level of creative expression, the 3D images as
`34.
`rendered, Planner 5D’s designers draw on their creative imagination in a number of
`different ways. First, some of Planner 5D’s objects are not modeled on any particular
`reference image, but stem entirely from the designers’ imaginations. Examples
`include 3D models of people, animals, flowers, and plants. Second, even where
`designers begin with a reference image, such as a drawing or a photograph, they
`never mechanically copy the reference. They never copy its measurements, for
`example, or use other mechanical or automated means of reproducing it. Their
`judgment and creative expression govern the models’ dimensions, sizes, shapes,
`angles, proportions, relative placements, textures, and colors. These choices can be
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`9
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 11 of 29
`
`
`
`compared to a photographer’s choices about the lighting, angles, highlights,
`shadows, and other features of photographic composition.
`35. Many of these creative choices entail still further, subsidiary, choices.
`For example, modelers not only select two-dimensional textures to apply to the
`three-dimensional models, they also choose from a broad array of visual attributes
`those textures will possess. These choices govern not only the size of the texture and
`how it should be fitted to the surface—e.g. by stretching or tiling—but also how to
`mix and configure visualization attributes such as: UV mapping, specular intensity
`and color, transparency, translucency, blending, diffuseness color, and alpha
`channels.
`Each attribute directly affects the appearance of the finished 3D models.
`36.
`UV mapping specifies the stretches and other reshaping the two-dimensional texture
`will undergo to fit the desired three-dimensional surface. Specular intensity refers to
`the degree of pure reflectivity of the model’s surface. Turning this knob up or down
`will cause the finished model to appear with more or less mirror-like reflections. A
`related knob controls the modelers’ desired coloring of these reflections.
`Transparency and translucency are related but distinct further design choices. They
`govern whether and how much the textured surface appears to transmit light
`through itself, and if that transmission is clear or blurred. Blending values are a
`related choice governing how light reflecting from a surface appears to be mixed
`with the light transmitting through it. Diffuseness color refers to a base color of the
`surface. Alpha channels control transparency on a point-by-point basis. Each of these
`creative choices is made by Planner 5D and its modelers. Each contributes
`significantly to the appearance of the finished product.
`37. Modelers also use independent creative expression to create multiple
`distinct furniture pieces from a single reference image. For example, starting with a
`reference image of a chair, a designer might create not just his or her own version of
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`10
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 12 of 29
`
`
`
`that chair, but also a sofa, bench, or love seat, all inspired by the same original
`reference. Each new furniture piece entails its own design choices.
`38. Moreover, Planner 5D authored and issued to its modelers guidelines
`for the models’ appearance, adding another layer of creative input to the finished
`products’ textures, lighting, materials, and colors
`Planner 5D’s models are designed to look realistic. “Realistic” means
`39.
`appearing to exist in real-life. It does not mean actually existing in real life, in the sense
`of replicating an actual real-life object. Thus, as noted, many of Planner 5D’s objects
`were created wholly from the modelers’ artistic imaginations, with no reference
`object. These objects are “realistic” but have no real-world counterparts. Other
`Planner 5D objects are inspired by reference images. But these models’ realism stems
`from appearing as though they could exist, not from looking exactly like something
`that does exist. “Realism” does not imply fidelity to a particular original. It simply
`implies seeming real.
`
`b.
`
`Originality and Creativity of Underlying Digital
`Object Files.
`In addition to the expressive choices embodied in the design of
`40.
`Planner 5D’s objects, there is a separate layer of creativity and originality in the
`digital files that store those 3D objects. First, every design choice described above is
`translated into and thus reflected in the strings of text that comprise the digital files.
`In creating their original 3D models, Planner 5D’s modelers are simultaneously
`creating original digital files whose text strings encode those creative choices. The
`result is a digital file that is itself entitled to copyright protection. Second, the digital
`files underlying every 3D object can be represented many different ways. The
`structure and organization of the digital files for each 3D object depends on the
`creative choices modelers make in how they create that particular object. These
`choices, as recorded in the underlying digital file structure, represent a separate and
`independent level of expressive content that is entitled to copyright protection.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`11
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 13 of 29
`
`
`
`c.
`Originality and Creativity of Object Compilation
`Finally, Planner 5D’s choices of objects to include in its collection is
`41.
`separately protectable as a copyrightable compilation. Each of the thousands of
`objects in Planner 5D’s collection was carefully selected for inclusion by Planner 5D.
`Planner 5D had its own vision of the kinds and varieties of objects it wanted. Its
`choices in assembling this collection, from among the virtually infinite number of
`possible ones, reflected both originality and creativity.
`
`d.
`
`Secrecy and Protection of Underlying Digital
`Object Files
`Each of Planner 5D’s object files was located at a unique, and secret,
`42.
`Internet address on Planner 5D’s servers. These addresses are never shown to
`Planner 5D’s users. Rather, users see only pictures of home-design objects that can be
`selected for inclusion in a floor plan. When a user clicks on and drags a picture of a
`desired object, Planner 5D’s proprietary software will, operating in the background
`and invisibly to the user, fetch the corresponding data file from a secret Internet
`address. Identifying the secret address of the object, or accessing the underlying data
`file stored there, is impossible without circumventing Planner 5D’s software and
`penetrating non-public addresses on its servers. Circumvention of these protections
`requires, first, using software developer tools to monitor and intercept
`communications activity between Planner 5D’s software and its European servers.
`Combining key information gleaned from these intercepted communications with
`specially-designed data-harvesting software, a hacker could determine the secret
`Internet address of each object file, and the full catalog of object files could be
`crawled and scraped.
`43. Without tools and techniques of this kind, users of Planner 5D’s
`website could not and cannot access the location or the content of even one of
`Planner 5D’s over-2,600 object files.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`12
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 14 of 29
`
`
`
`Each of Planner 5D’s over-2,600 object files is individually a trade secret
`44.
`belonging to Planner 5D. Separately, the compilation of over-2,600 object data files
`itself constitutes a trade secret belonging to Planner 5D.
`2.
`Planner 5D’s Scene Files
`In addition to its collection of over 2,600 object files, Planner 5D also
`45.
`owns a much larger set of data files that contain floor plans, or “scenes.” These scene
`files store configurations, or arrangements, of individual objects, that have been
`superimposed on a floor plan. Planner 5D’s website includes a large public gallery of
`pre-existing scenes (floorplans) that have been carefully selected to showcase the
`program’s capabilities, and to provide templates for users who don’t want to start
`their floor plans from scratch. As with Planner 5D’s object files, each scene file in this
`gallery was individually created by a human designer.
`a.
`Originality and Creativity of Scene Compilation
`46. When Princeton scraped Planner 5D’s files, the company’s publicly-
`available gallery of scenes numbered over 45,000 scenes. Each of these scenes was
`hand chosen by Planner 5D personnel for inclusion in the public gallery from a vastly
`larger collection of scenes. Their selection was based on criteria that included artistic
`value, variety, novelty, and suitability for a family-friendly service (i.e., absence of
`offensive or indecent content). Princeton scraped each and every one of these over-
`45,000 scene files then located in Planner 5D’s public scene gallery. It thus copied the
`entire copyrighted compilation.
`Planner 5D’s scene files, like its object files, are “realistic.” This means
`47.
`they are floor plans that resemble actual, plausible, interior and exterior designs that
`someone might design. As with the object files, “realistic” in this context does not
`mean that the floor plans were copied from actual floor plans somewhere. To the
`contrary, they are floor plans assembled from the imaginations of individual
`designers and reflect their creative choices.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`13
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 15 of 29
`
`
`
`b.
`
`Secrecy and Protection of Underlying Digital
`Scene Files
`
`48. As with the data files defining objects, those defining scenes are each
`kept at a unique, and secret, Internet address on Planner 5D’s servers. Neither these
`datafiles nor their secret Internet addresses are ever shown to Planner 5D’s users.
`Rather, users see only pictures of pre-existing scenes, or floor plans, that they can
`build on to personalize their interior design. When a user clicks on a desired picture
`of a scene, Planner 5D’s proprietary software will, operating in the background and
`invisibly to the user, fetch the data file for that scene from the secret Internet address
`at which it is stored. The software then renders the data file into a scene that is visible
`on the user’s screen. Identifying the secret address of the scene, or accessing the
`underlying data file stored there, is impossible without circumventing Planner 5D’s
`software and penetrating non-public addresses on its servers. Circumvention of these
`protections requires, first, using software developer tools to monitor and intercept
`communications activity between Planner 5D’s software and its European servers.
`Combining key information gleaned from these intercepted communications with
`specially-designed data-harvesting software, a hacker could determine the secret
`Internet address of each scene file, and the full catalog of scene files could be crawled
`and scraped.
`49. Without such tools and techniques, users of Planner 5D’s website could
`not and cannot access the location or the content of even one of Planner 5D’s over-
`45,000 scene files.
`The data file underlying each individual scene, like those underlying
`50.
`each object, is a trade secret belonging to Planner 5D. Separately, the compilation of
`over 45,000 scene data files is a trade secret belonging to Planner 5D. The company
`spent years and significant sums of money creating and compiling these trade
`secrets.
`
`Planner 5D’s Complaint
`
`14
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-02198 Document 1 Filed 03/31/20 Page 16 of 29
`
`
`
`B.
`Planner 5D’s Terms of Service
`51. When Princeton crawled and scraped Planner 5D’s data files, its Terms
`of Service strictly limited users’ use of the website and its materials, including a
`blanket

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket