throbber
Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 1 of 36
`
`
`
`James M. Wagstaffe (95535)
`Frank Busch (258288)
`WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT,
`BUSCH & RADWICK LLP
`100 Pine Street, Suite 725
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: (415) 357-8900
`Fax: (415) 357-8910
`wagstaffe@wvbrlaw.com
`busch@wvbrlaw.com
`
`
`Jonathan Gardner (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`Carol C. Villegas (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`Michael P. Canty (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`Melissa H. Nafash (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`Ross M. Kamhi (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
`140 Broadway
`New York, NY 10005
`Tel: (212) 907-0700
`Fax: (212) 818-0477
`jgardner@labaton.com
`cvillegas@labaton.com
`mcanty@labaton.com
`mnafash@labaton.com
`rkamhi@labaton.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
`
`
`
`
`Christian Levis (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`Amanda Fiorilla (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`LOWEY DANNENBERG, P.C.
`44 South Broadway, Suite 1100
`White Plains, NY 10601
`Telephone: (914) 997-0500
`Facsimile: (914) 997-0035
`clevis@lowey.com
`afiorilla@lowey.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: ______________
`ERICA FRASCO, individually and on behalf of
`
`
`all others similarly situated,
`
`
`
` CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`v.
`
`
`Flo Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 2 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Erica Frasco (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
`asserts the following against Defendant Flo Health, Inc. (“Flo Health”), based upon personal
`knowledge, where applicable, information and belief, and the investigation of counsel.
`SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS
`Flo Health owns and develops the Flo Period & Ovulation Tracker (“Flo App” or
`1.
`“App”), one of the most popular health and fitness mobile applications.
`The Flo App purports to use artificial intelligence to provide advice and assistance
`2.
`related to women’s health, such as by serving as an ovulation calendar, period tracker, pregnancy
`guide, and wellness and lifestyle tracker.
`Flo Health touts that its app is the “#1 mobile product for women’s health.” The
`3.
`Flo App has been installed more than 165 million times and has over 38 million monthly active
`users. The App has also been rated the #1 period tracker in the United States based on active
`audience and as the #1 most downloaded health app in the Apple App Store.1
`In order to use the Flo App, millions of users—including Plaintiff—provide Flo
`4.
`Health with personally identifying information (e.g., their names, email addresses, dates of birth,
`and places of residence), along with intimate details about their sexual health, menstruation cycles,
`gynecological health, and physical well-being through a series of “survey questions.” These
`questions cover extremely personal topics and include, for example: (1) “do you experience any
`pain during sex?” (2) “how often do you have sex?” (3) “how often do you masturbate?” (4) “have
`you noticed a decrease in sexual desire?” (5) “are you sexually active during your period?” and (6)
`“What type of relationship do you have at present?”
`Users also provided intimate, personal health details in response to probing survey
`5.
`questions about health and wellness, such as: (1) “do you smoke” (2) “how often do you
`experience stress? (3) “do you want to change your weight?” (4) “do you follow a particular diet?”
`(5) “how often do you exercise?” (6) “do you get yeast infections?” (6) “do you have any chronic
`
`1 The Flo App was also feature as the “App of the Day” in the Apple App Store in over 30 countries.
`
`2
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 3 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`diseases?” and (7) “do you have any reproductive system diseases?”
`Within the first few minutes of using the Flo App, users answer over thirty survey
`6.
`questions like these. As users continue to use the app, they are encouraged by Flo Health to
`provide more and more intimate health data, including daily information about whether they have
`their period, their weight, how long they slept, whether they had sex (as well as their sex drive, if
`sex was unprotected, or if they masturbated), their mood (ranging from “calm” to “very self-
`critical,”) and if they have any health symptoms (like headaches, breast tenderness, acne, or
`fatigue).
`By providing this information, Flo Health claims to predict ovulation, aid in
`7.
`pregnancy and childbirth, and provide lifestyle and wellness suggestions, allowing users to “take
`full control of [their] health.”
`Plaintiff and Class members provided this information to Flo Health based on the
`8.
`company’s repeated assurances that their intimate health data would remain protected and
`confidential and would not be disclosed to third parties.
`Flo Health’s privacy policies and public assurances have claimed—time and time
`9.
`again—that Flo Health would not share users’ intimate health data with anyone. Flo Health’s
`website touts that “[p]rivacy in the digital age is of utmost importance. Flo provides a secure
`platform for millions of women globally.”2
`Similarly, Flo Health’s privacy policy states, in all capital letters, that it “WILL
`10.
`NOT TRANSMIT ANY OF YOUR PERSONAL DATA TO THIRD PARTIES, EXCEPT IF IT
`IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE TO YOU (E.G. TECHNICAL SERVICE
`PROVIDERS), UNLESS WE HAVE ASKED FOR YOUR EXPLICIT CONSENT.” Flo Health
`assured users that these third parties would not receive “survey results,” “information regarding
`your marked cycles, pregnancy, symptoms, notes” or information about “which articles [users]
`view” i.e., users’ intimate health data. Flo Health further assured users that these third parties
`“will never use such information for any other purpose except to provide services in connection
`
`2 About Us, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/our-mission (last visited Jan. 27, 2021).
`
`3
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 4 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`with the App.”3
`These assurances were patently false. In February 2019, a report published by the
`11.
`Wall Street Journal revealed that, despite Flo Health’s promises that it would not share intimate
`health data, Flo Health had spent years disclosing the intimate health data that users entered into
`the Flo App to dozens of third parties, including major advertising companies such as Facebook,
`Inc. (“Facebook”) and Google, LLC (“Google”), who were free to use this data for their own
`purposes.
`In response to this revelation, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) launched its
`12.
`own investigation into Flo Health’s data privacy and disclosure practices and ultimately filed a
`complaint, charging Flo Health with making a variety of fraudulent misrepresentations to Flo App
`users in violation of their privacy rights.
`On January 13, 2021, Flo Health entered into a settlement with the FTC that
`13.
`prohibited Flo Health from further misrepresenting the purposes for which or entities to whom it
`discloses users’ intimate health data, as well as obtain an independent review of its privacy policy,
`obtain user consent before sharing their data, and notify third parties that previously received
`users’ intimate health data to destroy that information.4
`If Plaintiff and Class members had known that Flo Health would share their
`14.
`intimate health data, they would not have used the Flo App.
`Flo Health’s data disclosure practices constitute an extreme invasion of Plaintiff
`15.
`and Class members’ right to privacy and violates federal and state common law.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`16.
`U.S.C § 1332(d), because the amount in controversy for the Class exceeds $5,000,000 exclusive of
`
`
`3 Privacy Policy, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/privacy-policy-archived/may-25-2018 (effective
`May 25, 2018).
`4 Developer of Popular Women’s Fertility-Tracking App Settles FTC Allegations that it Mislead Consumers
`About the Disclosure of their Health Data, FTC, (Jan. 13, 2021), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-
`releases/2021/01/developer-popular-womens-fertility-tracking-app-settles-ftc.
`
`4
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 5 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`interest and costs, there are more than 100 putative class members defined below, and minimal
`diversity exists because a significant portion of putative class members are citizens of a state
`different from the citizenship of Defendants.
`This Court also has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`17.
`U.S.C. § 1331 since this suit is brought under the laws of the United States, i.e., the Stored
`Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2702, et seq., and supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28
`U.S.C. § 1367 over the remaining state common law and statutory claims as these state law claims
`are part of the same case or controversy as the federal statutory claim over which the Court has
`original jurisdiction.
`This Court has specific personal jurisdiction over Flo Health because it consented
`18.
`to jurisdiction in this District in its Terms of Use, which states:
`
`Any dispute arising from this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State
`of California without regard to its conflict of law provisions. SOLE AND
`EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION FOR ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING
`ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN
`AN APPROPRIATE STATE OR FEDERAL COURT LOCATED IN SAN
`FRANCISCO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA . . . .5
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(b), (c), and (d) because
`19.
`Flo Health transacts business in this District and a substantial portion of the events giving rise to
`the claims occurred in this District.
`Intra-district Assignment: A substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise
`20.
`to the violations of law alleged herein occurred in the County of San Francisco, and as such, this
`action may properly be assigned to the San Francisco or Oakland divisions of this Court pursuant
`to Civil Local Rule 3-2(c).
`
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`21.
`
`Plaintiff
`Plaintiff Erica Frasco (“Plaintiff”) is a natural person and citizen of the State of
`
`
`5 Terms of Use, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/terms-of-service (effective Feb. 5, 2020).
`5
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 6 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`New Jersey and a resident of Passaic County.
`Plaintiff Frasco downloaded the Flo App from the Apple app store in 2017 and has
`22.
`been an active user ever since.
`Plaintiff Frasco has provided Flo Health with her intimate health data, including
`23.
`questions about her health and wellness, menstruation cycle, and sexual activity in response to Flo
`Health’s survey questions.
`Plaintiff Frasco has continued to provide Flo Health with her intimate health data
`24.
`while using the Flo App, including personal details about her menstruation cycle and symptoms.
`Plaintiff Frasco believed that her intimate health data would stay private and that
`25.
`Flo Health would not disclose this information to third parties, like Facebook or Google. Plaintiff
`Frasco did not consent or provide permission for Flo Health to do so.
`In direct contravention to its privacy policy and public assurances, Flo Health
`26.
`disclosed Ms. Frasco’s intimate health data without her knowledge or consent to third parties.
`Plaintiff Frasco would not have used the Flo App if she had known that they would
`27.
`share her intimate health data with third parties.
`B.
`Defendant
`28.
`Defendant Flo Health, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with principal executive
`offices located at 1013 Centre Road, Suite 403-B, Wilmington, Delaware 19805.
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`Founding of Flo Health, Inc.
`Flo Health began as a startup in 2015 owned by a group of mobile app developers
`29.
`based in Minsk, Belarus. That same year, the company released the Flo App, the first mobile
`application to make use of artificial intelligence to accurately predict reproductive cycles.
`30. When first launched, the Flo App operated essentially as a calendar that allowed
`users to track their period and ovulation. Over time, the App’s developers expanded the Flo App’s
`functionality to assist with all phases of the reproductive cycle, including the start of menstruation,
`cycle tracking, preparation for conception, pregnancy, early motherhood, and menopause. The Flo
`
`I.
`
`6
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 7 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`App also expanded to provide users overall health and wellness suggestions.
`As Flo App’s features expanded, the App requested a wider and wider range of
`31.
`personal information from its users, including intimate personal details like a user’s history of
`contraceptive methods, vaginal discharge, diseases, water intake, weight, pains and other physical
`or mental symptoms, mood swings, and sexual activity (including the users’ sexual desire levels,
`whether they experience pain during sex, or did not use protection). Users can also write “personal
`notes” to log additional information in the App.
`In 2017, Flo Health further expanded Flo App’s functionality to include social
`32.
`media features alongside its services as a health product. The App’s developers included a new
`community section on the App, allowing users to anonymously ask and answer questions related
`to women’s health.
`That same year, Flo Health gained international attention by working with the
`33.
`United Nations Population Fund as part of its “Let’s Talk About it. Period.” campaign, which
`aimed to increase public awareness of social and health issues related to menstruation.
`Throughout this period, Flo App steadily grew more popular. By December 2020,
`34.
`150 million users had downloaded the App. The App has been rated #1 period tracker in the
`United States based on active audience and as the #1 most downloaded health app in the Apple
`App Store.
`Through its success, Flo Health has gathered and collected intimate health details
`35.
`from over 100 million users, including Plaintiff. Users provided this information based on Flo
`Health’s repeated assurances that this information would remain private and that they would not
`share users’ intimate health data.
`Flo Health promised that it would, under no circumstances, share users’ intimate
`36.
`health data without user consent. While Flo Health disclosed it might share “certain” information
`with third-parties who it uses to “supply software applications, web hosting an other technologies
`for the App,” Flo Health promised this would not include “information regarding your marked
`cycles, pregnancy, symptoms, notes and other information entered by [users]” or “survey results”
`
`7
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 8 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`and “articles [users] view.”
`However, in February 2019, the Wall Street Journal released a bombshell report
`37.
`revealing for the first time that Flo Health shares its users’ intimate health data with third-parties,
`like Facebook and Google, including when a user was on their period or intended to get pregnant.6
`Further investigations have revealed that Facebook was not the only third-party to
`38.
`which Flo Health disclosed consumers’ intimate health data. Between at least 2016 and 2019, Flo
`Health contracted with dozens of third-party firms to provide, among other things, various
`marketing and analytics services in connection with the Flo App. These firms included Facebook,
`Google, and mobile analytics firms AppsFlyer Ltd. (“AppsFlyer”) and Flurry, Inc. (“Flurry”).
`Despite Flo Health’s representations that third parties would not receive users’
`39.
`survey results and “information regarding your marked cycles, pregnancy, symptoms, notes and
`other information entered by [users],” Flo Health disclosed users’ intimate health data to third
`parties, including some of the largest advertising companies in the country.
`Further, despite Flo Health’s promise that third parties would only receive data “as
`40.
`necessary to perform their work” and “will never use such information for any other purpose
`except to provide services in connection with the App,” Flo Health did not contractually limit how
`these third parties could use this data.
`In fact, the terms of service governing Flo Health’s agreement with these third
`41.
`parties allowed them to use the data for their own purposes, completely unrelated to services
`provided in connection with the App.
`Flo Health entered into these contracts to disclose users’ sensitive health data
`42.
`without Plaintiff’s and Class members’ knowledge or consent, in violation of their privacy rights
`and federal law.
`
`
`
`6 Sam Schechner and Mark Secada, You Give Apps Sensitive Personal Information. Then They Tell
`Facebook, WALL STREET JOURNAL, (Feb. 22, 2019 11:07 AM), https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-give-
`apps-sensitive-personal-information-then-they-tell-facebook-11550851636.
`
`8
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 9 of 36
`
`
`
`II.
`
`Flo Health Designed its App to Facilitate the Collection of Users’ Private Data
`Flo Health designed the Flo App to request users to input intimate health and
`43.
`lifestyle-related information under the guise that they would receive better services. When a user
`creates a new account on the Flo App, the app will ask the user several question related to the
`timing of their menstrual cycle, the discomfort of their menstrual cycle, mood swings, preferred
`birth control methods, reproductive health disorders, and their level of satisfaction with their sex
`life and romantic relationships. Some of these questions are reflected in the example screenshots
`below:
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 10 of 36
`
`
`
`
`
`The Flo App asks users to input over 30 responses to intimate, personal questions
`44.
`like these all while setting up the App for the first time, including the following:
`How long have you been trying to conceive?
`a.
`b.
`Do you have any reproductive diseases?
`c.
`What medication are you currently taking? How often?
`d.
`How often do you have sex?
`e.
`Do you experience any pain during sex?
`f.
`How often do you masturbate?
`g.
`Is it easy for you to orgasm?
`
`10
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 11 of 36
`
`
`
`The Flo App also regularly encourages users to update the App with vast quantities
`45.
`of additional intimate health-related information as they continue to use the App. For example, the
`interface of the Flo App suggests that users “[l]og your menstruation days in a handy period
`calendar, ovulation and fertility tracker, schedule menstrual cycle reminders, record moods and
`PMS symptoms, use a due date calculator, follow a pregnancy calendar . . . .” As the screenshots
`below demonstrate, the information collected is extremely sensitive and includes information
`about a user’s sexual activity, sex drive, mood, premenstrual systems, and vaginal discharge,
`among other things:
`
`
`
`
`Flo Health entices users to input this information to “stay on top of [their] health,”
`46.
`explaining that “[l]ogging symptoms helps Flo detect possible imbalances in your body and
`
`11
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 12 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`advi[s]e you to see a doctor.”
`By encouraging millions of users to provide extensive information about their
`47.
`emotional and physical health, as well as their personal lifestyles and sexual activity, to the Flo
`App, Flo Health has collected massive volumes of deeply intimate health data about millions of
`consumers, including Plaintiff.
`Despite Flo Health’s repeated representations from 2017 to 2019 that it would
`48.
`protect users’ intimate private information, Flo Health contracted with numerous third parties
`granting them full access to any information obtained from Flo App users, which they could use
`for their own purposes, including advertising and product improvement unrelated to the Flo App.
`Specifically, Flo Health provided third parties with “Standard App Events” and
`49.
`“Custom App Events” created each time users interact with the Flo App. “Standard App Events”
`are records of routine app functions, such as launching or closing the app, while “Custom Apps
`Events,” are records of user-app interactions unique to the app itself. For example, when a user
`enters menstruation dates, their weight, sleep cycle, mood, physical or mental symptoms, or any
`other information in the Flo App, the Flo App registers the user’s interaction with that feature as a
`Custom App Event. Through these Custom App Events, every single interaction within the Flo
`App is recorded and stored.
`Flo Health receives and stores a record of all the Custom App Events that occur in
`50.
`the Flo App across its users’ devices. Flo Health claims to make use of these records to improve
`the Flo App’s functionality and identify which features are likely to interest new users.
`Flo Health purposefully designed the Custom App Events of the Flo App to have a
`51.
`descriptive title. For example, when a user enters the week of their pregnancy into the app’s
`calendar, the Flo App records the Custom App Event “R_PREGNANCY_WEEK_CHOSEN.”
`When a user selects a feature to receive menstruation reminders in the “wanting to get pregnant
`branch”
`of
`the
`app,
`the
`Flo App
`records
`the Custom App
`Event
`“P_ACCEPT_PUSHES_PERIOD.”
`As early as 2016, Flo Health integrated software development tools, known as
`52.
`
`12
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 13 of 36
`
`
`
`“software development kits” (“SDKs”) into the Flo App. These SDKs were provided by third-
`party marketing and analytics firms, such as Facebook, Google, Flurry and AppsFlyer, and
`allowed these firms to review information that users put into the Flo App through Custom App
`Events.
`As a consequence of the way that Flo Health titles the Custom App Events of the
`53.
`Flo App, the Custom App Events convey intimate details about a users’ health, including their
`menstruations, fertility, or pregnancies. Thus, a Flo Health developer or third party reviewing a
`record of a user’s Custom App Events learns intimate health information about that user, including
`their reproductive cycle and family planning decisions.
`By including intimate health information in the title of the Custom App Events, Flo
`54.
`Health disclosed user’s intimate health information to third parties. This directly contradicts Flo
`Health’s statements in its privacy policies that it would not disclose this information.
`Despite assurances made to consumers, the company spent years disclosing the
`55.
`intimate health information of millions of users in the form of Custom App Events. For example,
`Flo Health disclosed Custom App Event information to:
`Facebook from at least June 2016 to February 2019;
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Google from at least September 2018 to February 2019.
`e.
`Flo Health’s Failure to Obtain User Consent
`Between 2017 and 2019, Flo Health made repeated representations to Flo App
`56.
`users, promising that it would keep intimate health data they entered into the App private, and that
`Flo Health would only use Flo App users’ data in order to provide and improve Flo App’s
`services.
`57.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`III.
`
`Flurry from at least June 2016 to February 2019;
`
`Google’s subsidiary Fabric from at least November 2016 to February 2019;
`
`AppsFlyer from at least May 2018 to February 2019; and
`
`Based on Flo Health’s representations and the guarantees made in the company’s
`
`13
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 14 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Privacy Policy, millions of users entrusted Flo Health with intimate information regarding their
`physical and mental health, romantic relationships, sex life, and lifestyle preferences.
`Flo Health’s privacy policy assures customers that “[w]hen you use Flo, you are
`58.
`trusting us with intimate personal information. We are committed to keeping that trust, which is
`why our policy as a company is to take every step to ensure that individual user’s data and privacy
`rights are protected . . . .”7
`59. More specifically, the Flo Health privacy policy, effective between August 28,
`2017 and February 19, 2019, stated that Flo Health “may share certain” personal data with third
`parties, but only “information that is reasonably necessary to perform their work” which involves
`“supply[ing] software applications, web hosting, and other technologies for the App.”8
`The same Flo Health privacy policy stated that any information shared with third
`60.
`parties “exclud[ed] information regarding your marked cycles, pregnancy, symptoms, notes
`and other information that is entered by you and that you do not elect to share.” (emphasis
`added).9
`The same Flo Health privacy policy stated that third parties could not use Flo App
`61.
`users’ personal information “for any other purpose except to provide services in connection with
`the App.”10
`Furthermore, later versions of the Flo Health privacy policy, effective between May
`62.
`25, 2018 and February 19, 2019, specifically stated that Flo Health would not disclose “any data
`related to health” to either of the mobile analytics firms AppsFlyer or Flurry:11
`
`a.
`
`“AppsFlyer is a mobile marketing platform. We may share certain non-
`identifiable information about you and some Personal Data (but never any
`
`7 Privacy Policy, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/privacy-policy (effective Oct. 24, 2020).
`8 Privacy Policy, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/privacy-policy-archived/aug-28-2017 (effective Aug.
`28, 2017).
`9 Id.
`10 Id.
`11 Privacy Policy, FLO HEALTH, INC., https://flo.health/privacy-policy-archived/may-25-2018 (effective
`May 25, 2018).
`
`14
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 15 of 36
`
`
`
`data related to health) in order to carry out marketing activities and
`provide you better and more targeted, tailor-made service.” (emphasis
`added)
`
`
`b.
`
`“We may share certain non-identifiable information about you and some
`Personal Data (but never any data related to health) with Flurry.”
`Consistent with the assurances made in the Flo Health privacy policy, new users of
`63.
`the Flo App receive a notification, informing them that personal data disclosed to AppsFlyer is
`“strictly limited” to technical identifiers, age groups, subscription status, and data indicating that
`the App has been opened by the user.
`
`
`
`64.
`
`Flo Health’s privacy policy made similar assurances regarding Facebook, Google,
`
`15
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 16 of 36
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`and Google’s subsidiary Fabric. The privacy policy stated that these third parties would only
`receive “non-personally identifiable information,” “[p]ersonal Data like device identifiers,” or
`“device identifiers.” The Privacy Policy did not indicate that these third parties would receive
`access to any record of the Custom App Events (containing intimate health data) registered by the
`Flo App.12
`65.
`
`Specifically, the Flo Privacy Policy stated as follows:
`
`a.
`
`
`b.
`
`“We use Facebook Analytics and Google Analytics tools to track installs of
`our App. Normally, Facebook and Google collect only non-personally
`identifiable information, though some Personal Data like device
`identifiers may be transferred to Facebook ....” (emphasis added).
`
`“Fabric may use device identifiers that are stored on your mobile device
`and allow us to analyze your use of the App in order to improve our app
`feature [sic].” (emphasis added).
`
`By disclosing Custom App Events that users generated through interacting with the
`66.
`Flo App, Flo Health consistently violated these terms of its Privacy Policy. As explained above,
`Custom App Events include explicit, intimate health data related to a user’s reproductive cycles,
`fertility, and other health-related information. When Flo Health shared access to Custom App
`Events with third parties, Flo Health disclosed intimate “data related to health.”
`Flo Health further violated the guarantees made in its Privacy Policy by agreeing to
`67.
`contractual terms that directly contradicted its Privacy Policy. When entering into contracts with
`numerous third parties, Flo Health agreed to boilerplate terms of service which permitted the third
`party to use any information obtained from Flo App users for the third party’s own purposes,
`including purposes explicitly excluded by the Flo Privacy Policy, such as advertising and
`marketing:
`
`a.
`
`Facebook’s Business Tools Terms stated: “We use [aggregated] Event Data
`to personalize
`the
`features
`and
`content
`(including
`ads
`and
`recommendations) we show people on and off our Facebook Company
`Products .... We may also use Event Data ... for research and development
`purposes, and to ... improve the Facebook Company Products.” That “Event
`
`
`12 Id.
`
`16
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`CASE NO. ____________
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00757-SK Document 1 Filed 01/29/21 Page 17 of 36
`
`
`
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`
`d.
`
`Data” includes Custom App Events.
`
`Google Analytics’s Terms of Service stated: “Google and its wholly owned
`subsidiaries may retain and use ... information collected in [Flo Health’s]
`use of the service.”
`
`AppsFlyer’s Terms of Use stated: “You hereby allow AppsFlyer to collect,
`store, use and process Customer Data,” where “Customer Data” was
`defined to include “data concerning the characteristics and activities” of app
`users.
`
`The Fabric Software and Services Agreement stated: “[Flo Health]
`acknowledges and agrees that Google [Fabric] may use Usage Data for its
`own business purposes,” where “Usage Data” was defined to mean “all
`in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket