throbber
Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 25 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`ANDREW J. PINCUS (pro hac vice)
`apincus@mayerbrown.com
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`
`DOUGLAS A. SMITH (SBN 290598)
`dougsmith@mayerbrown.com
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90071-1503
`Telephone: (213) 229-9500
`Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
`
`Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Internet Association
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as
`Attorney General of Texas,
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`INTERNET ASSOCIATION’S MOTION
`FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS
`CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
`PLAINTIFF TWITTER’S MOTION
`FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`
`Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTERNET ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF TWITTER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`CASE NO. 3:21-CV-01644-MMC
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 25 Filed 03/24/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
`Internet Association (“IA”) moves for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of
`Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 5, 18). Plaintiff consents to
`the filing of this brief; Defendant does not oppose the motion for leave to file the brief.
`IA is a membership organization representing the Nation’s leading online service and
`technology providers, whose products and services empower citizens and businesses to
`communicate, form relationships, and engage in commerce in countless new and important ways.
`Many of IA’s members provide forums and tools for consumers to engage in a wide variety of
`activities that the First Amendment protects: they facilitate speech and public discourse; they enable
`persons to engage in virtual assembly by forming communities and communicating in groups; they
`enable citizens to air their grievances; and they allow businesses and patrons to discover each other
`and to transact business with each other.
`To ensure a quality user experience, internet companies exercise editorial discretion in the
`form of content moderation. That includes setting and enforcing rules against inappropriate,
`objectionable, and inaccurate material on their platforms, and—sometimes—temporarily or
`permanently suspending users who persist in violating the platforms’ community standards. The
`rules adopted by internet companies vary from company to company and represent a judgment
`about what types of content are appropriate in light of the nature of the specific service, its target
`audience, and concerns about the impact of online content on offline conduct. Amicus and its
`members therefore have a substantial interest in the circumstances in which the First Amendment
`permits their decisions regarding content on their platforms or suspending users from their websites
`to be subjected to the risks, burdens, and uncertainties of government investigations, and possibly
`government penalties.
`Accordingly, Amicus seeks to file the attached brief to provide the Court with general
`information regarding the content moderation process and explain why those decisions are
`protected by the First Amendment.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`INTERNET ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF TWITTER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`CASE NO. 3:21-CV-01644-MMC
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 25 Filed 03/24/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`By: /s/ Douglas A. Smith
`Douglas A. Smith
`
`DOUGLAS A. SMITH (SBN 290598)
`dougsmith@mayerbrown.com
`350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90071-1503
`Telephone: (213) 229-9500
`Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
`
`ANDREW J. PINCUS (pro hac vice)
`apincus@mayerbrown.com
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`
`Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Internet
`Association
`
`
`Dated: March 24, 2021
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`INTERNET ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF TWITTER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`CASE NO. 3:21-CV-01644-MMC
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket