`
`MARK D. FLANAGAN
`CA Bar No. 130303
`mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real #400
`Palo Alto, California 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6047
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
`
`PETER G. NEIMAN (pro hac vice)
`peter.neiman@wilmerhale.com
`ALEX W. MILLER (pro hac vice)
`alex.miller@wilmerhale.com
`RISHITA APSANI (pro hac vice)
`rishita.apsani@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`250 Greenwich St., 45th Floor
`New York, New York 10007
`Telephone: (212) 230-8800
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
`
`
`PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice)
`patrick.carome@wilmerhale.com
`ARI HOLTZBLATT (pro hac vice)
`ari.holtzblatt@wilmerhale.com
`ANURADHA SIVARAM (pro hac vice)
`anuradha.sivaram@wilmerhale.com
`SUSAN PELLETIER (pro hac vice)
`susan.pelletier@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
` Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`KEN PAXTON,
`in his official capacity as Attorney
`General of Texas,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 66 Filed 05/14/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. appeals to the United States Court
`of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Action
`(Dkt. 64) and Judgment (Dkt. 65), both of which were entered in this case on May 11, 2021, and
`which effectively denied Twitter’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
`A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and a true and correct
`copy of the Judgment is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pursuant to Rule 3-2(b) of the Ninth Circuit
`Rules of Appellate Procedure, attached hereto as Exhibit C is Plaintiff-Appellant Twitter’s
`Representation Statement.
`
`Dated: May 14, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Patrick J. Carome .
`Patrick J. Carome
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff,
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`1
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 66 Filed 05/14/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been
`
`served on May 14, 2021 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`service via the Court’s ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5-1.
`
`
`/s/ Patrick J. Carome
`Patrick J. Carome
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`2
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`