`
`MARK D. FLANAGAN
`CA Bar No. 130303
`mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real #400
`Palo Alto, California 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6047
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
`
`PETER G. NEIMAN (pro hac vice)
`peter.neiman@wilmerhale.com
`ALEX W. MILLER (pro hac vice)
`alex.miller@wilmerhale.com
`RISHITA APSANI (pro hac vice)
`rishita.apsani@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`250 Greenwich St., 45th Floor
`New York, New York 10007
`Telephone: (212) 230-8800
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
`
`
`PATRICK J. CAROME (pro hac vice)
`patrick.carome@wilmerhale.com
`ARI HOLTZBLATT (pro hac vice)
`ari.holtzblatt@wilmerhale.com
`ANURADHA SIVARAM (pro hac vice)
`anuradha.sivaram@wilmerhale.com
`SUSAN PELLETIER (pro hac vice)
`susan.pelletier@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
` Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`TWITTER, INC.’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`KEN PAXTON,
`in his official capacity as Attorney
`General of Texas,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 66 Filed 05/14/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. appeals to the United States Court
`of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Action
`(Dkt. 64) and Judgment (Dkt. 65), both of which were entered in this case on May 11, 2021, and
`which effectively denied Twitter’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
`A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and a true and correct
`copy of the Judgment is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pursuant to Rule 3-2(b) of the Ninth Circuit
`Rules of Appellate Procedure, attached hereto as Exhibit C is Plaintiff-Appellant Twitter’s
`Representation Statement.
`
`Dated: May 14, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Patrick J. Carome .
`Patrick J. Carome
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff,
`TWITTER, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`1
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-01644-MMC Document 66 Filed 05/14/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been
`
`served on May 14, 2021 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`service via the Court’s ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5-1.
`
`
`/s/ Patrick J. Carome
`Patrick J. Carome
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-01644-MMC
`
`2
`
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
