throbber
Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 11
`
`
`
`Jonah A. Grossbardt (State Bar No. 283584)
`Matthew L. Rollin (State Bar. No. 332631)
`SRIPLAW
`8730 Wilshire Boulevard
`Suite 350
`Beverly Hills, CA 90211
`323.364.6565 – Telephone
`561.404.4353 – Facsimile
`jonah.grossbardt@sriplaw.com
`matthew.rollin@sriplaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`ALEXANDER BAYONNE STROSS
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`ALEXANDER BAYONNE STROSS,
`
`
`
`
`
`AIRBNB, INC. AND DAN KLORES
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case Number:
`
`
`Copyright Infringement
`
`Demand for Jury Trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`(INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMANDED)
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross by and through his undersigned counsel,
`
`hereby brings this Complaint against Defendants Airbnb, Inc. and Dan Klores
`
`Communications, LLC for damages and injunctive relief, and in support thereof states as
`
`follows:
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 1 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`SUMMARY OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne Stross (“Stross”) brings this action for
`
`violations of exclusive rights under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 106, to copy and
`
`distribute Stross’s original copyrighted works of authorship.
`
`2.
`
`Stross is the owner and principal photographer of Stross Stock. After
`
`traveling the world with his camera, creating thousands of high-quality photographs, the
`
`natural next step was to offer the public means to license his Work. Each photo on Stross
`
`Stock is shot with top-quality equipment, thoughtfully produced, hand selected, and
`
`tastefully edited before being made available to the public. Stross is a native of Austin,
`
`10
`
`Texas, and watched the small city grow and develop into an urban hot spot. This served
`
`11
`
`as his inspiration to become a photographer, centering his expertise on complicated
`
`12
`
`architectural photography and landscape photography. In 2016, Stross was nominated and
`
`13
`
`accepted as a professional member of the American Society of Media Photographers,
`
`14
`
`which is a high honor. Stross received a B.S. in Computer Science at the University of
`
`15
`
`Texas at Austin and has since combined his love for the photographic arts and computer
`
`
`
`16
`
`science by building an online system to help protect artists' works on the internet..
`
`17
`
`3.
`
`Defendant Airbnb, Inc. (“Airbnb”) is one of the world’s largest
`
`18
`
`marketplaces for unique, authentic places to stay and things to do, offering over 7 million
`
`19
`
`accommodations and tens of thousands of handcrafted activities, all powered by local
`
`20
`
`hosts. An economic empowerment engine, Airbnb has helped millions of hospitality
`
`21
`
`entrepreneurs monetize their spaces and their passions while keeping the financial
`
`22
`
`benefits of tourism in their own communities. With more than three quarters of a billion
`
`23
`
`guest arrivals to date, and accessible in 62 languages across 220+ countries and regions,
`
`24
`
`Airbnb promotes people-to-people connection, community and trust around the world. At
`
`25
`
`all times relevant to herein, Airbnb is the owner of the website located at the URL
`
`26
`
`“https://www.airbnb.com/” (the website).
`
`27
`
`4.
`
`Dan Klores Communications, LLC (“DKC”) is a public relations firm that
`
`28
`
`knows how to drive brand stories and generate news. DKC is in the business of
`
`
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 2 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 3 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`enhancing reputation, building credibility, and increasing awareness. They are
`
`persuaders, influencers, opinion makers, writers, content creators, and experience
`
`producers that are guided by data and instinct.
`
`5.
`
`Stross alleges that Airbnb copied Stross's copyrighted works from the
`
`internet in order to advertise, market and promote its business activities. Airbnb
`
`committed the violations alleged in connection with Airbnb's business for purposes of
`
`advertising and promoting sales to the public in the course and scope of Airbnb's
`
`business.
`
`6.
`
`Stross alleges that DKC copied Stross's copyrighted works from the
`
`10
`
`internet in order to advertise, market and promote its business activities. DKC committed
`
`11
`
`the violations alleged in connection with DKC's business for purposes of advertising and
`
`12
`
`promoting sales to the public in the course and scope of DKC's business.
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`This is an action arising under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28
`
`16
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a).
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`Airbnb is subject to personal jurisdiction in California.
`
`DKC is subject to personal jurisdiction in California.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c) and
`
`20
`
`1400(a) because the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this district, Defendants
`
`21
`
`engaged in infringement in this district, Defendants resides in this district, and
`
`22
`
`Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`12.
`
`Airbnb, Inc. is a California Corporation with its principal place of business
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`25
`
`at 888 Brannan Street, Suite #4, San Francisco, California 94103, and can be served by
`
`26
`
`serving its Registered Agent, CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, 2710 Gateway Oaks
`
`27
`
`Drive, Suite 150N, Sacramento, CA 95833.
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 3 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 4 of 11
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Dan Klores Communications, LLC is a Delaware Corporation with an
`
`office at 425 Bush Street #410, San Francisco, CA 94108 and is registered to do business
`
`with the California Secretary of State and can be served by serving its Registered Agent
`
`Brenda Gilmore, 700 San Vicente Boulevard, Room G-405, West Hollywood CA 90069.
`
`THE COPYRIGHTED WORKS AT ISSUE
`
`14.
`
`Stross created the photographs listed on the chart below, attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 1, and collectively referred to herein as the “Works.”
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Photo Name
`
`Registration
`
`20111111-_MG_0015_16_17_18_19_20Adjust-Edit
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0120-Edit.jpg3
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0156_57_58_59_60_61Adjust-Edit-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0312_3_4_5_6_7Adjust-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0365_66_67_68_69_70Adjust-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`6 20111111-_MG_0398_399_400_401_402_403Adjust-Edit.jpg VAu 1-089-810
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`20111111-_MG_0500_1_2_3_4_5Adjust.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0552_3_4_6_7-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`20111111-_MG_0523_4_5_6_7_8Adjust-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`10
`
`20111111-_MG_0318_19_20_21_22_23Adjust-Edit.jpg
`
`VAu 1-089-810
`
`
`
`15.
`
`At the time he created the Works Stross applied copyright management
`
`information to the Works consisting of a copyright symbol, and his name, Alexander
`
`Stross, written in faint white writing at the bottom right corner of the images.
`
`16.
`
`Stross also created the photograph titled 20140812-1B3A3842-Edit.jpg
`
`(“Modern Guesthouse”) is attached hereto and included in Exhibit 1.
`
`17.
`
`Stross registered the Works with the Register of Copyrights on February
`
`19, 2012 and was assigned the registration number VAu 1-089-810. Stross registered
`
`Modern Guesthouse on January 15, 2015 and was assigned the registration number VAu
`
`1-198-970.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 4 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 5 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`The Certificates of Registration are attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
`
`At all relevant times Stross was the owner of the copyright to Modern
`
`Guesthouse and the copyrighted Works at issue in this case.
`
`INFRINGEMENT BY DEFENDANTS
`
`20.
`
`Airbnb has never been licensed to use Modern Guesthouse and the Works
`
`in this action for any purpose.
`
`21.
`
`On a date after Modern Guesthouse and the Works in this action were
`
`created, but prior to the filing of this action, Airbnb copied Modern Guesthouse and the
`
`Works.
`
`10
`
`22.
`
`Airbnb copied Stross's copyrighted Modern Guesthouse and the Works
`
`11
`
`without Stross's permission.
`
`12
`
`23.
`
`After Airbnb copied Modern Guesthouse and the Works it made further
`
`13
`
`copies and distributed the Work on the internet to promote the sale of goods and services
`
`14
`
`as part of home rental and vacation platform.
`
`15
`
`
`
`24.
`
`Airbnb copied and distributed Stross's copyrighted Modern Guesthouse
`
`16
`
`and the Works in connection with Airbnb's business for purposes of advertising and
`
`17
`
`promoting Airbnb's business, and in the course and scope of advertising and selling
`
`18
`
`products and services.
`
`19
`
`25.
`
`Stross's Modern Guesthouse and the Works are protected by copyright but
`
`20
`
`are not otherwise confidential, proprietary, or trade secrets.
`
`21
`
`26.
`
`Airbnb committed copyright infringement of the Works as evidenced by
`
`22
`
`the documents attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
`
`23
`
`27.
`
`Stross never gave Airbnb permission or authority to copy, distribute or
`
`24
`
`display Modern Guesthouse and the Works at issue in this case.
`
`25
`
`28.
`
`Stross first notified Airbnb of the allegations regarding the Works on April
`
`26
`
`29, 2019. A copy of the takedown letter is attached as Exhibit 4.
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 5 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 6 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`29.
`
`Airbnb did not respond to Stross and did not remove the Works from its
`
`website. A copy of the images on Airbnb’s website after the takedown letter was sent is
`
`attached as Exhibit 5.
`
`30.
`
`Stross again notified Airbnb of the allegations set forth herein on August
`
`11, 2020 and referenced the prior notice in the email. A copy of the email is attached
`
`hereto and marked Exhibit 6.
`
`31.
`
`On August 14, 2020, Airbnb responded to the take down notice and asked
`
`for additional information which was provided to it. A copy of the email is attached
`
`hereto and marked Exhibit 7.
`
`10
`
`32.
`
`On August 14, 2020, Airbnb stated that it was going to take down the
`
`11
`
`Works. A copy of the email from Airbnb is attached hereto and marked Exhibit 8.
`
`12
`
`33.
`
`On November 6, 2020, Stross once again found unauthorized uses his
`
`13
`
`Works on Airbnb’s website. Screenshots of the infringement are attached hereto and
`
`14
`
`marked Exhibit 9.
`
`15
`
`
`
`34.
`
`Airbnb has still not taken the Works off its website and web servers. A
`
`16
`
`copy of the images on Airbnb’s website and webservers is attached hereto and marked
`
`17
`
`Exhibit 10.
`
`18
`
`35. When Airbnb copied and displayed the Works at issue in this case, Airbnb
`
`19
`
`removed Stross's copyright management information from the Works.
`
`20
`
`36.
`
`Stross never gave Airbnb permission or authority to remove copyright
`
`21
`
`management information from the Works at issue in this case.
`
`22
`
`37.
`
`Airbnb not only used the images on its website but distributed them to
`
`23
`
`others.
`
`24
`
`38.
`
`Airbnb provided the images to at least one media company named SFG
`
`25
`
`Media Group, LLC.
`
`26
`
`39.
`
`SFG has stated that they obtained the works from Airbnb via
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`27
`
`press@airbnb.com.
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 6 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 7 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`40.
`
`SFG was provided the Works by DKC. The email correspondence
`
`between SFG and DKC is attached hereto and marked Exhibit 11.
`
`41.
`
`Airbnb copied and distributed the Works to DKC who then further copied
`
`and distributed them to SFG.
`
`42.
`
`SFG then used the eight of the Works on its website. A copy of the eight
`
`Works displayed on SFG’s website is attached hereto and marked Exhibit 12.
`
`43.
`
`On April 13, 2021, Stross found the Modern Guesthouse photograph on
`
`Airbnb’s servers and website. The Modern Guesthouse was also found on multiple blog
`
`sites, including BizLeads, Business Insider, and PR Times, all showing Modern
`
`10
`
`Guesthouse photograph originating from Airbnb. Screenshots of those infringements are
`
`11
`
`attached hereto and marked Exhibit 13.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`COUNT I
`
`COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`44.
`
`Stross incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 43 of this
`
`15
`
`Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`
`
`16
`
`45.
`
`Stross owns a valid copyright in the Works and the Modern Guesthouse at
`
`17
`
`issue in this case.
`
`18
`
`46.
`
`Stross registered the Modern Guesthouse and the Works at issue in this
`
`19
`
`case with the Register of Copyrights pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 411(a).
`
`20
`
`47.
`
`Defendants copied, displayed, and distributed the Modern Guesthouse and
`
`21
`
`the Works at issue in this case and made derivatives of the Modern Guesthouse and the
`
`22
`
`Works without Stross's authorization in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501.
`
`23
`
`48.
`
`Defendants performed the acts alleged in the course and scope of its
`
`24
`
`business activities.
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`Defendants’ acts were willful.
`
`Stross has been damaged.
`
`The harm caused to Stross has been irreparable.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`/ / /
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 7 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 8 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`COUNT II
`
`REMOVAL OF COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
`
`52.
`
`Stross incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 43 of this
`
`Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`53.
`
`The Works at issue in this case contains copyright management
`
`information (“CMI”).
`
`54.
`
`Airbnb knowingly and with the intent to enable or facilitate copyright
`
`infringement, removed CMI from the Works at issue in this action in violation of 17
`
`U.S.C. § 1202(b).
`
`10
`
`55.
`
`Airbnb committed these acts knowing or having reasonable grounds to
`
`11
`
`know that it will induce, enable, facilitate or conceal infringement of Stross's rights in the
`
`12
`
`Works at issue in this action protected under the Copyright Act.
`
`13
`
`56.
`
`Airbnb caused, directed and authorized others commit these acts knowing
`
`14
`
`or having reasonable grounds to know that it will induce, enable, facilitate or conceal
`
`15
`
`infringement of Stross's rights in the Works at issue in this action protected under the
`
`
`
`16
`
`Copyright Act.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`57.
`
`58.
`
`Stross has been damaged.
`
`The harm caused to Stross has been irreparable.
`
`COUNT III
`
`VICARIOUS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT BY DEFENDANTS
`
`59.
`
`Stross incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 43 of this
`
`22
`
`Complaint as if more fully set forth herein
`
`23
`
`60.
`
`Stross owns valid copyrights in the Modern Guesthouse and the Works at
`
`24
`
`issue in this case.
`
`25
`
`61.
`
`Stross registered the Modern Guesthouse and the Works at issue in this
`
`26
`
`case with the Register of Copyrights pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 411(a).
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 8 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 9 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`62.
`
`Airbnb, Inc. and Dan Klores Communications, LLC, displayed and
`
`distributed the Modern Guesthouse and the Works at issue in this case without Stross’s
`
`authorization in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501.
`
`63.
`
`Airbnb, Inc. had the right and ability to supervise the infringing activities
`
`of Dan Klores Communications, LLC and the other infringing websites alleged herein.
`
`64.
`
`Defendants had a direct financial interest in the infringing activities
`
`alleged herein.
`
`65.
`
`As a result of Defendant’s vicarious infringements as alleged above,
`
`Defendant’s obtained direct and indirect profits it would otherwise not have realized but
`
`10
`
`for its infringement of the Modern Guesthouse and the Works.
`
`11
`
`66.
`
`Defendants have continued to copy, display, and distribute the Modern
`
`12
`
`Guesthouse and the Works at issue with knowledge that such acts violate Stross’s
`
`13
`
`intellectual property rights.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`
`
`COUNT IV
`
`CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`67.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Defendants have directly infringed
`
`17
`
`Stross’s copyrights in the Modern Guesthouse and the Works by, inter alia displaying
`
`18
`
`and distributing Stross’s Modern Guesthouse and the Works in connection with the
`
`19
`
`marketing, advertising, and promotion of Defendants respective businesses and services
`
`20
`
`in violation of Stross’s exclusive rights under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. Sections 106
`
`21
`
`and 50
`
`22
`
`68.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Defendants are liable as contributory
`
`23
`
`infringers for the copyright infringements committed via publication and/or distribution
`
`24
`
`of the Modern Guesthouse and the Works, and that such uses are in violation of Stross’s
`
`25
`
`copyrights.
`
`26
`
`69.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Defendants, or one or more of them,
`
`27
`
`had actual and/or constructive knowledge and/or through the exercise of ordinary
`
`28
`
`business care and/or the examination of public and/or business records, knew or should
`
`
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 9 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 10 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`have known that the Modern Guesthouse and the Works were created by Stross, and that
`
`any use thereof was in violation of Stross’s copyright.
`
`70.
`
`That upon information and belief, Defendants, or one or more of them,
`
`knew or should have known that they were not authorized to use Stross’s Modern
`
`Guesthouse and the Works.
`
`71.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Defendants have directly and/or
`
`indirectly caused, enabled, encouraged, facilitated, and materially contributed to the
`
`infringement(s) via the publication and/or distribution of the Modern Guesthouse and the
`
`Works on their websites.
`
`10
`
`72.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Airbnb, Inc., in addition to the actions
`
`11
`
`above, provided the tools, including the Works, to Dan Klores Communications, LLC,
`
`12
`
`for the infringements via the publication and distribution of the Works.
`
`13
`
`73.
`
`That, upon information and belief, through the conduct described
`
`14
`
`hereinabove, Defendants are contributorily liable for the infringements described herein.
`
`15
`
`
`
`74.
`
`That, upon information and belief, the aforementioned acts of Defendants
`
`16
`
`constitute federal statutory contributory copyright infringement under Section 501 of the
`
`17
`
`Copyright Act in violation of the exclusive rights granted to Stross as the valid copyright
`
`18
`
`holder.
`
`19
`
`75.
`
`That, upon information and belief, Defendants’ infringements are and
`
`20
`
`have been willful, intentional, purposeful, and/or in disregard of the rights of Stross and
`
`21
`
`have caused substantial damage to Stross.
`
`22
`
`76.
`
`That as a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ infringements, Stross
`
`23
`
`has been and will continue to be damaged in an amount as yet undetermined.
`
`24
`
`77.
`
`Stross is entitled to the maximum statutory damages under 17 U.S.C.
`
`25
`
`Section 504 (c), and as an alternative to statutory damages, Stross, at his election prior to
`
`26
`
`judgment is entitled to recover his actual damages and any additional profits of the
`
`27
`
`Defendants, or one or more of them, attributable to the infringements as under 17 U.S.C.
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`28
`
`Sections 504 (a)-(b).
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 10 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-02886 Document 1 Filed 04/21/21 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`78.
`
`Stross is further entitled to damages, attorneys’ fees and costs under
`
`Section 504 and 505 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et., seq., given the
`
`willful, intentional, malicious and bad faith nature of Defendants’ copyright
`
`infringement.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendants Airbnb, Inc.
`
`and Dan Klores Communications, LLC that:
`
`a.
`
`Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, affiliated
`
`entities, and all of those in active concert with them, be preliminarily and permanently
`
`10
`
`enjoined from committing the acts alleged herein in violation of 17 U.S.C. §§ 501, 1203;
`
`11
`
`b.
`
`Defendants be required to pay Plaintiff his actual damages and
`
`12
`
`Defendants’ profits attributable to the infringement, or, at Plaintiff's election, statutory
`
`13
`
`damages, as provided in 17 U.S.C. §§ 504, 1203;
`
`14
`
`c.
`
`Plaintiff be awarded his attorneys’ fees and costs of suit under the
`
`15
`
`applicable statutes sued upon;
`
`
`
`16
`
`d.
`
`Plaintiff be awarded such other and further relief as the Court deems just
`
`17
`
`and proper; and
`
`e.
`
`Plaintiff be awarded pre- and post-judgment interest.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
` Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable.
`
`
`
`DATED: April 21, 2021
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jonah A. Grossbardt
`JONAH A. GROSSBARDT
`MATTHEW L. ROLLIN
`SRIPLAW
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Alexander Bayonne
`Stross
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`PAGE NO. 11 OF 11
`
`CASE NO.:
`
`CALIFORNIA ♦ GEORGIA ♦ FLORIDA ♦ TENNESSEE ♦ NEW YORK
`
`SRIPLAW
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket