throbber
Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 1 of 26
`
`
`Eve-Lynn J. Rapp (SBN 342892)
`erapp@edelson.com
`
`Edelson PC
`2101 Pearl Street
`Boulder, Colorado 80302
`Tel: 720.741.0084
`Fax: 720.741.0081
`
`Interim Lead Class Counsel
`
`Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page
`
`
`MATTHEW AMANS and
`BABAK MALEK, individually and on behalf of
`all similarly situated individuals,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
` TESLA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 3:21-CV-03577-VC
`Case No. 3:21-CV-03681-VC
`Case No. 3:21-CV-05528-VC
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
`COMPLAINT
`
`1) Breach of Contract,
`
`2) Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.,
`
`3) Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 7160,
`
`4) Cal. Civ. Code. §§ 1750 et seq., and
`
`5) 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`Plaintiffs Matthew Amans and Babek Malek bring this Class Action Complaint and Demand
`for Jury Trial against Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) for its unfair and deceptive practices in marketing and
`selling its solar roof product (referred to herein as the “Solar Roof”). Plaintiffs, for their Complaint,
`allege as follows upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts and experiences,
`and as to all other matters, upon information and belief, including investigation conducted by their
`attorneys.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 2 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) is a manufacturer and seller of electric vehicles and,
`more recently, solar panels and battery backup units.
`2.
`Tesla’s solar energy business emerged after Tesla’s multi-billion-dollar acquisition
`of a heavily indebted solar panel company called SolarCity, which was co-founded by Elon Musk
`and his cousins. SolarCity was on the brink of collapse when Musk, as CEO of Tesla and a
`chairman of SolarCity, orchestrated a merger with Tesla in an effort to save the solar panel business
`(and his own multi-million-dollar investment in it).
`3.
`In order to persuade Tesla’s investors to approve the controversial acquisition, Musk
`revealed a new product in October 2016—on the set of the television series Desperate
`Housewives—called the Solar Roof. Musk told analysts that Tesla’s acquisition of SolarCity and its
`Solar Roof would create a “huge market” for the combined companies. The merger would
`ostensibly allow Tesla to sell consumers the entire solar energy solution: generation (solar panels),
`storage (batteries), and transportation (electric cars).
`4.
`The Solar Roof promised novel and enticing solar energy solutions for homeowners.
`Unlike traditional boxy solar panels that sit atop a roof, the Solar Roof was designed to make the
`roof itself solar powered. The product comprises individual roof tiles with integrated photovoltaic
`(PV) solar cells capable of generating energy, while having the appearance of a traditional roof.
`During the product’s reveal, Musk touted the Solar Roof as more durable than a traditional roof and
`a more affordable energy solution for homeowners.
`5.
`However, the technology behind the Solar Roof was far from complete at the time
`Musk revealed the product. The Solar Roof that Musk showcased to investors at the October 2016
`event was in fact made entirely of non-functional “dummies,” according to engineers familiar with
`it. Some even referred to the event as “vaporware.” Thus, when the Solar Roof entered the market
`shortly thereafter, its technology was subprime, and it continued to disappoint in the years that
`followed.
`6.
`Tesla continued to revise the Solar Roof’s technology and, while still struggling to
`turn a profit after its SolarCity acquisition, the company released a “Version 3” of the Solar Roof
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`2
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 3 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`(the now-current version) in late 2019. The newest version of the Solar Roof promised several
`improvements over the previous versions including faster installation times and lower costs.
`Consumers wishing to purchase a Solar Roof, including Plaintiffs and the Classes (defined below),
`pre-ordered the product, agreed to a total project cost (based on their unique installation and roof
`requirements), paid a deposit, and prepared their properties for installation.
`7.
`Unfortunately, after finalizing its purchase and installation agreements with
`customers who ordered the newest Solar Roof, Tesla delayed performance beyond the timeframe
`promised, switched certain materials without consent, and in April 2021 advised customers that
`Tesla would not honor their contracts unless they agreed to a substantial price increase—in some
`instances just days before the customer’s scheduled installation. Tesla’s price increases
`substantially, materially, and unilaterally changed the terms of the parties’ purchase agreements and
`represented as much as a 100% increase for many consumers, amounting to tens of thousands of
`dollars of additional, not bargained-for, and unanticipated costs.
`8.
`Tesla’s behavior in marketing and selling the Solar Roofs is a textbook bait and
`switch scheme. The company lured in consumers with promises of stylish, affordable solar energy
`solutions with predictable installation times and costs, but then sought to hold its customers hostage
`with unjustified and unlawful price increases and delays.
`9.
`Following Tesla’s announcement in April 2021 that it would not honor its contracts,
`any consumers who wanted to move forward with the Solar Roof installation in which they had
`already invested considerable time and money had to agree to pay above and beyond the price they
`originally agreed to, as there is no alternative or comparable product on the market.
`10.
`Plaintiffs filed suit within weeks of Tesla’s price increase to hold Tesla accountable
`for its deceptive, unlawful, and unjust conduct and to compel compliance with the terms of its
`executed contracts.
`11.
`In or around early September 2021, Tesla suddenly reversed course and represented
`that it would honor its contract pricing agreed to prior to the April 2021 price increase and would
`refund any increased payments already made. However, Tesla has not agreed to honor the
`installation dates long-ago promised, and even more troubling, it has continued to deceptively
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`3
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 4 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`increase pricing (contrary to its representations) and impose new and/or additional charges on
`customers, on top of its previously agreed-to prices. In other words, Tesla’s alleged promise to
`remedy the price hikes underlying this lawsuit appears to be yet another bait and switch scheme.
`PARTIES
`12.
`Plaintiff Matthew Amans is an adult individual and at all times relevant has been a
`citizen and resident of California.
`13.
`Plaintiff Babak Malek is an adult individual and at all times relevant has been a
`citizen and resident of California.
`14.
`Defendant Tesla, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`Delaware with its principal place of business located at 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto,
`California 94304.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`15.
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2),
`because (i) at least one member of the Class is a citizen of a different state than Defendant, (ii) the
`amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and (iii) none of the
`exceptions under that subsection apply to this action. Specifically, Tesla marketed and entered into
`agreements for its Solar Roof with customers in various states across the country, including but not
`limited to, Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York,
`Pennsylvania, and Oregon.
`16.
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant conducts
`substantial business in California and has its principal place of business and headquarters in
`California and this District.
`17.
`Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because Defendant maintains its
`headquarters and conducts significant business in this District.
`COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`Overview of the Tesla Solar Roof
`18.
`Tesla currently offers for sale two solar products: traditional solar panels which are
`installed on top of existing roofs, and the Solar Roof which replaces the entire existing roof. The
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`4
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 5 of 26
`
`1 Solar Roof is a relatively new technology and consists of roof tiles with embedded photovoltaic
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`(PV) cells capable of generating electi·icity from the sun.
`
`19.
`
`This new technology promises several new benefits to homeowners.
`
`20.
`
`First, unlike u-aditional rectangular solar panels which proti11de from the roof, Solar
`
`5 Roof tiles seamlessly integrate into the consumer's roof and thus are more aesthetically pleasing for
`
`6 homeowners. See Figure 1.
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`(Figure 1)
`
`21.
`
`Tesla touts this aesthetic benefit on its website: "Replace your cmTent roof with
`
`18 Solar Roof and power your home with a fully integrated solar system. With a seamless design, each
`
`19
`
`tile looks great up-close or from the su-eet, complementing your home's architecture. " As Elon
`
`20 Musk stated, "[w]hen you have [the Solar Roof] installed on your house, you' ll have the best roof in
`
`21
`
`the neighbor hood. The aesthetics are that good."
`
`22
`
`22.
`
`Additionally, according to Tesla, the Solar Roof promises to be more durable than a
`
`23
`
`standard roofing tile. On its website Tesla explains, "Solar Roof tiles are more than three times
`
`24
`
`sti·onger than standard roofing tiles and are engineered for all-weather protectio n. With a 25-year
`
`25 wananty , Solar Roof lasts longer than an average roof and protects your home for decades to
`
`26 come."
`
`27
`
`23.
`
`Another significant benefit that the Solar Roof promises over ti·aditional solar panels
`
`28
`
`is the reduced maintenance associated with the underlying roof. Traditional solar panels may outlast
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`5
`
`Case No . 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 6 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`the underlying roof, and thus homeowners must disassemble and re-install an existing solar system
`in order to address any replacement or repairs needed for the underlying roof. Alternatively, some
`roofs may have to be entirely replaced before installing a traditional solar panel system, depending
`on their condition.
`24.
`Tesla also advertises the affordability of the Solar Roof as one of its key features. On
`its website, Tesla claims that the price of the Solar Roof is cheaper than purchasing electricity from
`the power grid: “Power your home at the lowest price per watt of any national provider and take
`control of your monthly electricity bill.” Indeed, Musk drew public attention to the affordability of
`the Solar Roof by stating, “It’s looking quite promising that a solar roof will actually cost less than a
`normal roof before you even take the value of electricity into account. So the basic proposition
`would be, ‘Would you like a roof that looks better than a normal roof, lasts twice as long, costs less
`and by the way generates electricity?’ It’s like, why would you get anything else?”
`25.
`Tesla also markets the Solar Roof as being environmentally friendly. Tesla tells
`consumers they can reduce their carbon footprint with the Solar Roof: “By switching to solar, you
`will be reducing your carbon emissions and environmental impact of energy use.”
`26.
`On its website, Tesla also campaigned against the bad experience of buying a
`traditional roof, which it compared to “buying a car through a dealership,” in which “[i]nitial
`contracts tend to be overly optimistic, and later customers face hidden costs that were never
`mentioned up front.” Tesla promised “transparency and putting the customer in control,” which it
`purportedly accomplished through its “Solar Roof calculator” that “lets homeowners estimate the
`upfront price of the Solar Roof…”
`27.
`By advertising these features, Tesla has attracted considerable consumer interest in
`its Solar Roof, particularly with consumers building or remodeling a home, or already planning to
`replace their existing roof.
`28.
`The purchase of a Solar Roof takes place in several steps. Tesla first provides
`consumers with an early quote for the estimated price of the consumer’s Solar Roof project, which
`ostensibly comprises the price of the Solar Roof (per estimated square foot) and standard
`installation costs; then, after exploring the homeowner’s unique project needs, Tesla offers a
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`6
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 7 of 26
`
`1 "contract price" which includ es the price of the Solar Roof system (per custom square foot
`
`2 measurements) , standard installation costs , and the customer's unique pre- construct ion need s.
`
`3
`
`29.
`
`Consumers initiate the tran saction by visitin g Tesla 's website and prov idin g Te sla
`
`4 with their address and current electr icity usage. In "S tep 1," Tesla perf01ms calculations that
`
`5 mea sure the consumer's roof and prov ides a suggested size based on the consume r 's electr icity
`
`6 consumpt ion and roof size . In advertising these services, Te sla promises to "re commend a system
`
`that maximize s your sav ings based on your average electricity usag e." See Figure 2.
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Stop l
`
`o,do, Onlln •
`fCI' o ,m nd II y1,t~
`\V
`
`tNt m.,Jt m ze your s.,v,ng,
`
`Vlrtual Home AsussmMt (01>tlon,il)
`Log n·o y01,r Tes , Acco-ur,t to 111ns1Yvr QJ9StlQl"ls
`!Ibo ,t /Our tlome. r n.'I i:11' Y°"' d
`n .!I 'd tra(k yov
`'1'!.lallat,on progress
`
`You Are Here -
`
`Oes1gn
`Wi cr('ilt9 y-wr d4s19n from ,:1er1al 1m,09 ng anQ 30
`
`We wC4'k w th your c ty to f e permiu '°" your
`
`P•rtnlt
`
`{k,pnnd1nQ
`sv,IN't'\
`one to t,ve .,.ffk.S..
`
`on \'OUt IGCAl•O!I th,, may
`
`tollk«t
`
`Site Vu,u
`Prior to 1nsull.at10'\, we perform a 5olte vmt to conlir-n no
`"'Cid t,-;in,I r«,f
`()( s IC! rf'P,l tS'lfO
`tt-QU rod
`
`Wt,
`r.t
`
`)'\te,.,,
`n you,
`t O dtte
`S ,C)4'dy.
`ICCO" \Cle
`)'~U
`l•on typ,ca ly tah0"$ b<-:wffti seven ond f ftee<1
`
`llliSOOdlOn
`We wor"- w rt\ your 1-oca, c ty ~o arr<1n9e ~( an ,nspett,on
`ft• t ,r1,t.,1 ~•on 1s comolet•
`
`Utility Approval
`W • wor~ w,th your Joe.a; \ol• 11v corrp.tny 10 vot po,rn111,,01
`t.:> operate y,ouf S}stem. Oepend ng on your ~at1on.
`ttus
`lQ a,,o, ..,.ot•t.~
`11 t;tk
`Qlll
`
`Step4
`
`Powe , on
`~or-mont
`to ;a,n nto,c...nn.ott1nn
`,~u
`Ho~t ut i.t o
`ti toroyou~.,"
`tuin on !ho s~t('m W• l•t voulmo.,.. whc-r
`~ou ha,e 0etm1ss~n to act,vJ:te ')'Oar svs1em
`
`Virtual Hom e Assessm ent (Optional)
`Log onto your Tesla Account
`to answer questions
`about your home, finalize your design and track your
`1nstollot1on progress.
`
`Design
`We create your design from aerial imaging and 3D
`modeling
`;:,long w,th your feedback.
`
`Permit
`for your
`we work with your city to hie permits
`system. Oepond,ng on your locat,on, th,s may take
`one to five weeks.
`
`Site Visit
`or1 c.1tP vic;.1t to confirm
`Prior
`to inc;.t.::1llation, WP pPrform
`additional
`roof or site repairs are required,
`
`no
`
`(Figure 2)
`
`30.
`
`After Step 1, Tesla prov ides consumers with an estimated price for the Solar Roof
`
`22 based on its initi al mea surement s, along with an option to place a pre-o rd er by pay ing a depo sit.
`
`23 Te sla intentionally advert ises a lower estimated pr ice at thi s early phase than what the company
`
`24
`
`reasonab ly expect s the consumer to pay on the final project in orde r to lure consum ers into m aking
`
`25
`
`a depo sit and begin the project.
`
`26
`
`31.
`
`In Step 2 of the process, Te sla offers its "Des ign" and "S ite Visit" services. In the
`
`27
`
`"D esign" phase, a Tesla technical team manually reviews satellite im ages of the consu mer 's roof
`
`28
`
`and creates a schemat ic of the solar installation (showing the place ment of the solar tile s and their
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`7
`
`Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 8 of 26
`
`1
`
`size). See Figures 2-3. In the "Site Visit" phase, a Tesla representative conducts an in-person
`
`2
`
`3
`
`inspection of the consumer's roof. In adveli ising these serv ices, Tesla explains that, "[p]r ior to
`
`installation , we perf01m a site visit to confom no additiona l roof or site repairs are required. " See
`
`4 Figure 2.
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`Design
`
`Root Remova l
`
`Waterproof n g
`
`Tile Installat ion
`
`Attla l imagery an-Cl JO
`modehf\9 dettrmint
`)'Cut cu\.lo m cle'li9n
`
`Roof ,e-mwa1 Is
`«>moleted OVl(kl)' anc:I
`('Uitlf'<llly
`
`AdU,.bl•
`w.atl\t'rorootlng laver
`io. ,iddrd
`lo kt!ep you r
`f'I.Offt• uf•
`ll'ld d,'f
`
`OJr ,,mpi. dUi9R
`enable,a\u,land
`C'lff--.c,rm Ille,
`l.t--'t•ll•1l6"'
`
`(Figure 3)
`
`32.
`
`Accord ing to Tesla's advertisements, the purpose of Step 2 is to identify any
`
`19 anoma lies or unique shapes in a customer's roof and to recommend an approp ri ate size of the solar
`
`20 a.nay (in other words, the amount of electr icity, in kilowatt hours, the Solar Roof can generate on an
`
`21
`
`average day). Upon review of their project design and customized measurements , customers finalize
`
`22
`
`their purchase by signing a "So lar Roof Purchase & Home Improvement Agreement " (the "Solar
`
`23 Roof Purcha se Agreement"). The Solar Roof Purcha se Agreement contains a consumer's Solar
`
`24 Roof project sp ecification s dete1mined during the review phase (includin g the size of the Solar Roof
`
`25
`
`and pre -construct ion need s) and a contract pri ce, based on tho se sp ecifications.
`
`26
`
`33.
`
`Te sla comp lem ents thi s process with an in-person site visit. The purpose of the in-
`
`27 person site visit is to detect any unique repair s needed at the installation location which may not
`
`28 have been readily apparent from satellite images .
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`8
`
`Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 9 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`34.
`Consumers reasonably rely on Tesla’s representations that the review phase enables
`Tesla to determine the appropriate size and scope of the project and to identify any anomalies in the
`project site which may increase the project’s total cost. Because the Solar Roof Purchase Agreement
`is entered into at or near the conclusion of Tesla’s review phase, customers reasonably rely on the
`contract price to be the final, or nearly final, price for their entire Solar Roof project.
`Tesla Unilaterally and Without Justification Increased the Price of the Solar Roof
`35.
`On or around April 10, 2021, Tesla sent consumers who pre-ordered a Tesla Solar
`Roof an email indicating that it increased the Solar Roof prices and would no longer honor
`consumers’ contracts (the “Price Increase Notice”). The email stated:
`
`
`We have increased the price of Solar Roof and have added adjustments for
`individual roof complexity. Learn More
`
`You will receive an email in the next 1-2 days when your new agreement is ready
`for your review and acceptance before moving forward. If you are no longer
`interested in moving forward with Solar Roof, you can cancel your order by
`logging into your Tesla Account and your deposit will automatically be refunded.
`
`We will be prioritizing customers based on the order in which they accept their
`updated agreements.
`
`
`36.
`Consumers who received the April 10th email had already signed a contract and
`agreed to a final price for the entire Solar Roof installation. These consumers had bargained for
`performance, paid deposits, and were waiting for their installations.
`37.
`In anticipation of the Solar Roof installation (and as instructed by Tesla), many
`consumers had spent thousands of dollars to make accommodations and alterations to their
`property, such as trimming trees to reduce shade on their roof, reenforcing their roof structure in
`anticipation of the increased weight, and converting their power meters as required by their utility
`company. Many consumers had also already begun to obtain financing for their Solar Roof, such as
`by taking out home equity loans.
`38.
`Tesla’s Price Increase Notice imposed significant and material changes to the
`existing project costs. Consumers have reported price hikes that range from 30% up to (and even
`exceeding) 100% of the previous agreed-upon price.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`9
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 10 of 26
`
`
`
`39.
`For instance, the publication Electrek interviewed one consumer who entered into a
`contract for a Solar Roof system at a total price of $77,019.22, signed a loan agreement for that
`amount, and spent $5,000 on home improvement preparations.1 On April 10, 2021, Tesla increased
`that consumer’s system price to $118,870.33—over $41,000 beyond the original contract price.
`40.
`Another consumer told the publication The Verge that “he signed a contract in
`February to install the solar roof for $35,000, with an additional $30,000 for the batteries. Later, he
`received a ‘terse email’ from Tesla stating that in several days he would receive a new contract with
`higher prices. He was then told he now owed $75,000 for the solar roof — a 114 percent increase
`— and $35,000 for the batteries.”2
`41.
`In many instances, the Price Increase Notice came just days or weeks before
`consumers’ scheduled installations. Consumers were left with two options: 1) either pay Tesla for
`the massive price hike, or 2) cancel their project, in which they have already invested significant
`time and money.
`42.
`Even worse, in the Price Increase Notice, Tesla implied that the company would
`delay the installation of the project if the consumer did not accept the new terms—and the massive
`price hike—right away. (“We will be prioritizing customers based on the order in which they accept
`their updated agreements.”) Many Solar Roof pre-order customers waited months and even a year
`or more for their installation only to have Tesla threaten them with further delays if they did not
`agree to Tesla’s unilateral new terms.
`43.
`At all times, Tesla has known and understood that it lacks any real competition and
`that its customers lack any alternatives to complete their Solar Roof projects.
`44.
`Before the company issued the Price Increase Notices, Musk revealed that the
`company made “significant mistakes” in its Solar Roof business. In a conference call with investors,
`Musk said Tesla had run into trouble “assessing the difficulty of certain roofs,” and said that the
`
`
` 1
`
`James Dow, Tesla hikes solar roof price on contracts signed over a year ago, ELECTREK,
`
`(Apr. 11, 2021), https://bit.ly/3tGAgdR.
`2
`Andrew J. Hawkins, Tesla is burning its solar roof customers with a huge price increase,
`THE VERGE (Apr. 12, 2021), https://bit.ly/2RIVlah.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`10
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 11 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`“complexity of roofs varies dramatically.” Musk also admitted that Tesla’s solar energy division is
`still not profitable. Tesla’s solution was to retroactively apply a new base pricing model to all of its
`already-signed contracts.
`45.
`In or around September 2021 and in response to the filing of Plaintiffs’ original class
`action complaints, Tesla again announced new prices for Plaintiffs and the Class Members’ Solar
`Roofs. While Tesla made oral representations that it was reverting the prices for the Class Members
`back to the original contract prices (i.e., pre-April 2021 Price Increase), it has not done so uniformly
`or accurately, and continues to fleece customers with updates to project designs (which require
`higher material and labor costs) and allegedly unforeseen repairs (at further additional cost).
`Moreover, Tesla has failed to compensate Plaintiffs or the Class Members for damages incurred
`while Tesla delayed performance, both in terms of time and/or money.
`46.
`Plaintiffs and the Classes seek to enforce their contracts with Tesla for their
`previously agreed-upon prices of the Solar Roof installation, enjoin Tesla from continuing its unfair,
`deceptive and/or unlawful practices, and for other relief as allowable under the law.
`FACTS SPECIFIC TO PLAINTIFFS
`47.
`Plaintiffs both entered contracts with Tesla for the purchase of a Solar Roof. For
`Plaintiffs, and consumers nationwide, this was a months-long process.
`Plaintiff Amans
`48.
`Plaintiff Amans pre-ordered a Solar Roof and battery backup units from Tesla in
`June 2020.
`49.
`After Tesla representatives inspected Amans’ roof by using satellite images and
`conducted an in-person site visit, Amans signed a final Solar Roof Purchase Agreement on March
`20, 2021 for the total amount of $71,074.42, which included $54,035.69 for the Solar Roof; the
`remainder of the contract price comprised of accessories and pre-construction costs.
`50.
`In anticipation of the Tesla Solar Roof installation, Amans made changes to his
`home. For instance, he converted his electrical plan to accommodate solar—which resulted in a
`higher utility bill without an installed Solar Roof. He also paid for landscaping repairs to limit shade
`to the roof (to optimize the anticipated Solar Roof), such as having trees trimmed and removed.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`11
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 12 of 26
`
`
`
`Amans did not install a new roof on his home that needed a replacement and he refrained from
`upgrading his home’s windows and skylights due to his anticipated Solar Roof installation.
`51.
`On April 10, 2021—almost 9 months after pre-ordering the Solar Roof—Amans
`received a Price Increase Notice from Tesla. Subsequently, Tesla sent Amans a revised Solar Roof
`Purchase Agreement in the amount of $146,462.22, an increase of 106%. Tesla did not make any
`adjustments to the accessory needs or pre-construction costs, but rather increased the price of the
`Solar Roof product from $54,035.69 to $122,404.46.
`52.
`Amans did not accept Tesla’s price increase and wishes for Tesla to honor its agreed-
`upon price of $71,074.42. Amans also wishes for Tesla to compensate him for any landscaping
`repairs that will have to be re-done due to the delayed installation and his higher utility bills (due to
`his conversion of his electrical plan to accommodate his solar) during the months when he
`reasonably expected to have the Solar Roof installed.
`Plaintiff Malek
`53.
` At the recommendation of his sister, who was a Tesla customer, Plaintiff Babak
`Malek signed a contract with Tesla for the purchase and installation of a solar roof system for his
`residence in West Hills, California in November 2020. Plaintiff Malek put down $100 to secure the
`project.
`54.
`After Tesla completed a more thorough design, Plaintiff Malek signed an adjusted
`contract on January 23, 2021. The contract price for his 18.48 kilowatt solar roof system, covering
`3615.409 square feet, was $64,735 (approximately $3,500 per kilowatt). The contract provided that
`Plaintiff Malek could cancel the contract within five business days of January 24, 2021. Plaintiff
`Malek did not exercise this option.
`55.
`The adjusted contract stated that installation would commence between one week
`and six months from January 23, 2021. In March 2021, two technicians representing Tesla inspected
`Plaintiff Malek’s roof and told him that installation would begin within weeks.
`56.
`In April 2021, Plaintiff Malek’s project was designated as in the “permitting” stage
`on the Tesla website.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`12
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 13 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`57.
`On April 10, 2021, along with other Tesla customers, Plaintiff Malek received an
`email from Tesla requiring that he approve and sign a new contract. On the Tesla website, Plaintiff
`Malek’s new contract showed his total cost as $91,400—an increase of over 40% above his January
`2021 contract price. The website showed Plaintiff Malek’s project as back to the “review and accept
`design” stage.
`58.
`Plaintiff Malek made several attempts to contact project advisors at Tesla to no avail.
`He finally was able to make contact with one advisor, who gave no explanation for the change in
`the contract price other than that it was a “corporate decision.” Since first contacting Tesla in
`November 2020 for construction of a solar roof, Tesla changed advisors on Plaintiff Malek’s project
`five (5) times, further causing delays and breakdown in communications.
`59.
`Plaintiff Malek sent several email inquiries to Tesla to follow up on his contract.
`Upon reading several news articles in spring 2021, Plaintiff Malek discovered that the sudden
`increase in price and delays in installation was happening to all other existing customers.
`60.
`On June 25, 2021, Tesla provided yet another amended sales contract. This contract,
`for the same roof and kilowatt output had increased several thousand dollars, to $95,107. As with
`prior contracts, this contract stated that installation would begin in approximately one week to six
`months from contract signing, providing no acknowledgment that Plaintiff Malek had already been
`waiting several months for installation.
`61.
`Because of the price increase, Plaintiff Malek decided to finance part of the purchase
`directly with Tesla.
`62.
`In July 2021, Tesla notified Plaintiff Malek that his utility provider was limiting the
`size of his solar roof to no more than 16.25 kilowatts. Based on this decreased output, Tesla
`amended the total price to $90,367.44—still much higher than the January 2021 contract price, and
`over $5,560 per kilowatt.
`63.
`Subsequently, in accordance with its purported reversion to the pre-2021 pricing,
`Tesla changed the price of Plaintiff Malek’s solar roof installation to $74,934 for 16 kilowatts
`($4,683 per kilowatt), which is still significantly more than his original price of $64,735.00 for 18.5
`kilowatts.
`
`CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`13
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-3577-VC (lead case)
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-03577-VC Document 54 Filed 02/22/22 Page 14 of 26
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`64.
`Plaintiff Malek’s residence is considered average in shape/size for his community.
`Despite the typicality of his residence, Defendant Tesla has changed the p

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket