throbber
Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 1 of 32
`
`Kimberly Channick (#325089)
` kchannick@alexwalshlaw.com
`WALSH LAW PLLC
`13428 Marcella Avenue, #203
`Marina del Rey, CA 90292
`Telephone: (310) 596-4545
`
`Alex Walsh (pro hac vice forthcoming)
` awalsh@alexwalshlaw.com
`WALSH LAW PLLC
`1050 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 500
`Washington D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (213) 863-4276
`Fax: (202) 780-3678
`
`David B. Byrne III (pro hac vice
`forthcoming)
` david.byrne@beasleyallen.com
`BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN,
`PORTIS & MIKES, P.C.
`218 Commerce Street
`Montgomery, Alabama 36104
`Telephone: (334) 269-2343
`
`Seth Meyer (pro hac vice
`forthcoming)
` sam@kellerlenkner.com
`Alex Dravillas (pro hac vice
`forthcoming)
` ajd@kellerlenkner.com
`KELLER LENKNER LLC
`150 N. Riverside Plaza
`Suite 4270
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: (312) 741-5220
`Fax: (312) 971-3502
`
`Warren Postman (#330869)
` wdp@kellerlenkner.com
`KELLER LENKNER LLC
`1300 I Street, N.W., Suite
`400E
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 918-1123
`Fax: (312) 971-3502
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case Number:
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`(Jury Trial Demanded)
`
`JOHANNA DOMINGUEZ and
`SHARRON MEIJER, individually and
`on behalf of all others similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER,
`INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 2 of 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Plaintiffs, Johanna Dominguez and Sharron Meijer (“Plaintiffs”), individually and on
`behalf of all others similarly situated, bring this action against Defendant Johnson & Johnson
`Consumer Inc. (“JJCI”), and in support thereof state as follows:
`NATURE OF THE CASE
`This is a class action lawsuit brought by Plaintiffs and other similarly situated
`1.
`purchasers of certain sunscreen products manufactured, marketed, distributed, and sold by JJCI
`under the brand names “Aveeno” and “Neutrogena.”1 Recent independent scientific testing,
`confirmed by JJCI through a massive nationwide recall, has revealed that several of JJCI’s
`Neutrogena and Aveeno sunscreen products contain dangerous and unacceptable levels of
`benzene, a known human carcinogen (hereinafter the “Products”).
`Each and every one of the Products has been marketed and sold as “sunscreen” by
`2.
`JJCI through packaging and other advertising materials, as required by 21 C.F.R. § 201.327(b).
`Each and every one of the Products fails to include labeling indicating that the
`3.
`Product may contain benzene as an active or inactive ingredient.
`4.
`The presence of benzene rendered the Products adulterated, misbranded, and
`unlawful for sale. JJCI’s conduct with respect to the Products caused economic damages to
`Plaintiffs and the putative Class. This suit is brought for injunctive relief and restitution of the
`full purchase price of the Products.
`Benzene is a simple hydrocarbon, C6H6, often found in crude oil and most easily
`5.
`identified by the smell associated with gasoline. It is used in industrial settings to make plastics,
`resins, synthetic fibers, and rubber lubricants, as well as dyes, detergents, drugs, and pesticides.
`6.
`Benzene is classified as a human carcinogen by the United States Department of
`Health and Health Services (“DHHS”). The World Health Organization (“WHO”) and the
`International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) have concluded that benzene is a Group 1
`
`1 JJCI is the manufacturer and/or distributor of the Products, and as of 2015, has succeeded
`to all the debts and liabilities of the Neutrogena brand and the Products. On information and belief,
`JJCI has, and continues to, operate the Neutrogena brand from its offices in Los Angeles,
`California. Likewise, on information and belief, JJCI is liable for all claims related to Aveeno
`products.
`
`1
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 3 of 32
`
`compound, i.e. it is “carcinogenic to humans.”2
`7.
`Scientific studies have established that exposure to benzene can cause leukemia,
`other blood and bone marrow disorders (including anemia), and a weakened immune system. In
`addition, benzene has been linked to multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
`8.
`The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) classifies benzene as a Class 1
`solvent, a group that encompasses materials that “should not be employed in the manufacture of
`drug substances, excipients, and drug products because of their unacceptable toxicity or . . .
`deleterious environmental effect.”3 In those limited cases where use of benzene is “unavoidable
`in order to produce a drug product with a significant therapeutic advance,” the FDA has restricted
`levels to 2 parts per million (“ppm”). In all other cases, no level of benzene is acceptable.
`The FDA regulates sunscreens to ensure they meet safety and effectiveness
`9.
`standards. All products that claim to provide Broad Spectrum Sun Protection Factor (“SPF”)
`protection, including the Products, are regulated as over-the-counter drugs, rather than as
`cosmetics. 21 C.F.R. § 352, et seq. The FDA requires sunscreen manufacturers to subject their
`products to certain testing before they are made available to any consumer. The FDA has also
`identified those materials that qualify as acceptable active ingredients for products labeled as
`sunscreen. Benzene is not one of those acceptable ingredients.
`The FDA’s regulations provide that an “over-the-counter sunscreen drug product
`10.
`in a form suitable for topical administration is generally recognized as safe and effective and is
`not misbranded if it meets” certain conditions. 21 C.F.R. § 352.1(a). Among other things, the
`product must contain “only suitable inactive ingredients which are safe in the amounts
`administered” and contains only listed active ingredients at levels “that do[] not exceed the
`amount reasonably required to achieve [their] intended effect.” 21 C.F.R. § 330.1(h).
`
`2 International Agency for Research on Cancer and World Health Organization, IARC
`to Humans
`Monographs
`on
`the
`Identification
`of
`Carcinogenic Hazards
`(https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications)
`3 Food and Drug Administration, Q3C – Tables and List Guidance for Industry (2017)
`(https://www.fda.gov/media/71737/download)
`
`2
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 4 of 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Valisure is an independent pharmacy, registered with the FDA, whose scientists
`11.
`analyze the safety of various consumer products. Recently, Valisure conducted a study on the
`potential carcinogenicity of active ingredients in a variety of sunscreens and after sun products,
`including numerous products manufactured, marketed, and sold by JJCI. These included:
`Ultra Sheer Weightless Sunscreen Spray, SPF 100+
`Ultra Sheer Weightless Sunscreen Spray, SPF 70
`Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Water Resistant Sunscreen, SPF 70
`Ultra Sheer Body Mist Sunscreen Broad Spectrum, SPF 45
`Ultra Sheer Body Mist Sunscreen Broad Spectrum, SPF 30
`Invisible Daily Defense Body Sunscreen Broad Spectrum, SPF 60+
`CoolDry Sport Water-Resistant Sunscreen Spray, SPF 70
`CoolDry Sport Water-Resistant Sunscreen Spray, SPF 50
`Beach Defense Oil-Free Body Sunscreen Spray, SPF 100
`Beach Defense Spray Body Sunscreen, SPF 50
`
`During its study, Valisure detected high levels of benzene in several JJCI product
`12.
`batches. In particular, Valisure identified benzene levels over 2 ppm in ten Neutrogena sunscreen
`batches from five separate products lines. (See table below.) It identified benzene levels of up to
`2 ppm in thirteen Neutrogena sunscreen batches from ten different product lines.4
`13.
`By way of reference, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
`(“NIOSH”) recommends protective equipment be worn by any worker expecting to be exposed to
`benzene at concentrations of 0.1 ppm for over 10 hours or 1 ppm for 15 minutes.5 NIOSH lists
`
`
`
`
`
`4 Should discovery reveal additional sunscreen products that are affected by this action and
`Plaintiff reserve their right to include additional sunscreen products manufactured, sold, and
`distributed by JJCI should discovery identify additional such products relevant to this action.
`5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Institute for Occupational
`and
`Health,
`BENZENE:
`Systemic
`Agent
`(2011)
`Safety
`(https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750032.html)
`3
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 5 of 32
`
`“skin absorption” as one way a person could be exposed to dangerous levels of benzene.6
`
`Valisure determined that benzene is not unavoidably present in the sunscreen
`14.
`products. Indeed, many of the sunscreens that Valisure tested contained no benzene. Nor is
`benzene’s presence in the products related to any known, let alone significant, therapeutic
`advance. Benzene is not a listed active or inactive ingredient on the label of any of the Products,
`and JJCI has never otherwise warned consumers that the Products may contain benzene.
`15.
`Products with avoidable levels of benzene do not “contain[] only suitable inactive
`ingredients which are safe in the amounts administered” or contain only listed active ingredients
`at levels “that do[] not exceed the amount reasonably required to achieve [their] intended effect.”
`21 C.F.R. § 352.1(a); 21 C.F.R. § 330.1(e)(h).
`16.
`Accordingly, per FDA guidelines, any significant detection of benzene in the
`Products should be deemed unacceptable.
`17.
`Valisure states that the presence of benzene in the Products may be the result of
`
`6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Institute for Occupational
`and
`Health
`(NIOSH),
`Benzene
`(October
`30,
`2019)
`Safety
`(https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0049.html)
`4
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 6 of 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`contamination. Valisure does not identify how this contamination could have occurred, but its
`testing showed how readily detectable this dangerous contaminant is in the Products.
`18.
`As Valisure concluded, the presence of a known human carcinogen in the Products
`is especially troubling as the Products are “widely recommended for the prevention of skin cancer
`and regularly used by adults and children in large volumes.”7 Because “[s]unscreen products are
`typically used in many times higher volume than standard drug products like tablets or capsules,”
`“even a relatively low concentration limit can result in very high total exposure.”8 As one
`researcher and clinician from Yale University has explained, “Considering that human skin has a
`large total surface area (~1.85 m2), and that ~28.5 g of sunscreen is needed per application to
`properly cover that skin surface, it follows then that there is not a safe level of benzene that can
`exist in sunscreen products.”9
`19.
`To put this figure in context, at the FDA conditional restriction limit of 2 ppm for
`benzene, 28.5 g of sunscreen would contain 57,000 ng of benzene in a single application which
`may reasonably be used 4 times per day, therefore amounting to 228,000 ng of benzene exposure
`per day. Other comparable carcinogens, such as N-Nitrosodimethylamine (“NDMA”), have
`permissible daily intakes of around 96 ng. This means a sunscreen with a benzene detection of
`6.26 ppm, such as JJCI’s Ultra Sheer Weightless Sunscreen Spray, SPF 100+, equates to
`approximately 695,800 ng of benzene in one day or 7,248 times the limit for comparable
`carcinogens.
`On May 25, 2021, Valisure filed a citizen petition with the FDA, detailing its
`20.
`findings and asking the FDA to recall all batches of sunscreen products in which benzene was
`detected, including all batches of Neutrogena products containing the carcinogen.
`As Valisure explained in its petition, the presence of benzene in the Products
`21.
`
`7 Light, Kucera, and Wu, Valisure Citizen Petition on Benzene in Sunscreen and After-sun
`Care Products, p. 2 (May 24, 2021).
`8 Id. at 16.
`9 Email from Dr. Christopher Bunick, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Dermatology at
`Yale University, New Haven, CT to Valisure.
`
`5
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 7 of 32
`
`renders them adulterated under Section 50110 of the Federal Drug and Cosmetics Act (“FDCA”)
`and misbranded under Section 50211 of the FDCA, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 351 and 21 U.S.C.
`§ 352, respectively. The Products are also misbranded under Cal. Health & Safety Code
`§ 111330 and N.Y. Educ. Law § 6802(13).
`22.
`Federal and analogous state law prohibits the manufacture, distribution, and
`receipt of any misbranded or adulterated drug. See 21 U.S.C. § 331(a); Cal. Health & Safety
`Code § 111440; N.Y. Educ. Law § 6811. Nonetheless, JJCI waited nearly two months before
`removing the some of the Products from the market. Despite announcing a nationwide recall of
`many aerosol Products on July 14, 2021,12 as of the date of this filing, JJCI continues to market,
`sell, and profit from the Products using false and misleading statements regarding their safety.13
`23.
`Despite the Valisure petition’s extensive reporting on the presence of benzene in
`its products, JJCI waited nearly two months to recall any of the Products or warn members of the
`public of the risks to their health or safety.
`24. When JJCI finally did announce the presence of benzene in the Products, it also
`revealed that not only had Neutrogena products been adulterated and mislabeled, but that benzene
`was also present in at least the Aveeno brand Protect + Refresh aerosol sunscreen product line.
`Despite the Valisure petition’s extensive reporting on the presence of benzene in
`25.
`its products, JJCI waited nearly two months before taking any action to remedy the mislabeling of
`
`10 Section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act provides that a drug
`(including a drug contained in a medicated feed) shall be deemed to be adulterated if the methods
`used in, or the facilities or controls used for, its manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do
`not conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with current good manufacturing
`practice to assure that such drug meets the requirement of the act as to safety and has the identity
`and strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics, which it purports or is represented to
`possess.
`11 Section 502(a) declares that a drug or device is misbranded if its labeling proves false or
`misleading in any particular.
`12 https://www.neutrogena.com/sunscreen-recall.html
`13 To date, JJCI has made no recall of Ultra Sheer Dry-Touch Water Resistant Sunscreen
`SPF 70.
`
`6
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 8 of 32
`
`the Products.
`To date, JJCI has not explained why or how benzene is present in the Products, or
`26.
`whether JJCI conducted testing that could and should have detected benzene.
`27.
`The revelation that the Products contain unacceptable levels of benzene, and are
`therefore adulterated and misbranded, stands in stark contrast to JJCI’s long-standing branding,
`marketing, and advertising strategy for Neutrogena and Aveeno products, including its sunscreen.
`That strategy revolves around convincing consumers that the Products are safe and healthy.
`28.
`The packaging for the Products, as well Neutrogena’s website, have long
`represented to consumers that the Products are “#1 Dermatologist Recommended.”14 The basis
`for this representation, which clearly aims to portray the product as safe and healthy, is nowhere
`specified on either the Products packaging or website. And the representation remains unchanged
`even in the wake of Valisure’s discovery and citizen’s petition. Nowhere do Defendants explain
`if or how dermatologists recommended the Products with knowledge that they contain benzene.
`However, the Neutrogena website acknowledges that “[t]he strong relationship between
`Neutrogena® Corporation and dermatologists gave the company an exceptional competitive
`advantage.”15
`
`14 https://www.neutrogena.com/the-bar/why
`neutrogena.html?q=dermatologist%20recommended (last visited July 9, 2021)
`15 Id. (last visited July 9, 2021).
`
`7
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 9 of 32
`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 9 of 32
`
`
`
`WmmIMMIljhmMmi-IEMMMl
`
`
`
`
`
`mammhflrlm
`mm; lama-Mum
`Hm Imp-mm numnmmwrmpm
`mummhlfiflflwflmmm
`annular
`
`Ikafi-mmnmmumm um
`WHMWMflmmwntum-hwn
`i filflfllmfimfllhfllflfimfiddflnlmw
`" wmwmamwww-w
`W Immumummm-m In
`umwmum IMHMM lulu
`animus-MMM'mn-uumm
`Mimmmmumhmmrfimulm
`mawmwmmiamwmwmm
`(dug Immnnw.wm1flm—imlmw
`mmmwm Immfimn‘thm
`mm-Mfim
`mmmwmm Illa-N
`
`
`
`Neutrogena'
`
`I1 DERMATOLDGIST RECOMMENDED BRAND
`
`Ultra Sheer”
`
`dry-touch
`
`sunscreen
`
`BROAD SPECTRUM SPF 3’0
`
`70
`
`halloplaxl
`Ina-dW mm
`
`lightweight ciean feel
`ox ybenzone free
`watt: r I'BSI slant can mm Lima)
`
`5.0 FL 02 (14? mL}
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`\IONKII#WNHOQOOQONM-RWNHOQOOQONM-RWNH
`
`NMNNNNNNb—lb—lb—lb—lb—lb—lb—lb—lb—lb—l
`
`N 00
`
`
`
`8
`8
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 10 of 32
`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 10 of 32
`
`
`
`Neutro 61121”
`
`Beach-shengtI-I
`mm mm
`sun protection
`oxyhenzone free
`
`#1 DEFIMATOLOGIST RECOMMENDED BRAND
`
`— mm
`Mm MWB
`
`i
`
`sunscreen spray
`
`BROAD SPECTRUM SPF 50
`
`
`
`
`Ughtweight,
` 500442?!E;
`
`B
`h
`WWLM].WWW.WW-WHM-.....-5u'wae'l
`
`U25 ll‘llfifiw whurn I n usedasdiecwdmumampmtecflnnmmsim
`Wflwm Enflskafak'nmnezw Earl} fibaqhgmsedhyflie sun
`Mags
`Defenses
`lawmmlmnmmnnmmrnmmImuimmisnmm
`I knepnu‘afamfiimuflhm‘rerh mum. Inapawayrmmmt: mid hru‘minE'rt
`
`IMWWMOWHWW‘S I mpnmmmlummmuw
`medkdrdmmmahismmmflflemmaw lflurger. filmhhmms
`undar mmflurfluwwm hum-«Hts snuklnnjnmmuncm n1 hcmmSmle
`wate r + sun
`mum'. and Inhalinu them“ can ta Wul ur1aIal.
`ammnm-12M[mr.mm asdimhdl'hfimi rrjmehyddbwhh
`protecnon
`
`
`
`Wm Iqmlmljam mmuanlmmn '5 nimabe'klresunuposura
`I held mnlaim 1-8 infimmhlkjn human] 'n. ldumtspmym'mclyimfam.
`
`
`
`Snwmmmmwym fanafiuh in. Ida mum-fin m'nw unmiflinns Iusefna
`I-mmmm
`:a‘TEBllltesnfl'
`
`a Swami Immimdgmrmwddmng lazleastmry
`m
`“a "“9”" '
`'
`'““"
`“W"
`
`
`2mm: ISM mirth MmmSnenrk'Pgfim In the“
`
`increaw mum flnwantmmn ag'rgTo
`
`
`meamnis :iangblarlyuse asunmen nimaamau
`Snmrr. SPFni-Je uf‘lfi m highera'm othersun mimim
`mm mm: IIn-Jttirnainlhum.upeciflrr'm
`
`
`1U art-hm. I main-sleeved mu. DEM hatsxd
`
` aurghssu ldlbenuflarfirm'rflisulaglkkam
`
`
`
`
`WWW-mm“ nmwmm amine
`has: and fired sun I wmin mt limits
`Emu WMWH-?.Mnflificujhrfiamw
`mm: ingredfants mm amaumm.
`halioplexfi
`Minimum-ml:
`Gupohlmer, Nnnplmyl Emu Dim, Fragrarce,
`
`:nmpherylmale
`oxybenzone free
`
`
`
`W calml-mmmm —
`water reslstant (so m1nutes}
`[whmwwrwam
`gflflfiofi:%méaglmmnmmInmllmumes:
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`\IOKII#WNHOOOOQONm-RWNHOCOOQONm-RWNH
`
`NMNNNNNNb—KHb—KHHb—KHHHb—K
`
`[\D 00
`
`
`
`
`NET WT 6.5 OZ (184 g)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`9
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 11 of 32
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29.
`Neutrogena also makes a point of associating the word “clean” with its Ultra Sheer
`product line, repeatedly noting in both its packaging and advertising that the product is “clean.”
`Ironically, in Valisure’s testing, Neutrogena’s Ultra Sheer products held four of the top five spots
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`10
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 12 of 32
`
`in benzene ppm.
`
`
`
`
`30.
`The packaging for the Aveeno Products, meanwhile, represents to consumers that
`the Aveeno Products have been “Dermatologist recommended for over 65 years.” The
`representation remains unchanged even in the wake of Aveeno’s recall. Nowhere does JJCI
`explain if or how dermatologists recommend the Products with knowledge that they contain
`benzene.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`11
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 13 of 32
`
`
`

`31.
`JJCI’s efforts to portray its sunscreens as clean and doctor approved extends to its
`commercials as well. For example, commercials for Neutrogena Ultra Sheer, starring actress
`Jennifer Garner, prominently display the representation, “#1 Dermatologist Recommended
`Suncare.”16 In these commercials, Ms. Garner emphasizes the “clean” feel of the product and
`deems it “the best for your skin.”17
`
`
`16 Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Dry Touch TV Commercial Featuring Jennifer Garner
`https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7ZH8/neutrogena-ultra-sheer-dry-touch-featuring-jennifer-garner
`(last
`visited July 13, 2021).
`17 GRANDLARGETV, Neutrogena w/Jennifer Garner, YOUTUBE (Feb. 23, 2017)
`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K55T4vbJa6Y
`12
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 14 of 32
`
`
`32.
`Another commercial, advertising the Neutrogena Beach Defense line, features
`children playing on a beach and happily being sprayed with Neutrogena sunscreen. The
`commercial emphasizes that the product is the “sun care brand used most by dermatologists and
`their families.” Smiling children appear as the word “families” is heard.18
`33.
`Neutrogena also touts itself as a “[l]eading the way” in product testing. The
`company’s website has an entire page dedicated to its supposedly high product-testing standards;
`among other claims, Neutrogena purports to “not only follow individual country regulations, but
`also look to incorporate the best thinking and practices from top authorities for skincare products
`around the world.” The webpage goes on to explain that the company “set[s] a high bar for using
`ingredients. Our ingredients are screened for quality, manufacturing process, government
`regulations, published research, and our own ingredient safety databases.” The company also
`makes specific claims about it manufacturing process, emphasizing that “[s]afety goes beyond the
`ingredients list,” with attention also paid to “how our ingredients are used, our manufacturing
`safeguards, how the products are used, and testing requirements for our products.”19
`34.
`Neutrogena’s product testing webpage links to another JJCI webpage regarding the
`company’s safety and care commitment. This webpage notes that, “Your safety is our priority.
`That’s why our safety assessment process meets or exceeds industry and regulatory standards for
`baby and beauty personal care products. It’s a process that never ends–we continually review our
`product ingredients against the latest research and consumer feedback. We believe our process is
`among the most rigorous in the world and is at the core of our Safety & Care Commitment.”20
`The webpage goes on to state that “Our Safety & Care Commitment means that every product is
`carefully reviewed and evaluated against internationally recognized standards.” The webpage
`
`
`18 Neutrogena Beach Defense TV Commercial, ‘More Protection. More Sun.’,
`https://www.ispot.tv/ad/OBGJ/neutrogena-beach-defense-more-protection-more-sun (last visited
`July 13, 2021).
`19 Neutrogena Product Testing, https://www.neutrogena.com/producttesting.html (last
`visited July 13, 2021).
`20 Commitment, https://safetyandcarecommitment.com/commitment (last visited July 13,
`
`2021).
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`13
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 15 of 32
`
`
`then reiterates the tenants of product testing that appear on the Neutrogena website.21
`35.
`Aveeno’s website likewise aggressively markets its products as contributing to
`consumers’ health and emphasizes that its products are comprised of ingredients from nature.
`Aveeno’s “About Aveeno” webpage is replete with claims about the safety and supposedly
`“natural” origins of its ingredients. For example, the webpage states “Healthy Skin, Naturally:
`Nature fuels our healthy spirit, just like healthy skin fuels yours. We research and work with
`scientists and dermatologists around the world to unlock the therapeutic power of nature’s most
`restorative ingredients, giving you clinically-proven products that nurture and care for your skin,
`so you can care for what’s most important in life.” The webpage goes on to explain that the
`company was started based on two brothers’ belief that “nature holds the secret to human health”
`and notes that since the creation of the brand, it has “published 70 years of clinical evidence
`supporting the benefits of not just oat, but other natural ingredients.” Under the section about
`Aveeno’s supposed “Commitment to Wellness,” the company notes when it comes to its
`ingredients “‘Good enough’ is never good enough for Aveeno®. Our internal standards for safety
`testing and ingredient quality far exceed those set by regulators around the world. . . . We think
`about every element we use in every one of our products—where it came from, what it does and
`how it impacts you and your skin. Only ingredients that pass our strict 5-step safety assurance
`process are used.”22
`36.
`On Aveeno’s webpage dedicated to sun products, the company goes even further
`to advertise its products as safe and healthy. The webpage notes “Soak Up The Sun Worry Free:
`The best sun care leaves you feeling carefree. Aveeno’s powerful and hydrating sun protection
`with broad spectrum SPF keeps your skin safe and healthy so you can enjoy sunny moments
`without a single worry.”23
`37.
`Representations made on JJCI’s Neutrogena and Aveeno websites remain today,
`
`
`
`21 Id.
`22 About Aveeno, https://www.aveeno.com/about (last visited July 14, 2021).
`23 https://www.aveeno.com/sun
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`14
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 16 of 32
`
`
`despite the recall of their products, making no mention of Valisure’s findings. These
`representations do not, and upon information and belief have never, explained whether or not
`JJCI itself bothered to test its products for benzene and, if such testing did actually occur, what
`the results were.
`38.
`In addition, the website for JJCI’s corporate parent, Johnson & Johnson, continues
`to promote a wide variety of articles claiming that chemical sunscreens, like the Products, are
`safe. For example, one webpage titled “The Science of Sunscreen: 3 Experts Tackle Common
`Myths About Its Safety” notes that both mineral and chemical sunscreens “are considered safe
`and effective, and have been used by consumers for decades.” The article quotes a Dr. Joshua
`Zeichner as stating “[d]espite anecdotal reports questioning the safety of the ingredients in
`sunscreen, there is no data that shows there is any harm to your health by using it.” The article
`also notes a 2011 review of sunscreen ingredients, which “found that none were shown to have
`toxicity in humans.”24 The referenced article, “Current Sunscreen Controversies: A Critical
`Review” by Mark Burnett and Steven Wang, unsurprisingly did not examine the toxicity of
`benzene.
`39.
`Other articles on the Johnson & Johnson website tout Neutrogena’s products as
`essential to health, including, ironically, cancer prevention. For example, one article titled “8
`Things We Learned From the New Neutrogena Documentary In the Sun,” notes that
`“[p]revention [of melanoma] starts with sunscreen.”25 Another article titled “The ABCs and 123s
`of Smart Summer Skin Care,” encourages readers to share the provided sunscreen facts and “have
`
`
`24 Sunny Sea Gold, The Science of Sunscreen: 3 Experts Tackle Common Myths About Its
`Safety, (May 20, 2019), https://www.jnj.com/health-and-wellness/sunscreen-safety-myths-experts-
`tackle-the-science-of-sun-protection; see also Krista Bennett DeMaio, 5 Things We Now Know
`About the Safety and Effectiveness of Sunscreen, (May 23, 2017), https://www.jnj.com/health-and-
`wellness/5-things-we-now-know-about-safety-and-effectiveness-of-sunscreen
`(noting
`that
`“[s]unscreen is . . . safe to use” and that “[w]e’ve been using some of the[] ingredients [in sunscreen]
`for 30 years with a proven safety record—and there’s much more evidence of benefit than harm”)
`25 Krista Bennett DeMaio, 8 Things We Learned From the New Neutrogena Documentary
`In the Sun, (May 18, 2021), https://www.jnj.com/health-and-wellness/sun-safety-facts-from-
`neutrogena-documentary-in-the-sun
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`15
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05419 Document 1 Filed 07/14/21 Page 17 of 32
`
`
`
`a safe, healthy summer!”26
`40.
`Neutrogena even created the “Choose Skin Health Movement,” which was
`purportedly designed to “change the future of skin health and reduce the risk of skin cancer
`through education, empowerment, and early detection.”27 Several celebrities filmed spots for the
`campaign, including Jennifer Garner, Kristen Bell, and Kerry Washington. In the kick-off video
`for the campaign, Ms. Garner emphasized the statistics on skin cancer and ended by stating that
`she chooses “Neutrogena suncare because “[she] choose[s] skin health.”28 In another such video,
`Garner states that she “wears Neutrogena Ultra Sheer 45 every day because” she chooses “skin
`health.”29 This sunscreen is from the same product line as many of the products Valisure revealed
`to be contaminated. In yet another video, Ms. Washington advises viewers to “[p]rotect yourself
`and those you love. Choose skin health for a lifetime of healthy skin.”30
`41.
`JJCI’s failure to prevent the presence of benzene in the Products, and its continued
`sale of these dangerous and illegal products, constitutes actionable fraud. As of the date of this
`filing, JJCI continues to mislead and defraud consumers by making affirmative
`
`
`(June 15, 2016),
`26 The ABCs and 123s of Smart Summer Skin Care,
`https://www.jnj.com/health-and-wellness/the-abcs-and-123s-of-smart-summer-skin-care. And the
`sunscreen-safety related articles do not stop there. See, e.g., Elizabeth Marglin, 6 Summer Sun
`Safety Tips From Seasoned Moms, (June 7. 2017), https://www.jnj.com/health-and-wellness/6-
`summer-sun-safety-tips-from-seasoned-moms; Gigi Ross, Being Sun Smart for UV Safety Month,
`(July 19, 2013), https://www.jnj.com/our-company/being-sun-smart-for-uv-safety-month.
`27 Neutrogena is kicking off its 2016 Choose Skin Health Campaign, HAPPI (July 1, 2016),
`https://www.happi.com/issues/2016-07-01/view_breaking-news/neutrogena-is-kicking-off-its-
`2016-choose-skin-health-campaign/
`28 Neutrogena, Jennifer Garner Shares Why You Should Join the #ChooseSkinHealth
`Movement, YOUTUBE (May 21, 2014),
`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1ep2dy4tS4&list=PLPA6DFZGPXhk7_EodvLLFRZRJK-
`mTwojI&index=14
`29 Neutrogena, Jennifer Garner Shares Her Daily Sunscreen, YOUTUBE (May 22, 2014),
`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38AIdCY1evQ
`30 Neutrogena, Kerry Washington Gets Personal About Her Skin Health, YOUTUBE (July
`22, 2015),
`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HokEk_1hwKI&list=PLPA6DFZGPXhk7_EodvLLFRZRJK
`-mTwojI
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket