`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`RELATED CASE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related or a
`Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been
`filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned
`to case:
`
`
`3:21-cv-09078-JD
`Apple Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited
`
`I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case
`assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not
`related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case
`for a related case determination.
`
`
`
`Case
`
`Title
`
`Related Not Related
`
`22-cv-07513-WHA Dada v. NSO Group Technologies Limited
`
`JD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the
`initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management
`conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the
`dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by Fed. R. Civ. P 16 and 26 accordingly.
`Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-
`noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local
`Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to
`govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned
`judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 5, 2023
`
`
`
`By:
` JAMES DONATO
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`