throbber
Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 1 of 32
`
`Abby L. Dennis, DC Bar No. 994476
`Peggy Bayer Femenella, DC Bar No. 472770
`Joshua Goodman, NY Bar (No Number)
`Jeanine Balbach, MD Bar (No Number)
`Michael Barnett, TX Bar No. 24006801
`E. Eric Elmore, NY Bar (No Number)
`Justin Epner, DC Bar No. 1028431
`Sean D. Hughto, DC Bar No. 421224
`Frances Anne Johnson, MD Bar (No Number)
`Andrew Lowdon, DC Bar No. 230095
`Kristian Rogers, MA Bar No. 675951
`Anthony R. Saunders, NJ Bar No. 008032001
`Timothy Singer, DC Bar No. 1048769
`Federal Trade Commission
`600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20580
`Tel: (202) 326-2381
`adennis@ftc.gov; pbayer@ftc.gov:
`jgoodman@ftc.gov; jbalbach@ftc.gov;
`mbarnett@ftc.gov; eelmore@ftc.gov;
`jepner@ftc.gov; shughto@ftc.gov;
`fjohnson@ftc.gov; alowdon@ftc.gov;
`krogers@ftc.gov; asaunders@ftc.gov;
`tsinger@ftc.gov
`Erika Wodinsky, CA Bar No. 091700
`90 7th Street, Suite 14-300
`San Francisco, CA 94103
`Tel: (415) 848-5190
`ewodinsky@ftc.gov
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`META PLATFORMS, INC.,
`MARK ZUCKERBERG,
`and
`WITHIN UNLIMITED, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. ____________
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY
`RESTRAINING ORDER
`AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(B)
`OF THE FEDERAL TRADE
`COMMISSION ACT
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT
`SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`1
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 2 of 32
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), by its designated
`attorneys, petitions this Court for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction
`enjoining Defendants Meta Platforms, Inc., its subsidiaries (collectively “Meta”), and its
`controlling shareholder Mark Zuckerberg from consummating its proposed acquisition (the
`“Acquisition”) of Within Unlimited, Inc. (“Within”). The Commission seeks this relief pursuant
`to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b). Absent
`such relief, Meta, Mr. Zuckerberg, and Within (collectively, “Defendants”) have represented
`that they would be free to consummate the Acquisition after 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (or 8:59
`p.m. Pacific Time) on July 31, 2022.
`Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), authorizes the Commission, whenever
`it has reason to believe that a proposed merger is unlawful, to seek preliminary injunctive relief
`to prevent consummation of a merger until the Commission has had an opportunity to issue an
`administrative complaint, and if such complaint is issued, adjudicate the merger’s legality in an
`administrative proceeding. The Commission therefore seeks this preliminary relief “pending the
`issuance of a[n administrative] complaint by the Commission and until such complaint is
`dismissed by the Commission or set aside by the court on review, or until the order of the
`Commission made thereon has become final.” 15 U.S.C. § 53(b)(2). Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §
`53(b)(2), such an administrative complaint must be filed no later than 20 days after this Court
`grants a temporary restraining order.
`A temporary restraining order enjoining the Acquisition is necessary to preserve this
`Court’s ability to provide full and effective relief after considering the Commission’s motion for
`a preliminary injunction. Preliminary injunctive relief is imperative to preserve the status quo
`and to protect competition “pending the issuance of a[n administrative] complaint by the
`Commission,” and if such complaint is issued, while the Commission adjudicates whether the
`Acquisition is unlawful. Allowing the Acquisition to proceed would harm competition and
`consumers and undermine the Commission’s ability to remedy the anticompetitive effects of the
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`2
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 3 of 32
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`Acquisition if the Commission issues an administrative complaint and the Acquisition is found
`unlawful after a full administrative trial on the merits and any subsequent appeals.
`NATURE OF THE CASE
`
`Meta, one of the largest technology companies in the world and
`1.
`provider of virtual reality (“VR”) devices and applications (“apps”) in the United States, seeks
`to acquire Within, a software company that develops apps for VR devices, including the highly
`popular
` fitness app “Supernatural.” If consummated, the Acquisition would
`substantially lessen competition, or tend to create a monopoly, in the relevant market for VR
`dedicated fitness apps and the broader relevant market for VR fitness apps. That lessening of
`rivalry may yield multiple harmful outcomes, including less innovation, lower quality, higher
`prices, less incentive to attract and keep employees, and less consumer choice.
`A global technology behemoth, Meta reaches into every corner of the world
`2.
`through its “Family of Apps”—Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp—with more
`than three billion regular users. Seeking to expand its empire even further, Meta in recent years
`has set its sights on building, and ultimately controlling, a VR “metaverse.” One need look no
`further than the rebranding of the company from Facebook to “Meta” in 2021 to understand its
`vision—and its priorities—for the future. And Meta is serious about its goals: it has become the
`largest provider of VR devices and apps to customers in the United States.
`Meta’s campaign to conquer VR began in 2014 when it acquired Oculus VR,
`3.
`Inc., a VR headset manufacturer. Since then, Meta’s VR headsets have become the cornerstone
`of its growth in the VR space: its current generation headset, the Meta Quest 2, is by far
`
` with a significant majority of headset sales in 2021 and
`2022. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has publicly stated that Meta subsidizes its VR devices or
`sells them at cost in order to attract users.
`
`And Meta’s Quest Store (formerly Oculus Store) has become
`4.
`distribution platform for VR software apps in the United States, connecting app developers and
`VR users in an online marketplace through which developers can offer their products to users
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 4 of 32
`
`
`
`for download onto their individual VR devices. Meta controls the wildly popular app Beat
`Saber, which it acquired by purchasing Beat Games in November 2019. Beat Saber
`
`
`
`
`
` In addition to Beat Games, Meta owns a number of other VR
`apps, some of which it developed in-house but most of which it acquired by rolling up other app
`studios.
`Meta has thus become a key player at each level of the VR ecosystem: in
`5.
`hardware with its Meta Quest 2 headset, in app distribution with the Quest Store, and in apps
`with Beat Saber and several other popular titles. This is not by accident; Meta has an explicit
`strategy of
` Meta could have chosen to try to compete with Within on the merits; instead, Meta
`decided it preferred to simply buy
`in a vitally important,
`
`category.
`As Meta fully recognizes, network effects on a digital platform can cause the
`6.
`platform to become more powerful—and its rivals weaker and less able to seriously compete—
`as it gains more users, content, and developers. The acquisition of new users, content, and
`developers each feed into one another, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that entrenches the
`company’s early lead. This market dynamic can spur companies to compete harder in beneficial
`ways by, for example, adding useful product features or hiring additional employees. But it can
`also make anticompetitive strategies more attractive.
`Meta seeks to exploit the network-effects dynamic in VR. Indeed, Mr.
`7.
`Zuckerberg has made clear that his aspiration for the VR space is control of the entire
`ecosystem. As early as 2015, Mr. Zuckerberg instructed key Facebook executives that his vision
`for “the next wave of computing” was control of apps and the platform on which those apps
`were distributed, making clear in an internal email to key Facebook executives that a key part of
`this strategy was for his company to be “completely ubiquitous in killer apps”—i.e., in
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`4
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 5 of 32
`
`
`
`significant VR apps that prove the value of the technology. In that same email, Mr. Zuckerberg
`told his executives that Facebook should “us[e] acquisitions opportunistically.”
`The proposed acquisition of Within would be one more step along that path
`8.
`toward dominance. According to Within’s co-founder and CEO, “Fitness is the killer use case
`for VR.” But instead of choosing to compete on the merits through its own VR dedicated fitness
`app, Meta has resorted to proposing this unlawful acquisition.
`If Meta is able to proceed with this proposed acquisition of Within, the merger
`9.
`poses a reasonable likelihood of substantially lessening competition in the market for VR
`dedicated fitness apps, where Supernatural is
`.
`Having simply bought up the
`10.
`, Meta would no longer have
`any incentive to develop its own competing app from scratch, add new features to Beat Saber or
`other existing Meta apps to compete with Supernatural on the merits, or
`
`
` develop an app to compete with Supernatural. Instead of adding a significant new rival
`to the mix, the Acquisition would simply let Meta assume total control of
`
`overnight. That lessening of competition violates the antitrust laws.
`11. Moreover, a company poised on the edge of a market may exert competitive
`pressure on existing participants. Regardless of whether such a company actually intends to
`enter, the possibility that it may do so can spur other companies already in the market to
`proactively ramp up their own competitive efforts. Meta, poised on the edge of the VR
`dedicated fitness app market with its popular Beat Saber app, and with all its vast resources and
`unique strategic advantages, exerts such an influence.
`
`
`
`. The Acquisition
`would eliminate that incentive for market participants to compete, again in contravention of the
`antitrust laws.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`5
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 6 of 32
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`12. When viewed against the backdrop of the broader VR fitness app market, which
`includes both dedicated or deliberate fitness apps (“dedicated fitness apps”) and apps, such as
`rhythm and active sports games, that provide an incidental fitness benefit (“incidental fitness
`apps”), the merger is no less anticompetitive. Letting Meta acquire Supernatural would combine
`the makers of two of the most significant VR fitness apps, thereby eliminating beneficial rivalry
`between Meta’s Beat Saber app and Within’s Supernatural app.
`Accordingly, this Acquisition poses a reasonable probability of eliminating both
`13.
`present and future competition. That lessening of competition may result in reduced innovation,
`quality, and choice, less pressure to compete for the most talented app developers, and
`potentially higher prices for VR fitness apps. And Meta would be one step closer to its ultimate
`goal of owning the entire “Metaverse.”
` The Commission voted to file this Complaint seeking preliminary relief
`14.
`pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b). The Commission is entitled to
`preliminary relief in this Court because of its likelihood of success on the merits and the weight
`of the equities. To succeed on the merits, the FTC must prove that the Acquisition violates
`Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits mergers the effect of which “may be substantially
`to lessen competition, or tend to create a monopoly.” For the reasons described below, the FTC
`is likely to succeed in proving an antitrust violation, and the equities weigh strongly in favor of
`enforcing the antitrust laws.
`Preliminary injunctive relief restraining Defendants from proceeding with the
`15.
`Acquisition is necessary to prevent interim harm to competition “pending the issuance of a[n
`administrative] complaint by the Commission,” and if such complaint is issued, during any
`subsequent administrative proceeding. Absent preliminary relief, Defendants can close the
`Acquisition and combine Meta’s and Within’s operations. Allowing Defendants to consummate
`the Acquisition before the Commission issues an administrative complaint, and before any
`administrative proceeding has concluded, is likely to cause immediate harm to competition and
`consumers and would undermine the Commission’s ability to remedy the anticompetitive
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`6
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 7 of 32
`
`
`
`effects of the Acquisition if it is found unlawful after a full trial on the merits and any
`subsequent appeals.
`A temporary restraining order enjoining the Acquisition is necessary to preserve
`16.
`the status quo and protect competition while the Court considers Plaintiff’s application for a
`preliminary injunction. Unless temporarily restrained by the Court, Defendants would be free to
`consummate the Acquisition on or after August 1, 2022.
`JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
`
`Jurisdiction
`A.
`This Court’s jurisdiction arises under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §
`17.
`53(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337, and 1345. This is a civil action arising under Acts of
`Congress protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies and is brought by an
`agency of the United States authorized by an Act of Congress to bring this action.
`Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), provides in pertinent part:
`18.
`Whenever the Commission has reason to believe—
`
`(1) that any person, partnership, or corporation is violating, or is about to
`violate, any provision of law enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, and
`
`(2) that the enjoining thereof pending the issuance of a complaint by the
`Commission and until such complaint is dismissed by the Commission or set
`aside by the court on review, or until the order of the Commission made
`thereon has become final, would be in the interest of the public—
`
`the Commission by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose
`may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin any such
`act or practice. Upon a proper showing that, weighing the equities and
`considering the Commission’s likelihood of ultimate success, such action
`would be in the public interest, and after notice to the defendant, a
`temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction may be granted
`without bond. . . .
`Defendants and their relevant operating entities and subsidiaries are, and at all
`19.
`relevant times have been, engaged in activities affecting “commerce” as defined in Section 4 of
`the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44, and Section 1 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`7
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 8 of 32
`
`
`
`Venue
`B.
`Venue in the Northern District of California is proper under Section 13(b) of the
`20.
`FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c). Defendants are found, reside,
`and/or transact business in this state and district, and are subject to personal jurisdiction therein.
`Intradistrict Assignment
`C.
`21.
`Assignment to the San Francisco Division is proper. This action arises in San
`Mateo County because a substantial part of the events giving rise to these claims occurred in
`San Mateo County, where Defendant Meta is headquartered.
`THE PARTIES AND PROPOSED ACQUISITION
`Plaintiff, the Commission, is an administrative agency of the United States
`22.
`government, established, organized, and existing pursuant to the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 41 et
`seq., with its principal offices at 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
`The Commission is vested with authority and responsibility for enforcing, inter alia, Section 7
`of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
`Defendant Meta is a publicly traded company organized under the laws of
`23.
`Delaware with headquarters in Menlo Park, California. Meta develops and sells VR and other
`extended reality hardware and software through its “Reality Labs” division. Reality Labs has
`been growing at breakneck speed: it generated revenues of $2.274 billion in 2021, which
`reflected a 127% jump from 2019 and a 100% increase since 2020. Meta’s best-selling VR
`hardware product to date is the Meta Quest 2, while its best-selling VR software product is the
`wildly popular Beat Saber, which was initially released by Beat Games, a studio that Meta
`acquired in 2019. Meta continues to add new downloadable content to Beat Saber; for example,
`it recently added a “Lady Gaga Music Pack” available for a $12.99 add-on fee.
`Defendant Mark Zuckerberg is the founder, Chairman, CEO, and controlling
`24.
`shareholder of Defendant Meta. Mark Zuckerberg ultimately controls Meta. His offices are
`located at 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California, 94025.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`8
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 9 of 32
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`Defendant Within is a privately held virtual and augmented reality company
`25.
`organized under the laws of Delaware with headquarters—and its principal business—in Los
`Angeles, California. Founded by Chris Milk and Aaron Koblin, Within’s flagship product is
`Supernatural, a VR subscription fitness service. Supernatural offers over 800 fully immersive
`VR workouts, each set to music and located in a virtual setting like the Galapagos Islands or the
`Great Wall of China. Through deals with major music studios, Supernatural continues to grow
`its catalog, which includes songs from A-list artists like Katy Perry, Imagine Dragons, Lady
`Gaga, and Coldplay. Supernatural’s workouts are fitness classes that customers can access by
`paying a monthly subscription fee of $18.99, or a yearly subscription fee of $179.99.
`Supernatural is presently only available on the Meta Quest and Quest 2 and is sold in the United
`States and Canada.
`On October 22, 2021, Meta and Within signed an Agreement and Plan of
`26.
`Merger, pursuant to which Meta would acquire all shares of Within in a transaction valued at
`
`
`Unless this Court grants Plaintiff’s temporary restraining order, Defendants are
`27.
`free to close the proposed Acquisition after 11:59 PM Eastern Time (or 8:59 p.m. Pacific Time)
`on July 31, 2022.
`
`INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
`The VR industry is currently characterized by a high degree of innovation and
`28.
`growth. Global sales are predicted to more than double in just three years, from $5 billion in
`2021 to more than $12 billion in 2024.
`Users typically engage with the VR experience through a headset with displays
`29.
`in front of each eye to place a user in a fully rendered, three-dimensional environment. Cutting-
`edge VR technology creates an immersive digital experience like no other. VR users can
`instantly be transported anywhere in the world, backward or forward in time, into outer space or
`fictional lands—all from the comfort and safety of their own homes. Unlike a game, video, or
`app on a tablet, phone, or monitor, the three-dimensional VR environment creates the
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`9
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 10 of 32
`
`
`
`perception of completely surrounding the user, allowing the user to move around in the
`projected space. As Mark Zuckerberg explains, “you’re right there with another person or in
`another place and that’s very different from every experience of technology that we’ve had
`before. . . .”
`30. Meta’s Quest 2 is the best-selling VR headset and has been since shortly after its
`launch in 2020. In 2020, Meta shipped more than 62% of all VR headsets sold worldwide. That
`percentage surged to 78% in 2021, when industry sources estimate that Meta sold more than 8.7
`million Quest 2 headsets.
`The majority of users get apps for VR headsets from online app stores, which
`31.
`distribute products for use on individual VR devices. Meta controls its own app store called the
`“Meta Quest Store,” with more than 400 apps available for download. Meta also offers the
`“App Lab,” a Meta-produced tool that allows third-party developers to distribute apps not
`present in the Meta Quest Store directly to consumers. Other VR app stores include Valve’s
`Steam Store and SideQuest,
`
`
`
`
`VR software and studio companies like Within develop the apps that run on VR
`32.
`headsets. These apps run the gamut of genres from rhythm games to shooters to e-sports to
`creation and exploration and more.
` Meta’s Beat Saber, an
`33.
`enormously popular rhythm game “where you slash the beats of adrenaline-pumping music as
`they fly towards you, surrounded by a futuristic world.” Meta acquired control of Beat Saber
`through its purchase of Beat Games
` in
`November 2019.
`Since its acquisition of Beat Games, Meta has continued to acquire a series of
`34.
`studios behind many popular VR apps, and now boasts one of the largest first-party VR content
`organizations in the world:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`10
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 11 of 32
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`a. In January 2020, Meta acquired Sanzaru games, maker of the fantasy Viking
`combat game Asgard’s Wrath.
`b. In May 2020, Meta acquired Ready at Dawn Studios, maker of Lone Echo II, a
`zero-gravity adventure game, and Echo VR, an online team-based sports game.
`c. In April 2021, Meta acquired Downpour Interactive, maker of Onward, a team-
`based first-person shooter.
`d. In May 2021, Meta acquired BigBox VR, maker of Population One, a
`multiplayer first-person arena shooter.
`e. In June 2021, Meta acquired Unit 2 Games, the maker of Crayta, a collaborative
`platform that allows users to create and play their own games.
`f. And, in November 2021, Meta acquired Twisted Pixel, a studio that makes
`various games, including Path of the Warrior (a fighting game), B-Team (a first-
`person shooter), and Wilson’s Heart (a mystery noir thriller game).
`In addition to the aforementioned acquisitions, Meta has developed and released
`35.
`its own VR apps. These include:
`a. Horizon Worlds, a Massively Multiplayer Online game that allows users to
`build, share, and interact in virtual worlds;
`b. Horizon Workrooms, a productivity app that lets teams of people share their
`computer screens, collaborate on virtual whiteboards, and more;
`c. Horizon Venues, a live-events app that lets users experience concerts, sporting
`events, and more; and
`d. Horizon Home, a social-space app that lets users hang out with their friends,
`watch videos together, and join multiplayer VR games together.
`Among VR apps, dedicated fitness
`
`36.
`
`
`. As Within’s co-founder and CEO puts it,
`
`
`“Fitness is the killer use case for VR.”
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`11
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 12 of 32
`
`
`
`
`
` platform-level tools such as
`Oculus Move, a calorie and time counter that runs in the background of other Quest apps and
`displays to users data about their activity levels while in VR.
`
`
`
`
`THE RELEVANT ANTITRUST MARKETS
`The Acquisition would substantially lessen competition or tend to create a
`37.
`monopoly in the relevant antitrust market for VR dedicated fitness apps in the United States
`(“VR Dedicated Fitness App market”). The Acquisition would also substantially lessen
`competition or tend to create a monopoly in the broader relevant antitrust market of VR fitness
`apps in the United States (“VR Fitness App market”) that includes both dedicated fitness apps
`and incidental fitness apps.
`The VR Dedicated Fitness App Market
`A.
`38.
`The VR Dedicated Fitness App market is a relevant product market. The market
`consists of VR apps, like Within’s Supernatural app, that are designed so that users can exercise
`through a structured physical workout in their own homes.
`39.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dedicated fitness apps offer distinct functionality when compared to other VR
`40.
`apps, including VR incidental fitness apps. For example, they may feature adjusting difficulty
`so that users never “fail” a workout; they may feature workouts designed by trainers or fitness
`experts; they are designed to maximize exertion and physical movement for the purpose of
`exercise; and they may feature classes or other active coaching.
`41.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`12
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 13 of 32
`
`
`
`Dedicated fitness apps typically entail a higher degree of physical exertion than incidental
`fitness apps. According to the Virtual Reality Institute of Health and Exercise, which rates
`energy expenditures during VR app usage, Within’s Supernatural currently has the highest
`energy expenditure, at 12–13 calories per minute.
`VR dedicated fitness apps are also typically offered using a distinct,
`42.
`subscription-based pricing model.
`
`
`
`
`
`43.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The VR Dedicated Fitness App market does not include other products that are
`44.
`neither close substitutes for, nor offered under similar competitive conditions as, VR dedicated
`fitness apps. For example, it does not include non-VR at-home smart fitness solutions, such as
`digitally connected exercise bikes, treadmills, weight machines, mobile phone apps, video
`games, or workout videos.
`Functional, practical, technological, and price differences show that non-VR at-
`45.
`home smart fitness solutions and at-home exercise products are distinct from VR dedicated
`fitness apps.
`VR offers a level of immersion that other at-home fitness experiences do not, and
`46.
`cannot, offer. VR technology allows users to exercise from the comfort, privacy, and safety of
`home with the feeling and visuals of being somewhere else—atop a mountain, on a tropical
`island, in a futuristic world, virtually anywhere. The sensors in a VR headset and controllers
`also allow for a degree of tracking, adjustment, and feedback that non-immersive exercise
`programs cannot match. As Within’s co-founder and CEO explained, “[W]orking out in
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`13
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 14 of 32
`
`
`
` 1
` 2
` 3
` 4
` 5
` 6
` 7
` 8
` 9
` 10
` 11
` 12
` 13
` 14
` 15
` 16
` 17
` 18
` 19
` 20
` 21
` 22
` 23
` 24
` 25
` 26
` 27
` 28
`
`
`Supernatural feels like you’re a champion of a sport from the future. I love that and haven’t felt
`that sense of athleticism ever on a treadmill or an exercise bike.”
`There also tend to be substantial price differences between VR fitness and smart
`47.
`at-home fitness products. Most smart at-home fitness solutions have much higher up-front costs
`and much higher ongoing costs than current VR fitness apps. A Peloton smart bicycle, for
`example, costs over $1,000, with an additional $44 per month subscription cost, compared to
`the cost of a $299 Meta Quest 2 plus $18.99 per month for Supernatural. It also weighs 135
`pounds.
`In addition to Supernatural, other apps in the VR Dedicated Fitness App market
`48.
`include FitXR, Holofit from Holodia, VZFit from Virzoom, and Les Mills Body Combat from
`Odders Lab.
`49.
` Other than Supernatural and FitXR,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The VR Fitness App Market
`B.
`The VR Fitness App market comprises VR apps that are recognized and
`50.
`marketed as providing a fitness benefit to the user. This broader market includes both VR
`dedicated fitness apps and incidental fitness apps, such as rhythm and active sports games—
`including Meta’s
`Beat Saber.
`The incidental fitness category includes VR apps whose primary focus is not
`51.
`fitness, but that allow users to get a workout as a byproduct of their use because of the
`physically active nature of these apps. This category includes “rhythm” games like Beat Saber,
`Pistol Whip, and OhShape, where a user must dodge, strike, or shoot targets along to music, as
`well as active sports games like Thrill of the Fight, a boxing simulator.
`52.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PURSUANT
`TO SECTION 13(B) OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
`
`
`14
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-04325-EJD Document 1 Filed 07/27/22 Page 15 of 32
`
`
`
`Publicly, Meta has acknowledged a VR Fitness App market comprising both
`53.
`dedicated and incidental fitness apps. Meta includes Beat Saber in this market. In a post on the
`Oculus website entitled “Exercise By Accident: VR Games to Help You Work Out At Home,”
`Meta extols the virtues of rhythm and sports games for physical exercise: “while our first port of
`call for VR fitness is dedicated fitness apps like Supernatural and FitXR, you can get a
`surprising amount of exercise ‘by accident’ with a bunch of the games below,” including Meta’s
`own Beat Saber app. Meta classified the type of exercise offered by Beat Saber as “Full-body,
`Aerobic”—the exact same type of exercise it listed for both Supernatural and FitXR.
`Technology and fitness reviewers also recognize the VR Fitness App market.
`54.
`Publications reviewing VR fitness options often include incidental fitness apps alongside
`dedicated fitness apps, with Beat Saber featuring prominently. Many reviews of Supernatural
`compare it to Beat Saber specifically, noting the similarities in game mechanics, comparing the
`exercise effect of each app, a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket