throbber
Case 3:22-cv-05744-AGT Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`CHARLES L. THOEMING (CA State Bar No. 153504)
`ASCENDANT IP®
`3443 Golden Gate Way, Suite H
`Lafayette, California 94549
`Telephone: (925) 385,7190
`Fax: (855) 312.4463
`E-mail: cthoeming@ascendantip.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
`MIZUNETWORK, LLC
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ONLINE LEARNING, LLC dba ONE
`CLICK TRAFFIC SCHOOL, a California
`limited liability company,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`MIZUNETWORK, LLC dba TRAFFIC
`SCHOOL 4 BUSY PEOPLE, a California
`limited liability company,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.
`
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`Defendant, MIZUNETWORK, LLC dba TRAFFIC SCHOOL 4 BUSY
`
`PEOPLE, a California limited liability company (“Defendant” or “TS4BP”), files this
`notice of removal under 28 U.S.C. §1446(a).
`
`A.
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`Plaintiff is ONLINE LEARNING, LLC dba ONE CLICK TRAFFIC
`SCHOOL, a California limited liability company.
`2.
`On July 27, 2022, Plaintiff sued Defendant for trade name infringement
`1
`
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-05744-AGT Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`and assorted other business torts in the Superior Court for Santa Clara County,
`California in Case No. 22CV402129 (“State Court Case”).
`3.
`Defendant was served with citation and a copy of Plaintiff’s Complaint
`in the State Court Case on September 14, 2022. Defendant timely files this notice of
`removal within the 30-day time period required by 28 U.S.C. §1446(b)(1), because
`the State Court Case was removable when originally filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a);
`Hunter v. Phillip Morris USA, 582 F.3d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Ansley v.
`Ameriquest Mortg. Co., 340 F.3d 858, 861 (9th Cir. 2003)).
`B.
`BASIS FOR REMOVAL
`4.
`Removal is proper because Plaintiff’s suit involves a federal question
`under 15 U.S.C. §§1051 – 1141n. (See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(a); Grable &n Sons
`Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng’g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308, 312 (2005); Broader v. Cablevision
`Sys. Corp., 418 F.3d 187, 194 (2d Cir. 2005); Peters v. Union Pac. R.R., 80 F.3d 257, 260
`(8th Cir. 1996). Specifically, Plaintiff alleges common law trademark, plus state and
`federal trademark registrations as supporting its trade name infringement cause of
`action, establishing Federal-question jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. §§1051 – 1141n.
`(See Complaint, paragraph 8, pp. 3 – 4).
`5.
`Consent of a defendant is not necessary if that defendant is unknown.
`Green v. Am. Online (AOL), 318 F.3d 465, 470 (3d Cir. 2003). Plaintiff’s complaint
`includes unknown DOE defendants 1 through 25, inclusive.
`6.
`Copies of all pleadings, process, orders, and other filings in the State
`Court Case are attached to this notice as required by 28 U.S.C. §1446(a).
`7.
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §1441(a) because the
`state court where the State Court Case is pending is located in this district.
`8.
`Defendant will promptly file a copy of this notice of removal with the
`clerk of the state court where the State Court Case is pending.
`C.
`JURY DEMAND
`Plaintiff did not demand a jury in the State Court Case.
`
`9.
`//
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-05744-AGT Document 1 Filed 10/05/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`D.
`CONCLUSION
`10.
`For these reasons, Defendant asks the Court to remove the suit to the
`United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
`
`
`Dated: October 5, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ASCENDANT IP®
`/s/Charles L. Thoeming
`Charles L. Thoeming
`
`Attorneys for Defendant,
`MIZUNETWORK, LLC dba TRAFFIC
`SCHOOL 4 BUSY PEOPLE, a California
`limited liability company
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` certify that on October 5, 2022, I electronically transmitted the foregoing
`document and all referenced attachments to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF
`System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF
`registrants of record in this matter.
`I certify that on October 5, 2022, I also served copies of the foregoing
`documents and all referenced attachments to Plaintiff’s lawyers as identified in the
`State Court Case at the following email addresses:
`•
`john@rdlaw.net; and
`• greg@rdlaw.net.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Charles L. Thoeming
` Charles L. Thoeming
`
`3
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket