throbber
Case 3:23-cv-02772-TLT Document 54 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
`Joshua I. Schiller (SBN 330653)
`jischiller@bsfllp.com
`44 Montgomery Street, 41st Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 293-6800
`Facsimile: (415) 293-6899
`
`Benjamin Margulis (Admitted pro hac vice)
`bmargulis@bsfllp.com
`55 Hudson Yards, 20th Floor
`New York, NY 10001
`Telephone: (212) 446-2300
`Facsimile: (212) 446-2350
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Julia Bois
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`JULIA BOIS,
`
` Plaintiff,
` v.
`
`LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
` Case No. 3:23-cv-02772-TLT
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA I.
`SCHILLER IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANT LEVI STRAUSS & CO.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
`PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
`SEALED
`
`Judge: Trina L Thompson
`Date: March 26, 2024
`Time:
`2:00 p.m.
`Dept:
`9
`
`Complaint Filed: June 5, 2023
`Trial Date:
`December 2, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECL. OF JOSHUA I. SCHILLER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S ADMIN MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`Case No. 3:23-cv-02772-TLT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-02772-TLT Document 54 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA I. SCHILLER
`I, Joshua I. Schiller, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am an attorney at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, counsel to Plaintiff Julia Bois
`(“Plaintiff”). I make this declaration pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) and in response to and
`in support of Defendant Levi Strauss & Co.’s (“Defendant”) Administrative Motion to Consider
`Whether Another Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed (“Sealing Motion”) (Dkt. 48.) I have
`knowledge of the facts stated herein from my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I
`could and would competently testify thereto.
`2.
`The parties in the above-captioned matter (“Action”) entered a Stipulated
`Protective Order (Dkt. 28) pursuant to which the parties may designate certain materials
`Confidential.
`3.
`As set forth in Defendant’s Sealing Motion and in Plaintiff’s Administrative
`Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. 50), all of the depositions in this Action were designated
`Confidential at the time testimony was taken, and this designation was confirmed by Plaintiff in a
`letter sent to Defendant. As a result, Defendant’s Sealing Motion covers all three deposition
`transcripts—for the depositions of Plaintiff Julia Bois, Stacey Doren and Lauren Uchrin—and for
`certain exhibits to these depositions.
`4.
`Plaintiff maintains that all of these materials are confidential; but in the interest of
`narrowly tailoring the request to seal, Plaintiff hereby seeks to seal only the following portions of
`the Deposition of Julia Bois (“Bois Dep.”) and its related exhibits, all attached as Exhibit A to the
`Declaration of Victoria Morgan (“Morgan Decl.”) in support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary
`Judgment (the “Confidential Information”):1
`A. Bois Dep., Page 37, lines 14-19; page 39, lines 15-19; and page 40, line 5 to page
`46, line 7; which is testimony relating to Plaintiff’s private psychologist records,
`
`
`1 Citations to the Bois Dep. herein refer to the original deposition page number identified as
`“Page” in the lower right corner of the document, not to be confused with the numbers associated
`with “Tab __, Page __” below that number and added by Defendants as part of their filing.
`
`
`-2-
`DECL. OF JOSHUA I. SCHILLER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S ADMIN MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`Case No. 3:23-cv-02772-TLT
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-02772-TLT Document 54 Filed 01/30/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`including diagnoses and treatment from (and conversations with) her
`psychologists.
`B. Exhibit 502 to the Bois Dep., JB_PROD_000130–000132, which are a set of
`handwritten notes belonging to Ms. Bois’ psychologist regarding their meetings
`and her treatment.2
`C. Bois Dep., Page 90, lines 8-19, which is testimony that divulges the names of Ms.
`Uchrin’s and Plaintiff’s minor children.
`There are compelling reasons the Confidential Information should remain under
`
`5.
`
`seal.
`
`6.
`First, as to items 4(A) and 4(B) (relating to Ms. Bois’ medical treatment),
`documents containing “specific medical information” may be filed under seal. Domingo v.
`Brennan, 690 Fed. Appx. 928, 930 (9th Cir. 2017). Indeed, there is a compelling reason to keep
`medical records under seal as they are deemed confidential under the Health Insurance Portability
`and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”). Pratt v. Gamboa, No. 17-CV-04375-LHK, 2020 WL
`8992141, at *2 (N.D. Cal. May 22, 2020) (citing San Ramon Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Principal
`Life Ins. Co., No. 10-cv-02258-SBA, 2011 WL 89931, at *1 n.1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)
`(sealing, sua sponte, medical records on the basis of confidentiality under HIPAA)); see also Liaw
`v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 19-CV-00396-WHA, 2019 WL 6251204, at *10 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22,
`2019). Pratt confirms: “Courts routinely conclude that the need to protect medical privacy
`qualifies as a compelling reason for sealing records.” 2020 WL 8992141, at *2.
`7.
`As in Pratt, the records Plaintiff seeks to preserve as to sealing are narrowly
`tailored, including only “the portions of deposition testimony that discuss those medical
`records . . . .” Id.
`
`
`2 By this Declaration pertaining to Defendant’s MSJ, Plaintiff does not waive any right and/or
`argument with respect to other portions of documents referenced herein, given that Defendant’s
`MSJ cites to certain pages of transcripts and documents that are Confidential in their entirety,
`including Exhibit 502. Plaintiff also reserves her rights as to other documents or materials
`designated Confidential that may not currently (or ever) be cited in the MSJ.
`
`
`-3-
`DECL. OF JOSHUA I. SCHILLER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S ADMIN MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`Case No. 3:23-cv-02772-TLT
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-02772-TLT Document 54 Filed 01/30/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`8.
`In order to pursue her claims, Plaintiff had to produce and divulge in deposition a
`limited amount of information related to her psychological records. All such information or
`records were designated Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order. However, this does not
`dispose of her rights under HIPAA or general privacy concerns with regard to the greater public.
`These concerns remain a compelling reason to maintain the seal on those records. See, e.g., id.
`9.
`Moreover, in the case of Exhibit 502 (identified in 4(B) above), mere redaction is
`insufficient and inappropriate. The document consists entirely of private psychologists’ notes,
`meaning that making any portion of it public would harm Plaintiff’s privacy interests described
`above. For the same reason, the portions of the Bois Dep. transcript identified in 4(A) cannot be
`further reduced, as the testimony pertains only and specifically to the aforementioned Exhibit 502
`(the notes).
`10.
`As to item 4(C) (relating to and referencing the names of Plaintiff’s minor children,
`as well as the names of the children of Defendant’s employee, Lauren Uchrin): Pursuant to Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 5.2(a), “the name of an individual known to be a minor” must be redacted. See Meyers
`v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan Inc., No. 17-CV-04946-LHK, 2019 WL 120657, at *2 (N.D. Cal.
`Jan. 6, 2019).
`
` I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 30th day of January 2024, at San Francisco, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Joshua I. Schiller
`Joshua I. Schiller
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`DECL. OF JOSHUA I. SCHILLER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S ADMIN MOTION TO CONSIDER
`WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
`Case No. 3:23-cv-02772-TLT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket