throbber

`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 1 of 22
`
`Kenneth P. Herzinger (SBN 209688)
`Kelsey McQuilkin (SBN 340288)
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`101 California Street, 48th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 856-7040
`Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
`kennethherzinger@paulhastings.com
`
`Aaron Charfoos (pro hac vice)
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive, 45th Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: (312) 499-6016
`Facsimile: (312) 499-6116
`aaroncharfoos@paulhastings.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`DAPPER LABS, INC. and
`NBA PROPERTIES, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`THOMAS FAN, individually and on behalf
`of all others similarly situated,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`NBA PROPERTIES, INC. and DAPPER
`LABS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`DEFENDANT DAPPER LABS, INC.’S
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Judge: Hon. Susan Illston
`
`Trial date: None set
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 2 of 22
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, Defendant Dapper Labs, Inc. (“Dapper”) by its
`attorneys, Paul Hastings LLP, hereby answers and asserts defenses to the Second Amended Complaint
`(“the Complaint”) (ECF No. 50) of Plaintiff Thomas Fan (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all
`others similarly situated, and responds to Plaintiff’s allegations.
`Except as otherwise expressly admitted below, Dapper denies each and every allegation of the
`Complaint and specifically denies any liability to Plaintiff.1
`The preamble to the Complaint contains legal conclusions and characterizations that require no
`response. To the extent the preamble to the Complaint contains factual allegations or otherwise requires
`a response, Dapper admits that Plaintiff purports to bring the described action, but denies the remaining
`allegations in the preamble to the Complaint and denies any and all liability.
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`Dapper admits that Plaintiff purports to bring the class action described in Paragraph No.
`1. Dapper denies that a class action is appropriate, denies any liability, and denies the remaining
`allegations in Paragraph No. 1.
`2.
`Dapper admits that it sells digital collectibles known as NBA Top Shot Moments to
`basketball fans around the world, which are non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) that are minted, numbered,
`and released in limited quantities. Dapper admits that NBA Top Shot is a platform built on the Flow
`Blockchain but denies that it is a private blockchain. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are
`video clips. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 2 including that NBA Top
`Shot is an unincorporated joint venture or partnership created by the Defendants.
`3.
`Dapper admits that when a fan purchases NBA Top Shot Moments, their purchase is
`recorded on the Flow Blockchain, a public, online ledger, and allows anyone with access to the internet
`to verify which username owns which NBA Top Shot Moment. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot
`Moments are video clips. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 3.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Dapper also denies all titles, headings, footnotes, subheadings, and any other material not contained in
`numbered paragraphs.
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 3 of 22
`
`4.
`Dapper admits that it utilizes Meta Tracking Pixel on certain pages of its website,
`nbatopshot.com. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video clips. Dapper denies the
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 4.
`5.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 5 partially quotes from a Senate Report. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the Senate Report for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quotes found in Paragraph
`No. 5. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 5 including any allegations or
`characterizations based on this Senate Report.
`
`PARTIES
`6.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 6, and therefore, denies them.
`7.
`Dapper admits that NBA Properties, Inc. (“NBAP”) is incorporated in New York with its
`principal place of business at 645 Fifth Ave., New York, New York, United States. Dapper denies the
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 7 including that NBAP is a “partner” in the NBA Top
`Shot “enterprise” or that any such partnership or enterprise exists. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot
`Moments are video clips. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 7.
`8.
`Dapper admits that it is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business at 565
`Great Northern Way #600, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T08 and that it sells its NBA Top
`Shot Moments to fans in California and the United States. Dapper denies the remainder of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 8 including that Dapper is a “partner” in the NBA Top Shot “Enterprise” or
`that any such partnership or enterprise exists. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video
`clips. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 8.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`9.
`Paragraph No. 9 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 9 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 9.
`
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-2-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 4 of 22
`
`10.
`Paragraph No. 10 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 10 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 10.
`11.
`Paragraph No. 11 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 11 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 11.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`The VPPA
`A.
`12.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 12 partially quotes from a Senate Report. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the Senate Report for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quotes found in Paragraph
`No. 12. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 12 including any allegations or
`characterizations based on this Senate Report.
`13.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 13 partially quotes from the statute cited. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the statute for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quotes found in Paragraph
`No. 13. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 13 including any allegations or
`characterizations based on the statute.
`B.
`The Meta Tracking Pixel
`14.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 14 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 14. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of this webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 14, and therefore, denies them.
`15.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 15, and therefore, denies them.
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-3-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 5 of 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`16.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 16 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 16. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 16, and therefore, denies them.
`17.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 17 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 17. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 17, and therefore, denies them.
`18.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 18 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 18. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 18, and therefore, denies them.
`19.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 19 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 19. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 19, and therefore, denies them.
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 6 of 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`20.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 20 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of their contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 20. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. Dapper otherwise lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the
`truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 20, and therefore, denies them.
`C.
`NBA Top Shot and the Meta Pixel
`21.
`Dapper admits that it sells NBA Top Shot Moments on its website, nbatopshot.com, and
`that users can buy, sell, and trade on the website. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in
`Paragraph No. 21.
`22.
`Dapper admits that its Moments feature highlights from NBA games, which website
`browsers can view and that the Moments can be played on repeat. Dapper denies that all Moments
`contain audio. Dapper admits that between the time period October 3, 2021 – October 3, 2023, it
`created twenty-eight unique NBA Top Shot Moments, bearing twenty-eight unique serial numbers out of
`approximately 30,000,000 Moments, bearing 30,0000,000 unique serial numbers, with audio. Plaintiff
`Fan never owned a Moment with audio. Dapper further admits that users can purchase NBA Top Shot
`Moments. Dapper also admits that Moments are non-fungible, meaning they are unique. Dapper denies
`the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 22.
`23.
`Dapper admits that the Flow Blockchain, which is a public blockchain, permanently
`records ownership, transfer, and price information, among other attributes, of Moments. Dapper denies
`that NBA Top Shot Moments are video clips. The remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 23
`contains arguments and opinions that require no response. To the extent that Paragraph No. 23 contains
`factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies them.
`24.
`Dapper admits that its Moments bear unique serial numbers and NFT token IDs. Dapper
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 24.
`25.
`Dapper admits that the image in Figure 1 in Paragraph No. 25 appears to be a screenshot
`of the Dapper website. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 7 of 22
`
`full text of the Dapper website for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of
`the partial image found in Paragraph No. 25. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video
`clips and that such Moments are “burned.” Dapper admits that NFT tokens can be burned. Dapper
`admits the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph No. 25.
`26.
`Dapper admits that ownership of a Moment is recorded on the Flow Blockchain. Dapper
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 26 including that the Flow Blockchain is a private
`blockchain and that only Dapper has full access to it.
`27.
`Dapper admits that the image in Figure 2 in Paragraph No. 27 appears to be a screenshot
`of the Dapper website. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the
`full text of the Dapper website for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of
`the partial image found in Paragraph No. 27. Dapper admits that in order to complete a purchase on the
`nbatopshot.com website, users must create an account and that Figure 2 accurately represents the initial
`sign-up screen at the time the Complaint was filed on October 3, 2023. Dapper admits that the image
`provides users with notice that “by continuing you are acknowledging that you have read and agreed to
`Dapper’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.” Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in
`Paragraph No. 27.
`28.
`Dapper admits that when a user creates an account, they are assigned a username and
`users are permitted to change their username. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in
`Paragraph No. 28.
`29.
`Dapper admits that the image in Figure 3 in Paragraph No. 29 appears to be a screenshot
`of the Dapper website. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the
`full text of the Dapper website for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of
`the partial image found in Paragraph No. 29. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video
`clips. Dapper otherwise admits the allegations in Paragraph No. 29.
`30.
`Dapper admits that Dapper does not disclose the legal identity of its users on the NBA
`Top Shot website unless the user chooses to do so. Dapper denies the remainder of the allegations in
`Paragraph No. 30.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-6-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 8 of 22
`
`31.
`Paragraph No. 31 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 31 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 31.
`32.
`Dapper admits it utilizes the Meta Tracking Pixel on certain pages of its website,
`nbatopshot.com. Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video clips. The remainder of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 32 contain legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 32 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No.
`32, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits that the images in Figures 4, 5, and 6 in Paragraph No.
`32 appear to be screenshots of the Dapper website and the Meta Pixel helper. Without admitting to any
`facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the Dapper website for a complete and
`accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial image found in Figure 4. Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Figures 5 and 6
`of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them.
`33.
`Paragraph No. 33 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 33 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper denies
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 33.
`34.
`Dapper admits that after a user clicks “SELECT AND BUY,” he or she is presented with
`a number of NFTs he or she can choose from, along with the NFTs’ prices, owners, and serial numbers.
`The remainder of Paragraph No. 34 otherwise contains legal conclusions to which no response is
`required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 34 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a
`response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 34, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits that the image in Figure 7 in
`Paragraph No. 34 appears to be a screenshot of the Dapper website. Without admitting to any facts
`asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the Dapper website for a complete and
`accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial image found in Figure 7 of Paragraph No.
`34.
`
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-7-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 9 of 22
`
`35.
`Dapper admits that if a user clicks on a particular moment, and clicks the “BUY FOR
`$[cost of NFT]” button, they are taken to a payment page. The remainder of Paragraph No. 35 contains
`legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 35 contains factual
`allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 35, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits
`that the image in Figure 8 in Paragraph No. 35 appears to be a screenshot of the Dapper website and the
`Meta Pixel helper. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full
`text of the Dapper website for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the
`partial image found in Figure 8 of Paragraph No. 35. Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient
`to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Figure 8 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies
`them.
`36.
`Paragraph No. 36 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 36 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No.
`36, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits that the image in Figure 9 in Paragraph No. 36 appears to
`be a screenshot of the Meta Pixel helper. Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`belief about the truth of the allegations in Figure 9 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them.
`37.
`Dapper admits that after a user inputs their payment information, and clicks “Pay with
`credit card,” they are redirected to a receipt page. The remainder of Paragraph No. 37 contains legal
`conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 37 contains factual
`allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 37, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits
`that the images in Figures 10 and 11 in Paragraph No. 37 appear to be a screenshots of the Dapper
`website and Meta Pixel helper. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court
`to the full text of the Dapper website for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the
`context of the partial image found in Figure 10 of Paragraph No. 37. Dapper lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Figure 11 of the Complaint,
`and therefore, denies them.
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-8-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 10 of 22
`
`38.
`Paragraph No. 38 of the Complaint contains legal conclusions to which no response is
`required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 38 of the Complaint contains factual allegations or otherwise
`requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph No. 38 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them. Dapper admits that
`the images in Figures 12, 13, and 14 in Paragraph No. 38 appear to be screenshots of the Meta Pixel
`helper. Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Figures 12, 13, and 14 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them.
`39.
`Paragraph No. 39 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 39 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No.
`39, and therefore, denies them.
`40.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 40, and therefore, denies them.
`41.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 41, and therefore, denies them.
`42.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 42, and therefore, denies them.
`43.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 43 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 43. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on these
`webpages, and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility
`of the webpages. To the extent that Paragraph No. 43 of the Complaint contains factual allegations or
`otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
`the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 43 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them.
`44.
`Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`allegations in Paragraph No. 44 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies them.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`
`-9-
`
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 11 of 22
`
`45.
`Paragraph No. 45 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the
`extent that Paragraph No. 45 contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No.
`45, and therefore, denies them.
`46.
`Dapper denies that NBA Top Shot Moments are video clips. Dapper lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 46, and
`therefore, denies them.
`47.
`Dapper denies that its website discloses user information to Meta. Paragraph No. 47
`contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 47
`contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information
`sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 47, and therefore, denies
`them.
`
`48.
`Dapper denies that its website discloses user information to Meta. Paragraph No. 48
`contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that Paragraph No. 48
`contains factual allegations or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information
`sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 48, and therefore, denies
`them.
`
`49.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 49 partially quotes from the cited webpage and that
`Figure 15 appears to be a screenshot of Facebook’s off-site activity report for users. Without admitting
`to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpage itself for a complete
`and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph No. 49.
`Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on this webpage, and reserves all rights with
`regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of this webpage. Dapper lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in Figure 15 of the
`Complaint, and therefore, denies them. To the extent that Paragraph No. 49 contains factual allegations
`or otherwise requires a response, Dapper lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`about the truth of the allegations in Paragraph No. 49, and therefore, denies them.
`50.
`Dapper denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 50.
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`-10-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 12 of 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`51.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 51 partially quotes from the cited statute. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the statute itself for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph
`No. 51. Paragraph No. 51 contains legal conclusions to which no response is required. Dapper denies
`any allegations or characterizations based on this statute. Dapper otherwise denies the allegations in
`Paragraph No. 51.
`D.
`Enterprise Allegations
`Intent of the Parties
`52.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 52 partially quotes from the cited webpage. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpage itself for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph
`No. 52. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on this webpage, and reserves all
`rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of this webpage. Dapper
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 52 of the Complaint.
`53.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 53 partially quotes from the cited webpage. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpage itself for a
`complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph
`No. 53. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on this webpage, and reserves all
`rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of this webpage. Dapper
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 53.
`54.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 54 partially quotes from the cited exhibit, which
`contains the License Agreement between Defendants. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein,
`Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the exhibit itself for a complete and accurate depiction of its
`contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph No. 54. Dapper denies any allegations
`or characterizations based on this exhibit. Dapper otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 54.
`55.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 55 partially quotes from the cited exhibit, which
`contains the License Agreement between Defendants. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein,
`Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the exhibit itself for a complete and accurate depiction of its
`U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. 23-cv-05069-SI
`DAPPER LABS, INC.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`-11-
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-05069-SI Document 58 Filed 04/19/24 Page 13 of 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`contents and the context of the partial quote found in Paragraph No. 55. Dapper denies any allegations
`or characterizations based on this exhibit. Dapper otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 55
`of the Complaint.
`The NBA shares in both the risks and rewards of the NBA Top Shot Enterprise
`56.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 56 partially quotes from the cited webpages. Without
`admitting to any facts asserted therein, Dapper refers the Court to the full text of the webpages
`themselves for a complete and accurate depiction of its contents and the context of the partial quotes
`found in Paragraph No. 56. Dapper denies any allegations or characterizations based on the webpages,
`and reserves all rights with regard to the existence, authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of these
`webpages. Dapper otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph No. 56.
`57.
`Dapper admits that Paragraph No. 57 partially quotes from the cited exhibit, which
`contains the License Agreement between Defendants. Without admitting to any facts asserted therein,
`Dapper refers the Court to the full text o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket