`Case4:O4—cv—OO634—PJH Document322 Fi|edO8/O2/O5 Page1of2
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP
`Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
`victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
`John B. Quinn (Bar No. 090378)
`johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com
`Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. 118215)
`adrianpruetz@quinnemanue1.com
`865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`Telephone: (213) 443-3000
`Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
`
`Attorneys for Defendant MONSANTO COMPANY
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. C04-00634-PJH (EDL)
`
`DISCOVERY MATTER
`
`[ ] ORDER GRANTING
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION PURSUANT TO
`CIVIL L.R. 7-11 TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`(1)
`?
`
`
` ; (2) EXHIBITS
`A-C TO THE DECLARATION OF JOHN
`van LOBEN SELS IN SUPPORT OF
`
`OPPOSITION; (3) DECLARATIONS OF
`STEVEN BIERSCHENK, JULIA O’NEIL
` ; (4) RESPONSE TO
`PLAINTIFF’S CONTENTIONS IN
`
`SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL,
`AND (5) EXHIBITS A AND C TO THE
`DECLARATION OF JOHN van LOBEN
`SELS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
`MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO
`
`INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS
`FOR ADMISSION
`
`Date:
`Time:
`Before:
`Location:
`
`August 16, 2005
`9:00 a.m.
`
`Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte
`Courtroom E, 15th Floor
`
`) ) ) ) ) )
`
`) ) ) ) ) ) 3 )
`
`) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
`
`THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
`
`OF CALIFORNIA, a California public
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`MONSANTO COMPANY, a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`10
`
`11
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`03685/33560
`
` RDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`CASE No. CO4-00634-PJH (EDL)
`
`
`
`
`
`Case4:04-cv-00634-PJH Document322 Filed08/02/05 Page2 of 2
`
`in part; and,
`
`3. Many of the redactions in Defendant's Opposition appear unjustified. See, e.g., pp.
`1-4. Redacting the Declaration of Ms. Troupis also seems unjustified. If within one
`week Monsanto makes a further showing explaining why these redactions are
`S D ISTRICT
`E
`T
`ST A
`appropriate, the Court will order the documents filed under seal. Until then, these two
`documents will remain lodged with the Court.
`I T I S S O O R D E R E D
`August 2
`A S M O D I F I E D
`i z a b e t h D . L a p o r t e
`O F CALIF
`
`J u d g e E l
`
`N O R
`
`T
`
`H ERN
`
`DISTRI C T
`
`CO U
`
`R
`
`T
`
`ORNIA
`
`UNITED