`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No.: 16-CV-1730 YGR
`
`
`ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO
`DISMISS; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendant,
`
`
`
`
`In light of the Court’s discussion with the parties on the record at the summary judgment
`pre-filing conference on January 28, 2019, Facebook has withdrawn its motion to dismiss for lack
`of jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 129.) Facebook will incorporate the arguments therein into its motion
`for summary judgment.
`Facebook’s motion for summary judgment will be filed no later than February 11, 2019,
`with opposition due by March 1, 2019, and reply due by March 8, 2019. The hearing will be set
`for April 2, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom One. As discussed at the conference, the Court
`requires that the briefing stay within the usual page limits under the Local Rules.
`The parties are DIRECTED to provide to the Court, in conjunction with their briefing,
`complete copies of the pertinent expert reports and expert deposition transcripts, with cited
`portions highlighted. The parties are further reminded that they must comply with the Court’s
`Standing Order with respect to summary judgment filings, including: (1) filing a separate
`statement with an attestation as to the accuracy of the facts stated therein; and (2) ensuring that
`evidentiary submissions have the pertinent portions underlined, highlighted, or otherwise
`annotated. Finally, the parties should pay particular attention to the Local Rules on administrative
`motions to seal and declarations in support thereof, noting that the higher “compelling reasons”
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 149 Filed 01/31/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`standard applies to summary judgment motions. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d
`665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010).
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Date: January 31, 2019
`
`
`
`_______________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`2
`
`