throbber
Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 82 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 4
`
`COOLEY LLP
`MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
`(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
`HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`MARK R. WEINSTEIN (193043)
`mweinstein@cooley.com
`PHILLIP E. MORTON (pro hac vice)
`pmorton@cooley.com
`COOLEY LLP
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
`Telephone:
`(650) 843-5000
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-7400
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`BRADLEY W. CALDWELL (pro hac vice)
`bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com
`JASON D. CASSADY (pro hac vice)
`jcassady@caldwellcc.com
`JOHN AUSTIN CURRY (pro hac vice)
`acurry@caldwellcc.com
`WARREN J. MCCARTY, III (pro hac vice)
`wmccarty@caldwellcc.com
`CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY
`
`2101 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 1000
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 888-4848
`
`Facsimile: (214) 888-4849
`
`CHRISTOPHER D. BANYS (SBN 230038)
`JENNIFER L. GILBERT (SBN 255820)
`cdb@banyspc.com
`jlg@banyspc.com
`BANYS, P.C.
`1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100
`Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Tel: (650) 308-8505
` Fax: (650) 353-2202
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Windy City
`Innovations, LLC
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`Defendant.
`
`Case Nos. 4:16-cv-01730-YGR
`
`
`JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING
`STATUS OF INTER PARTES REVIEW
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STATEMENT RE STATUS OF IPR
`PROCEEDINGS
` 4:16-CV-01730-YGR
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 82 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 4
`
`In accordance with the Court’s December 28, 2016 Order staying the above-captioned
`litigation (ECF No. 76) and the Court’s June 26, 2017 Order continuing the June 30, 2017
`compliance hearing (ECF No. 80), Plaintiff Windy City Innovations LLC (“Windy City”) and
`Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (together, “the Parties”) hereby notify the Court that the
`PTAB issued Final Written Decisions in the inter partes reviews (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent Nos.
`8,407,356 (“the ’356 patent”), 8,458,245 (“the ’245 patent”), 8,473,552 (“the ’552 patent”), and
`8,694,657 (“the ’657 patent”) (collectively, “the Patents-in-Suit”).
`Outcome of IPR Proceedings at PTAB. The results of the Final Written Decisions, all
`having issued on December 6, 2017, are as follows:
`
`Patent
`8,407,356
`8,458,245
`8,473,552
`8,694,657
`
`Claims Found Unpatentable
`1-9, 12, 14-28, 31, 33-37
`1-15, 17, 18
`2, 3, 5, 7, 10-17, 59, 64
`189, 334, 342, 348, 465, 477, 482,
`487, 492, 580, 584, 592
`
`Claims Not Found Unpatentable
`None
`19, 22-25
`1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 18-58
`203, 209, 215, 221
`
`Both Windy City and Facebook have the right to appeal the PTAB’s decisions. The
`deadline to file Notices of Appeal is no later than February 7, 2018.
`Status of Asserted Claims. In the Court’s Scheduling Order, Windy City was required
`to make a Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, asserting no more than ten claims from each
`patent and not more than a total of 32 claims across all four asserted patents (ECF No. 68). The
`chart below summarizes the status of all asserted claims asserted by Windy City against Facebook:
`Patent
`Asserted Claims Found
`Asserted Claims Not Found
`Unpatentable
`Unpatentable
`1, 2, 7, 14, 16, 19, 20, 26, 33, 35
`None
`10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 59, 64
`189, 465, 477, 482, 487, 492
`
`None
`19, 22-25
`None
`203, 209, 215, 221
`
`8,407,356
`8,458,245
`8,473,552
`8,694,657
`
`Windy City has reserved the right to seek leave of the Court to substitute or otherwise amend its
`list of asserted claims should circumstances, including the Court’s claim constructions and the
`PTAB’s decisions, so merit. Facebook does not agree that Windy City should be permitted to
`substitute any asserted claims.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`JOINT STATEMENT RE STATUS OF IPR
`PROCEEDINGS
` 4:16-CV-01730-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 82 Filed 12/21/17 Page 3 of 4
`
`Request for Joint Status Conference. The Court’s Order granting the parties’
`
`Stipulation to Stay Litigation Pending IPR (Doc. No. 76) requires the parties to request a joint
`
`status conference at the Court’s convenience to be conducted no earlier than 60 days after all of
`
`the Final Written Decisions have issued. Windy City and Facebook respectfully request that the
`
`Court set this joint status conference on Monday, February 12, 2018 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon
`
`
`thereafter as the Court’s schedule permits.
`
`Motion to Lift Stay. Plaintiff has informed Facebook that it intends to file a motion
`
`asking the Court to lift the stay and set a schedule for this case. Facebook opposes any motion to
`
`
`lift the stay at this time. Facebook intends to appeal the PTAB’s findings that certain challenged
`
`claims are not unpatentable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`Facebook understands that Windy City has not yet made any decision about appealing the PTAB’s
`
`findings that certain challenged claims are unpatentable.
`
`Compliance Hearing. The Court has set a compliance hearing regarding the status of
`
`the IPRs for Friday December 29, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Should the Court wish to proceed with this
`
`hearing, the Parties are happy to appear before the Court at that time. Subject to the Court’s
`
`preference, however, the Parties have agreed that the joint status conference required by the
`
`Court’s Order granting the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Litigation Pending IPR (Doc. No. 76), as
`
`requested above, is an appropriate time to address any issues relating to setting a schedule in this
`
`case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`JOINT STATEMENT RE STATUS OF IPR
`PROCEEDINGS
` 4:16-CV-01730-YGR
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-01730-YGR Document 82 Filed 12/21/17 Page 4 of 4
`
`Dated: December 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CALDWELL CASSADY & CURRY
`
`/s/ Warren J. McCarty, III
`Warren J. McCarty, III
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`COOLEY LLP
`
`/s/ Heidi L. Keefe
`Heidi L. Keefe
`Attorneys for Defendant
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`FILER’S ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), the undersigned attests that all parties have
`concurred in the filing of this Joint Statement Regarding Status of Inter Partes Review
`Proceedings.
`
`
`DATED: December 21, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COOLEY LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ Heidi L. Keefe
`
`Heidi L. Keefe
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`JOINT STATEMENT RE STATUS OF IPR
`PROCEEDINGS
` 4:16-CV-01730-YGR
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket