`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES'
`RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC., et al.,
`
`Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS)
`
`
`ORDER RE JOINT DISCOVERY
`LETTER
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 348
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint discovery letter addressing Defendants’
`
`continued withholding of approximately 1,850 documents on the basis of attorney-client privilege.
`
`The parties previously narrowed their privilege disputes to 232 documents. Therefore, the Court
`
`rejects Plaintiff’s request for relief as to all of the documents on Defendants’ privilege logs.
`
`Further, as to the remaining unproduced documents from the set of 232 to which the parties
`
`previously narrowed their disputes, it appears that the parties have not adequately met and
`
`conferred. Therefore, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff’s request for relief as to these
`
`documents and orders the parties to meet and confer to address this remaining subset of
`
`documents. Should any documents in this subset remain in dispute after the parties have met and
`
`conferred, they may file a renewed discovery letter addressing the disputes related to those
`
`documents.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: March 8, 2023
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`JOSEPH C. SPERO
`Chief Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
