throbber
Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 18
`
`
`
`BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
`L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
`1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
`Walnut Creek, CA 94596
`Telephone: (925) 300-4455
`Facsimile: (925) 407-2700
`E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
`
`BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
`Yitzchak Kopel (Pro hac vice)
`888 Seventh Avenue, Third Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (646) 837-7150
`Facsimile: (212) 989-9163
`E-Mail: ykopel@bursor.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`EDWARD TROMBLE, individually and on
`behalf of all others similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 18
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Edward Tromble (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys, brings this action on
`behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Defendant Western Digital Corporation
`(“Western Digital” or “Defendant”). Plaintiff makes the following allegations pursuant to the
`investigation of his counsel and based upon information and belief, except as to allegations
`specifically pertaining to himself and his counsel, which are based on personal knowledge.
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`This is a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of the following Western
`Digital hard drives: WD Blue 3.5'' 2 terabyte (WD20EZAZ), WD Blue 3.5'' 6 terabyte
`(WD60EZAZ), WD Blue 2.5'' 1 terabyte (WD10SPZX), WD Blue 2.5'' 2 terabyte (WD20SPZX)
`(collectively, the “WD Blue Drives”), and WD Black 2.5'' 1 terabyte WD10SPSX (the “WD
`Black Drives”) (collectively, the “Hard Drives” or the “Products”).
`2.
`Defendant has failed to disclose that the Hard Drives utilize Shingle Magnetic
`Recording (“SMR”) technology, which results in slower performance and inferior stability
`compared to higher-performance Conventional Magnetic Recording (“CMR”) technology.
`3.
`Defendant previously utilized CMR technology in the Hard Drives, but
`surreptitiously switched to SMR technology in the last several years without disclosing this
`change to consumers.
`4.
`This inferior technology is cheaper to manufacture for Defendant. But despite the
`downgrade, the pricing for the Hard Drives has remained the same.
`5.
`In this regard, Defendant was able to increase its profits by reducing its costs of
`goods sold while still bringing in the same amount of revenue for each of the Hard Drives sold.
`6.
`Had Defendant disclosed that the Hard Drives use SMR technology, Plaintiff and
`putative Class members would not have purchased the Hard Drives, or would have paid less for
`the Hard Drives than they did.
`7.
`Plaintiff and Class members were accordingly injured by the price premium they
`paid for inferior hard drives.
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 3 of 18
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`OVERVIEW OF HARD DRIVE TECHNOLOGY
`8.
`A hard drive disk (“HDD”) is a form of magnetic mass storage. Each hard drive
`contains a stack of circular plates of magnetic material called “platters,” divided into billions of
`tiny areas called “bits” that can be independently magnetized (to store a 1) or demagnetized (to
`store a 0). Data is “read” (retrieved) or “written” (recorded) onto an HDD by converting strings
`of bits into electrical current fed through an electromagnet that changes the magnetization of
`each bit. Once the information is written onto the HDD, the HDD uses a magnetic reader to turn
`the data back into a useful form (the file to be stored or retrieved), much like a record player’s
`needle translates a record’s grooves into music.1
`9.
`To store the amount of data that HDDs store today, the HDDs must contain
`billions of bits. Thus, “areal density” comes into play, which is the number of bits of data that
`can be recorded onto a platter and is measured by the number of bits or gigabits (one billion bits)
`per square inch. Higher areal density values allow for greater storage using the same amount of
`disk space.2
`10.
`There are several methods that exist to read and write data to HDDs and
`maximize areal density. The first of these is Perpendicular or Conventional Magnetic Recording
`(“CMR”). CMR “works by aligning the poles of the magnetic elements, which represent bits of
`data, perpendicularly to the surface of the disk. Magnetic tracks are written side-by-side, without
`overlapping.”3
`//
`//
`
`
`1 Kanawat Senanan, How do Hard Drives Work?, TED-ED, https://www.youtube.com/
`watch?v=wteUW2sL7bc; How a Hard Disk Drive Works, SEAGATE, https://www.youtube.com/
`watch?v=NtPc0jI21i0.
`2 What are PMR and SMR Hard Disk Drives?, SYNOLOGY, https://www.synology.com/en-
`us/knowledgebase/DSM/tutorial/Storage/PMR_SMR_hard_disk_drives (last accessed June 11,
`2020).
`3 Id.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 4 of 18
`
`
`
`
`11.
`CMR HDDs “delivery excellent random-access performance,” and are as such
`“widely used not only in PCs but also for online storage applications.”4 CMR is used in most
`standard HDDs.5
`12.
`Another method of reading and writing data is Shingled Magnetic Recording
`(“SMR”). “Rather than writing each magnetic track without overlapping, SMR overlaps each
`new track with part of the previously written track, much like shingles on a roof. By overlapping
`the tracks, write heads become thinner, thus expanding areal density.”6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4 Shimomura Kazuhito, Shingled Magnetic Recording Technologies for Large-Capacity Hard
`Disk Drives, 1 TOSHIBA REVIEW GLOBAL EDITION 33, 33 (2015), https://www.toshiba.co.jp/tech/
`review/en/01_02/pdf/a08.pdf.
`5 Joel Hruska, Western Digital, Seagate Are Shipping Slow SMR Drives Without Informing
`Customers: Reports, EXTREMETECH, Apr. 14, 2020,
`https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309389-western-digital-seagate-reportedly-shipping-
`slow-smr-drives-without-informing-customers.
`6 What are PMR and SMR Hard Disk Drives?, SYNOLOGY.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`
`13.
`SMR thus allows for low-cost, high-capacity HDDs.7 “However, if new (or
`modified) data needs to be placed near existing data, the drive will have to overwrite the
`neighboring shingled tracks … That makes [SMR] drive[s] significantly slower at writing tasks,
`especially for random writes.”8
`14.
`In addition, the design of SMR drives makes permanent data loss more likely.
`Whereas data engineers can rebuild certain components on other storage types and recover lost
`data, the SMR data translators cannot be repaired. This can result in permanent data loss if the
`translators are damaged.9
`15.
`In short, while SMR HDDs boast high areal density, they are at a disadvantage in
`nearly every other category.10 For these reasons, SMR HDDs are typically only used “for cold
`data storage, like archives and backups, because of their poor performance,”11 and are typically
`marked as “archival” to designate the use of the technology.12 SMR HDDs are not
`recommended for use by the ordinary consumer.13
`
`
`7 Shingled Magnetic Recording Technologies for Large-Capacity Hard Disk Drives, 1 TOSHIBA
`REVIEW GLOBAL EDITION at 33.
`8 Paul Alcorn, Western Digital Fesses Up: Some Red HDDs Use Slow SMR Tech Without
`Disclosure, TOM’S HARDWARE, Apr. 14, 2020, https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd-fesses-
`up-some-red-hdds-use-slow-smr-tech.
`9 David Blizzard, WD Shingled Magnetic Recording – New Road Blocks For Data Recovery
`Pros, BLIZZARD DATA RECOVERY, https://www.blizzarddr.com/wd-smr-translation-new-road-
`blocks/.
`10 Joel Hruska, Western Digital, Seagate Are Shipping Slow SMR Drives Without Informing
`Customers: Reports.
`11 Paul Alcorn, Western Digital Fesses Up: Some Red HDDs Use Slow SMR Tech Without
`Disclosure.
`12 Jim Salter, Buyer Beware—That 2TB-6TB “NAS” Drive You’ve Been Eyeing Might be SMR,
`ARS TECHNICA, Apr. 17, 2020, https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/04/caveat-emptor-smr-
`disks-are-being-submarined-into-unexpected-channels/.
`13 Joel Hruska, Western Digital, Seagate Are Shipping Slow SMR Drives Without Informing
`Customers: Reports.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 6 of 18
`
`
`
`II. WESTERN DIGITAL’S FRAUDULENT OMISSIONS
`16. Western Digital is one of the largest computer HDD manufacturers in the United
`
`States.
`
`17. Western Digital markets its hard drives series by color. The WD Black Drives are
`“comprised of the performance oriented consumer drives. WD Black Drives are aimed at high
`capacity with the fastest possible throughput.”14
`18. Western Digital advertises its WD Black Drives as having “[s]ophisticated
`performance-enhancing features [that] deliver the speed you need for demanding applications
`like photo and video editing and internet gaming.” Western Digital claims the WD Black Drives
`offer “[h]igh performance, high capacity, high reliability, and cutting-edge technology.”15
`19.
`The WD Blue Drives are “aimed at mixing high capacity, fast sequential
`write/read speeds, and affordability. These drives are primarily aimed at everyday computing
`and basic media consumption; they are the jumping-off point for the average customer.”16
`20. Western Digital advertises its WD Blue Drives as “offer[ing] the features that are
`ideal for your everyday mobile computing needs.”17
`21. Western Digital maintained that most of its drives were CMR-based until April
`2020. Even as late as March 2020, Yemi Elegunde, an enterprise and channel sales manager for
`Western Digital UK claimed:
`
`“The only SMR drive that Western Digital will have in production is our 20TB
`hard enterprise hard drives and even these will not be rolled out into the channel.
`All of our current range of hard drives are based on CMR Conventional
`Magnetic Recording. With SMR Western Digital would make it very clear as
`
`
`14 Eric Hamilton, WD Blue vs. Black vs. Red & Purple HDD & SSD Differences (2017), GAMERS
`NEXUS, Feb. 8, 2017, https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2796-wd-blue-vs-black-vs-red-in-
`2017.
`15 WD BLACK PERFORMANCE MOBILE HARD DRIVE, https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/
`internal-drives/wd-black-mobile-sata-hdd#WD10SPSX.
`16 Eric Hamilton, WD Blue vs. Black vs. Red & Purple HDD & SSD Differences (2017).
`17 WD BLUE PC MOBILE HARD DRIVE, https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/internal-
`drives/wd-blue-mobile-sata-hdd#WD20SPZX.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 7 of 18
`
`
`
`
`that format of hard drive requires a lot of technological tweaks in customer
`systems.”18
`22.
`Consumers were not aware that the Hard Drives utilized SMR technology. Only
`Western Digital knew that the Hard Drives used SMR technology.
`23.
`In April 2020, Western Digital admitted that the following drives utilize SMR
`technology:19
`
`24.
`The use of SMR technology in WD Black Drives is particularly egregious
`because, as noted above, the WD Black Drives are designed for “high-performance users.”20 As
`Joel Hruska writes on the tech blog, ExtremeTech:
`
`Selling an SMR drive in the WD Black line is an insult to the product. When
`Western Digital created its initial color-based branding, WD Black hard
`drives were supposed to sit at the top of the stack.21
`
`
`//
`
`
`
`18 Jim Salter, Buyer Beware—That 2TB-6TB “NAS” Drive You’ve Been Eyeing Might be SMR
`(emphasis added).
`19 Paul Alcorn, WD Sets the Record Straight: Lists All Drives that Use Slower SMR Tech, TOM’S
`HARDWARE, Apr. 23, 2020, https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd-lists-all-drives-slower-
`smr-techNOLOGY (last accessed June 12, 2020).
`20 Id.
`21 Joel Hruska, Western Digital Comes Clean, Shares Which Hard Drives Use SMR,
`EXTREMETECH, Apr. 24, 2020, https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309730-western-
`digital-comes-clean-shares-which-hard-drives-use-smr (last accessed June 12, 2020).
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 8 of 18
`
`
`
`
`25.
`Consumers have likewise excoriated Western Digital for its failure to disclose that
`the Hard Drives use SMR technology22:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22 FYI – WESTERN DIGITAL SMR HDDS, REDDIT,
`https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/g7m542/fyi_western_digital_smr_hdds/ (last
`accessed June 15, 2020).
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 9 of 18
`
`
`
`
`26.
`Further, even though SMR HDDs are cheaper to produce, Western Digital is not
`passing those savings onto consumers.23 For instance, in January 2020, prior to disclosing that
`its WD Black Drives use SMR technology, Western Digital sold the WD Black Drives for
`approximately $69.24 Yet, since disclosing the WD Black Drives use the inferior SMR
`technology, Western Digital is still selling the WD Black Drives for $6925:
`
`
`
`
`23 Paul Alcorn, Western Digital Fesses Up: Some Red HDDs Use Slow SMR Tech Without
`Disclosure.
`24 WD BLACK PERFORMANCE MOBILE HARD DRIVE, WAYBACK MACHINE, https://web.archive
`.org/web/20200104165130/https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/internal-drives/wd-black-
`mobile-sata-hdd#WD10SPSX.
`25 WD BLACK PERFORMANCE MOBILE HARD DRIVE, https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/
`internal-drives/wd-black-mobile-sata-hdd#WD10SPSX.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 10 of 18
`
`
`
`
`27.
`The same is true of the WD Blue Drives. For instance, in March 2020, prior to
`disclosing that its WD Blue Drives use SMR technology, Western Digital sold the 6 TB WD
`Blue Drive for $168 (pre-discount).26 Yet, since disclosing the WD Blue Drives use the inferior
`SMR technology, technology, Western Digital is still selling the 6 TB WD Blue Drives for $168
`(pre discount)27:
`
`
`
`
`26 WD BLUE PC DESKTOP HARD DRIVE, WAYBACK MACHINE, https://web.archive.org/web/
`20200310230750/https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/internal-drives/wd-blue-desktop-sata-
`hdd#WD60EZAZ.
`27 WD BLUE PC DESKTOP HARD DRIVE, https://shop.westerndigital.com/products/internal-
`drives/wd-blue-desktop-sata-hdd#WD60EZAZ.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 11 of 18
`
`
`
`
`28.
`In short, Plaintiff and Class members who purchased the WD Black Drives or
`WD Blue Drives were not told that the Hard Drives use SMR technology, which affects drive
`performance and data stability. These consumers paid a price premium for drives they believed
`used CMR technology, which offers better performance. Had Western Digital disclosed that the
`Hard Drives use SMR technology, Plaintiff and Class members would not have purchased the
`Hard Drives, or would have paid less for the Hard Drives.
`29.
`Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and the Class for equitable relief
`and to recover damages and restitution for: (i) violation of New York General Business Law
`(“GBL”) § 349, (ii) violation of GBL § 350, (iii) fraudulent concealment, and (iv) unjust
`enrichment.
`
`PARTIES
`30.
`Plaintiff Edward Tromble is a resident of Kenmore, New York and has an intent to
`remain there, and is therefore a domiciliary of New York. In or about December 2019, Mr.
`Tromble purchased a 6 TB WD Blue Drive from Best Buy in New York for approximately $210.
`When deciding which hard drive to purchase, Mr. Tromble was particularly concerned with hard
`drive performance. Mr. Tromble was aware that the WD Blue Drives were advertised as
`“offer[ing] the features that are ideal for your everyday mobile computing needs.” Based on this,
`Mr. Tromble understood that he would receive a Hard Drive utilizing components suitable for
`everyday mobile computing needs, rather than inferior components which were prone to slow
`performance and data loss.
`31.
`Prior to purchase, Mr. Tromble carefully reviewed the labeling on his WD Blue
`Drive’s packaging, but he saw no representations that the WD Blue Drive used SMR technology.
`Had Defendant disclosed that the WD Blue Drives use the inferior SMR technology, which caused
`slower performance and worse data integrity, Mr. Tromble would have been aware of that fact and
`would not have purchased the WD Blue Drive at all, or would have only been willing to pay a
`substantially reduced price for the WD Blue Drive.
`32. Mr. Tromble used the WD Blue Drive as directed, but has repeatedly experienced
`data loss.
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 12 of 18
`
`
`
`
`33.
`Defendant Western Digital Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its
`principal place of business at 5601 Great Oaks Parkway, San Jose, California 95119. Western
`Digital distributes Hard Drives throughout the United States, and specifically in the State of New
`York.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`34.
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`§ 1332(d) because there are more than 100 class members, the aggregate amount in controversy
`exceeds $5,000,000.00, exclusive of interest, fees, and costs, and at least one Class member is a
`citizen of a state different from Defendant.
`35.
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant maintains
`its principal place of business in California.
`36.
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because
`Defendant maintains its principal place of business in this District and the events or omissions
`giving rise to this action occurred in this District.
`CLASS REPRESENTATION ALLEGATIONS
`37.
`Plaintiff seeks to represent a class defined as all persons in the United States who
`purchased the Hard Drives (collectively, the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are persons who
`made such purchase for purpose of resale.
`38.
`Plaintiff also seeks to represent a subclass defined as all Class members who
`purchased the Hard Drives in New York (the “New York Subclass”).
`39.
`Collectively, the Class and the New York Subclass shall be referred to as the
`“Classes.”
`Numerosity. Members of the Classes are so numerous that their individual
`40.
`joinder herein is impracticable. On information and belief, members of the Class number in the
`millions. The precise number of members of the Class and Subclass and their identities are
`unknown to Plaintiff at this time but may be determined through discovery. Members of the
`Class and Subclass may be notified of the pendency of this action by mail and/or publication
`through the distribution records of Defendant and third-party retailers and vendors.
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 13 of 18
`
`(c)
`
`(e)
`
`(f)
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`(d)
`
`Existence and predominance of common questions of law and fact. Common
`41.
`questions of law and fact exist as to all members of the Class and subclass and predominate over
`questions affecting only individual members of the Class and subclass. Common legal and
`factual questions include, but are not limited to:
`(a) Whether Defendant’s failure to disclose the presence of SMR technology
`in the Hard Drives is a material omission;
`(b) Whether Defendant had a duty to disclose the presence of SMR
`technology in the Hard Drives;
`whether Defendant is liable to Plaintiff and the Classes for unjust
`enrichment;
`whether Plaintiff and the Class have sustained monetary loss and the
`proper measure of their losses;
`whether Plaintiff and the Class and Subclass are entitled to declaratory and
`injunctive relief; and
`whether Plaintiff and the Class and Subclass are entitled to restitution and
`disgorgement from Defendant.
`Typicality. The claims of the named Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the
`42.
`Class and Subclass in that the named Plaintiff was exposed to Defendant’s misleading marketing
`and promotional materials and representations, purchased the Hard Drives without knowledge
`that they use SMR technology, and suffered a loss as a result of that purchase.
`Adequacy of Representation. Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class
`43.
`and Subclass because his interests do not conflict with the interests of the members of the
`Classes he seeks to represent, he has retained competent counsel experienced in prosecuting class
`actions, and he intends to prosecute this action vigorously. The interests of members of the
`Classes will be fairly and adequately protected by Plaintiff and his counsel.
`Superiority. The class mechanism is superior to other available means for the
`44.
`fair and efficient adjudication of the claims of members of the Class and subclass. Each
`individual member of the Classes may lack the resources to undergo the burden and expense of
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`12
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 14 of 18
`
`
`
`individual prosecution of the complex and extensive litigation necessary to establish Defendant’s
`liability. Individualized litigation increases the delay and expense to all parties and multiplies
`the burden on the judicial system presented by the complex legal and factual issues of this case.
`Individualized litigation also presents a potential for inconsistent or contradictory judgments. In
`contrast, the class action device presents far fewer management difficulties and provides the
`benefits of single adjudication, economy of scale, and comprehensive supervision by a single
`court on the issue of Defendant’s liability. Class treatment of the liability issues will ensure that
`all claims and claimants are before this Court for consistent adjudication of the liability issues.
`
`COUNT I
`Violation Of New York General Business Law § 349
`(On Behalf Of The New York Subclass)
`45.
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference and re-alleges each and every allegation set
`forth above as though fully set forth herein.
`46.
`Plaintiff brings this claim individually and on behalf of members of the New York
`Subclass against Defendant.
`47.
`By the acts and conduct alleged herein, Defendant committed unfair or deceptive
`acts and practices by failing to disclose that the Hard Drives use SMR technology.
`48.
`The foregoing deceptive acts and practices were directed at consumers.
`49.
`The foregoing deceptive acts and practices are misleading in a material way
`because SMR technology has inferior speed (performance) and data security to standard CMR
`technology used in most consumer-grade HDDs. Accordingly, Defendant’s omission was
`material to Plaintiff and members of the New York Subclass.
`50.
`Defendant alone possessed the knowledge that the Hard Drives use SMR
`technology, and did not provide that information to consumers until April 2020.
`51.
`Plaintiff and members of the New York Subclass were injured as a result because
`(a) they would not have purchased the Hard Drives if they had known that the Hard Drives use
`inferior and unsuitable SMR technology, and (b) they overpaid for the Hard Drives on account of
`Defendant’s failure to disclose that the Hard Drives use SMR technology.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 15 of 18
`
`
`
`
`52.
`On behalf of himself and other members of the New York Subclass, Plaintiff
`seeks to enjoin the unlawful acts and practices described herein, to recover his actual damages or
`fifty dollars, whichever is greater, three times actual damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
`
`COUNT II
`Violation Of New York General Business Law § 350
`(On Behalf Of The New York Subclass)
`53.
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference and re-alleges each and every allegation set
`forth above as though fully set forth herein.
`54.
`Plaintiff brings this claim individually and on behalf of members of the New York
`Subclass against Defendant.
`55.
`Based on the foregoing, Defendant has engaged in consumer-oriented conduct
`that is deceptive or misleading in a material way, which constitutes false advertising in violation
`of Section 350 of the New York General Business Law, by failing to disclose that the Hard
`Drives use SMR technology.
`56.
`The foregoing advertising was directed at consumers and was likely to mislead a
`reasonable consumer acting reasonably under the circumstances.
`57.
`This omission has resulted in consumer injury or harm to the public interest.
`58.
`Defendant alone possessed the knowledge that the Hard Drives use inferior and
`unsuitable SMR technology, and did not provide that information to consumers until April 2020.
`59.
`As a result of this omission, Plaintiff and members of the New York Subclass
`have suffered economic injury because (a) they would not have purchased the Hard Drives if
`they had known that the Hard Drives use SMR technology, and (b) they overpaid for the Hard
`Drives on account of Defendant’s failure to disclose that the Hard Drives use SMR technology.
`60.
`On behalf of himself and other members of the New York Subclass, Plaintiff
`seeks to enjoin the unlawful acts and practices described herein, to recover their actual damages
`or five hundred dollars, whichever is greater, three times actual damages, and reasonable
`attorneys’ fees.
`//
`//
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 16 of 18
`
`
`
`
`COUNT III
`Fraudulent Concealment
`(On Behalf Of The Nationwide Class)
`61.
`Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the allegations contained in all
`preceding paragraphs of this complaint.
`62.
`Plaintiff brings this claim individually and on behalf of the members of the
`proposed Class and New York Subclass against Defendant.
`63.
`Defendant had a duty to disclose material facts to Plaintiff and the Class, namely
`that Defendant were in fact manufacturing, distributing, and selling the Hard Drives with SMR
`technology without disclosing as much, because Defendant had superior knowledge such that the
`transactions without the disclosure were rendered inherently unfair.
`64.
`Defendant possessed knowledge of these material facts. During this time,
`Plaintiff and members of the Classes purchased the Hard Drives without knowing the Hard
`Drives used inferior and unsuitable SMR technology, nor was such knowledge readily available
`to Plaintiff and members of the Class. Indeed, even following purchase, a consumer would need
`to disassemble her Hard Drive in order to discover that it used SMR, rather than CMR,
`technology.
`65.
`Defendant failed to discharge its duty to disclose these materials facts.
`66.
`In so failing to disclose these material facts to Plaintiff and the Class, Defendant
`intended to hide from Plaintiff and the Class that the Hard Drives they were purchasing used
`SMR technology, and thus acted with scienter and/or an intent to defraud.
`67.
`Defendant knew that Plaintiff and members of the Class were acting on the basis
`of Defendant’s failure to disclose that the Hard Drives used SMR technology.
`68.
`Plaintiff and the Class reasonably relied on Defendant’s failure to disclose insofar
`as they would not have purchased the Hard Drives sold by Defendant had they known the Hard
`Drives used SMR technology.
`69.
`As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s fraudulent concealment, Plaintiff
`and the Class suffered damages in the amount of price premium paid for the Hard Drives that
`Plaintiff and the Class believed did not use SMR technology.
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 17 of 18
`
`As a result of Defendant’s willful and malicious conduct, punitive damages are
`
`
`
`
`70.
`warranted.
`
`COUNT IV
`Unjust Enrichment
`(On Behalf Of The Classes)
`71.
`Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the allegations contained in all
`preceding paragraphs of this complaint.
`72.
`Plaintiff brings this claim individually and on behalf of the members of the
`proposed Class and New York Subclass against Defendant.
`73.
`Plaintiff and the Class members conferred a benefit on Defendant in the form of
`monies paid to purchase Defendant’s Hard Drives.
`74.
`Defendant is aware of this benefit.
`75.
`Defendant voluntarily accepted and retained this benefit.
`76.
`Defendant has been unjustly enriched in retaining the revenues derived from
`Plaintiff’s and Class members’ purchases of Hard Drives. Retention of those monies under these
`circumstances is unjust and inequitable because Defendant failed to disclose that the Hard Drives
`use inferior and unsuitable SMR technology.
`77.
`Because Defendant’s retention of the non-gratuitous benefits conferred on it by
`Plaintiff and members of the Classes is unjust and inequitable, Defendant must pay restitution to
`Plaintiff and the members of the Class and subclass for their unjust enrichment, as ordered by the
`Court.
`
`RELIEF DEMANDED
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, seeks
`judgment against Defendant, as follows:
`(a)
`For an order certifying the Classes under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of
`Civil Procedure and naming Plaintiff as representative of the Class and
`New York Subclass and Plaintiff’s attorneys as Class Counsel to represent
`the Class and New York Subclass;
`
`FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-08102-YGR
`
`16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-08102-YGR Document 61 Filed 03/05/21 Page 18 of 18
`
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`(f)
`(g)
`
`(h)
`
`For an order declaring the Defendant’s conduct violates the statutes
`referenced herein;
`For an order finding in favor of Plaintiff and the Class and New York
`Subclass on all counts asserted herein;
`For compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages in amounts to be
`de

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket