throbber
Case 5:16-cv-00349-NC Document 17 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
`croberts@durietangri.com
`LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713)
`lmiller@durietangri.com
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-362-6666
`Facsimile:
`415-236-6300
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`YAHOO! INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YAHOO! INC.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`KUDELSKI SA and OPENTV, INC.,,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 5:16-cv-00349-NC
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE
`CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
`
`Date: April 20, 2016
`Time: 10:00 a.m.
`Ctrm: 7, 4th Floor
`Judge: Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
`CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC
`
`

`
`Case 5:16-cv-00349-NC Document 17 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-3 and 7-11, Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc.
`
`(“Yahoo”) hereby moves the Court to continue the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for
`
`April 20, 2016. Yahoo filed a complaint against Kudelski SA and OpenTV, Inc. (“Defendants”) seeking
`
`declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement and invalidity on January 21, 2016. Dkt. No. 1. On
`
`that same day, an Initial Case Management Conference was set for April 20, 2016, and the case was
`
`referred to Magistrate Judge Cousins. Dkt. No. 11. Defendants returned waivers of service of summons
`
`on February 11, 2016. Dkt. Nos. 15 & 16. The deadline to file responsive pleadings is April 11, 2016.
`
`Id. The deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement is currently April 13, 2016. Dkt. No. 11.
`
`While Yahoo has consented to have Judge Cousins conduct all further proceedings in this case, Dkt. No.
`
`14, counsel for Defendants have not yet appeared and so have not indicated whether or not they consent.
`
`Further, in light of the deadline for responsive pleadings, the parties have not had the opportunity to
`
`conduct a Rule 26(f) conference. The schedule has not previously been modified in this case, and no
`
`deadlines have been set beyond the Initial Case Management Conference. In light of the foregoing,
`
`Yahoo requests that the Initial Case Management Conference be continued until such time as counsel for
`
`Defendants appear and file a responsive pleading, and the parties have adequate time to conduct a Rule
`
`26(f) conference. Counsel for Defendants do not oppose this request. Miller Decl. ¶ 2.
`
`
`
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`
`/s/ Laura E. Miller
`LAURA E. MILLER
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`YAHOO! INC.
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 1, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
`CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case 5:16-cv-00349-NC Document 17 Filed 04/01/16 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 1, 2016 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the Court
`
`using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case.
`
`
`
`/s/ Laura E. Miller
`LAURA E. MILLER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
`CONFERENCE / CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00349-NC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket