`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`
`STEPHEN HADLEY, et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`KELLOGG SALES COMPANY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 16-CV-04955-LHK
`
`ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
`MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT
`ENFORCEMENT AND RENEWED
`MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT
`APPROVAL
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 346, 347
`
`
`
`On November 12, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for settlement
`
`enforcement, ECF No. 346, and Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for settlement approval, ECF No. 347.
`
`During the hearing, Plaintiffs withdrew their motion for settlement enforcement. Thus, the Court
`
`DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for settlement enforcement as moot.
`
`In addition, during the hearing, the Court discussed with the parties Plaintiffs’ renewed
`
`motion for settlement approval. For the reasons stated on the record and in the Court’s February
`
`20, 2020 Order Denying Without Prejudice Motion for Preliminary Approval, ECF No. 339, the
`
`Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for settlement approval. As stated on
`
`the record, the parties have committed to curing the identified deficiencies and to filing a new
`
`Case No. 16-CV-04955-LHK
`ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT ENFORCEMENT AND RENEWED MOTION
`FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:16-cv-04955-LHK Document 361 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement.
`
`Lastly, the Court continues the December 2, 2020 case management conference to
`
`December 9, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. In the parties’ December 2, 2020 joint case management statement,
`
`the parties shall indicate: (1) whether they request a referral to alternative dispute resolution
`
`(“ADR”), and if so, what form of ADR and with whom; and (2) when the parties expect to file a
`
`new motion for preliminary approval.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 12, 2020
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`LUCY H. KOH
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`Case No. 16-CV-04955-LHK
`ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT ENFORCEMENT AND RENEWED MOTION
`FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`