`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION,
`et al.,
`
`Case No.16-cv-06371-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS
`TO FILE CITED EXCERPTS OF HARI
`RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION
`TRANSCRIPT
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On April 30, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery dispute letter regarding plaintiff
`
`Power Integrations, Inc.’s (“PI”) request to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony
`
`from defendants. Dkt. No. 217. That discovery dispute letter cited to portions of Ajay Hari’s Rule
`
`30(b)(6) deposition transcript filed under seal. At the Court’s request, defendants lodged the entire
`
`transcript of Mr. Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Dkt. No. 249 at 30:8-13. In its order resolving
`
`the parties’ dispute, the Court cited to portions of Mr. Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition transcript
`
`that were not previously filed. Dkt. No. 250.
`
`Accordingly, defendants shall file the following additional excerpts of the transcript of Mr.
`
`Hari’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition by June 11, 2019: pages 80, 177-179, and 364-367. As the Court
`
`has already concluded that good cause exists to file this material under seal, defendants need not
`
`file an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. Dkt. No. 252.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: June 4, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
