throbber
Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 50
`
`Roger Fulghum (Pro hac vice /
`roger.fulghum@bakerbotts.com)
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`910 Louisiana Street
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: (713) 229-1234
`Facsimile: (713) 229-1522
`
`John M. Neukom (CA BAR 275887)
`johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6600
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Attorneys for
`ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. and
`SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
`INDUSTRIES, LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,
`
`Case No. 16-cv-06371-BLF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. AND
`SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
`INDUSTRIES, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. AND
`SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
`INDUSTRIES, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON
`SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. AND
`SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS
`INDUSTRIES, LLC FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT AND DECLARATORY
`JUDGMENT
`
`(DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY)
`
`Case No. 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.
`AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 50
`
`ON Semiconductor Corporation and Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC
`
`(collectively, “ON”) brings this civil action against Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”)
`
`and hereby avers and complains as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`ON Semiconductor Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of
`
`business at 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona, 85008.
`
`2.
`
`Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company
`
`with its principal place of business at 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona, 85008.
`
`Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC is the principal domestic operating subsidiary of ON
`
`Semiconductor Corporation and does business under the name of ON Semiconductor. ON
`
`Semiconductor designs, manufactures, and markets a comprehensive portfolio of semiconductor
`
`products, including AC-DC controllers and regulators.
`
`3.
`
`Power Integrations, Inc. (“Power Integrations”) is incorporated under the laws of the
`
`state of Delaware, and has a regular and established place of business at 5245 Hellyer Avenue, San
`
`Jose, California, 95138. Power Integrations may be served through its registered agent at 5245
`
`Hellyer Avenue, San Jose, California, 95138.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`This is action arises under the United States patent laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq.,
`
`and includes a request for declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
`
`5.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, and 2201,
`
`and 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.
`
`6.
`
`Power Integrations is subject to general personal jurisdiction in this judicial district.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Power Integrations because Power Integrations has
`
`purposely availed themselves of the privilege of conducting activities within this State and judicial
`
`District. For example, Power Integrations maintains continuous and systematic contacts with this
`
`District, including maintaining its principal place of business in San Jose, California.
`
`2
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 3 of 50
`
`7.
`
`Power Integrations is subject to specific personal jurisdiction in this judicial district
`
`for its infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,333,624, U.S. Patent No. 6,429,709, U.S. Patent No.
`
`RE39,933, U.S. Patent No. RE41,908, U.S. Patent No. RE45,862, U.S. Patent No. 6,597,221, U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,944,272, and U.S. Patent No. 7,447,601 at least because Power Integrations has placed
`
`and continues to place the accused products into the stream of commerce that are sold in this
`
`district, and has therefore purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in this
`
`judicial district.
`
`8.
`
`Power Integrations is also subject to specific personal jurisdiction in this judicial
`
`district for ON’s declaratory judgment claims concerning U.S. Patent No. 6,249,876, at least
`
`because of Power Integrations’s patent enforcement contacts with the jurisdiction, demonstrating
`
`that Power Integrations has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in this
`
`judicial district.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under each of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), 1391(c), and
`
`1400(b). Power Integrations has its principal place of business in this district and has committed
`
`acts of infringement in this district.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF ON’s PATENTS
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`ON re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of Paragraphs 1-9 above.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,333,624, entitled “Circuit and Method for a Switching
`
`Power Supply with Primary Side Transformer Sensing” (hereinafter, “the ’624 patent”) on
`
`December 25, 2001. A true and correct copy of the ’624 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`12.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,429,709, entitled “Power Converter and Method for
`
`Controlling” (hereinafter, “the ’709 patent”) on August 6, 2002. A true and correct copy of the 709
`
`patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`13.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. RE39,933, entitled “Power Conversion Integrated Circuit
`
`3
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 4 of 50
`
`and Method for Programming” (hereinafter, “the ’933 patent”) on December 4, 2007. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’933 patent is attached as Exhibit C. The ’933 patent is a reissue of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 5,859,768 (“the ’768 patent”) and claims 1-20 of the ’768 patent also appear in claims 1-20 of
`
`the ’933 patent.
`
`14.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. RE41,908, entitled “Power Conversion Integrated Circuit
`
`and Method for Programming” (hereinafter, “the ’908 patent”) on November 2, 2010. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’908 patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`
`15.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. RE45,862, entitled “Power Conversion Integrated Circuit
`
`and Method for Programming” (hereinafter, “the ’862 patent”) on January 19, 2016. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’862 patent is attached as Exhibit E.
`
`16.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 6,597,221, entitled “Power Converter Circuit and Method
`
`for Controlling” (hereinafter, “the ’221 patent”) on July 22, 2003. A true and correct copy of the
`
`’221 patent is attached as Exhibit F.
`
`17.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 7,944,272, entitled “Constant Current Circuit” (hereinafter,
`
`“the ‘272 patent”) on May 17, 2011. A true and correct copy of the 272 patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit G.
`
`18.
`
`After a full and fair examination, the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No. 7,447,601, entitled “Power Supply Controller Method and
`
`Structure” (hereinafter, “the ‘601 patent”) on November 4, 2008. A true and correct copy of the
`
`‘601 patent is attached as Exhibit H.
`
`19.
`
`Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC owns title and all rights to the ’624,
`
`’709, ’933, ’768, ’908,’862, ’221, ‘272, and ‘601 patents, including the right to prevent others from
`
`making, having made, using, offering for sale, importing, or selling products and services covered
`
`4
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 5 of 50
`
`by those patents; the right to enforce those patents against Power Integrations; and the right to
`
`collect damages for all relevant times.
`
`20.
`
`Power Integrations has offered and continues to offer infringing semiconductors,
`
`including but not limited to the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having
`
`product name LNK574/576, TOPSwitch-HX series of integrated circuits, LYTSwitch-4 integrated
`
`circuit, InnoSwitch-CE integrated circuit, and LYTSwitch-3 integrated circuit for sale, through
`
`intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others), in this district and elsewhere.
`
`EXISTENCE OF AN ACTUAL CONTROVERSY
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`ON re-alleges and incorporates by reference each of Paragraphs 1-20 above.
`
`An actual controversy exists within the jurisdiction of this Court under 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations is the owner of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,249,876, entitled “Frequency Jittering Control for Varying the Switching Frequency of a
`
`Power Supply” (“the ’876 patent”), by assignment from named inventors Balu Balakrishnan, Alex
`
`Djenguerian, and Leif Lund. The ’876 patent bears an issuance date of June 19, 2001. A copy of
`
`the ’876 patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit I.
`
`24.
`
`Power Integrations has accused ON of infringing the ’876 patent. Specifically, Balu
`
`Balakrishnan, President and CEO of Power Integrations and named inventor on the ‘876 patent, sent
`
`an e-mail to Keith Jackson, President and Chief Executive Officer of ON, alleging that ON infringes
`
`the ’876 patent in connection with its manufacture, sale, and/or offers to sell ON’s AC-DC
`
`controller with the model number NCP1246. A copy of the text of the e-mail (with e-mail
`
`addresses redacted) is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit J.
`
`25.
`
`Power Integrations has a history of asserting the ‘876 patent. See, e.g., Power
`
`Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-1371 (D. Del. filed Oct.
`
`20, 2004) (asserting the ’876 patent); Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor, Int’l
`
`Inc., Case No. 1:08-CV-0309 (D. Del. filed May 23, 2008) (asserting the ’876 patent); and Power
`
`5
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 6 of 50
`
`Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:15-CV-04854 (N.D. Cal.
`
`filed October 21, 2015) (asserting the ’079 and ’876 patents).
`
`26.
`
`In light of the specific allegation of infringement in Mr. Balakrishnan’s e-mail, and
`
`Power Integrations’s history of filing suit for patent infringement on the ‘876 patent against other
`
`semiconductor companies, the circumstances show a substantial controversy between parties with
`
`adverse legal interests of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory
`
`judgment. Therefore, an actual controversy within this Court’s jurisdiction exists under
`
`28 U.S.C. § 2201.
`
`COUNT ONE
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,333,624
`
`27.
`
`ON re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation of paragraphs
`
`1-26 as though fully set forth herein.
`
`The ’624 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`Power Integrations has at no time, expressly or impliedly, been licensed under the
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`’624 patent.
`
`30.
`
`Upon information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now directly
`
`infringing, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’624 patent
`
`through at least the acts of making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing in the United
`
`States infringing power supply controllers that include the features of one or more claims of the
`
`’624 patent. More particularly, and without limitation, Power Integrations’s LinkZero-LP series of
`
`integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, infringe at least claim 6 of
`
`the ’624 patent. Upon information and belief, Power Integrations’s LinkZero-LP series of
`
`integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, include a switching
`
`regulator coupled for receiving a first feedback signal and a variable reference signal to provide the
`
`switching transistor drive signal. Upon information and belief, Power Integrations’s LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, include a
`
`6
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 7 of 50
`
`compensation circuit coupled for receiving a current reference signal representative of the inductor
`
`current for generating the variable reference signal.
`
`31.
`
`Upon information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now actively
`
`inducing infringement of one or more claims of the ’624 patent, either literally or under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`Power Integrations has known of the ’624 patent since at least September 25, 2014.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has intended, and continues to intend,
`
`to induce patent infringement by third parties and has knowledge that the inducing acts would cause
`
`infringement or has been willfully blind to the possibility that its inducing acts would cause
`
`infringing acts. For example, Power Integrations is aware that the features claimed in the ’624
`
`patent are features of the power supply controller products and are necessarily used by purchasers of
`
`the power supply controller products and, therefore, that Power Integrations’s customers will
`
`infringe the ’624 patent by using the power supply controller products or incorporating the power
`
`supply controller products in other products, and that subsequent sales of such products would also
`
`be a direct infringement. More particularly, and without limitation, Power Integrations is aware that
`
`the features claimed in the ’624 patent are present in the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits,
`
`including those having product name LNK574/576, and that such features are necessarily used by
`
`purchasers of the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits and, therefore, that Power Integrations’s
`
`customers will infringe the ’624 patent by using the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits or
`
`incorporating the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits in other products, and that subsequent
`
`sales of such products would also be a direct infringement.
`
`34.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations’s intentional actions induce others to
`
`directly infringe, and those actions are undertaken with the specific intent that they will, in fact, induce
`
`direct infringement and with full knowledge that Power Integrations’s products infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ‘624 patent both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. By way of example only,
`
`Power Integrations sells and delivers the infringing LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits,
`
`including those having product name LNK574/576 devices to U.S. distributors including Mouser
`
`7
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 8 of 50
`
`Electronics located in Mansfield, TX and thereafter induce Mouser Electronics to sell and offer for sale
`
`the infringing products to customers in the United States, thereby directly infringing the ‘624 patent.
`
`Power Integrations maintains a website in which it promotes the sale of and identifies that LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, are available for sale
`
`in the United States by Mouser Electronics (https://ac-dc.power.com/sales/distributors/mouser/), thereby
`
`inducing acts of direct infringement. Power Integrations further induces third parties to design the
`
`accused products into power supplies and other products to be used in the United States, by, for
`
`example, providing datasheets, application notes, design notes, and other collateral on their Internet
`
`website available to customers and instructing those customers how to incorporate the LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, into a power supply.
`
`See, e.g., https://ac-dc.power.com/sites/default/files/product-docs/linkzero-lp_family_datasheet.pdf. In
`
`addition, Power Integrations employs sales representatives and field applications engineers that interact
`
`with and work directly with customers to assist them in designing complete power supplies or other
`
`products that, upon information and belief, Power Integrations knows or has reason to believe are
`
`intended to be sold worldwide, including in the United States.
`
`35.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now contributing to
`
`the infringement of the ’624 patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`36.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has been aware, since first learning of
`
`the ’624 patent, that its power supply controllers that include the claimed features of the ’624 patent
`
`are a material part of the patented invention, are not a staple article or commodity of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial non-infringing use, and are especially made and/or adapted for use in
`
`infringing the ’624 patent, at least because the claimed features of the ’624 patent are necessarily
`
`used by purchasers of its power supply controllers. More particularly, and without limitation,
`
`Power Integrations is aware that the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those
`
`having product name LNK574/576, are a material part of the patented invention, are not a staple
`
`article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use, and are especially
`
`8
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 9 of 50
`
`made and/or adapted for use in infringing the ’624 patent, at least because the claimed features of
`
`the ’624 patent are necessarily used by purchasers of its power supply controllers.
`
`37.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations’s customers have in fact directly
`
`infringed the ’624 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing in the United
`
`States infringing devices that incorporate a Power Integrations power supply controller chip that
`
`includes the claimed features of the ’624 patent. These devices meet each and every limitation of at
`
`least one claim of the ’624 patent either literally or equivalently. Power Integrations has knowledge
`
`of these infringing uses by its customers. Specifically, and without limitation, Power Integrations’s
`
`customers have directly infringed the ’624 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and
`
`importing in the United States the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having
`
`product name LNK574/576.
`
`38.
`
`ON has been irreparably harmed by Power Integrations’s infringement of the ’624
`
`patent and will continue to be harmed unless and until Power Integrations’s infringement is
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`39.
`
`Power Integrations’s infringement of the ’624 has been willful as Power Integrations
`
`has had knowledge of the ’624 since at least September 2014. Upon information and belief, Power
`
`Integrations’s decision to continue to knowingly infringe the ’624 patent is willful, deliberate, and
`
`consciously wrongful, and Power Integrations has no good reason to believe its infringing conduct
`
`is defensible. Upon information and belief, Power Integrations’s acts of infringement have been,
`
`and continue to be, willful so as to warrant the enhancement of damages awarded as a result of their
`
`infringement. In particular, despite knowing of ON Semiconductor’s patent rights, Power
`
`Integrations continue to infringe the ’624 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or
`
`importing at least LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having product name
`
`LNK574/576, and contributing to and inducing others to do the same, knowing the products contain
`
`infringing circuitry.
`
`40.
`
`As a result of Power Integrations’s infringement, ON has suffered and will continue
`
`to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`9
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 10 of 50
`
`COUNT TWO
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,429,709
`
`41.
`
`ON re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation of paragraphs
`
`1-40 as though fully set forth herein.
`
`The ’709 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`Power Integrations has at no time, expressly or impliedly, been licensed under the
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`’709 patent.
`
`44.
`
`Upon information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now directly
`
`infringing, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’709 patent
`
`through at least the acts of making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing in the United
`
`States infringing power supply controllers that include the features of one or more claims of the
`
`’709 patent. More particularly, and without limitation, the use of Power Integrations’s LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, infringe at least
`
`claim 12 of the ’709 patent. Upon information and belief, the use of Power Integrations’s
`
`LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576,
`
`includes performing the steps of comparing an input voltage to a first reference signal to provide a
`
`first compare signal. Upon information and belief, the use of Power Integrations’s LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, includes
`
`performing the steps of comparing the input voltage to a second reference signal after receiving the
`
`first compare signal to provide a second compare signal, and passing the control signal from the
`
`first node to the second node after receiving the second compare signal.
`
`45.
`
`Upon information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now actively
`
`inducing infringement of one or more claims of the ’709 patent, either literally or under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`Power Integrations has known of the ’709 patent since at least September 25, 2014.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has intended, and continues to intend,
`
`to induce patent infringement by third parties and has knowledge that the inducing acts would cause
`
`10
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 11 of 50
`
`infringement or has been willfully blind to the possibility that its inducing acts would cause
`
`infringing acts. For example, Power Integrations is aware that the features claimed in the ’709
`
`patent are features of the power supply controller products and are necessarily used by purchasers of
`
`the power supply controller products and, therefore, that Power Integrations’s customers will
`
`infringe the ’709 patent by using the power supply controller products or incorporating the power
`
`supply controller products in other products, and that subsequent sales of such products would also
`
`be a direct infringement. More particularly, and without limitation, Power Integrations is aware that
`
`the features claimed in the ’709 patent are present in the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits,
`
`including those having product name LNK574/576, and that such features are necessarily used by
`
`purchasers of the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits and, therefore, that Power Integrations’s
`
`customers will infringe the ’709 patent by using the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits or
`
`incorporating the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits in other products, and that subsequent
`
`sales of such products would also be a direct infringement.
`
`48.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations’s intentional actions induce others to
`
`directly infringe, and those actions are undertaken with the specific intent that they will, in fact, induce
`
`direct infringement and with full knowledge that Power Integrations’s products infringe one or more
`
`claims of the ‘709 patent both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. By way of example only,
`
`Power Integrations sells and delivers the infringing LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits,
`
`including those having product name LNK574/576 devices to U.S. distributors including Mouser
`
`Electronics located in Mansfield, TX and thereafter induce Mouser Electronics to sell and offer for sale
`
`the infringing products to customers in the United States, thereby directly infringing the ‘709 patent.
`
`Power Integrations maintains a website in which it promotes the sale of and identifies that LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, are available for sale
`
`in the United States by Mouser Electronics (https://ac-dc.power.com/sales/distributors/mouser/), thereby
`
`inducing acts of direct infringement. Power Integrations further induces third parties to design the
`
`accused products into power supplies and other products to be used in the United States, by, for
`
`example, providing datasheets, application notes, design notes, and other collateral on their Internet
`
`11
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 12 of 50
`
`website available to customers and instructing those customers how to incorporate the LinkZero-LP
`
`series of integrated circuits, including those having product name LNK574/576, into a power supply.
`
`See, e.g., https://ac-dc.power.com/sites/default/files/product-docs/linkzero-lp_family_datasheet.pdf. In
`
`addition, Power Integrations employs sales representatives and field applications engineers that interact
`
`with and work directly with customers to assist them in designing complete power supplies or other
`
`products that, upon information and belief, Power Integrations knows or has reason to believe are
`
`intended to be sold worldwide, including in the United States.
`
`49.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now contributing to
`
`the infringement of the ’709 patent, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`50.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations has been aware, since first learning of
`
`the ’709 patent, that its power supply controllers that include the claimed features of the ’709 patent
`
`are a material part of the patented invention, are not a staple article or commodity of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial non-infringing use, and are especially made and/or adapted for use in
`
`infringing the ’709 patent, at least because the claimed features of the ’709 patent are necessarily
`
`used by purchasers of its power supply controllers. More particularly, and without limitation,
`
`Power Integrations is aware that the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those
`
`having product name LNK574/576, are a material part of the patented invention, are not a staple
`
`article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use, and are especially
`
`made and/or adapted for use in infringing the ’709 patent, at least because the claimed features of
`
`the ’709 patent are necessarily used by purchasers of its power supply controllers.
`
`51.
`
`On information and belief, Power Integrations’s customers have in fact directly
`
`infringed the ’709 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing in the United
`
`States infringing devices that incorporate a Power Integrations power supply controller chip that
`
`includes the claimed features of the ’709 patent. These devices meet each and every limitation of at
`
`least one claim of the ’709 patent either literally or equivalently. Power Integrations has knowledge
`
`of these infringing uses by its customers. Specifically, and without limitation, Power Integrations’s
`
`customers have directly infringed the ’709 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and
`
`12
`
`THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ON SEMICONDUCTOR
`CORP. AND SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES
` Case Nos. 16-cv-06371-BLF and 17-cv-03189-BLF
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-06371-BLF Document 94 Filed 02/05/18 Page 13 of 50
`
`importing in the United States the LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having
`
`product name LNK574/576.
`
`52.
`
`ON has been irreparably harmed by Power Integrations’s infringement of the ’709
`
`patent and will continue to be harmed unless and until Power Integrations’s infringement is
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`53.
`
`Power Integrations’s infringement of the ’709 has been willful as Power Integrations
`
`has had knowledge of the ’709 since at least September 2014. Upon information and belief, Power
`
`Integrations’s decision to continue to knowingly infringe the ’709 patent is willful, deliberate, and
`
`consciously wrongful, and Power Integrations has no good reason to believe its infringing conduct
`
`is defensible. Upon information and belief, Power Integrations’s acts of infringement have been,
`
`and continue to be, willful so as to warrant the enhancement of damages awarded as a result of their
`
`infringement. In particular, despite knowing of ON Semiconductor’s patent rights, Power
`
`Integrations continues to infringe the ’709 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or
`
`importing at least LinkZero-LP series of integrated circuits, including those having product name
`
`LNK574/576, and contributing to and inducing others to do the same, knowing the products contain
`
`infringing circuitry.
`
`54.
`
`As a result of Power Integrations’s infringement, ON has suffered and will continue
`
`to suffer damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
`
`COUNT THREE
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. RE39,933
`
`55.
`
`ON re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation of paragraphs
`
`1-54 as though fully set forth herein.
`
`The ’933 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`Power Integrations has at no time, expressly or impliedly, been licensed under the
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`’933 patent.
`
`58.
`
`Upon information and belief, Power Integrations has been and is now

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket