throbber
Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 25
`
`David E. Bower (SBN 119546)
`MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
`600 Corporate Pointe, Suite 1170
`Culver City, CA 90230
`Tel: (213) 446-6652
`Fax: (212) 202-7880
`dbower@monteverdelaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Ronald Blackwell
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`RONALD BLACKWELL, Individually and
`on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
`
`Civil Action No. 5:20-cv-5365
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`CLASS ACTION
`
`FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`MICHAEL DECESARE, THERESIA
`GOUW, JAMES BEER, DAVID DEWALT,
`ELIZABETH HACKENSON, MARK
`JENSEN, KATHY MCELLIGOTT,
`ENRIQUE SALEM, and HEZY
`YESHURUN,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`1. VIOLATION OF SECTION 14(e)
`OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
`ACT OF 1934
`2. VIOLATION OF SECTION 20(a)
`OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
`ACT OF 1934
`3. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTIES
`
`Plaintiff Ronald Blackwell (“Plaintiff”), by his undersigned attorneys, alleges upon
`
`personal knowledge with respect to himself, and upon information and belief based upon, inter
`
`alia, the investigation of counsel as to all other allegations herein, as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This action is brought by Plaintiff as class action against Forescout Technologies,
`
`Inc. (“Forescout” or the “Company”) and the members of the Company’s board of directors
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`(collectively referred to as the “Board” or the “Individual Defendants” and, together with
`
`2
`
`Forescout, the “Defendants”) for their violations of Sections 14(e) and 20(a) of the Securities
`
`3
`
`Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78n(e) and 78t(a), respectively. Plaintiff
`
`4
`
`also asserts a claim against the Individual Defendants for breaching their fiduciary duties under
`
`5
`
`state law. Plaintiff’s claims arise in connection with the proposed tender offer (“Tender Offer”) by
`
`6
`
`Ferrari Group Holdings, L.P. (“Parent”) and Ferrari Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), affiliates of
`
`7
`
`Advent International Corporation (together with Parent and Merger Sub “Advent”), to acquire all
`
`8
`
`of the issued and outstanding shares of Forescout (the “Proposed Transaction”).
`
`9
`
`2.
`
`On February 6, 2020, Forescout and Advent entered into an agreement and plan of
`
`10
`
`merger (the “Initial Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Forescout’s shareholders would be
`
`11
`
`entitled to receive $33.00 per share in cash for each share of Forescout common stock they own
`
`12
`
`(the “Initial Consideration”). On March 3, 2020 Forescout issue a proxy statement soliciting
`
`13
`
`shareholders to vote in favor of the Initial Merger Agreement, and on April 23, 2020, Forescout
`
`14
`
`shareholders approved the Initial Merger Agreement.
`
`15
`
`3.
`
`However, three days before the Initial Merger was scheduled to close, Advent
`
`16
`
`informed Forescout that it had concluded that certain closing conditions provided in the Initial
`
`17
`
`Merger Agreement could not be met, and as a result Advent would not consummate the acquisition.
`
`18
`
`4.
`
`On July 15, 2020, Forescout entered into a new agreement and plan of merger with
`
`19
`
`Advent and its subsidiaries (the “Merger Agreement”), whereby shareholders of Forescout
`
`20
`
`common stock will receive $29.00 in cash for each share of Forescout stock they own (the “Offer
`
`21
`
`Price”).
`
`22
`
`5.
`
`In renegotiating a deal with Advent, the officers and directors of the Company
`
`23
`
`abandoned the interests of shareholders in pursuit of their own personal benefits. Indeed one of the
`
`24
`
`primary new features present in the Merger Agreement that was absent from the Initial Merger
`
`25
`
`Agreement is the ability for certain shareholders and certain holders of Forescout Stock-Based
`
`26
`
`Awards and/or Forescout Options, including Forescout's executive officers, to roll their equity
`
`27
`
`over into the combined company and continue to share in the future growth of the Company. This
`
`28
`
`rollover comes at the expense of common shareholders, who will now receive four dollars less per
`
`
`
`2
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`share from the Initial Consideration. This unfair sales process represents a breach of the fiduciary
`
`2
`
`duties of the Individual Defendants.
`
`3
`
`6.
`
`On July 20, 2020, in order to convince Forescout shareholders to tender their shares,
`
`4
`
`the Board authorized the filing of a materially incomplete and misleading Schedule 14D-9
`
`5
`
`Solicitation/Recommendation Statement (the “Recommendation Statement”) with the Securities
`
`6
`
`and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In particular, the Recommendation Statement contains
`
`7
`
`materially incomplete and misleading information concerning: (i) the Company’s financial
`
`8
`
`projections; (ii) the valuation analyses performed by the Company’s financial advisor, Morgan
`
`9
`
`Stanley & Co. LLC (“Morgan Stanley”); (iii) the conflicts of interest facing Morgan Stanley; (iv)
`
`10
`
`the conflicts of interest facing the Company’s officers and directors; and (v) the background of the
`
`11
`
`offer. These material misstatements and omissions represent violations of the Exchange Act and
`
`12
`
`breaches of the Individual Defendants’ duty of candor/disclosure.
`
`13
`
`7.
`
`The Tender Offer is scheduled to expire at the end of the day, one minute after
`
`14
`
`11:59 p.m., Eastern time on August 20, 2020 (the “Expiration Date”). It is imperative that the
`
`15
`
`material information that has been omitted from the Recommendation Statement is disclosed to
`
`16
`
`the Company’s shareholders prior to the forthcoming Expiration Date so they may make an
`
`17
`
`informed determination on whether to tender their shares.
`
`18
`
`8.
`
`For these reasons, and as set forth in detail herein, Plaintiff seeks to enjoin
`
`19
`
`Defendants from closing the Tender Offer or taking any steps to consummate the Proposed
`
`20
`
`Transaction, unless and until the material information discussed below is disclosed to Forescout
`
`21
`
`shareholders or, in the event the Proposed Transaction is consummated, to recover damages
`
`22
`
`resulting from the Defendants’ violations of the Exchange Act and breaches of fiduciary duty.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`This Court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 27 of the
`
`25
`
`Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction) as Plaintiff
`
`26
`
`alleges violations of Sections 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act.
`
`27
`
`10.
`
`The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim for breach of
`
`28
`
`fiduciary duty pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`
`
`
`3
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`11.
`
`Personal jurisdiction exists over each Defendant either because the Defendant
`
`2
`
`conducts business in or maintains operations in this District, or is an individual who is either
`
`3
`
`present in this District for jurisdictional purposes or has sufficient minimum contacts with this
`
`4
`
`District as to render the exercise of jurisdiction over the Defendants by this Court permissible
`
`5
`
`under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. “Where a federal statute such as
`
`6
`
`Section 27 of the [Exchange] Act confers nationwide service of process, the question becomes
`
`7
`
`whether the party has sufficient contacts with the United States, not any particular state.” Sec. Inv’r
`
`8
`
`Prot. Corp. v. Vigman, 764 F.2d 1309, 1305 (9th Cir. 1985). “[S]o long as a defendant has
`
`9
`
`minimum contacts with the United States, Section of the Act confers personal jurisdiction over the
`
`10
`
`defendant in any federal district court.” Id. At 1316.
`
`11
`
`12.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §
`
`12
`
`78aa, as well as pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because: (i) the conduct at issue took place and had
`
`13
`
`an effect in this District; (ii) Forescout maintains its principal place of business in this District and
`
`14
`
`each of the Individual Defendants, and Company officers or directors, either resides in this District
`
`15
`
`or has extensive contacts within this District; (iii) a substantial portion of the transactions and
`
`16
`
`wrongs complained of herein occurred in this District; (iv) most of the relevant documents
`
`17
`
`pertaining to Plaintiff’s claims are stored (electronically and otherwise), and evidence exists, in
`
`18
`
`this District; and (v) Defendants have received substantial compensation in this District by doing
`
`19
`
`business here and engaging in numerous activities that had an effect in this District.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff brings this class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of himself
`
`22
`
`and the other public shareholders of Forescout (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are
`
`23
`
`Defendants herein and any person, firm, trust, corporation, or other entity related to or affiliated
`
`24
`
`with any Defendant.
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`14.
`
`This action is properly maintainable as a class action because:
`
`a.
`
`The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. As
`
`of July 15, 2020, there were 49,602,911 shares of Forescout common stock outstanding,
`
`held by hundreds to thousands of individuals and entities scattered throughout the country.
`
`4
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 5 of 25
`
`The actual number of public stockholders of Forescout will be ascertained through
`
`discovery;
`
`b.
`
`There are questions of law and fact that are common to the Class that
`
`predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, including the
`
`following:
`
`i)
`
`whether Defendants have misrepresented or omitted material
`
`information concerning
`
`the Proposed Transaction
`
`in
`
`the
`
`Recommendation Statement, in violation of Sections14(e) of the
`
`Exchange Act;
`
`ii)
`
`whether the Individual Defendants have violated Section 20(a) of
`
`the Exchange Act;
`
`iii)
`
`whether the Individual Defendants have breached their fiduciary
`
`duties; and
`
`iv)
`
`whether Plaintiff and other members of the Class will suffer
`
`irreparable harm if compelled to tender their shares based on the
`
`materially incomplete and misleading Recommendation Statement;
`
`c.
`
`Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class, has retained competent
`
`counsel experienced in litigation of this nature, and will fairly and adequately protect the
`
`interests of the Class;
`
`d.
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the other members of the Class
`
`and Plaintiff does not have any interests adverse to the Class;
`
`e.
`
`The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the Class
`
`would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual
`
`members of the Class, which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the
`
`party opposing the Class;
`
`f.
`
`Defendants have acted on grounds generally applicable to the Class with
`
`respect to the matters complained of herein, thereby making appropriate the relief sought
`
`herein with respect to the Class as a whole; and
`
`5
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`15.
`
`A class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently
`
`2
`
`adjudicating the controversy
`
`3
`
`4
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff is, and has been continuously throughout all times relevant hereto, the
`
`PARTIES
`
`5
`
`owner of Forescout common stock.
`
`6
`
`17.
`
`Defendant Forescout is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices
`
`7
`
`located at 190 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, California 95134.
`
`8
`
`18.
`
`Defendant Michael DeCesare (“DeCesare”) is, and has been at all relevant times,
`
`9
`
`the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company.
`
`10
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Theresia Gouw (“Gouw”) is, and has been at all relevant times, the Chair
`
`11
`
`of the Company’s Board of Directors.
`
`12
`
`20.
`
`Defendant James Beer (“Beer”) is, and has been at all relevant times, a director of
`
`13
`
`the Company.
`
`14
`
`21.
`
`Defendant David DeWalt (“DeWalt”) is, and has been at all relevant times, a
`
`15
`
`director of the Company.
`
`16
`
`22.
`
`Defendant Elizabeth Hackenson (“Hackenson”) is, and has been at all relevant
`
`17
`
`times, a director of the Company.
`
`18
`
`23.
`
`Defendant Mark Jensen (“Jensen”) is, and has been at all relevant times, a director
`
`19
`
`of the Company.
`
`20
`
`24.
`
`Defendant Kathy McElligott (“McElligott”) is, and has been at all relevant times, a
`
`21
`
`director of the Company.
`
`22
`
`25.
`
`Defendant Enrique Salem (“Salem”) is, and has been at all relevant times, a director
`
`23
`
`of the Company.
`
`24
`
`26.
`
`Defendant Hezy Yeshurun (“Yeshurun”) is a co-founder of the Company and the
`
`25
`
`former Chair of Company’s Board of Directors, and has been at all relevant times, a director of
`
`26
`
`the Company.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`6
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`27.
`
`The Defendants identified in paragraphs 18 through 26 are collectively referred to
`
`2
`
`herein as the “Board” or the “Individual Defendants,” and together with the Company, the
`
`3
`
`“Defendants.”
`
`4
`
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`
`5
`
`I.
`
`Background and the Proposed Transaction
`
`6
`
`28.
`
`Forescout is a provider of device visibility and control solutions. The Company
`
`7
`
`provides real-time identification, classification, assessment and continuous control over the
`
`8
`
`devices, that collectively, comprise an organization’s network. The Company’s network extends
`
`9
`
`across the campus information technology (IT) devices, the campus Internet of Things (IoT)
`
`10
`
`devices, operational technology (OT) devices, the data center and within the third-party cloud. The
`
`11
`
`Company offers Forescout platform, which provides organizations with situational awareness of
`
`12
`
`extended enterprise and the ability to orchestrate actions to reduce cyber risk. The Company offers
`
`13
`
`products such as eyesight, eyeSegment, eyeControl, eyeExtend, eyeManage and SilentDefense.
`
`14
`
`29.
`
`Advent is a private equity firm which invests in business, financial services,
`
`15
`
`healthcare, industrial, retail, consumer, and leisure sectors, as well as offers investment advisory,
`
`16
`
`wealth management, due diligence, and evaluation services. Advent has $48 billion in assets under
`
`17
`
`management.
`
`18
`
`30.
`
`In October 2019, Forescout hired Morgan Stanley to conduct a sales process. In
`
`19
`
`November 2019, Forescout originally prepared its operating plan for 2019-2023, referred to as the
`
`20
`
`Target Plan:
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 8 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`31.
`
`In January 2020, Forescout management performed a bottoms-up analysis
`
`2
`
`reflecting a bottoms-up analysis of Forescout's sales pipeline, a bottoms-up expense analysis, and
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Forescout's results for the fourth quarter of 2019, referred to as the Alternate Plan:
`
`
`32.
`
`Notably, the Alternate Plan significantly downgraded the Company’s projections
`
`for years 2020-2023. In March 2020—after the Initial Merger Agreement and once the Company
`
`was already sold—it was approved by the Forescout Board as Forescout's operating plan for 2020.
`
`33.
`
`On February 6, 2020, Forescout and Advent entered into the Initial Merger
`
`
`
`Agreement and issued a press release announcing it, which stated in relevant part:
`
`Forescout to be Acquired by Advent International in $1.9 Billion Transaction
`
`SAN JOSE, Calif., Feb. 06, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Forescout
`Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSCT, “Forescout”), the leader in device visibility
`and control, today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement under
`which Advent International (“Advent”), one of the largest and most experienced
`global private equity investors, will acquire all outstanding shares of Forescout
`common stock for $33.00 per share in an all-cash transaction valued at $1.9 billion.
`Advent will be joined by Crosspoint Capital Partners (“Crosspoint Capital”), a
`private equity investment firm focused on the cybersecurity and privacy industries,
`as a co-investor and advisor.
`
`The purchase price represents a premium of approximately 30% over Forescout’s
`closing share price of $25.45 on October 18, 2019, the last full trading day prior to
`the release of the 13-D filings by Corvex Management L.P. and Jericho Capital
`Asset Management L.P. on October 21, 2019, which disclosed they had formed a
`partnership to approach Forescout and accumulated a combined 14.5% ownership
`in the company. Upon completion of the transaction, Forescout will become a
`private company with the flexibility to continue investing in the development and
`deployment of leading-edge cybersecurity products and solutions that serve the
`evolving needs of enterprise customers. CEO and President Michael DeCesare will
`continue to lead the company, and Forescout will continue to be headquartered in
`San Jose, California.
`
`“Forescout has established itself as a leader in device visibility and control, with
`the most advanced platform in the market,” said Michael DeCesare, CEO and
`
`8
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 9 of 25
`
`President, Forescout. “We are still in early innings of a large market opportunity as
`every organization needs visibility into what is connecting to their network and how
`to mitigate against high risk devices, including non-traditional IoT and OT devices.
`This transaction represents an exciting new phase in the evolution of Forescout. We
`are excited to be partnering with Advent International and Crosspoint Capital,
`premier firms with security DNA and track records of success in strengthening
`companies and supporting them through transitionary times. We look forward to
`working with Advent and Crosspoint Capital to advance our strategic objectives
`and want to thank our employees for their continued hard work and commitment to
`Forescout.”
`
`“We are pleased to have reached this agreement with Advent, which delivers
`significant immediate value to shareholders, and positions Forescout to continue
`meeting and exceeding the expectations of our customers,” said Theresia Gouw,
`Chair of the Forescout Board. “This transaction, which is the result of a robust
`process conducted by the Board of Directors with the assistance of independent
`legal and financial advisors, is a testament to the value Forescout has created and
`the reputation our team has built. In making its determination, the Board of
`Directors considered the likely volatility associated with the business model
`transition to ratable revenue recognition, changes to our go-to-market initiatives,
`particularly in EMEA, and timing of significant eight-figure deals, while managing
`to quarterly street estimates as a publicly traded company. We are confident that
`this transaction is the best path forward for Forescout and our stakeholders.”
`
`“Forescout is an ideal partner for Advent — as it’s a mission-critical business
`positioned to capitalize on key tech megatrends,” said Bryan Taylor, head of
`Advent’s technology investment team and a Managing Partner in Palo Alto. “The
`company has differentiated itself from its core competitors with its proprietary,
`agentless technology, making it ideal for large, complex organizations in a rapidly
`evolving cyber risk landscape. In partnership with Greg Clark and the Crosspoint
`Capital team, Advent is thrilled to work with Forescout to build on its record of
`innovation and continue delivering world-class cybersecurity solutions to
`customers for years to come.”
`
`“As enterprises continue to shift to the cloud and decentralized networks, today’s
`chief information security officers are looking for secure solutions to increase
`visibility and provide orchestration, making their network controls more seamless,”
`said Greg Clark, Managing Partner at Crosspoint Capital. “Forescout’s platform is
`already ahead of the curve, and we believe we can further advance the company’s
`market position by applying
`the collective experience and expertise
`in
`cybersecurity software of the Advent and Crosspoint Capital team.”
`
`Transaction Details
`
`Under the terms of the agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the
`Forescout Board of Directors, Forescout shareholders will receive $33.00 in cash
`for each share of common stock they own.
`
`The agreement includes a 30-day "go-shop" period expiring on March 8, 2020,
`which permits Forescout’s Board of Directors and advisors to solicit alternative
`acquisition proposals from third parties. Forescout will have the right to terminate
`the merger agreement to enter into a superior proposal subject to the terms and
`conditions of the merger agreement. There can be no assurance that this "go-shop"
`will result in a superior proposal, and Forescout does not intend to disclose
`developments with respect to the solicitation process unless and until it determines
`such disclosure is appropriate or is otherwise required.
`
`
`9
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`The transaction is expected to close in the second calendar quarter of 2020, subject
`to customary closing conditions, including approval by Forescout shareholders and
`receipt of regulatory approvals. Upon completion of the transaction, Forescout
`common stock will no longer be listed on any public market.
`
`Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Conference Call Update
`
`Separately, Forescout today announced its fourth quarter and full year 2019
`financial results, which are available on the “Investor Relations” section of the
`Forescout website. In light of the announced transaction with Advent International,
`Forescout has cancelled the earnings conference call previously scheduled for
`February 6, 2020, at 1:30pm PT (4:30pm ET).
`
`Advisors
`
`Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC is serving as exclusive financial advisor to Forescout
`and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati is serving as legal counsel. Ropes & Gray
`is serving as legal counsel to Advent International and financing for the transaction
`is being arranged and provided by Owl Rock Capital.
`
`34.
`
`On March 3, 2020, the Company filed its preliminary proxy statement soliciting
`
`shareholder approval for the Initial Merger Agreement, which provided shareholders with both the
`
`Target Plan and the Alternate Plan. On March 24, 2020, the Company filed its definitive proxy
`
`statement and set the shareholder vote for the Initial Merger Agreement for April 23, 2020, which
`
`corrected the discrepancy in the treatment of amortization of intangibles for both the Target Plan
`
`and the Alternate Plan. On April 23, 2020 Forescout shareholders approved the sale of the
`
`Company in exchange for $33 per share pursuant to the Initial Merger Agreement.
`
`35.
`
`On May 11, 2020, Forescout announced poor results for the first quarter of 2020,
`
`primarily due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual Defendant DeCesare
`
`commented:
`
`In March, the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic sharply escalated around the
`world, causing some customers to delay purchasing decisions in order to prioritize
`employee health and safety and business continuity planning. As organizations
`have shifted to remote workforces, their network footprint has evolved but the need
`for visibility and control of all devices on the network remains imperative,
`regardless of whether devices reside within the confines of corporate offices or in
`remote, work from home environments. Forescout’s platform is uniquely
`positioned to help enterprises in today’s perimeter-less world and defend against
`increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. We look forward to completing our
`pending transaction with Advent International Corporation, which will position us
`for long-term success as we execute on our large and growing market opportunity.
`
`36.
`
`On May 15, 2020, news broke that Advent was pulling out of the Initial Merger
`
`Agreement, and that the merger would not be completed as scheduled. On May 18, 2020, Forescout
`
`issued a press release stating, in relevant part:
`
`10
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`
`On May 15, 2020, Advent provided notice to Forescout that it would not be
`proceeding to consummate the acquisition of Forescout on May 18, 2020, as
`scheduled. Forescout and Advent are engaged in ongoing discussions regarding
`timing to close and the terms of the transaction. There can be no assurance that
`Forescout and Advent will be able to reach agreement on terms.
`
`“This is an uncertain time for everyone, as businesses and communities across the
`world navigate the challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Michael
`DeCesare, CEO and President of Forescout. “We continue to believe that Advent
`is the right partner for Forescout and we remain committed to completing the
`transaction in the near-term. We thank our employees for their extraordinary efforts
`and commitment to Forescout, and we remain focused on continuing our course of
`advancing our
`innovation
`roadmap and strategic cloud and business
`transformation.”
`
`37.
`
`On May 19, 2020, Forescout sued Advent in Delaware Chancery Court for
`
`breaching the Initial Merger Agreement and seeking specific performance of the Initial Merger
`
`Agreement. On May 20, 2020, Forescout issued a press release stating, in relevant part:
`
`On May 15, 2020, Advent notified Forescout that it would not consummate the
`acquisition on May 18, 2020, as scheduled. Advent’s purported excuse for its
`wrongful conduct is that a closing condition to the transaction has not been satisfied
`because a “material adverse effect” has occurred at Forescout. Forescout believes
`that no material adverse effect has occurred, that all closing conditions are satisfied,
`and that Advent is obligated to close the transaction. Forescout believes that Advent
`has relied on meritless excuses to support its position.
`
`The merger agreement explicitly allocated the risk of any impacts from COVID-19
`to Advent. Since announcing
`the
`transaction, Forescout
`shareholders
`overwhelmingly approved the transaction.
`
`“We have satisfied all conditions to closing under our merger agreement, and a
`material adverse effect has not occurred,” said Theresia Gouw, Chair of the
`Forescout Board. “The only change since the merger agreement was jointly
`executed in February is the deepening of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has
`significantly impacted global macro-economic conditions. All companies have
`been challenged by this pandemic, and it is highly disappointing that Advent would
`attempt to exploit market volatility to renege on its contractual obligations,
`particularly when the merger agreement explicitly excludes the effects of a
`pandemic as a material adverse event. Advent is required to promptly complete the
`transaction. We are taking immediate action to enforce Forescout’s rights and
`ensure that Advent fulfills its obligations. We are confident that the steps that we
`are taking are in the best interests of Forescout and its shareholders.”
`
`“I remain confident in the strength of Forescout and its incredible team,” said
`Michael DeCesare, CEO and President of Forescout. “Forescout is in a strong
`financial position, with $100 million of cash on hand as of March 31, 2020. We are
`well positioned for success and the fundamentals of our business have not changed.
`Customers around the world trust Forescout to help solve their most pressing
`security challenges, and that’s exactly what we are doing.”
`
`11
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`1
`
`38.
`
`On May 30, 2020, Advent filed counterclaims alleging that Forescout breached the
`
`2
`
`Initial Merger Agreement and that certain conditions to closing thereunder could not be met. An
`
`3
`
`expedited trial schedule was granted with the trial set to take place on July 20, 2020.
`
`4
`
`39.
`
`On June 30, 2020, Forescout closed out their second quarter for 2020. On July 1,
`
`5
`
`2020, Forescout provided Advent with certain preliminary information regarding the results of
`
`6
`
`Forescout's second quarter of 2020. On July 8, 2020, Forescout publicly announced its positive
`
`7
`
`preliminary financial results for the second quarter of 2020, including revenue in the range of $78-
`
`8
`
`$82 million, up 40% quarter-over-quarter at the midpoint of the range. Individual Defendant
`
`9
`
`DeCesare commented: “I am extremely proud of our team’s performance. We remained focused
`
`10
`
`and executed well, despite macroeconomic challenges and the impact of ongoing litigation with
`
`11
`
`Advent International. The strength of our quarterly results shows the compelling value proposition
`
`12
`
`for Forescout’s solutions and that we can execute and deliver despite obstacles. We believe
`
`13
`
`Advent’s claims are without merit, and we are continuing to pursue our rights under the existing
`
`14
`
`merger agreement.”
`
`15
`
`40.
`
`On July 12, 2020, Forescout and Advent tentatively came to terms on the Proposed
`
`16
`
`Transaction at $29 per Forescout share. Members of the Board’s Strategic Committee then
`
`17
`
`discussed the various financial cases that could be used for the purposes of Morgan Stanley's
`
`18
`
`financial analysis of Forescout. Early on July 15, 2020, before the opening of trading on Nasdaq,
`
`19
`
`the Amended Merger Agreement was signed by Forescout, Parent and Purchaser, and Forescout
`
`20
`
`and Advent publicly disclosed the entry into the Amended Merger Agreement. Contemporaneous
`
`21
`
`with signing the Amended Merger Agreement, Forescout and Advent also signed a settlement
`
`22
`
`agreement to settle and dismiss with prejudice all claims and defenses in the Advent Litigation.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`41.
`
`On July 15, 2020, Forescout and Advent issued a joint press release, which stated
`
`in relevant part:
`
`Forescout and Advent International Reach Amended Merger Agreement
`
`• Forescout Shareholders to Receive $29.00 Per Share
`• Advent to Commence Tender Offer; Forescout Board Unanimously
`Recommends that all Shareholders Tender Their Shares in Support of the
`Transaction
`• Agreement Provides Immediate and Certain Value
`
`
`12
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-05365 Document 1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 13 of 25
`
`SAN JOSE, Calif. and BOSTON, Mass., July 15, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --
`Forescout Technologies, Inc. (FSCT), the leader in device visibility and control,
`and Advent International (“Advent”), one of the largest and most experienced
`global private equity investors, today announced that the companies have agreed to
`amend the terms of their previously announced transaction. The Forescout Board
`of Directors has unanimously approved a revised definitive agreement under which
`Advent will acquire all outstanding shares of Forescout common stock for $29.00
`per share. Advent has partnered with Crosspoint Capital Partners, a private equity
`investment firm focused on cybersecurity and privacy industries, as an advisor on
`this transaction.
`
`Concurrently with executing the amended merger agreement, Forescout and
`Advent reached a settlement agreement as a result of which the pending litigation
`in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed.
`
`“We continue to believe that

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket