throbber

`
`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 1 of 43
`
`MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
`Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 90058)
`Tatiana G. Avakian, Esq. (SBN 298970)
`29800 Agoura Road, Suite 210
`Agoura Hills, California 91301
`Telephone:
`(818) 991-8080
`Facsimile:
`(818) 991-8081
`ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
`tavakian@marlinsaltzman.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative Class
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`JUSTIN OCAMPO, individually and on
`behalf of all others similarly situated,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC., a California corporation, and
`DOES 1-10, inclusive,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR:
`1. Violation of the California Consumer
`Legal Remedies Act
`2. Violation of the California False
`Advertising Law
`3. Violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer
`Warranty Act
`4. Violation of the California Unfair
`Competition Law
`5. Violation of the Magnuson-Moss
`Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301, et seq.
`6. Breach of Express Warranty
`7. Breach of Implied Warranty of
`Merchantability
`8. Violation of the Consumer Fraud
`Statutes of All 50 States and the District
`of Columbia; and
`9. Fraudulent Concealment
`10. Unjust Enrichment
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 2 of 43
`
`
`Plaintiff Justin Ocampo (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings this
`action, on behalf of himself in his individual capacity, a Nationwide Class of all other similarly
`situated consumers, and a California Subclass of all other similarly situated consumers, against
`Defendants APPLE INC. (“Defendant”), who engages in retail sales via internet, telephone, and
`retail stores throughout all fifty United States and the District of Columbia, and DOES 1-10,
`inclusive, as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`Plaintiff brings this Class Action on behalf of himself and all similarly situated
`consumers nationwide (“Nationwide Class”) and in California (“California subclass”)
`(collectively referred to as “Class or “Classes”), as more fully defined below, seeking to redress
`the pervasive pattern of deceptive, false, misleading, and otherwise improper advertising, sales,
`and marketing practices that Defendant has engaged in with regard to their model year October
`2016 and later Apple MacBook Pro laptops (“MacBook Pro” or “MacBook Pro laptops”).
`2.
`In October 2016, Apple released a new MacBook Pro model that included a Touch
`Bar, a small strip at the top of the screen that features a light-up touch-based panel that replaces
`certain function keys on the keyboard. Apple advertised the MacBook Pro as the thinnest and
`lightest MacBook Pro model ever, weighing 3 pounds and measuring in at 14.9 mm of thickness,
`down from 18 mm.1 Apple also announced that the new display of the MacBook Pro is 67 percent
`brighter, has a 67 percent better contrast ratio, and displays 25 percent more colors compared to
`the previous model.2 One of the selling points of the new MacBook Pro laptops that Apple
`highlighted was “[t]he new display in the MacBook Pro is the best ever in a Mac notebook,” and
`that it “ensures truer-to-life pictures with realistically vivid details…”3
`
`
`
`1 http://web.archive.org/web/20161027220820/https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`
`2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19J1oK1981k (last accessed 8/18/20)
`3 http://web.archive.org/web/20161027220820/https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-2-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 3 of 43
`
`
`3.
`Apple’s representations of its display screen are false. In order to support a
`compact design, the new MacBook Pro uses thin, flexible ribbon cables (“flex cables”) to connect
`the display to a display controller board beneath the Touch Bar. These flex cables, which wrap
`over the controller board, are defective. By opening and closing the laptop screen, the flex cables
`wear out over time. Consequentially, the laptop’s display backlight4 shows dark spots across the
`screen and/or stops working altogether.
`4.
`When the display backlight issues surface in the MacBook Pro, the laptop
`essentially becomes nonfunctional. Consumers are either unable to use the laptop when the laptop
`screen is open beyond certain degrees, or they are unable to use the laptop at all because the
`display screen is inoperable. Accordingly, the problems with the MacBook Pro are material and
`compromise the laptops’ core functionality.
`5.
`Further, repairing the display backlight issue is not a simple fix. Because the flex
`cables are part of the display, the cables cannot simply be replaced. Instead, the entire display unit
`needs to be replaced, therefore substantially increasing the repair cost.
`6.
`Defendant has publicly acknowledged that the 13-inch MacBook Pro year 2016
`model is prone to issues regarding the display backlight either showing vertical bright areas along
`the bottom of the screen, or not working at all. On May 21, 2019, Defendant issued a notice on
`its website, announcing the “13-inch MacBook Pro Display Backlight Service Program,”
`(“Backlight Service Program”) and acknowledging the display backlight issues.5 The Backlight
`Service Program does not apply to 15-inch MacBook Pros or MacBook Pro models after 2016.
`7.
`In addition, even prior to announcing the Backlight Service Program, Defendant
`was aware of the defective nature of the flex cable design because consumers posted complaints
`on Defendant’s website and/or submitted repair tickets to Defendant’s Genius Bar. As to the
`former, Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant often removed consumer threads posted
`
`
`
`4 Backlight is a form of illumination used to illuminate a display screen.
`5 https://www.apple.com/support/13-inch-macbook-pro-display-backlight-service/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-3-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 4 of 43
`
`
`on its website that discussed the defective flex cable design and display backlight issues. As to
`the repair tickets, because these defects typically manifested after Apple’s one-year written
`warranty, in order to repair the defects, Apple quoted consumers hundreds of dollars to replace
`the entire display screen. Thus, after the warranty period expires, consumers are left with a
`defective laptop, and forced to pay for the expensive costs of repairing the entire display screen
`in order to have a functioning laptop.
`8.
`Despite having knowledge of the defective flex cable design, at no time while
`Defendant advertised and sold the MacBook Pros did Defendant disclose to Plaintiff and other
`consumers that the flex cables were defective, or that the laptop was prone to display backlight
`issues. Had Defendant notified its consumers of these defects, and had its consumers known of
`Defendant’s false and misleading advertising, its consumers would not otherwise purchased a
`purportedly high-end laptop costing approximately $1,499.00 to $2,399.00.6
`9.
`Numerous consumers, including Plaintiff, have reported display backlight issues
`when opening and closing their MacBook Pro laptops, and have posted comments on various
`online forums, blogs, and Apple’s website. Further, a consumer started a petition on Change.org
`– which includes close to 28,000 signatures – requesting that Defendant launch an extended
`warranty program to address the display backlight issues.7
`10.
`Not only has Defendant sold the defective MacBook Pro, Defendant unreasonably
`delayed issuing a repair program despite the fact that it both knew and should have known that
`the flex cables resulted in backlight display screens that rendered the laptops inoperable before it
`issued a notice regarding the Backlight Service Program.
`11.
`In addition, another Change.org petition was started addressing Apple’s
`inadequate Backlight Service Program, citing complaints that Apple refused to provide free
`display repair or repair refunds under the program to certain customers because “the serial number
`
`
`
`6 The price of the MacBook Pro varies, depending on storage size.
`7 https://www.change.org/p/apple-fix-all-macbook-pro-2016-and-later-with-stage-light-effect-
`or-backlight-shutdown-flexgate (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-4-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 5 of 43
`
`
`does not qualify,” or “the system does not process,” or not providing a reason at all.8 The
`Backlight Service Program is inadequate also in that it does not provide repair services to the 15-
`inch MacBook Pros or for MacBook Pros after the year 2016.
`12.
`Accordingly, Plaintiff brings this class action on behalf of himself and all other
`similarly situated consumers seeking monetary relief and an order forcing Defendant to provide
`appropriate injunctive relief by no longer defrauding the public and its consumers by advertising
`and selling the MacBook Pro models with the defective flex cables, and by ensuring that it
`provides an adequate, comprehensive program for repairing all MacBook Pro models that
`experience backlight display issues and/or will manifest backlight display issues in the future.
`PARTIES
`13.
`Plaintiff is and at all material times was a citizen and resident of San Joaquin
`County, California. Plaintiff purchased the MacBook Pro at issue at Best Buy in San Jose,
`California.
`14.
`Defendant is a California corporation with its principal place of business at One
`Apple Park Way, Cupertino, California 95014. Defendant is a multinational company that designs,
`develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software, and online services.
`15.
`DOES 1 through 10 inclusive are now and/or at all times mentioned in this
`Complaint were licensed to do business and/or actually doing business in the State of California.
`Plaintiff does not know the true names or capacities, whether individual, partner, or corporate, of
`DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and for that reason, DOES 1 through 10 are sued under such
`fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave of court to amend this Complaint to allege such names
`and capacities as soon as they are ascertained.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`16.
`Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) because at least
`one member of the putative Class is a citizen of a State other than that of the Defendant, there are
`
`
`
`8 https://www.change.org/p/apple-stop-avoiding-refunds-to-users-affected-by-macbook-pro-
`backlight-service-program (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-5-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 6 of 43
`
`
`more than 100 Class members, and the damages suffered and sought to be recovered herein total,
`in the aggregate, in excess of $5,000,000, exclusive of interests and costs.
`17.
`Personal jurisdiction is proper because Defendant’s principal place of business is
`within this District and Defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting
`business activities within this District.
`18.
`The Court has original jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”)
`and/or supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`19.
`Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because Defendant, at all material times,
`has had continuous and systematic contacts in this District by actively doing business and
`perpetuating the deceptive business practices that are the subject of this lawsuit in this District. In
`addition, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in
`this District in that Plaintiff purchased his MacBook Pro in this District.
`CALIFORNIA CHOICE OF LAW ALLEGATIONS
`20.
`Because this Complaint is brought in California, California’s choice of law regime
`governs the state law allegations in this Complaint. Under California’s governmental
`interest/comparative impairment choice of law rules, California law applies to the claims of all
`Class members, regardless of their state of residence or state of purchase.
`21.
`Because Apple is headquartered, and made all decisions relevant to these claims,
`in California, California has a substantial connection to, and materially greater interest in, the
`rights, interests, and policies involved in this action than any other state.
`FACTS
`
`Common Factual Background
`22.
`Apple first introduced the MacBook Pro line of laptops in January 2006, marketing
`its new line of laptops as the fastest and thinnest Mac notebook ever. In its press release for the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-6-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 7 of 43
`
`
`new MacBook Pro laptop,9 Apple describes itself as revolutionizing the world of technology,
`particularly regarding personal computers:
`Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with
`the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with
`the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in
`innovation with
`its award-winning desktop and notebook
`computers, OS X operating system, and iLife and professional
`applications…
`23.
`Over the years, Apple released updated versions of the MacBook Pro that included
`new features, including Retina Display, thinner and lighter models, faster processors, and
`redesigned keyboards, among other features.
`24.
`On or about October 27, 2016, Apple released a new MacBook Pro model, which
`it characterized as the thinnest and lightest MacBook Pro model ever, with the best ever display
`screen of any of the MacBook Pro models.
`25.
`In October 2016, Apple introduced the new MacBook Pro model during its launch
`event at Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, California. During the event, Apple’s CEO, Tim
`Cook, described the new MacBook Pro as “absolutely incredible.”10 Phil Schiller, Vice President
`for Worldwide Marketing, praised the MacBook Pro as “the new gold standard of notebook
`computers,” “impressive,” and “the most forward-looking, advanced MacBook line we have ever
`had.”11 Jonathan Ive, former Chief Design Officer for Apple, described the MacBook Pro as “an
`extremely purposeful and powerful creative tool,” and “a milestone in the evolution of the Mac.”12
`
`
`
`9 https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2006/01/10Apple-Introduces-MacBook-Pro/ (last accessed
`8/18/20)
`
`10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19J1oK1981k (last accessed 8/18/20)
`11 Id.
`12 Id.
`
`-7-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 8 of 43
`
`
`26.
`Further, during the launch event, Mr. Schiller highlighted several defining features
`of the new MacBook Pro,13 some of which include:
`• “It is simply the thinnest and lightest MacBook Pro we have ever made.” The 13-
`inch model is 17% thinner, 23% smaller in volume, and half a pound less than the
`previous model. The 15-inch model is 14% thinner, 20% smaller in volume, and
`half a pound less than the previous model.
`• “The display of the new Apple Pro is simply the best display we’ve ever made on
`a Mac.” Compared to the previous 15-inch MacBook Pro model, the new model
`is 67% brighter, has 67% higher contrast ratio, and 25% more colors.
`• The synergism between the new Touch Bar and the MacBook Pro’s display screen.
`Consumers can utilize the Touch Bar to compose emails, edit videos and
`photographs, adjust the display screen brightness, among other tasks, without
`clicking the keyboard. The options on the Touch Bar panel on which the consumer
`clicks are displayed on the laptop’s screen. Therefore, the functionality of the
`display screen is central to the utilization of the Touch Bar.
`27.
`Apple described the new MacBook Pro laptop as “built on groundbreaking
`ideas.”14 The MacBook Pro included a Touch Bar, a small strip at the top of the screen that features
`a light-up touch-based panel that replaces certain function keys on the keyboard. On its website,
`Apple flaunted this new MacBook Pro as “[a] touch of genius.”15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13 Id.
`
`14 http://web.archive.org/web/20161027220820/https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`15 Id.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-8-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 9 of 43
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`28.
`Apple advertised the MacBook Pro as the thinnest and lightest MacBook Pro
`model ever, up to 17% thinner than previous models, and weighing 3 pounds and measuring in at
`14.9 mm of thickness, down from 18 mm, for the 13-inch model.16 Apple boasted that the new
`MacBook Pro “has the brightest, most colorful Mac notebook display ever,” with 67% brighter
`display than prior models.17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16 Id.
`17 Id.
`
`-9-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 10 of 43
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29.
`Apple’s website emphasized that “[t]he new display in the MacBook Pro is the
`best ever in a Mac notebook,” and that it “ensures truer-to-life pictures with realistically vivid
`details…”18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18 Id.
`
`-10-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 11 of 43
`
`
`30.
`Apple began selling the new MacBook Pro on or about October 27, 2016. Since
`then, Apple has released updated versions of the MacBook Pro in 2017, 2018, and 2019, which
`were similar to the October 2016 model. Apple charges a premium price for its MacBook Pros,
`ranging from $1,499 to $2,399.
`31.
`Based on Apple’s various representations that the MacBook Pro models since
`October 2016 are high-end and revolutionary laptops, consumers across the country pay a
`premium price for the MacBook Pro laptops, believing that they are lighter, thinner, and have a
`better display screen than other laptops on the market.
`The MacBook Pro Is Defective
`32.
`The MacBook Pro has a defective flex cable, which connects the laptop’s display
`screen to the base of the laptop. The flex cable is a latent, physical defect. Beginning with the new
`model of MacBook Pro laptops from in or around October 2016, Apple opted to use a flexible
`ribbon cable to connect the display screen to a display controller board in order to design the
`thinnest and lightest laptop. An image of the flex cable wrapped around the display controller
`board is shown below:19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19 https://web.archive.org/web/20190605233112/https:/ifixit.org/blog/12903/flexgate/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-11-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 12 of 43
`
`
`33.
`The flexible cables wrap over the display controller board and deteriorate over
`time with the ordinary use of opening and closing the laptop display screen. The deterioration of
`the flex cables results in the display screen exhibiting dark spots and/or in the display screen
`turning completely black when the laptop screen is open beyond certain angles (with some
`consumers complaining of experiencing issues if they opened the screen beyond a 45-degree
`angle). Therefore, consumers are prevented from using their laptops for their ordinary and
`intended purpose: to open the display screen beyond a 45-degree angle when using the laptop.
`34.
`Since the release of the MacBook Pro in or around October 2016, consumers have
`flooded forums, blogs, and Apple’s website with complaints about the issues with the display
`screen, including that the screen shows dark spots and shuts down completely:
`sofie, posted on March 19, 2019 at 5:57 am
`This just happened to my macbook pro 13’ as well. First the stage light appeared and now,
`two weeks later I can’t open it more then 45º without it’s going black. 1 year warranty
`has just expired ):20
`Tami, posted on March 20, 2019 at 12:21 am
`Thank you for this. I’ve had the exact same problem with my 2016 MBP 13” with Touch
`Bar. First the stage light effect, then the blacking out if opened past 45 degrees. Warranty
`expired six months ago. I didn’t expect to need Apple Care for a $3k machine, given my
`last MBP lasted five years and was still going strong when I passed it on to a niece. Apple
`should do the decent thing. I’ve been a loyal Apple user for years but this has me
`questioning that.21
`Imrul Huda, posted on March 23, 2019 at 3:09 am
`Hi! I am graduate student who spent 1700 dollar out of 2000 savings for MBP 2016 oct
`Model. Now I am screwed. The screen is very dark. It first seems completely turned off.
`
`
`
`20 https://web.archive.org/web/20190605233112/https://ifixit.org/blog/12903/flexgate/ (last
`accessed 8/18/20)
`21 Id.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-12-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 13 of 43
`
`
`But after looking very carefully, You can see that it is actually on. But definitely in a non-
`working condition. What can I do? Should I replace it? If it replace it, do I have to do
`that again in 02 years? Is there are a lawsuit or petition? I am thinking about using it with
`external monitor instead of replacing display.22
`Supun, posted on March 23, 2019 at 11:20 pm
`Hi!, This happened to my MBP 2017, just one week after the warranty. Went from dealer
`to dealer, tried Apple, finally paid LKR 95,000/- (USD 534) and got the whole screen
`replaced. I don’t know if this is a permanent solution since the new screen cable is bound
`to fail too, just around the year mark. It is not how, it is when your MBP get affected,
`because ultimately all MBP will end up with this issue sooner or later. So if your are
`thinking my MBP is still not affected, don’t worry it will…This is what happen when ‘Tim
`Apple’ takes over from ‘Steve Apple’ and end up with ‘Rotten Apples’. Singed the petition
`and waiting for some good news.23
`Ching, posted on January 26, 2019 at 7:30 am
`My MacBook pro with touch bar bought in 2018, and the stage light effect appeared at the
`first week while watching video! And it is still regularly appeared…after reading this
`blog, I just realized how serious it is and will send back asap! Thanks.24
`Noor Sabarullah B Sugiman, posted on January 24, 2019 at 3:48 pm
`Happened to us too!! MBP retina display 2016. At first it was a broken screen. Spend a
`fortune as apple says its our fault. After 6 months or so now we have the issue exactly
`explained here. At around 50 deg. We went to apple repair centre [sic] and the fella over
`there says oh it’s quite common. You are among 6-7 others who have this problem. Now
`we paid kidney-worthy price and i feel we kinda get black market scam after service.25
`
`
`
`22 Id.
`
`23 Id.
`24 Id.
`25 Id.
`
`-13-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 14 of 43
`
`
`
`Sergey, posted on October 22, 2019
`I have the same issue with my MBP touch bar 2017. Apple denied it and suggests me to
`pay for the repairing. Its [sic] very sad. I open thread on Apple …26
`Chuck, posted on December 5, 2019
`…Our child bought a macbook pro for college. Now, barely after 2 years with this nearly
`$1500 machine, it too has a monitor cable issue. We made an appointment at the apple
`store (closest one over an hour away) and were told would be a $500 fix plus more if any
`additional problems were found. So we purchased a new macbook pro due to the urgency.
`Coincidentally the man beside us at the apple store table had the EXACT SAME
`MACBOOK MONITOR ISSUE with his college daughter’s mabook pro. “Stage lights”
`a few days or weeks then no backlight at all especially if you open it more than half way.
`Since, I am now livid! After contacting a few 3rd party apple repair shops & searching the
`internet I discover this is a KNOWN ISSUE. No mention from the Apple Store employee.
`No accountability from apple.27
`35.
`Consumers also posted comments on Apple’s website, complaining about the flex
`cable and black light screen issues. However, consumers complained that Apple was removing
`these comments:
`Joe Black, posted on March 14, 2019 at 11:20 am
`I have a feeling that Apple has a script that prevents you from posting anything that
`includes stage light, design flaw, or extended warranty. A tl;dr [sic] for that idea is that
`my Mac (2016 touchbar model) screen just died after suffering from the stagelight issue,
`so I wanted to rant on Apple support. Bad idea. It was instantly deleted.28
`
`
`
`
`26 https://ifixit.org/blog/12903/flexgate/ (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`27 Id.
`28 https://web.archive.org/web/20190605233112/https://ifixit.org/blog/12903/flexgate/ (last
`accessed 5/12/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-14-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 15 of 43
`
`
`
`akjaineusanuj, posted on January 22, 2019
`…Also see https://discusionss.apple.com/thread/250...about this issue as well
`In response, spearson commented on January 26 that “Looks like Apple deleted the topic
`on your issue just now.29
`sishmuemaw, posted on December 25, 2018
`…Apple frequently deleted that issue whenever you post on their discussion forum…30
`36.
` Apple was aware of the issues with the backlight screen and the defective flex
`cable, in light of the comments posted by consumers on Apple’s discussion forum and that those
`comments were deleted after they were posted. Despite these complaints, Apple did not take steps
`until in or around May 2019 to correct the defective flex cable in the MacBook Pro – and solely
`for the 13-inch 2016 MacBook Pro model.
`37.
`In addition, Apple was aware of the issues with the backlight screen and the
`defective design because the flex cable in the 2018 MacBook Pro laptops was approximately 2
`mm longer than in the 2016 or 2017 MacBook Pro models.31 Therefore, Apple was aware that the
`defective thinner and shorter flex cable resulted in the backlight screen issues in the MacBook
`Pro and redesigned the flex cable in the newer MacBook Pro model.
`38.
`Although Defendant issued a notice of a service program on or about May 21,
`2019, to consumers of 2016 MacBook Pros with backlight issues, the repair program is inadequate
`to address the complaints made by consumers. The repair program is only limited to 13-inch 2016
`MacBook Pro models. Therefore, 15-inch models and models for years other than 2016 are
`excluded from the repair program.
`
`
`
`29
`https://web.archive.org/web/20190605233110/https://www.ifixit.com/Answers/View/486856/Sc
`reen+issues,+Back+light+dims+&+goes+out (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`30 Id.
`31 https://ifixit.org/blog/13979/apples-2018-macbook-pros-attempt-to-solve-flexgate-without-
`admitting-it-exists (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-15-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 16 of 43
`
`
`39.
`Further, the repair program is insufficient in that it fails to provide monetary
`compensation to consumers who were forced to pay out-of-pocket for repairs they made to their
`MacBook Pros at any point prior to the repair program.
`40.
`In addition, the repair program fails to account for monetary compensation to
`consumers who are forced to part with their MacBook Pros during the period when the laptops
`are submitted to Apple for the service program.
`41. Many consumers have incurred substantial expenses as a result of purchasing the
`MacBook Pros, including the cost of the laptops, the cost to repair the laptops, and the purchase
`of any external equipment used as a result of the backlight issues experienced with the MacBook
`Pros.
`Plaintiff’s Experience
`42.
`On or about December 21, 2016, Plaintiff purchased a 13-inch MacBook Pro
`laptop from Best Buy in San Jose, California for $1,376.38. 32 Plaintiff’s MacBook Pro
`automatically came with Defendant’s one-year warranty plan.
`43.
`Before purchasing the MacBook Pro laptop, Plaintiff watched Apple’s October
`2016 launch event, which announced the new MacBook Pro model. In addition, Plaintiff reviewed
`Apple’s website, which advertised the features of the MacBook Pro model. Plaintiff recalls Apple
`representing that the new MacBook Pro was the thinnest, lightest MacBook Pro ever, that it had
`the best display screen ever, and that it was a revolutionary design. Plaintiff relied on these
`representations to purchase the MacBook Pro laptop.
`44.
`In or around late 2018, between October and December, the backlight on Plaintiff’s
`MacBook Pro began failing such that the display screen depicted dark spots near the bottom of
`the screen, which interfered with the clarity of the images displayed on the screen. The failing
`backlight issue occurred on a more consistent basis within 1-2 weeks after it first started. These
`issues were an interference with the ordinary use of Plaintiff’s laptop, particularly where Plaintiff
`
`
`
`32 The regular price of Plaintiff’s MacBook Pro was $1,799.99. However, Plaintiff received a
`discount on his purchase because the laptop had been previously opened.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-16-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 17 of 43
`
`
`used his MacBook Pro to edit photographs. The following image found online33 is representative
`of the issues that Plaintiff experienced with his display screen:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`45.
`Shortly thereafter, in or around December 2018 or January 2019, the display screen
`on Plaintiff’s laptop failed completely where the screen turned black despite the laptop being
`turned on. The display screen turned black when the monitor was open at an angle greater than
`approximately 30 degrees. Therefore, Plaintiff was unable to utilize his MacBook Pro when the
`monitor was open at a normal angle.
`46.
`In or around January 2019, Plaintiff took his MacBook Pro to the Apple Oakridge
`store in San Jose, California and consulted with one of the Genius Bar representatives regarding
`the display screen issue. Apple told Plaintiff that he would need to ship his MacBook Pro to an
`
`
`
`33 https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/5/18251264/macbook-pro-2018-flexgate-fix-display-cable-
`2mm-longer (last accessed 8/18/20)
`
`-17-
`Class Action Complaint
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-05857 Document 1 Filed 08/19/20 Page 18 of 43
`
`
`offsite repair center to replace the display screen. Because the MacBook Pro was no longer under
`Apple’s one-year warranty plan, Defendant quoted Plaintiff $475.00 for the repair.
`47.
`Plaintiff was unable to afford the repair cost and did not submit his MacBook Pro
`to Apple for repair at that time.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket