`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`10TALES INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`vs.
`
`TIKTOK INC., TIKTOK PTE. LTD., BYTEDANCE
`LTD., AND BYTEDANCE INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Case No.: 21-CV-03868-YGR
`
`ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY
`
`Re Dkt. No. 96.
`
`Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to stay. (Dkt. No. 96.) The Court understands
`from the parties’ joint status report filed August 27, 2021 that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(“PTAB”) denied defendants’ petition for inter partes review and that defendant is now seeking a
`rehearing of the PTAB’s decision. Given the unlikelihood of the PTAB granting defendant’s request
`for rehearing, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendants’ motion to stay. Should the PTAB
`grant defendants’ rehearing request, defendants may file an amended motion to stay within twenty-
`one (21) days of the order.
`The Court hereby sets an initial case management conference for MONDAY, OCTOBER 25,
`2021. Parties are to file a joint CMC statement by Monday, October 18, 2021.
`This Order terminates docket number 96.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Dated:
`
`September 29, 2021
`
`____________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
