throbber
Case 5:21-cv-03868-VKD Document 238 Filed 05/24/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Stephen S. Korniczky, Cal. Bar No. 135532
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
`
`LLP
`A Limited Liability Partnership
`Including Professional Corporations
`ERICKA J. SCHULZ, Cal. Bar No. 246667
`JAMES YOUNG HURT, Cal. Bar No. 312390
`MICHAEL J. HOPKINS, Cal. Bar No. 326621
`ZACHARY M. ALPER, Cal. Bar No. 339489
`12275 El Camino Real, Suite 100
`San Diego, California 92130-4092
`Telephone:
`858.720.8900
`Facsimile:
`858.509.3691
`E-mail
`skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
`eschulz@sheppardmullin.com
`jhurt@sheppardmullin.com
`mhopkins@sheppardmullin.com
`zalper@sheppardmullin.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TikTok Inc., TikTok Pte.
`Ltd., ByteDance Ltd., and ByteDance Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Nathan Dooley (SBN 224331)
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3700
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel:
`213-892-7900
`Fax: 213-892-7999
`Email: ndooley@cozen.com
`
`Barry Golob (Pro Hac Vice)
`Thomas J. Fisher (Pro Hac Vice)
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`1200 19TH Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Tel:
`202-912-4800
`Fax: 202-861-1905
`Email: bgolob@cozen.com
`
`tfisher@cozen.com
`
`William E. Davis, III (Pro Hac Vice)
`Rudolph (Rudy) Fink IV (Pro Hac Vice)
`THE DAVIS FIRM, PC
`213 N. Fredonia Street, Suite 230
`Longview, Texas 75601
`Tel:
`903-230-9090
`Fax: 903-230-9661
`Email: bdavis@davisfirm.com
`
`rfink@davisfirm.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`10Tales, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`10TALES, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`TIKTOK INC., TIKTOK PTE. LTD.,
`BYTEDANCE LTD., AND
`BYTEDANCE INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
` Case No. 5:21-cv-03868-VKD
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING HEARING AND
`BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’
`MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 285 AND 28 U.S.C.
`§ 1927
`
`Judge: Honorable Virginia K. DeMarchi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING
`AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-03868-VKD
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 237
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-03868-VKD Document 238 Filed 05/24/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff 10Tales, Inc. (“10Tales”) and Defendants
`
`2
`
`TikTok Inc., TikTok PTE. Ltd., ByteDance Ltd., and ByteDance Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”),
`
`3
`
`by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
`
`4
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants filed and served a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Pursuant
`
`5
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (the “Motion”) on May 16, 2024 (ECF No. 236);
`
`6
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants noticed their motion for a hearing on June 25, 2024;
`
`7
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, 10Tales’ Opposition brief is currently due May 30, 2024, and Defendants’
`
`8
`
`Reply brief is currently due no later than June 6, 2024;
`
`9
`
`10
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants’ motion was originally due on April 16, 2024;
`
`WHEREAS, 10Tales stipulated to a 30-day extension of time for Defendants to file their
`
`11
`
`Motion;
`
`12
`
`WHEREAS, due to amount of supporting documents that Defendants’ filed with the
`
`13
`
`Motion, the length of time this case has been pending, and other commitments that 10Tales’
`
`14
`
`counsel has over the next several weeks, the Parties stipulate to a thirty (30) day extension of time
`
`15
`
`for 10Tales to file their opposition to Defendants’ Motion;
`
`16
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties further stipulate to a fourteen (14) day extension of time for
`
`17
`
`Defendants to file their reply to 10Tales’ Opposition;
`
`18
`
`WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment in this case on April 2, 2024 (ECF No. 224), such
`
`19
`
`that the requested extensions will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by
`
`20
`
`Court order;
`
`21
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their
`
`22
`
`respective undersigned counsel, that 10Tales’ Opposition brief to Defendants’ Motion shall be due
`
`23
`
`by July 1, 2024, Defendants’ Reply brief shall be due by July 22, 2024, and Defendants’ Motion is
`
`24
`
`deemed noticed for a hearing on August 6, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., or at some other date set by the
`
`25
`
`Court, in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi.
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING
`AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
`
`-2-
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-03868-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-03868-VKD Document 238 Filed 05/24/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`Dated: May 23, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`
`
`Dated: May 23, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`
`
`By
`
`/s/ Thomas J. Fisher
`Nathan Dooley
`Barry Golob
`Thomas J. Fisher
`
`THE DAVIS FIRM PC
`William E. Davis, III
`Rudolph (Rudy) Fink IV
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff 10Tales, Inc.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`
`
`By
`
`/s/ Stephen S. Korniczky
`Stephen S. Korniczky
`Ericka J. Schulz
`James Young Hurt
`Michael J. Hopkins
`Zachary M. Alper
`
`Attorneys for Defendants TikTok Inc., TikTok Pte. Ltd.,
`ByteDance Ltd., and ByteDance Inc.
`
`
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING
`AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
`
`-3-
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-03868-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-03868-VKD Document 238 Filed 05/24/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: ______________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___________________ ___ ___ _ _
`Virginia K. DeMarchi
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING
`AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
`
`-4-
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-03868-VKD
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`May 24, 2024
`
`XXXXXXXXX
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket