throbber
Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
` Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND
`PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; CISCO
`TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and CIENA
`CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`WUHAN WOLON COMMUNICATION
`TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and WUHAN
`WOLON CLOUD NETWORK
`COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY CO.,
`LTD.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`On consent of Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc. (together,
`“Cisco”) and Plaintiff Ciena Corporation (“Ciena”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants
`Wuhan Wolon Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and Wuhan Wolon Cloud Network
`Communication Technology Co., Ltd., (together, “Wolon”):
`WHEREAS, on July 22, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint asserting
`federal claims for Trademark Infringement (15 U.SC. § 1114–1117), Dilution of Mark (15 U.S.C.
`§ 1125), and Unfair Competition (15 U.S.C. § 1125), as well as California law claims for False
`Advertising (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500) and Unfair Competition (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`7200), and alleging that Wolon, without authorization from Cisco and Ciena, marketed,
`advertised, distributed, sold, offered for sale, and otherwise used in commerce in the United States
`counterfeit Cisco and Ciena pluggable transceiver modules and labels, all of which claims have
`given rise to significant damages;
`WHEREAS, Wolon now stipulates and consents to this Consent Judgment and Permanent
`Injunction, and to its prompt entry by the Court, and in order to avoid the costs and expenses
`related to litigation, Plaintiffs and Wolon wish to mutually release each other from certain liability
`and claims;
`NOW THEREFORE, upon consent of the parties hereto, and in consideration of the
`promises, releases, representations, and warranties set forth herein, the sufficiency of which is
`acknowledged by all parties to this Consent Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED,
`AND DECREED:
`1.
`Wolon’s acts set forth in the First Amended Complaint constitute federal
`Trademark Infringement, (15 U.SC. § 1114–1117), Dilution of Mark (15 U.S.C. § 1125), and
`Unfair Competition (15 U.S.C. § 1125), and violate California law for False Advertising (Cal.
`Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500) and Unfair Competition (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 7200);
`2.
`As a direct and proximate result of Wolon’s infringing conduct, Plaintiffs have
`sustained substantial, immediate, and irreparable injury, and are entitled to damages and an
`injunction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116-1117;
`3.
`Wolon, along with its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees,
`directors, officers, parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries,
`and all other persons in active concert and participation with them, or who otherwise aid and abet
`Wolon, are permanently enjoined from manufacturing, buying, selling, importing, marketing,
`advertising, distributing, or in any way using in commerce any goods bearing any of the following
`marks, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, colorable imitation of, or any logo, trade name, or
`trademark confusingly similar to any of the following marks, or otherwise infringing or diluting
`any of the following marks (the “Cisco Marks”):
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`2
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`• ”CISCO” (Reg. Nos. 1,542,339; 2,498,746; 3,709,076; 3,978,294; 3,985,844;
`3,990,147; 4,005,670);
`
`•
`
` (Reg. Nos. 3,759,451).
`
`And (the “Ciena Marks”):
`
`• “Ciena” (Reg. Nos. 2,070,330 and 3,026,860);
`
`•
`
`
`
`4.
`Wolon, along with its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees,
`directors, officers, parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries,
`and all other persons in active concert and participation with them, or who otherwise aid and abet
`Wolon, are further permanently enjoined from mentioning “Cisco” and/or “Ciena” or using any of
`the Cisco Marks and/or Ciena Marks in its publicity, promotion, or advertising, including, without
`limitation, on any domain name, website, uniform resource locator (URL), internet store, or
`online marketplace platform, including, without limitation, Amazon and Alibaba.
`5.
`Wolon, along with its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees,
`directors, officers, parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries,
`and all other persons in active concert and participation with them, or who otherwise aid and abet
`Wolon, are further permanently enjoined from using any logo, trade name, or trademark which
`may be calculated to falsely represent or which has the effect of falsely representing that the
`services or products of Wolon are sponsored by, authorized by, or in any way associated with
`Cisco and/or Ciena, or affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the sale of any
`goods a false description or representation including words or other symbols tending to falsely
`describe or represent such goods as being Cisco and/or Ciena products, or engaging in any act
`which is likely to cause the trade, retailers, or members of the purchasing public to believe that
`Wolon is associated with Cisco and/or Ciena.
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`3
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`6.
`Wolon and its principals may not invest in, control, have any direct or indirect
`ownership interest in, work for, lend money to, or participate in any business that violates any
`term of this Consent Judgment.
`7.
`If Wolon is found by the court to have violated the prohibitions of this Consent
`Judgment or has failed to maintain complete records of their violations, Plaintiffs are entitled at
`their election to liquidated damages of $10,000 per item of counterfeit Cisco and/or Ciena product,
`label, listing, or advertisement that Wolon advertised and/or sold (or has advertised or sold on its
`behalf by its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees, directors, officers,
`parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries, and all other
`persons in active concert and participation with them, or who otherwise aid and abet Wolon in
`violating this Consent Judgment) that violate this Consent Judgment; or to Cisco’s and/or Ciena’s
`actual, statutory, and punitive damages. Where Wolon has failed to maintain complete records of
`its violations, all sales and/or listings by Wolon within the period of Wolon’s record-keeping
`failure shall be considered counterfeit Cisco and/or Ciena sales and/or listings in violation of this
`Consent Judgment and shall be subject to Cisco’s and/or Ciena’s damages election. In any action,
`regardless of which measure of damages Cisco and/or Ciena selects, they shall be entitled to
`recover their attorneys’ fees and investigator fees for finding and demonstrating that Wolon has
`violated this Consent Judgment and otherwise incurred in connection with obtaining, enforcing,
`and collecting an award of damages. All liability will be joint and several among Wolon and its
`principals.
`8.
`In addition to other remedies, including damages, for contempt of this Consent
`Judgment, in the event of breach or violation by Wolon along with its principals, agents, attorneys,
`members, servants, employees, directors, officers, parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors,
`representatives, and subsidiaries, and all other persons in active concert and participation with
`them, or who otherwise aid and abet Wolon in violating this Consent Judgment, Cisco and/or
`Ciena are entitled to a preliminary and permanent injunction against the breaching conduct upon a
`showing of a possibility of success of establishing that such a breach occurred.
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`4
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`9.
`Plaintiffs and Wolon each agree that jurisdiction and venue for an action for
`contempt of this Consent Judgment exists in the United States District Court for the Northern
`District of California. In such an action, Wolon shall waive any and all defenses based upon
`personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and venue.
`10. Wolon agrees to assist Plaintiffs in the prosecution of the Action. Wolon also
`agrees to assist Plaintiffs in the prosecution of any future pleading, discovery, or action related to
`the subject matter of the Action. Wolon further agrees to alert Plaintiffs to any future sales or
`purchases of counterfeit Cisco and/or Ciena products in the United States of which Wolon
`becomes aware and to assist Plaintiffs in pursuing those cases. The assistance contemplated by this
`paragraph shall include Wolon notifying Plaintiffs about and sharing any information Wolon
`possesses or comes to possess in the future concerning the importation, manufacturing, purchase,
`marketing, advertisement, distribution, sale, offer for sale, or use in commerce in the United States
`of Cisco and/or Ciena products, and Wolon’s agreement, upon receipt of reasonable written notice,
`to testify at any deposition, hearing, or trial relating to counterfeit Cisco and/or Ciena products.
`11. Wolon hereby assigns to Plaintiffs any and all of Wolon’s known and unknown,
`suspected and unsuspected claims, demands, causes of action, damages, accounts, reckonings,
`costs, expenses, and actions of any nature whatsoever on account of or arising out of the subject
`matter of the Action, which Wolon now has, owns, or holds, or at any time may hereafter have,
`own, or hold against any other defendant or non-party to the Action, or otherwise relating to
`Wolon’s importation, purchase, marketing, advertisement, distribution, sale, offer for sale, and/or
`use in commerce in the United States of counterfeit Cisco and/or Ciena products. This includes,
`but is in no way limited to, claims for indemnity or contribution.
`12.
`This Consent Judgment is entered pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`Procedure, and this Action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, only as to Wolon, without costs or
`attorneys’ fees, save that this District Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action, including,
`without limitation, over implementation of or disputes arising out of this Consent Judgment with
`regard to Wolon or its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees, directors,
`officers, parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries. Plaintiffs,
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`5
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`in addition to any award of damages or injunctive relief, shall be entitled to an award of attorneys’
`fees and costs and investigators’ fees and costs in connection with a violation of this order by
`Wolon or its principals, agents, attorneys, members, servants, employees, directors, officers,
`parents, successors, heirs, assigns, executors, representatives, and subsidiaries.
`13.
`The Parties hereby state that they have agreed to this Consent Judgment solely to
`avoid further litigation. To the extent allowable by law, this Consent Judgment shall have no
`precedential value or effect and shall not be admissible in any other action or proceeding, except
`in any action or proceeding to enforce this Consent Judgment, any action or proceeding
`contemplated by the terms of this Consent Judgment, or any action or proceeding relating to any
`contemporaneous Agreement among the parties to this Consent Judgment.
`14.
`Signatures to this Consent Judgment transmitted electronically or by facsimile shall
`be deemed original.
`
`
`
`
`
`{Signatures on following page}
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`6
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 7 of 9
`
`Dated: __________, 2021
`
`Wuhan Wolon Communication Technology
`Co., Ltd. and Wuhan Wolon Cloud Network
`Communication Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`
`By:
`Title:
`
`Jack Liv
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONSENTED AND AGREED TO BY:
`Dated: __________, 2021
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`
` William W. Friedman
`By:
`Title: Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
`
`
`
`Cisco Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Dan Lang
`By:
`Title: Vice President & Assistant Secretary
`
`Dated: October 1, 2021
`
`Ciena Corporation
`
`
`
`By:
`Title:
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`EDWARD J. DAVILA
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`7
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`October 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`CONSENTED AND AGREED TO BY:
`Dated: __________, 2021
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`
` William W. Friedman
`By:
`Title: Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
`
`
`
`Cisco Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`
` Dan Lang
`By:
`Title: Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
`
`Dated: __________, 2021
`
`Ciena Corporation
`
`Dated: __________, 2021
`
`Wuhan Wolon Communication Technology
`Co., Ltd. and Wuhan Wolon Cloud Network
`Communication Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`
`By:
`Title:
`
`Jack Liv
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` David M. Rothenstein
`By:
`Title: Senior Vice President & General Counsel
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`EDWARD J. DAVILA
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`2790.000/1662162.2
`
`
`
`7
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`* Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 9 of 9
`Case 5:21-cv-04272-EJD Document 60-1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 9 of 9
`
`CONSENTED AND AGREED TO BY:
`
`Dated:
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`, 2021
`
`Deputy General Counsel
`
`
`By: William W. Friedman
`Title: Vice President &
`
`Cisco Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`By: Dan Lang
`Title: Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
`
`Dated:
`
`, 2021
`
`Ciena Corporation
`
`
`
`By:
`Title:
`
`kEWHWwW
`NyDDtr
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`EDWARD J. DAVILA
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`a 2
`
`2
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Uy
`
`28
`
`2790,000/1662162.2
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04272-EJD
`7
`CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENTINJUNCTION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket