throbber

`
`Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 98 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 2Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 99 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`Jack Russo (Cal. Bar No. 96068)
`jrusso@computerlaw.com
`Joseph A. Greco (Cal. Bar No. 104476)
`jgreco@computerlaw.com
`COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
`401 Florence Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Tel.: (650) 327-9800
`Fax: (650) 618-1863
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`MICHAEL PHILIP KAUFMAN
`
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Ray R. Zado (Cal. Bar No. 208501)
`rayzado@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 500
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`
`Sam Stake (Cal. Bar No. 257916)
`samstake@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6600
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant salesforce.com, inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Michael Philip Kaufman, an individual,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff;
`
`
`v.
`
`salesforce.com, inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
`PREJUDICE
`
`
`Action filed
`(transferred):
`
`
`
`June 10, 2021
`
`
`04554-00014/12855264.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 98 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 2Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 99 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff
`
`Michael Philip Kaufman and Defendant salesforce.com, inc. hereby stipulate and agree that all
`claims and counterclaims, if any, in this action are dismissed with prejudice, and that each party
`shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees in this action.
`SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: July 21, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 21, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
`
`By: /s/Jack Russo
`
`Jack Russo
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Michael Philip Kaufman
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Kevin P.B. Johnson
`
`
` Kevin P.B. Johnson
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`salesforce.com, inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), Jack Russo attests that concurrence in the filing of the
`document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.
`Dated: July 21, 2021
`
`COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/Jack Russo
`
`Jack Russo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Michael Philip Kaufman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`04554-00014/12855264.2
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 98-1 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 2Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 99 Filed 07/22/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Michael Philip Kaufman, an individual,
`
`
`
`
`
`salesforce.com, inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff;
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`Action filed
`(transferred):
`
`
`
`June 10, 2021
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`04554-00014/12856390.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 98-1 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 2Case 5:21-cv-04491-BLF Document 99 Filed 07/22/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Before the Court is the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (“Stipulation”), filed by
`
`2
`
`Plaintiff Michael Philip Kaufman and Defendant salesforce.com, inc. The Court is of the opinion
`
`3
`
`that the Stipulation is well-taken and the case should be DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of
`
`4
`
`Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and (ii).
`
`5
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
`
`1. All claims and counterclaims, if any, in this action are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees in this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: _______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Court
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`04554-00014/12856390.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04491-BLF
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`July 22, 2021
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket