throbber
Case 5:22-cv-00372-BLF Document 35 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`SWEET CICELY DANIHER,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 5:22-cv-00372-BLF
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
`
`v.
`
`PIXAR ANIMATION STUDIOS, et al.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On May 12, 2022, the parties appeared before Judge Beth Labson Freeman for a Case
`
`Management Conference. The Court ORDERS as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(1)
`
`The presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`
`
`Procedure shall apply to this case unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
`
`(2)
`
`The deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the
`
`
`
`pleadings, is sixty days after entry of this order unless stated otherwise below.
`
`(3)
`
`The deadline for the parties to meet, confer, and submit a stipulation and order
`
`
`
`
`
`setting all deadlines not set by the Court below, including discovery cut-offs and
`
`expert disclosure deadlines, May 27, 2022.
`
`(4)
`
`All disputes with respect to disclosures or discovery are referred to the assigned
`
`
`
`Magistrate Judge.
`
`(5)
`
`Unless previously ordered or stipulated, the parties shall meet and confer further in
`
`order to reach an agreement on an ADR process within 10 days of the date of this
`
`Order. Within that same time frame, the parties shall either (1) file the form entitled
`
`"Stipulation and (Proposed) order Selecting ADR Process" if an agreement is reached,
`
`or (2) file the form entitled "Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference".
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-00372-BLF Document 35 Filed 05/17/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`(6)
`
`The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available on
`
`
`
`the Court’s website and in the Clerk’s Office.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Parties are to engage in ADR within 120 days of
`
`issuance of the order on the pending Motion to Dismiss.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule and deadlines shall apply to this
`
`case:
`
`
`
`EVENT
`
`Last Day to Request Leave to Amend the
`Pleadings per F.R.Civ.P 15
`
`DATE OR DEADLINE
`
`60 Days from Date of this Order
`
`Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions
`
`6/27/2024 at 9:00 AM
`
`Final Pretrial Conference
`
`10/3/2024 at 1:30 PM
`
`Trial
`
`
`
`Dated: May 17, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11/4/2024 at 9:00 AM
`
`_________________________________
`BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket