throbber
Case 5:22-cv-00372-BLF Document 37 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`LAW OFFICE OF J. CONOR CORCORAN, P.C.
`J, CONOR CORCORAN, ESQUIRE
`(PA Atty. Id. No. 8911 Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`conor@jccesq.com
`1650 Market Street, Suite 3600
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Tel: (215) 735-1135
`Fax: (215) 735-1175
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`JARED WEINSTOCK, ESQUIRE (SB# 252335)
`jaredweinstock@gmail.com
`4295 Bakman Avenue
`North Hollywood, CA 91602
`Phone: (310) 702-1224
`Fax: (215) 735-1175
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`SWEET CICELY DANIHER
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SWEET CICELY DANIHER,
`
`CASE NO. 5:22-cv-00372-BLF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`PIXAR ANIMATION STUDIOS; PIXAR
`TALKING PICTURES; WALT DISNEY
`MOTION PICTURES GROUP; and KORI
`RAE
`
`Defendants.
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
`AND ORDER
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY (22-CV-
`00372)
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-00372-BLF Document 37 Filed 05/31/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Court held a Case Management Conference on May 12, 2022;
`
`WHEREAS, on May 17, 2022, the Court issued a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 35),
`
`ordering, among other things, that:
`
`1.
`
`“The deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other amendments to the
`
`pleadings, is sixty days after entry of this order;”
`
`2.
`
`“The deadline for the parties to meet, confer, and submit a stipulation and order
`
`setting all deadlines not set by the Court below, including discovery cut-offs and
`
`expert disclosure deadlines, May 27, 2022;” and
`
`3.
`
`“Unless previously ordered or stipulated, the parties shall meet and confer further in
`
`order to reach an agreement on an ADR process within 10 days of the date of this
`
`Order. Within that same time frame, the parties shall either (1) file the form entitled
`
`‘Stipulation and (Proposed) order Selecting ADR Process’ if an agreement is
`
`reached, or (2) file the form entitled ‘Notice of Need of ADR Phone Conference’.”
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have discussed and are continuing to discuss (i) a potential
`
`resolution to this case and (ii) a schedule for amended pleadings and motion practice if no resolution
`
`is reached;
`
`WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, the parties have agreed to
`
`stay this case for thirty (30) days while pursuing the aforementioned resolution;
`
`WHEREAS, by prior stipulations subsequently granted by the Court, the Parties (i)
`
`extended Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by thirty
`
`(30) days (Dkt. No. 17) and then, given Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, to the date that is thirty (30)
`
`days after the Court issues an order deciding that Motion (Dkt. No. 19), now set as June 9, 2022,
`
`and (ii) set a briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 23);
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY (22-CV-
`00372)
`
`

`

`Case 5:22-cv-00372-BLF Document 37 Filed 05/31/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`WHEREAS, other than (i) Defendants’ June 9, 2022 deadline to answer or otherwise
`
`respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and (ii) the deadlines set forth above from the Case Management
`
`Order, this stipulated stay will not affect the case schedule or alter the date of any event or deadline
`
`already fixed by Court order.
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Local
`
`Civil Rule 6-2, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, that
`
`the above-captioned lawsuit shall be stayed for thirty (30) days, through and including June 27,
`
`2022. All deadlines pending in the above-captioned lawsuit as of May 27, 2022 shall be extended
`
`for thirty (30) days.
`
`DATED: May 27, 2022
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`LAW OFFICE OF J. CONOR CORCORAN,
`P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Josh B. Gordon
`Josh B. Gordon
`
`By: /s/ J. Conor Corcoran
`J. Conor Corcoran
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Pixar Animation
`Studios, Pixar Talking Pictures, Walt Disney
`Motion Pictures Group, and Kori Rae
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Sweet Cicely
`Daniher
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`May 31, 2022
`Date: ________________________
`
`By: ___________________________
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`U.S. District Judge
`
`Filer’s Attestation
`
`I, J. Conor Corcoran, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
`
`file this JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(h)(3), I
`
`hereby attest that the above-named signatories concur in this filing.
`
`- 2 -
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY (22-CV-
`00372)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket