throbber
Case 3:22-cv-01973-CRB Document 69 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6000
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
` Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com
`
`SETH P. WAXMAN (pro hac vice)
`HOWARD M. SHAPIRO (pro hac vice)
`JONATHAN E. PAIKIN (pro hac vice)
`DEREK A. WOODMAN (pro hac vice)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
` Seth.Waxman@wilmerhale.com
` Howard.Shapiro@wilmerhale.com
` Jonathan.Paikin@wilmerhale.com
` Derek.Woodman@wilmerhale.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`INTUIT INC.
`
`
`
`
`DAVID Z. GRINGER (pro hac vice)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich St.
`New York, NY 10007
`Telephone: (212) 230-8800
`Facsimile: (212) 230-8888
` David.Gringer@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`INTUIT INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-01973-CRB
`
`DEFENDANT INTUIT INC.’S NOTICE OF
`SETTLEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`TEMPORARILY UNDER SEAL
`CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE OF RECENT
`DEVELOPMENT AND DECLARATION OF
`THOMAS HENRY
`
`CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-01973-CRB
`
`
`
` INTUIT’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-01973-CRB Document 69 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Defendant Intuit Inc. files this Notice to apprise the Court that it has entered a public,
`nationwide settlement with the State Attorneys General of all 50 states and the District of Columbia
`to settle potential claims related to Intuit’s marketing of its online tax-preparation products. Copies
`of Assurances of Voluntary Compliance entered into with New York and Texas, both of which
`memorialize the settlement, are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. Substantively identical
`agreements have been filed in other state courts pursuant to those states’ laws. Intuit did not admit
`liability in the settlement, and if necessary, it will continue to defend its practices in this litigation and
`the FTC administrative proceeding.
`In connection with the recent TRO Hearing, Intuit filed an administrative motion (ECF No.
`58) notifying the Court that a settlement in principle had been reached, and requesting that the
`information remain under seal until the settlement was finalized and publicly announced. The FTC
`opposed the request to temporarily seal (ECF No. 63), which, because it also discussed the settlement
`was itself subject to an administrative motion to seal (ECF Nos. 64 and 67). Now that the settlement
`is public, the basis for sealing has expired and the following documents can be unsealed and placed
`on the public docket:
`
`
`
`Intuit’s Confidential Notice of Recent Development and Declaration of Thomas Henry
`in Support of Intuit’s Administrative Motion to File Temporarily Under Seal, filed on
`April 20, 2022 (ECF Nos. 58-2 and 58-3).
`
` FTC’s Opposition to Intuit’s Administrative Motion to File Temporarily Under Seal,
`filed on April 22, 2022 (ECF No. 64-1).
`To avoid any confusion, Intuit’s Statement Responding to Plaintiff’s Administrative Motions
`to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed and Administrative Motion to Strike
`Exhibits (ECF No. 56), to which the FTC responded (ECF No. 65), remains pending. The documents
`at issue in that administrative motion do not relate to the settlement.
`
`
`Dated: May 4, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-01973-CRB
`
`
`
`2
`
`
` INTUIT’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-01973-CRB Document 69 Filed 05/04/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:/s/ David Z. Gringer
`David Z. Gringer (pro hac vice)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich St.
`New York, NY 10007
`Telephone: (212) 230-8800
`Facsimile: (212) 230-8888
` David.Gringer@wilmerhale.com
`
`Sonal N. Mehta (SBN: 222086)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6000
`Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
` Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com
`
`Seth P. Waxman (pro hac vice)
`Howard M. Shapiro (pro hac vice)
`Jonathan E. Paikin (pro hac vice)
`Derek A. Woodman (pro hac vice)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`Facsimile: (202) 663-6363
` Seth.Waxman@wilmerhale.com
` Howard.Shapiro@wilmerhale.com
` Jonathan.Paikin@wilmerhale.com
` Derek.Woodman@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Intuit Inc.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-01973-CRB
`
`
`
`3
`
`
` INTUIT’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket